Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
REG:
"While companies using the Rule 506 exemption do not have to register their securities and usually do not have to file reports with the SEC, they must file what is known as a "Form D" after they first sell their securities. Form D is a brief notice that includes the names and addresses of the company’s owners and stock promoters, but contains little other information about the company."
IT GIVES ME PAUSE.
GLTU
without...which is correct?
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=50217772
I threw in the similar name for good measure in case there is a weird cross reference later on.
Different addresses:
EURO-AMERICAN EQUITIES, INC.
4327 FOREST AVENUE S.E., MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
Mailing Address: 4327 FOREST AVENUE S.E., MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040
EUROPEAN AMERICAN EQUITIES, INC.
350 MADISON AVENUE, 8TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10017
http://www.finra.org/AboutFINRA/MemberFirms/ListOfMembers/p012916
WHo knows...
European American Equities, Inc.Subsidiary of investment bank "terranova".
http://www.terracap.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=5
Weird article:
Update
Reg reader Owen writes (see comments) that the website [9] of JR Hoffman and Associates, a "mergers and acquisition" firm purporting to be based in Montreal, Canada, is virtually identical to Peterson and Jones Associates' site.
Could the two be related? They certainly do appear to share a common ancestor. Marketing copy on both websites is the same as on that of Terranova Capital Partners [10], a legitimate New York investment firm
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/12/totalise_warning/print.html
SAGE'S Current president and director...David rector's handiwork.....
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/NANS/charts?countryCode=US&submitted=true&intflavor=advanced&origurl=%2Ftools%2Fquotes%2Fintchart.asp&time=13&freq=1&comp=Enter%20Symbol(s)%3A&compidx=aaaaa~0&compind=aaaaa~0&uf=7168&ma=1&maval=50&lf=1&lf2=4&lf3=0&type=2&size=1&optstyle=1013
Was it you S4 that previously posted the past performances of a list of companies these guys have been involved in..showing failure after failure?
Yet according to their front page website?:
"Sagebrush Gold is confident it has the capacity to endure and thrive in the difficult global economic climate"
What a curious little company.
"Seeing how that company has operated, they'll probably use the cash for a "stock promotion".
Good point, that would be my speculation as well, especially seeing that they are offering these private placements without Form-D.
The more I see SAGE, the more I dislike.
Not 100% sure..but I would speculate no; according to the document..not likely:
8. Duration of Offering
Does the Issuer intend this offering to last more than one year? o Yes x No
9. Type(s) of Securities Offered (select all that apply)
o Pooled Investment Fund Interests o Equity
o Tenant-in-Common Securities o Debt
o Mineral Property Securities o Option, Warrant or Other Right to Acquire Another Security
o Security to be Acquired Upon Exercise of Option, Warrant or Other Right to Acquire Security x Other (describe)
Units consisting of common stock and warrants
10. Business Combination Transaction
Is this offering being made in connection with a business combination transaction, such as a merger, acquisition or exchange offer? o Yes x No
Clarification of Response (if Necessary)
ALSO,
Interestingly enough they have chosen to offer these securities without using FORM D....what a curious thing to do...I wonder why?
http://www.sec.gov/answers/rule506.htm
Amigo, you ask for other's thoughts. Mine are simple.
You enitre posts is extreme speculation. I won't waste time cutting and pasting to every single sentence that appears to be bloated with personal interpretations of events.
Quite simply, we have nothing to show for the last year or so, except a lowered pps, and scheduled previously agreed actions as per NAK's "J/V STYLE" agreement with us.
.75? ..geez...I want to see this stock go up as much as the next person, but really...how can you know that?
Speculation..relying on past performance? (we all know about this no no rule)
I would be happy is she climbs to .15 on NAK OFFICIAL J/V news...and stays there, until the necesary fundings for drilling is found....she can explode upwards all she wants after huge deposits are proven with drill bits.
IMHO you shoud have simply suggested a $1.00, just to round things off, since you are speculating anyways...why the strict .25 diff?
Nice spec post imo..I hope you are right in the end FWIW.
Which lows exactly were deceptive as you muse? I can only see one "recent" deceptive low... 18 months ago?.
I admit..tech analysis is really NOT my strong point. Trying to understand your reasoning.
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=webchart&btn=s_ok&ctl00%24sb3%24tbq1=Get+Quote&as_values_IH=&ctl00%24sb3%24stb1=Search+iHub&symbol=OTCBB%3ALBSR&s_ok=Get+Chart&period=6&drawmode=0&size=19&volume=1
TIA
Good point. Unfortunately for me, i'm not a savvy technical pro trader, so I rely on my business sense and experience as I understand the overall industry.
You may have the superior strategy in the end.
I don't see anything in your post that I disagree with.
I'm not suggesting NAK is spending money for nothing..could be a simple hedge in a speculated mineral rich zone. NOT that it's conclusive we are in fact have the reality of such at hand through ztem data. I don't know that...we cant' see it.
I also know this area will eventually be mined..I'm just not so sure if LBSR will be the ones doing it, depending obviously on that elusive funding.
I'm hopeful the SAGE deal with give us a strong start in the right direction...etc.
Anything is possible. I just disagree on the significance of this current PR.
If sage deal falls through..and no other third party enters the picture...Briscoe would have apparently wasted alot of time and money for nothing..another year lost...will be time for him to step down IMO
but to the existence of minerals"...
MAM, this is precisely the way I read it, refering to minerals.
