Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yep. I would bet you will see buys today in hopes numbers come out tomorrow that will excite and then they can flip them. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out buy a bunch at .0002 and flip at .0003 and buy at .0003 and flip at .0004. Pretty simple but anymore...this stock is pretty much dead unless the 504 guy is dumping.
The smart ones will be trying to make rent money for the next six months! Then again...no one knows what the numbers will say for sure so ya gotta be careful trying to trade on "possibilities".
Guess you forgot too. I am sure the company will do their very best to get it done on time. No worries! lol
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=75545825
Oh no.... guess I forgot about that. Thank you sir.
You are so welcome! I have been "supporting" this company for about 4 years now! How awesome are they? The chart is phenomenal and I think they will be the next WD40! Given the chart and fins look so amazing and it is so clear the company knows how to make it in the big world out there...I am sure shareholders will one day get exactly what they deserve! I am betting on it!
GLTA
Yep. I just don't count on anything until it actually happens.
This is the reason why I say the blog post by the company about removing permanent marker is "blah, blah, blah". There are so many other ways to remove permanent marker that are "skin friendly" meaning most people can use most of these ideas. Those who have skin allergies...there are plenty of ways to remove it without using "chemicals".
Here are a few examples. The fact that WC will remove permanent marker...makes them no more special than all of these other ways to remove it with common household products...
http://www.wikihow.com/Remove-Permanent-Marker-from-the-Skin
http://www.parentsconnect.com/parenting-your-kids/kids-health/hygiene-for-kids/tip_1213505013025.html
http://removeez.com/
Numbers out tomorrow...maybe.
Pretty pathetic actually. Kinda like when the company was helping support the canadian chick's singing career thinking she would help get teens excited about WC. LOL! BANNER management decision! Ranks right up there with the convience/gas station debacle and the NASCAR bologna.
Have a great weekend!
Once again....blah, blah, blah.
Making $$ isn't about "happy talk" and "dreams of someday", its doing.
I contacted several racing contacts from our racing days. They sent messages asking for more info on trackmoist....never got a response.
LOL! That is a great question no one knows the answer to.
I agree Tib. I don't believe the CEO has ever "lied". I believe what he says...he believes to be the truth based on his best guesstimates, parameters set by others or simply hoping for the best outcome.
Making the videos can be fun! Just be sure you download them on to a protected computer!
the potential for success is what keeps those who counter the accomplishments with the current shareprice hanging around. Why in the world would anyone have any interest at all in a .0002 stock if success weren't possible, right?
I don't believe I have read that before. I looked at it shortly before becoming a mod. Everything was so scattered, I probably missed it. I haven't looked at it since.
Interesting read. Who wrote that?
Well teddi...some people don't like it when companies hire relatives, spouses, life partners or anyone along those lines.
As long as people do their jobs, I personally could care less but for some investors it is a concern.
Daniela Relja is listed under "family" in the annual report. On page 9 under C. She is listed as his "partner" and she works for the company...for some that is a big red flag.
We had our primary here in Indiana yesterday. Voting for Romney was not fun for me either but as you so eloquently pointed out...it's him or Obama so there really was no other choice.
I guess we will see what Romney is really made of in the next few months. Let the praying begin!
Great post Bobpatch! I agree completely. Consistent...a very good word to use. The proof is in the numbers. Can't argue with numbers.
In my opinion, no. Kind laundry soap works about as well as any other laundry soap. Nothing special. There are plenty of others to use that are "eco-friendly" that work better. I prefer Ecos.
I dont remember what I paid for shipping back when I used it a few years ago. It may have been free shipping.
Forgot about that. Thanks for the reminder Tib!
Good morning! No blah blah blogs for a few days. I am sure the company is busy with getting Q1 numbers ready. No doubt a grand plan is in the making to keep things rolling along.
WC has always been considered their "lead product" and given there seems to be little or no push for their other products, I guess they do have all their eggs in one basket despite the desire to do so.
Are they even making Clean1, the dry cleaning stuff, Trackmoist?
Here is a great post showing revenue/loss numbers. When Q1 2012 come out... I am most curious to see where the share count is.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=75355436
Have an awesome Wednesday!
Exactly. Views seem to change as needed in order to soothe the sting of the current state of affairs.
If no GREAT NEWS of awesome non-toxic financing or a MAJOR account this week... Taki will get his .0001's next week. IMO Yet another reality yet to be fully absorbed.
