Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
i don't think this board is going to be quiet for too much longer, lakers. the word is DEFINITELY getting out on PFSD.
PFSD closed at its all time high today on high volume. earnings due out this week could make this one could really, really move.
PFSD has been building a very strong vertical market in natural enzyme-based pool and spa chemicals. it's a multi billion dollar industry and they've gone from being a small mom and pop outfit to a growing world wide distributor in just a few years. upcoming earnings should show them to be profitable. if so, watch the stock go into warp drive... or boosh. it'll be tasty.
you are very welcome. good trading!
zow, indeed..! PFSD is a bomb waiting to go off. extremely low float, real revenues, real company. thinly traded, tightly held. the potential is HUGE.
volume happens when traders like you and me spread the word. considering the incredibly small float, a little buying could send this thing flying.
PFSD has been building a very strong vertical market in natural enzyme-based pool and spa chemicals. it's a multi billion dollar industry and they've gone from being a small mom and pop outfit to a growing world wide distributor in just a few years. upcoming earnings should show them to be profitable. if so, watch the stock take off like a rocket.
PFSD closed at its all time high today on high volume. earnings due out this week and chances are they will post a profit. this one could really, really move.
PFSD closed at its all time high today on high volume. earnings due out this week and chances are they will post a profit. this one could really, really move.
PFSD closed at its all time high today on high volume. earnings due out this week and chances are they will post a profit. this one could really, really move.
goin' green, and looking strong!
now don't i feel a bit stupid for not grabbing more on that dip!!
EDEX is looking like it's ready to go green. nice move off the low here!
ndoldtrdr i think a lot of people will follow your lead. as soon as NDOL's pps stablizes we should see some profit taking there... and where do you think that money will go? i'm betting it finds its way to AURC. we should see a very strong close.
OT: 2create, the market seems to agree with you. NDOL recovering nicely. .81!!
john denver would have loved this.
" expects to release the details on or before May 10 at the close of market."
just a reminder... it could close monday, even before the bell.
LOL! that was excellent. eom.
great post, pug. thanks a lot. looking forward to MONDAY! less than 24 hours to liftoff.
indeed, and cost drives everything in terms of consumer demand. the only reason anyone in corporate america gives a hoot about alternative energy now is that conventional forms are becoming so expensive. if it weren't for this, and the ensuing consumer backlash against these prices, we would still be encouraged by big oil to guzzle, gasp, smoke and belch our way to hyrdrocarbon oblivion, until the polar caps turn to steaming swamps.
that may happen anyway, now that climate change has gathered a great deal of momentum, but at least things like wind power, solar and hydrogen are in the public consciousness. perhaps we can pull our planet back from the brink - but it will take effort and a little progressive thinking. this is why the naysayers bug me so much. their dogma is a huge part of the problem, as the whole world is at stake.
rolo, i'm sorry if i took anyone's comments out of context. true, biodiesel will be the first step along an incremental shift in fuels, but so will ethanol, and while that is happening you'd better believe the oil companies will be busy angling for their piece in the next wave. that WILL be hydrogen. of course, we ought to expect the feds to pass tough laws against 'making your own', as big money will need its monopoly protected.
from an investment standpoint i think it's prudent to have some assets at work in the "now", but also to put some cash to work in the future technologies. as explosive as growth in biofuels has been, getting into the right hydrogen tech now could make the savvy investor very wealthy.
a basher on the RB AURC board today was trying to raise fear and doubt about russian companies, especially in light of dick cheney's recent angry remarks directed at putin, and i suggested the russian companies, especially energy and gold, will actually be the BEST hedge against a weakening dollar, hyper inflation, and continued geopolitical turmoil. given how many enemies the US has right now in the middle east, n. korea, & now mixing it up with russia... wouldn't an american's money be safest in a candadian/russian company parked in putin's backyard?
OT: if they are tight with the current administration i'm sure (given all the cross-connections) a lot of this goodwill spills over into every monimpex venture, AURC included. sweeeet..!
futrcash, that is soooo good. i posted it on RB tonight. thanks, Airdale! eom.
buyondips, the more i look at your posts the more you seem like a dogmatic, angry and shrill little conehead.
"hydrogen is not the answer"? what? i think this assertion of yours is utterly ridiculous, and so would the majority on wall street. i could show you a few companies that develop hydrogen technology and believe me, it's currently quite popular with big oil, but why bother? your steel trap mind is made up.
and you probably think solar is also a bunch of "hogwash", too. how sad. you're missing out on a paradigm shift due to your dogma, and you're also missing out on a a lot of profits! LOL
ignorned. good riddance.
buyondips: your track record begins here:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=10948315
we'll see who's right. give it a little time.
hey speaking of membermarks, this is starting to look like the AURC board! greetings to all the familiar faces. and best of luck to all.
btw, thanks to that charitable soul who gave me those .065 shares. they will come in very handy in a few weeks. ;)
yeah, come to think of it, i've been enjoying the good DrFeelgood's posts on the AURC board, too. another membermark! great post.
don't worry, lowman, i got you marked, too! LOL
SAVILLE: Gold versus Oil
Steve Saville
May 3, 2006
http://www.321energy.com/editorials/saville/saville050306.html
Posted by: roguedolphin
In reply to: roguedolphin who wrote msg# 42333 Date:5/3/2006 2:48:23 AM
Post #of 42546
Below is an extract from a commentary originally posted at www.speculative-investor.com on 27th April 2006.