What does "possibility mean"? We don' t have access to full ZTEM data...for all we know, NAK is simply viewing this J/V style situation as a cheap hedged bet for them...not necesarily factual that there were shown anything significantly proven with ZTEM data they have seen. A drill bit is needed..so in the interim..spend a few dollars as an option?.
NAK Play money, good hedge. maybe nothing more? I have no idea at this point.
The SAGE situation will tell me more or less, if briscoe is onto something or not.
What in the world are you talking about?
You really should be sure about your facts ESPECIALLY when attacking someone's credibility.
Where is the magic link saying I sold anything?
I had an order in @0.01 which I removed, since the last news was not very insipring to me.
I also said I will wait to see, depending on the next PR, and what happens with sage, to determine at that time... if I will lighten my holdings here.
So what are you yapping about, really?
GLTU
I'm disapointed in the PR. I read it differently than most here I suppose:
"Their further participation in the project indicates their full understanding of the possibility of commercially important targets for porphyry copper, gold and moly [Molybdenum] in lands adjacent to their Pebble property. We look forward to exploration activity in the area once substantial funding becomes available.”
IMO..this doesn't sound like anything more concrete than what we already previously agreed to.
NAK contuine to nickle and dime us along...there's no definitve comments on where the potetnial "significant funding" will come from..or when.
J.B. looks like he is setting up to simply continue to collect rocks for his collection.
SAGE pr will be a definitive factor on how I proceed with these holdings.
WHERE'S THE MONEY BRISCOE?
:(
So what's the plan?
What are you frustrated shareholders going to do about it?
No one has answered the question.
Besides possibly selling...what else will you do about it?
I offered an occupy j.b possibility. But no takers.
psst...Don't forget to be thankful on turkey day for MR. BRISCOE for all he's done for you.
Happy tukey day to all my board roomies...see you folks in a week!
gobble gobble gobble
KUDOS, have you tried calling the office? Maybe try venting your concerns towards those channels?
Just trying to help.
GLTU
STAY...FREE ENTERTAINMENT.
YOU FORGOT IMHO
PM REPLY:....."MILLIONS".
Bid cancelled after PR release. Feel better? I know I do :)
Yeah. As soon as I read this PR, I realized I may have to limit my risk exposure, and put some money into play elsewhere.... depending on what the next filing indicates to me.
If I don't like what I see, I will still keep a small core position to ride till next year.
December is critical.
In the next filing I meant, not the next PR.
What are you thoughts on today's PR so far?
TIA
I hope the next filing clears most of this up...if not..I think it's safe to say the SP will suffer...MIGHTILY.
I have accepted there is alot going on behind the scenes..but its' time for management to give us clear indications in the next PR.
GLTA
With having access to insider information...Did Othon give up? or was he forced out?
What a strange time to quit his post. This is the most significant event I read in the PR...IMO.
Something is weird here.
LOL..I can't believe we are still arguing about the amendment clauses.
"What could have happened before October 31st. Speculate!"
Most important question imo.
GLTU
yohooo...psst...dumpers...I still need my 0.01 filled.
TIA
Score, he did say:
"Everyone owning shares today who is willing to wait for that event will be greatly rewarded, IMO"
I think if he had previously said, "i haven't sold any shares, and never will"... and then turned around today saying he sold a bunch, and that this pos is doomed..you would have a point.
He obviously wasn't willing to wait any longer, and in a move to protect his gains he sold some.
I don't see how your statement is warranted. He still believes in the story here, but is proactively protecting his portfolio, using risk management techniques.
I wonder how you can validate the honesty level of the other posters you mentioned?
You truly believe that is FAIR assesment of the situation?
Agreed. Happy early thanksgiving to all:) There' s more to life than making/losing $$.
I'm Leaving work early today. taking 6 days off...won' t be checking the board.
Either way, I still expect we will hear something very soon, pro or con. So we should just chill out and wait.
SAGE news pending next month..LBSR filing soon...cheer up boys...santa is making his list....we about to find out soon, who was naughty or nice.
GLTA
OTR IN THE WHITE SUIT ON BOTTOM RIGHT?-main agitator.
S4 in the middle front, angry but objective.
Fernace... in far bottom left...just looking to break something off in his own world...moondoggy 23rd row..oh wait..no one's there lol
Go get em' boys.
I'm personally not worried either. Just trying to help out my frustrated board mates.
I continue to add as I go.
GLTU
Number 1 or a close 2nd on the list of demands.
We could all chip some $, in order to pay for someone's salary round trip air fare/food for a week.
Ofcourse hotel stay won't be included, since the point is to CAMP OUT in protest on site.
Preferably our man/woman on the ground will have a satelite uplink to post live web video of protest activites. (or siphon off j.bs wireless lan, since I suspect they probably couldn't figure out how to password protect it :)
Protest in front of the office with a list of demands/frustrations.
Better than complaining here 24/7. no?
GLTA
So much doom and gloom. Who are buying these shares today?
I would prefer it crashed to 0.0001 at this point, if the LBSR handwringing would cease lol
Come on boys...cheer up :)
We KNOW we have crappy managment. Yet I don't see anyone doing anything about it.
It is what it is.
If it's that UNBEARABLE to you, what are you doing about it? Perhaps buy a plane ticket, and go to the old man's office?.
OCCUPY J.B.
Some would disagree. Just putting it out there, he certainly can carry on as he deems best.
"Overheard conversation:"
Banks, IMO you might consider taking better care when posting in this style. Could be viewed as potentially libelous/defamatory.
Just saying.
GLTU
My name is lilpup, and I approve of this message :)