Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Surely you must know that audited financial reports are not required for OTC Markets pink, so there is no fraud here.
Size of bank account and profit/loss do not equate to fraud.
So, there is no evidence of fraud in your post.
Not even a good try this time, but keep trying.
You ask " Why would I go to them?". The answer of course is to get the answer to your question, but then if you are not interested in the answer then why did you ask in the first place?
Why are you asking me? If you call the company and ask maybe they will tell you.
Nope!.....repeating false information over and over will not make it true.
Clinical trial info due soon.
FDA never used the word "banned". Application was denied because it is a drug, and this leaves the door open to apply for approval as a drug, so "banned" is not a proper word to use here. This is not the FDA word, but your word. You are incorrect in the first sentence, so no need to go any further into the conspiracy theories that follow.
Incorrect!.....not banned, just not approved at this time. FDA says its a drug.
Readers should put the post and all your others in the "unfounded conspiracy theory" category. I say this because there is never any supporting evidence for your claims, reducing them to opinions at best.
Here are some undeniable facts, yet you deny all of these:
FDA says its a drug.
Approved in Canada.
Approved in Mexico.
Sucanon works!
Sucanon contains active ingredients.
Trial results should be out soon, then India approves and sales start in India via Canagen.
Go Roth!
FDA says its a drug. This is undeniable.
You state" Fact is the FDA BANNED this scam for any Interstate Commerce", but everyone knows the true story:
The truth and full story is that the FDA denied the application for over-the-counter sales BECAUSE it is a drug, so of course there can be no interstate commerce. I have posted this information many times, but it is always ignored and the incorrect information is repeated.
So, why bother to read the next 7 claims when credibility is destroyed in the first false claim?
Readers should put the post and all your others in the "unfounded conspiracy theory" category. I say this because there is never any supporting evidence for your claims, reducing them to opinions at best.
Here are some undeniable facts, yet you deny all of these:
FDA says its a drug.
Approved in Canada.
Approved in Mexico.
Sucanon works!
Sucanon contains active ingredients.
Trial results should be out soon, then India approves and sales start in India via Canagen.
Go roth!
You cry "health fraud", but yet it is approved in Canada, Mexico and soon to be approved by India, and the FDA says its a drug.
As everyone knows, this is all supported by veriyable evidence.
Doesn't sound like a health fraud to me.
Go Roth!
You are 100% incorrect. This is just a opinion and not supported by and credible evidence.
As for the financials, remember that the current share price is less than 1/2 cent. If the company was making profit the price would be much higher. The people investing in this see the strong possibilities of sales soon in Canada and India too.
Go Roth!
Excellent, Stockmaster!.....you are correct on all points.
Unfortunately (for you) none of these so-called "facts" equates to a fraud.
Nice try, keep trying!
Yes, and India soon to follow. India is where the first big sales will be in my opinion.
Here are some undeniable facts:
FDA says its a drug.
Approved in Canada.
Approved in Mexico.
Sucanon works!
Sucanon contains active ingredients.
No fact have been presented, but just unsupportable claims, which are incorrect, incomplete or misleading. When this is pointed out there is never acceptance or acknowledgement, but instead the subject shifts.
Here are some undeniable facts:
FDA says its a drug.
Approved in Canada.
Approved in Mexico.
Sucanon works!
Sucanon contains active ingredients.
sweetlou, with some posters the truth does not seem to be important, because truth is not the goal.
Just more unsupported buzz words and half-truths at best.
No credibility.
Sorry, but suggested is the same as optional, meaning not required.
Your premise that "A non fraud company would do as the FDA suggested" is incorrect. Roth does not have the resources at the present time to pursue FDA approval as a drug, so what would be the point of applying? There is no reason to do so at this time.
Roth has made the decision to market in Mexico, Canada and India at this time. This is the company focus. The US is in the future.
You can say they are banned from interstate commerce till the cows come home, but it is irrelevant as Sucanon has never been sold or marketed in the US.
Please read my recents posts that say contacting Compliance is optional (Roth's option) if they want to pursue approval as a drug, so the answer to your question is "NO".
You actually must agree that is optional as you say "...as FDA suggested" which is the same as optional.
Again, just to confirm, Roth is in 100% good standing with the FDA.
There is no hiding from Compliance. If you can find wording that says otherwise, then please highlight the exact words, but I am not holding my breath.
It is abundantly clear in the FDA letter that contacting Compliance is optional. Nobody is 'hiding' from the FDA Compliance department.
For the Record:
1) FDA says Sucanon is a drug. This is undeniable. Get over it.
2) Sucanon contains active ingredients. This is undeniable. Get over it!
3) Sucanon is approved in Canada and Mexico. This is undeniable. Get over it!
4) Roth is in 100% good standing with the FDA. This is undeniable. Get over it!
5) Roth is not a scam or a fraud. This is undeniable. Get over it!
Again you are 100% incrrect. Nobody is hiding because contacting Compliance is option. This is undeniable. Get over it!
There is no deception and no fraud. You cannot support your claims.
Again you misread the King's English. Nobody got caught doing anything wrong.
