Indeed it does..

Let’s hope we also get a government backed partner.
Lol

As far as I know - 49% of CCTI is equally available.

Nice! Was that done on test results?

Or commercial viability?

I haven’t been paying much attention to REEMF since my message on their board about a year ago didn’t stick.
I think it was under a dime at the time..

Either way,
Good luck in 2020!

Looking forward to an interesting several weeks.

Favorable DOE/NETL reviews could shoot us over a dollar. And commercialization in 2020 should give us the ability to reach several more..

IMO Our time is near :)

It's all good..

For all I know, starting with graphite is cheaper. At least in processing.

The end cost is what's important. Feedstock and method of processing combined as end product. More or less..

It all gets a bit too confusing. As does graphene vs carbon nano tubes. Zipping and unzipping, etc.

On a side note: Vapour Deposition has been used to create CNT's. It's also the process CCTI uses to render their product dust-free/impermeable.
If CCTI is coating their coal with CNT's, I'm betting the Dr's estimation of 50-100X cheaper - isn't an exaggeration.

Good luck amigo!

P.S. According to Dr Yuan Gao,

who works on NETL’s functional materials team:

“By using abundant coal feedstocks, we are synthesising graphene that is 50¬ -100 times less expensive than the usual method of using graphite”

Just sayin..

Interesting. What’s the cost to produce?

An optimist may also say coal-derived graphene will help rid childhood cancer.

Now, that would make some good press!

A Twitter acct linked to a potentially hacked website?

And we’re to be optimistic??

Not sure, BBB

Maybe they want NETL and the DOE to review the technology first. You know, to make sure they're not dealing with a scam or shell company. As some have claimed..

There's a good possibility Pristine and/or SA will be the focus.

There's also a possibility the research will involve more than Dr. Horner and his team.

-NE Wyoming's Local Governments Commit To Dept. Of Energy Project-

Totally agree Cartman

Lets hope they were made aware they were too far along prior to applying.
Instead of being told they were too far along after they applied.

Either way, pumping grants if known unavailable, sounds dishonest at best.

When did they pump this info? I know there's been some grant $$ research at the University here in Wyoming, and possibly overseas. Was this wannabe application prior to us being approached by the U?

Thanks

Good questions flip3

It's hard to guess where test plant 2.0 will root itself. I think the lease on Altas Carbon's lot had a 3-year term. Not sure if Altas will somehow come to own/lease the plant. Or perhaps it will end up on lot 4 or 5 somewhere. Maybe on the designated school pad next to ACPIC? It's anyone's guess..

As far as the company being contacted by the University.
I'm please to hear that's still the "story". Lol
I first heard this during the Dec 2017 webcast JamesE_ later transcribed for us in Jan 2018 (post 43378).

Thanks again for the information shared :)

You're welcome flip3! It's also encouraging to know CCTI was listed on the SER Budget Presentation earlier this year.

The good parts IMO start on page 14

-TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING BUDGET COMMITTEE FY2020-
http://www.uwyo.edu/trustees/_files/docs/2019_board_meetings/2019_may_supplemental/fy20-budget-hearing-presentations-master-updated-5-13-19.pdf

Good luck!

Indeed it is! Here's the latest..


-Partnerships Bring New Goals for Old Coal-

ACPIC -Request For Proposals-

Plans for neighboring lots 4&5 at Fort Union Industrial
https://www.ccgov.net/DocumentCenter/View/16080/Request-for-Proposals---ACPIC-Professional-Design-Services?bidId=

Any idea where they presented in Sept?

Or who may have presented on their behalf?

Thanks!

Also, do you know when/where the testing was done that enhanced the BTU level(s) beyond the results claimed in the previous presentation?

Best of my knowledge..

Fiscal year 2019, SER had $10,151,584 available from State appropriations for expenditure. This included a $1,000,000 (one time) Carbon Engineering appropriation.

As we know, this extra CE $$ provided by the State, was to be "matched" by CCTI.


Hope this helps :)

Also hoping we see a bit more color added in the Q..

I think he's been doing a lot of "final drying" lately..

Lol

Thanks for sharing, Betonit

It's nice to see more media outlets sharing the recent developments. We know the State of Wyoming and Gov Gordon are giving SER the tools to advance clean coal technologies.

