Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Fins ready for filing, (post 280382), with others to follow. No one anywhere has ever posted any charge of Securities Fraud, likely having no basis to so allege. The Transfer Agent, comparing, has already reported the Maciora matter to FINRA, with basis in possible fraud. There is public charge on file.
No shares for Maciora (Post 266785)in Agreed Judgment. In the post from late last year, 266785, referencing documents filed in a lawsuit, "There was no court determination of any shares to Maciora," in the August, 2016, Agreed Judgment of parties, including Signature Stock Transfer. In the post, further, it is reported that SST even reported other claims of Maciora to shares to FINRA: As evidence of possible fraud.
Maciora won nothing, post 280595. Lots of people seem to have made comments on the matter, during the year. Nothing comes up since nothing happened.
_______________________________________
Kenneth Maciora vs. Signature Stock Transfer
This is the second case in which Ken Maciora claimed he was owed 66 million unauthorized shares he allegedly purchased from Rod Zalunardo for $2,000. The first effort was tossed by a Federal Court Judge.
Unfortunately, this Collins County Case ended with an Agreed Judgement (aka Settlement Agreement) between Signature Stock Transfer and Maciora. MEC believes this agreement was issued in error and is challenging the action through their current share fraud case against Maciora.
To be clear, Ken Maciora did not "win" this case. Winning requires a fair and impartial hearing. No hearing transpired.
Meritless lawsuit, apparently shown. The best part is the waiver of the fee that the plaintiff alleges plaintiff is owed. The plaintiff did that. Doesn't read like planitiff's lawsuit, to recover anything from TTCM: Will at all go forward.
Nigeria v. Cameroon is Monday, when half the Nigerian population is doing a Moslem holiday, and everyone else is on the public holiday, along with the Moslems. There is likely all kinds of anticipation, checking into the deposit window at the Bet9ja website. A main featured app is UBA Emailmoni. "Interesting" matters all happening, then, even next week at MECINCORP--even anticipating IRS, likely with basis in accounting.
Facebook posters seem ready and waiting! The weekly transparency will likely show that Nigeria was not on holiday over the coming weekend. The New Transparency is working well with likely the most vast majority of current shareholders, awaiting new ones.
Just today, commenting on the financials, someone posted. Interest is mounting with reports of monster revenue increases.
___________________________
Not worried about it. They'll come just would be nice to be current again but not going anywhere. Things are starting to get interesting!
Grand Theft(?) revs, complete with old filings(?), now on IHUB! Fewer than a dozen even call said filings, news and reporting(?)!
$25,000 weekly revs, increasing weekly, plus USA revs, increasing too. The new OTC Transparency at MECINCORP, accomplished weekly, is easily said underway. Filings can make it noticeable.
Routine reports, now: Tuesday Fins even anticipated(?), with likely basis in the new weekly routine transparency. The emphasis is on the new routine Facebook reports appearing every Tuesday, in recent weeks. Any stock would call that news. So does SEC.
______________________________________________________
would it be possible to add the fins to the next post and by next Tuesday Ed?
Maybe 135 shareholders know "Exempt" from some obligations and requirements, even.
FB Question asks about Tuesday Fins, even. Others note that last year's reports will have to have lots of subsequent developments sections: Not using those words, exactly. "Disaster," may have been used, actually(?). Available disclosure documents appear to exist.
Exemption-level shareholder count, 135: Last reported. That easily makes myec an exemption-level stock. The fact of revenues and payments supports the absolute need for financials, however. Emerging companies need credit lines. Guess what lenders want to see? Anyone has to guess that MECINCORP is more or less at pay-as-you-go, today. Within days, that can reverse into a major international presence. . . probably no longer with an exemption-level shareholder-count(?)
Some filings now likely imminent, Pink Current still likely within weeks. OTCQB is still within previously announced range. There is immediate disappointment and remorse posted, but later there was posted that something, partial, viable and tangible is in hand.
$25,000/wk maybe now, not all year. The transactions, downloads, and revenues reportedly increase fairly rapidly, in the last few weeks. The claim of August financials appears to have basis in payments made. There is likely increased basis, even just this week.