You are again 100% incorrect and continue to tell only half the story.
Everyone knows, and you do too, that the application was not approved because Sucanon is a drug. This is the complete story so why not tell the complete story?
For the record, Roth is excellent standing with the FDA. Roth has never had any violations with the FDA and has never received any warning letters, even though there were posts attempting to connect Roth to non-applicable Consumer Reports articles.
The FDA letter is clearly written in the "King's English" and it says that Sucanon is a drug, the exact words are "appears to be a drug" which is essentially the same thing.
I find it interesting that only one person here takes issue with the statement the "Sucanon is a drug per the FDA", so if one person sees it differently than all the others, that person should reread the FDA letter more carefully and see that he is most likely incorrect. I surely would if I was that person.
You are misinterpreting the FDA letter. As I addressed the issue of contacting Compliance many times before, and I will do so again, contacting Compliance is at the option of Roth if they wish to pursue approval as a drug.
Contacting Compliance is not an absolute requirement and Roth is in 100% good standing with the FDA. If anyone doubts this they can call the FDA and verify.
You are again 100% wrong and continue to tell only half the story.
Everyone knows, and you do too, that the application was not approved because Sucanon is a drug. This is the complete story so why not tell the complete story?
For the record, Roth is excellent standing with the FDA. Roth has never had any violations with the FDA and has never received any warning letters, even though there were posts attempting to connect Roth to non-applicable Consumer Reports articles.
You are so silly......banned BECAUSE it is a drug.
It is a drug per the FDA and you even posted it yourself (I think you forgot to bold this part).
As for Canada, it is the same formulation and for the same purpose, so it must be a drug there too.
No credible evidence of scam or fraud has ever been presented, but please keep on trying in vain. If there was any legit evidence of scam or fraud you would have found it by now, but hey, keep trying if it makes you happy.
Its not so much what the other posters say as much as its about what is verifyable. For the record, the FDA is not a poster and you continue to misrepresent the FDA letter. The FDA was very impressed with Sucanon. I won't reiterate my comments on banned and interstate commerce, but just reread my recent posts.
You are 100% wrong!
First, there is no evidence of scam or fraud.
Second, by saying "Do not sir play with people's health and lives" you imply that Sucanon does not work and is harmful. The problem is that Sucanon does work and there are no harmful side effects.
Third, by making unfounded and incorrect statements you may be the one playing with people's health and lives.
Fourth, Canada and Mexico are the main countries that have approved Sucanon and they would not have done so without extensive review of Sucanon. India will also approve (most likely) shortly.
Fifth, the FDA says its a drug.
Sixth, other countruies such as Peru and I believe Iran and a few others have also approved.
You state "--this week you will be double teamed by this fraud to lose your $$".
Sounds like you either have inside information or else you just put new batteries in your Wal-Mart crystal ball. I'm betting on the latter.
The interstate commerce comment is just plain silly! Everyone knows that Sucanon is not approved for sale in the US because it is a drug, so of course there can be no interstate commerce.
As for the rest of the post, it is even more silly. This sort of thing reminds me of the McCarthy era where there was supposedly a cummunist behind every tree.
But I have to say that the post is so over-the-top that is did make me chuckle.
The news of clinical trials report being issued is imminent.
Nobody is hiding from FDA Compliance. I don't know where you ever got the idea that contacting Compliance was mandatory (it is not), but optional at the discretion of Roth if and when they wish to pursue FDA approval as a drug.
Roth is in 100% compliance with the FDA and always was.
A misleading soundbite for sure....
First, "banned" is a misleading word here, as banned is usually used after a product has been removed from the market, so banned is not a proper usage here. In this case, as you are fully aware, an applicaton was not approved.
Second, "denied" is another inappropriate word here, as the aplication was not approved, because it is a drug.
Third, "not allowed" is not a good choice either, as Roth is allowed to apply for approval as a drug, so Sucanon is ALLOWED to be applied for as a drug.
Half the story all the time. A half-truth is a half-lie. Always tell the complete story.
Everyone knows that the FDA was very impressed as they said Sucanon is a drug.
For the record, the application for herbal over-the-counter sales was denied BECAUSE it is a drug. And also for the record, the FDA never said Sucanon is a scam.
Half the story all the time. A half-truth is a half-lie. Always tell the complete story.
Everyone knows that the FDA was very impressed as they said Sucanon is a drug.
For the record, the application for herbal over-the-counter sales was denied BECAUSE it is a drug. And also for the record, the FDA never said Sucanon is a scam.
Quite to the contrary, everyone knows that the FDA was very impressed as they said Sucanon is a drug.
For the record, the application for herbal over-the-counter sales was denied BECAUSE it is a drug. And also for the record, the FDA never said Sucanon is a scam.
A half-truth is a half-lie. Always tell the complete story.
You state "The FDA banned ROTH's product--period". Nothing could be further from the truth.
Think about it....if it was "banned period", why would the FDA say it appears to be a drug and tell Roth how to proceed to get Sucanon approved as a drug?
You are 100% incorrect. However, Stockmaster is 100% correct.