It appears Gordon requested funds from the State of Wyoming for a pre-combustion project that has previously undergone "field testing" at the Fort Union location. The project was to move forward under the SER, ONLY after receiving matching funds.

Since this January 2019 letter of request, CCTI announced the SER is matching funds for advancement of their Patented technology(ies). Shortly thereafter, management announced reassembly at Fort Union.

I expect some delays going forward, but as one poster often says..

Moving Forward!

Speaking of old news.. Here's a 2016 IEA Clean-Coal Centre publication.

Reading this may help some understand the lengthy process we've been involved in. Worth the entire read IMO.

If you're only interested in seeing CCTI info - Start with page 32

-Low quality coals – key
commercial, environmental
and plant considerations-
https://www.usea.org/sites/default/files/Low%20quality%20coals%20-%20key%20commercial%2C%20environmental%20and%20plant%20considerations%20-ccc270.pdf

#MRMD at .88

Not done climbing yet!

Originally? 0.45

But if you traded this stock over time, my guess is those shares are long gone.

Hard to say tho. Since you called bottom support $2's ago..

Either way, who cares?
I just hope we see a 50% increase soon so I can be back to even :/

What exactly are you looking for?

We've been told by the University that they are helping us develop our tech. The matching grant $$ is in-part for the rotary kiln.

There are several NDA's in play surrounding clean-coal technologies in development by ECED. The college is also working with a company involved in the same specific tests.

My assumption is that company is CCTI.
Have you a better guess?

I remember that.

Rick Perry has been a horse in Washington for American energy. Clean-coal is part of that "basket".

There's rumors he is leaving to pursue big plans in the private sector. This was reportedly spoken about prior to the recent Ukraine thing.

Given the fact we picked up Robert Liscouski (first assistant secretary for infrastructure protection for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security), any chance the (soon-to-be) former United States Secretary of Energy, would join us next?

For those of you not familiar with Mr Liscouski and his current position, you can read post 1535 on the QUBT board. This will clue you in on why I believe he may have a particular interest in CCTI.

As always, my posts are just my opinion(s).

Good Luck!

Seems odd for someone currently representing the United States on a global stage..

Let's see what happens

Anyone know who this unnamed speaker is??

Kinda hoping it's Eves or Neary making an appearance right after the "hot topics" segment.

Also hoping we'll be represented in the upcoming Clean-Coal conference in Indonesia..



-Energy Law and Policy Issues Focus of UW Conference Oct. 25-

Lol! Probably so..

Getting worse!

About to lose my shirt :/

Indeed I did. My bad

Reports I've found, say ACPIC will be put out for bid Q1 2020. I'm not sure our test plant needs to be running by then. But Aiden seemed pretty sure about his timeline in that interview. So maybe it does.

Either way, if we're up and running prior to ACPIC breaking ground, we will have plenty of time to test foreign materials.

As far as your $1.. $2.. and $3 estimates.
Coal production has been a cornerstone of the modern Wyoming economy since the 1970's, and has served as Wyoming's most stable source of tax revenues since.

If our technology is capable of finding new markets and securing a sustainable natural resource for future Wyomingites (and others) my guess is you'll need to move your estimated decimal further to the right. Even at full dilution..

I agree. No need for one during our advancements currently taking place at Fort Union.

I doubt revenue will be here anytime soon.
Maybe this time next year IMO

Also my opinion that we'll be way above a dime on other news - prior to revenue..

Good luck

-Facility to Make Coal Cleaner, More Efficient, Taking Shape in Wyoming-

Sounds pretty solid!
A good read IMO
I can wait another 6 months :)

https://www.powermag.com/facility-to-make-coal-cleaner-more-efficient-taking-shape-in-wyoming/?pagenum=3

If the Sate of Wyoming, along with the University have free use of our technology for reason to develop..

Why would an 8-K come into play?

We've had a technological agreement since Oct 2017

Great question!

I've done some research for you and found that Gov Gordon has final say on the technologies used within the SER pilot project utilizing advanced coal-based generation.

I've also learned that some of the technologies they're working with were being "field tested" at Ft Union as early as Q1 2019.