Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
And there she goes!
Mary,
If you have 5 to 10m plus, yes it matters.
Paco, That good for you! I also am not down but feel bad for what I am seeing. They are selling shares into the market and dropping this.
Don't forget Roy was a broker at 1st. Very sad and clear.
Paco,
So how much are you down for that sample?
it's clear now, Pump and Dump!
ATTD was diluted. That's why it fell.
My brother n law is a manager for one. They are Not in the stores yet.
Skip,
What Walgreens did you buy one from?
What is the address?
I would like to verify that you bought one.
But here's the question. Is the dept being reduced with the note holders selling shares lately?
The question is:
Who sold the shared?
The company?
The note holders?
And, some- one bought them. Or shorted them.
Well, I guess post get removed on this board.
Anyone have the link to the interview tomorrow?
It seems that someone removed the post that it's in Walgreens now in Tampa.
What Walgreens, address, phone number?
We would like to verify that.
Long Shareholder
Skip,
How would you get on the Phone, web to ask questions?
Do you have a link to this interview to help me?
Thank. You for your time.
Just because he bought at .03 means only that he bought at .03 cent.
Let's hope we get to .03 cents.
CEO's buy stock in hopes of getting the price of the shares up.
He did not buy enough to really matter.
And I am a long shareholder,
Is it known how many sans stores that ATTD is/was going to be
in was bought by 7-11? Could be all of them for what I now know.
Do you have more data Micro?
Thanks,
7-11 bought SAMs so we do not know for s ure if that deal is going to happen now.
And I am long, not a brasher.
Thats good to hear.
Small cap market.
I have a question for you. And I am long ATTD.
Are you getting paid any money or stocks to promote ATTD?
The buyer of Sams may of said yes, ATTD, we will
sell your product. And he did not know that 7-11
was buying all of the stores as announced.
That deal may very well be dead now.
ATTD Needs to let us know. Or they knew about
This Sams deal and knew they could made the statement,
We are going to be in Sams now! and a couple of days
later, 7-11 announces the deal.
Now that 7-11 is buying these Sams stores,
Will they sell ATTD product?
That's the new question.
Every one deserves a second chance.
We can only hope that Roy realizes that we are
using our money for his chance.
SmallCapsMarket
We have been through this already. This will be his last chance
to prove himself.
Share
Saturday, January 28, 2012 1:55:41 PM
Re: This stock is it post# 7781
Post # of 7798
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 07-80966-CIV-RYSKAMP/VrrUNAC JOSEPH C. HUBBARD, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ROY G. WARREN and TOMMY E. KEE, Defendants. ___________________________________________/ ORDER CLOSING CASE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court pursuant to the parties' Rule 41 Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice, filed May 12, 2008 [DE 16]. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-styled case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DONE AND ORDERED at Chambers in West Palm Beach, Florida this 14th day of May, 2008. S/Kenneth L. Ryskamp UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (59 KB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 07-80966-CIV-RYSKAMP/VITUNAC JOSEPH C. HUBBARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. ROY G. WARREN and TOMMY E. KEE, Defendants. NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Lead plaintiffs, through their undersigned counsel, hereby give notice of the voluntary dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(i), Fed. R. Civ. P. Nothing of value was either offered to or received by lead plaintiffs or their counsel in return for this dismissal. Dated: May 12, 2008 VIANALE & VIANALE LLP By: s/ Julie Prag Vianale Kenneth J. Vianale Fla. Bar No. 0169668 kvianale(2);vianalelaw .com Trial Counsel Julie Prag Vianale Fla. Bar No. 0184977 j vianale(S;y ianalelaw ¦ com 2499 Glades Road, Suite 112 Boca Raton, FL 33431 Tel: (561) 392-4750 Fax: (561) 392-4775 David R. Chase, Esq. DAVID R. CHASE, P.A. 1700 East Las Olas Boulevard Penthouse 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
http://classactionworld.com/Bravo!+Brands,+Inc.+Class+Action+Litigation/saaoc/21123.html
I tried to say: so have I.
So ha be I.
But I am long.
Great job Small Cap.
I just got your document.
I will see if the attorney that sued Roy is willing to e-mail or provide the end results on Monday.