There isn't a consistent relationship between gold and oil. In fact, the number of barrels of oil it takes to buy one ounce of gold tends to make huge swings -- from below 10 to above 25 and then back again -- and doesn't spend much time at all near its long-term average of 15. These huge swings are illustrated on the following sharelynx.com (http://www.sharelynx.com) chart of the gold/oil ratio.
With respect to the current situation, the only reasonable conclusions we can draw from the historical performance of the gold/oil ratio are:
a) At the end of last August, in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, gold was as cheap relative to oil as it has been at any time over the past 35 years, and although it has out-performed since that time it is still very cheap relative to oil.
b) Over the past 35 years there have, prior to last year, been 4 times (1976, 1982, 1990 and 2000) when the gold/oil ratio dropped into single digits. In each case the ratio rebounded to above 15 within the ensuing 2 years.
Now, just because markets performed in a certain way in the past doesn't mean they will perform that way in the future. It could be argued, for example, that there's been such a big change in oil's supply/demand situation that the gold/oil ratio will continue to move lower over the coming years.
Our view is that the gold/oil ratio made a major bottom last year and will, as a minimum, move up to 15-20 within the next two years. There are two main reasons for this.
First and as explained in previous commentaries, there is a lot of evidence that inflation expectations remain quite low despite the many obvious signs of an inflation problem. This suggests that few people appreciate the bullish case for gold -- gold has, we think, been pushed higher as part of a general commodity play rather than as a monetary play -- and, therefore, that the market hasn't yet begun to really discount gold's bullish fundamentals. On the other hand, is there anyone in the world who isn't well versed on the bullish case for oil?
Second, a sharply higher gold price would have no direct effect on commerce whereas a sharply higher oil price would hinder economic growth (and thus sow the seeds for a reduction in oil demand). A rising gold price might be perceived as evidence of an emerging inflation problem and might therefore create upward pressure on interest rates, but then again it might be possible for the media and the monetary authorities to explain away a substantial rise in the gold price as a reaction to geopolitical tensions, or China's growth, or gold buying by Arab sheiks, or falling mine supply, or something else unrelated to the true cause (inflation). The bottom line is that the gold price could rise to a multiple of its current level without making a significant difference to the economy (except to the extent that it affected inflation expectations), but the oil price could not do the same.
http://www.321energy.com/editorials/saville/saville050306.html
wolfandbear, a ten bagger... let's say by the end of the summer. that's very possible! it's only a matter of time before the next gshf/vrdm/insq PR blitz. fasten your seat belt! or maybe i should say "put on that spacesuit!" lol
i think it's safe to say we can confidently buy any dips. on monday the weak hands have my permission to sell out, flip out, and get out. longs are winning here!
have a great weekend, everyone!!
AND WHAT A CLOSE, HOLY TOLEDO!!!
indeed, 2create! AURC has the management experience to develop their resources with a JV, so WHY NOT GET FULL VALUE, EH??
LOVING THIS STOCK... LOOK AT THAT VOLUME!!!!
COOL. nice to see they are busy updating the site! i'm hearing a lot more chatter about AURC, a lot more interest. we are definitely on the map!
GLTA!
i think this is just the beginning of the story on INSQ's improving share structure. anyone's chief complaint has always been the huge float and it looks like GSHF is aware of that. GOOD FOR US!
heartbeat it is NOT a loaded question! what the hell are you talking about? if it's got an easy answer what's so hard about giving it?
i absolutely agree. if the questions asked by a newbie are easy enough to answer, then answer them. attacking someone new for a simple question, even if it has been asked before, makes it look like longs have something to hide -- and that doesn't encourage any new investment.
enough of the MM games, already! eom.
me, too. this sell off is motivated by the stupidity of herd mentality. any moment now sellers at this level will be chasing NDOL back up again.
i wasn't aware it was being pumped. what do you know so far? i hear a PR about their egypt well/s is due out soon.
hello, everyone. brand new to this stock. checked out the PRs but it's clear what's driving this stock now is not in the news yet. any ideas? tia.
hey, mfb, nice to see a familiar face.
i wouldn't subscribe. not sure what their short squeeze indicators are based on, but it's not random walk theory, that's for sure. consider how much the NDOL news affected AURC"s pps yesterday. would TA or any "indicator" help you react to that? the answer is a flat out "no". so i would rather stay alert and watch the news feeds, than subscribe to buyins. besides, it seems their most important info requires no subscription fee.