Actually 2 SEC Fillings, Weekly FB reports, just this year. African revenues alone are likely at or near $25,000 per week. There are apparently financials in-hand, ready to file. "Small" is no longer in the August weekly revenue reports.
For basis, there was an exponential revenue growth starting out this year. 400 times that maybe went to $8-$10,000 per week. Double that in just two weeks could be $20,000 per week. There may have been a new surge over the most recent weekend. Maybe 97% of 15,000 installs have the app on 30,000 devices. They top-off four times or more per month. That is nearing only 10% of transactions. Times 10 is approaching 1.5 mil. transactions per month. A few filings and forward-looking statements are news. Pink current is better nears. OTCQB is better news.
See Posts 280382 & 280379, and proper spelling of "Accountant
MECINCORP now intends filings, hours ago, and in a fully paid sequence.
____________________
We can start filing what has been compete, there's a lot to file, I think there is still some work to complete this years Q's but not much so the OTC filings should happen quickly
Accountant fee-protecting took steps. More recently it is posted, (hours ago), at Company Facebook that Company can now take steps, helping to resolve further difficulties with accountant. Some filings can happen. Others can happen more quickly.
New plan is a bundle of filings(?). That can actually work to call attention to the new transparency. From Facebook, some filings can be started already.
_____________________________________________
We can start filing what has been compete, there's a lot to file, I think there is still some work to complete this years Q's but not much so the OTC filings should happen quickly
Posted is that MEC chose disclosure failure. It sent payments, expecting an outcome, apparently with no further intent of fulfilling obligations to the vendor. MEC thought it could make some payments. Complete disclosure would happen. Vendor demanded payment in full, now required for public requested, and demanded, disclosure. Company is left to function with no basis for credit applications evidence of financials, no basis for IRS compliance, no basis for SEC compliance, and no basis for OTC Current listing. That it take to new client acquisitions, or possibly even keeping of existing clients, such as UBA. Mainly it so far appears to want a lot of underworld collaboration, anyone might say.
New accountant this year needs last year, too, in the context of the prior years audits. If the accountant is alleging insolvency, then the Facebook posts are entirely relevant in any negotiation of who owes what to whom, and why. The company cannot admit to insolvency, specifically having no basis to so admit. The accountant has no case, if sued; Excepting that company appears to have changed the accounting firm. The accounting firm now needs to collect, since forever after, it is out of the picture.
Company claims it stiffed its vendor(?), who is now in the position of having stiffed its client(?). The covenant breach is probably significant if in fact the Company was led to provide even more financials for filings--which vendor, (accountant), then refused to do, in a breach of good faith. It could be said that accountant is protecting itself against a bankruptcy filing, for example. It may be said in active employment of nefarious company competition in advancing the perception, now public. There is likely some breach of ethics and professional covenant involved.
The numbers involved are likely USD, and so accountant maybe only be allowed to go so far as to see direct payment evidence--a revenue stream--in support of numbers it has in its possession. It is probably not clear that the accountant has ownership rights to the information the client provided. The accountant is telling the investors that something is wrong, if CEO report is correct.
For now, stiffed accountant has information on which the public has to rely. Accountant now most likely is required to provide the disclosure, and possibly is subject to professional censure.
Fins denigrators screwed investors again! The audit of the audited financials is an expense that was needless. The lawsuit creating it was even dismissed with prejudice. The expense now matters, created by all posting denigrators, probably long-term, now revived as a receivable. The accountants appear to be able to abide by professional standards. That is already shown, even in a court of law, apparently.
The upside is that an increasing revenue stream, also reported at Facebook, appears to be under way. Even Fins Denigrators appear to follow along the veracity of the Facebook posts.
So the Suggestion of future financials within days or weeks is plausible. Money has already been paid. Even the accountant should be able to agree that filings will enhance credibility of their receivable: With more speed. The Accountants have been partially paid. An excerpt of the Facebook post is below.
Notice that verbal understandings, "He Said, She Said," is not always well-remembered, like happens in motions and other legal matters, and filings.