They could be sealed. Perhaps Roy can provide a link for them.
Asking for proof is how a good trader, makes money.
You will lose your money if word of mouth is how you I invest.
What ashame you will not listen to people that know better.
Good luck.
No, only that I have not seen any documents to show the end results.
You must be new to trading.
When you post information on a stock board,
You need to provide the documents/links to verify
what you are saying is true.
insults actually show how you are!
By the way, I am long ATTD
Nota,
Provide proof, not word of mouth from the person
being sued.
IMPORTANT PLEASE READ..He is never involved in half baked deals.. REALLY?
HE WAS CEO OF BRAVO BRANDS AND WAS INVOLVED IN CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT.
ATTITUDE DRINKS BOUGHT THEIR PRODUCT LINES INCLUDING A MILK BASED NUTRITIONAL DRINK CALLED SLAMMERS.
YOU READ THE REST AND THEN TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK OF ROY WARREN
The Brualdi Law Firm Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Bravo! Brands, Inc.
By: GlobeNewswire News Releases
Posted on October 17, 2007 at 17:32 PM EDT
.
NEW YORK, Oct. 17, 2007 (PRIME NEWSWIRE) -- The Brualdi Law Firm announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed on October 16, 2007 on behalf of purchasers of the securities of Bravo! Brands, Inc. ("Bravo") (Pink Sheets:BRVO) between November 20, 2005 and May 15, 2007 (the "Class Period").
If you bought the securities of Bravo between November 20, 2005 and May 15, 2007, no later than December 17, 2007, you may move the court to appoint you as lead plaintiff, a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members. Your ability to recover is not, however, affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff.
To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, and you may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Tali Leger, Director of ShareholderRelations at The Brualdi Law Firm, 29 Broadway, Suite 2400, New York, New York 10006, by telephone toll free at (877) 495-1877 or (212) 952-0602, by email to tleger@brualdilawfirm.com or visit our website athttp://www.brualdilawfirm.com/ ;
The complaint alleges that Bravo CEO Roy G. Warren and Chief Accounting Officer Tommy E. Kee violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. During the Class Period, Bravo concealed that its sole distributor, Coca Cola Enterprises, Inc. ("CCE"), had drastically cut its demand for Bravo's milk drinks. (Bravo sold its products under the brand names Slammers and Bravo.) Bravo also failed to timely disclose that it had defaulted on interest payments to senior note holders.
Bravo falsely told investors on April 3, 2007 that it had expanded its drink products by introducing the first milk-based sports drink. Only one month later, Bravo announced that it would substantially reduce its workforce, that it would not roll out brands into new channels of distribution, and that its sales with CCE had declined substantially in April and May 2007. On May 15, 2007, the last day of the Class Period, Bravo announced that it had recognized a $17.6 million non-cash impairment charge during the quarter ended March 31, 2007. On September 21, 2007, Bravo filed for bankruptcy.
CONTACT: The Brualdi Law Firm
Tali Leger, Director of Shareholder Relations
(877) 495-1877
(212) 952-0602
tleger@brualdilawfirm.com
http://www.brualdilawfirm.com ;
The Federal Reserve is the primary federal regulator for the holding company and the bank, please review the following link if you have any additional questions regarding this matter - http://www.federalreserveconsumerhelp.gov/?District=13
Thank you,
FDIC
DRR Customer Service
Good Afternoon,
Tennessee Commerce Bancorp Inc. is a bank holding company, the FDIC does not take over bank holding companies.
According to the Federal Reserve this holding company is still an open company.
Thank you,
Lisa
FDIC
DRR Customer Service – Dallas
Or he settled.
The suit did say he lied. This is going
to be his last chance to prove he is not a crook.
Operating where they are, South FL. Area.
I would bet on some people having the money
that will sue him again if he is a crook.
Or SAMs has a contract that 7-11 will have to complete.
Charles,
What did you discover ?
I would expect the company to say something about all of these shares that are trading each day. If they don't then it does not look very good for them. Diluting or not? That is the question.
This drop does not look good at all.
That is my 500k sitting there from a 1m order. I will not chase it.
Is it a public company? What is the symbol?