If a company insists on communicating with shareholders via blogs, emails for mods to post etc... they should tell them vital operating factual info. Not throw out guesstimates and and dates they do not have control over. This company (like typical pinks) has a history of publicly announcing dates rarely met, possibilities bragged about that never happen. Then, there is the " yeah, we sent product to ________( insert random name) and it wil be awesome"! Only to find out after hard pressed....one case was sent to some tiny shop. Or.....yeah, we are in (insert any company) only to find out later...it is only available in a few stores but if someone already knows about it and therefore asks for it at another store...it can be ordered for them.
So...if they are gonna say "90 days to complete" and people are keeping track based on that info., they are just paying attention. I continue to have hopes of seeing a PR indicating they got financing that wont destroy this stock ....within the 90 days. Now, go ahead...turn on me for pointing out the 90 day comment made by the company! You will have to get in line apparently! lol
Over the next 90 days there will be a great deal of work going on to complete this.
Enough said.
EOM
Shouldn't have given a "90 day" window in the first place. If they have been thinking about this or working on this since summer of 2011, why put a 90 day time frame on it now? Same mistake made so many times in the last few years.
Mistakes are always made in business as they grow. Those just make the company stronger but to make the same mistakes time and again and again does not speak well for them. It makes the company look incompetent and irresponsible. There may be no intent to mislead shareholders...no doubt there... but they shoot themselves in the foot every single time.
Now, there are those who will say "They had to because shareholders kept asking." NO, they don't have to tell shareholders anything. It is fine to want to tell investors things but just like being a parent/guardian, just because your kid whines doesn't mean you give in if it's not in the best interest of the "family". IMO
GLTA
Well good morning! The company is the one that stated "90 days" from the start. Yes, I am well aware that was their target time frame. Simply stating that the original 90 days is almost up.
I am not the one who said "90 days". The company did. Then once pressed, they said "well, it may take longer but 90 days is our goal" (paraphrasing). I fully expected them to back off of their 90 day comment as they have a long history of setting deadlines publicly or giving dates for things to be accomplished and not meeting those dates.
What I find so funny is that, yes,,,one sets a budget for their household..it's up to them to make sure it happens. If it happens or doesn't happen...only your household is affected.
When a company publicly sets goals using other people's money..it's a bit of a bigger deal to me to make sure they meet those goals! There is a distinct difference in responsibility. IMO
Have a great Tuesday! Headed out to work in the flower and veggie beds.
Good morning! A few more weeks until the "90 day" window first blah, blah, blogged about has passed. I guess there is still hope! Right?
I have no doubt the company is peddling as fast as they can.
Eric and company will do just fine
Oh honey...don't worry about what others post. They are only expressing their opinion. Unfortunately what fewer and fewer don't want to see (because more and more are seeing it)...this stock ACTS like a typical penny stock. The CEO is definitely not typical but the stock trades that way without a doubt.
There are PLENTY of CYB comments made by the company so they can do as they see fit. Any smart company does that. Makes good business sense as things change in a moments notice. I would guess this company is no different. All the best intentions could be the goal, but there are things that many understand are not within company control.
Well then stop! LOL!!! I don't see anyone being petty or nasty honey. Just having an opinion different than others.
Have a great Friday Teddi!
so, which is it"? and also "It seems to me they don't know what they will accept"
I copied and pasted two statements recently made by the company. I didn't say I agree or disagree with his statement. What the company said months ago or years ago...meaningless at this point. Things change, situations evolve all the time and the mindset on how to deal with those issues has to change.
The company's stance on an R/S can change with the wind depending on what is going on. Things do happen (or don't happen) that can be out of their control. While that may not be what they intended to do 6 months ago...a year ago...5 years ago...they may have dug themselves in to a hole so far they have no other choice.
TB... wasn't asking you in particular. Just showing the contradiction in statements. Only the writer knows the real intent behind the words they choose to use. Speculation is what these boards are all about. Right? Speculation on their success, speculation on failure...makes for interesting conversation!
GLTA
So..which is it? The company won't rule it out or they won't accept a transaction that requires a R/S? It seems to me they don't know what they will accept.
There are circumstances in which a Reverse Split is perfectly acceptable, such as a listing on a stock exchange. That’s why I have never ruled it out. I don’t believe in R/S as a lazy way to increase the share price.
I state categorically that I will not accept a transaction that is toxic, desperate, routine for this segment of the market, shady, or linked to a reverse split as a requirement.
I don’t believe in R/S as a lazy way to increase the share price
Given the CEO of this company mentions this in his response, I have provided a copy of IHUB rules in reference to his comments.
When I recently proved to the moderators that comments made by a regular detractor were explicitly false, I was told that there was nothing the moderator(s) can do because the TOU do not recognize the right of a company to address falsehoods.