_____________________________________
We haven't been able to pay our accountants in full yet and they will not release the financials until fully paid. I have sent recent payments and thought we had an agreement with them to start filing with the OTC. I accept the responsibility for not getting them fully paid yet, and not filing in August, but I expect to pay them in full very soon and we will start filing then.
Audited Fins Have Held Up Under Audit, before. Time and money-wasting plaintiff's case was dismissed with prejudice, included. The Audit cost money, and the second audit cost money. Anyone posting about fins, clearly is bound to so-state: The over-compliance with audited fins, in the past.
OTCQB later, pink current first.
Pink Current is all that expected.
Even IRS will touch The Financials(?)! "Revenue is small" language has disappeared from the weekly Facebook reporting, August 29. Positive cash flow expectations have been reported in August. August 11 revenues were up 400% over July period. Aug 22 was up 42% over previous week, then last week up 28% over that. That is nearly double in just two weeks. Facebook keeps reporting the interest in the Pink Current filing status. Clearly, UBA Emailmoni is in business(?)! Over 2/3 of transactions are not just top-ups, (10.4%), or Money Sends, (20.2%). Those were 50% of transactions, only a few days before. Customers are clearly learning how to use UBA Emailmoni, keeping it, and even at the expected 97% retention rate. In the USA, in contrast, on 57% of people downloaded, even one app last year. That was even reported on USA TV, CNBC. People want apps that matter to them, deep down inside, the comment was made.
Disclosures were audited already, in the matter of the lawsuit dismissed with prejudice. On the basis that business operations are allowed in California--in the context of all the rules and special rules: Then the delay of new financials is likely only pursuant to funds needed in operations. That appears to have been remedied. There have been recent announcements and Facebook Books.
Any asset disclosures would be old-operations related, more likely. That is likely how best to understand any Greenpay connection. Those operations were announced as being ascribed to developers. Banks are reluctant to get involved even now. Southern California Municipal Credit Unions, however, may be open to the concept--Since Municipal zoning is becoming MJ friendly. Credit Unions are known to be now on board with financing MJ ops directly.
Emailmoni, Bet9ja, 97% retention rate app, confirmed report of patent reinstatement submittal, posting of weeks and weeks of revenues increase: All are corroborated, even from app analytics sources. "Transparency" is even spelled differently from, "Lie." It is publically noted that some posters will not even corroborate that(?). The UBA Bank connection with MECINCORP is affirmed, long since called a "Lie." The Bet9ja traffic exposure alone is 60 mil. or more every day. There may have been some betting worldwide, just of the recent weekend. Some posters will call that a "Lie." The MECINCORP Emailmoni app is the one featured app from UBA--Even that: A connection that some posters fail to corroborate. There is a connection in place, going forward, between MECINCORP and UBA Bank, getting started, even in "Bank-Years."
MYEC is an OTC Facebook-Transparency example, already. Mostly that has come about in the last few weeks. 10,000 OTC stocks have an example of how to move to the top tiers, just using Facebook, so far. After that comes Pink Current. OTCQB is after that.
Patent Office likely needs a direct required statement: The USPTO form for this type of petition include the required unintentional statement: “The delay in payment of the maintenance fee for this patent was unintentional.” Currently, the USPTO usually accepts that statement without requiring more information about why the delay was unintentional. Whatever is wanted: The objective is avoid starting the reinstatement process all over again.
Patent prepaid maintenance fees, may have left new deadlines and requirements unnoticed. Regardless, mostly "unintentional" not filing of the maintenance requirements is clearly noted in the Pierretp post. US patents are differently regarded worldwide. The current transparency requirements help explain why US Patents are widely regarded, worldwide. There are stringency requirements.
Director may require additional information, under 37 CFR 1.137, re the federal patent office procedures. The transparency originates of MECINCORP, in the matter of the patent reinstatement.
Weekly Revenue Reports, Financials Calendared, all SEC supported.
Auditors upheld is germane to MEC, the audit reviewed pursuant to a lawsuit. An audit of the auditor's report has been noted, in connection with the lawsuit. "Ken did not win the lawsuit against the auditor," is even posted today, elsewhere. Issues and statutes regarding title and conveyance are easily an entire branch of both law and accounting. Consistency with an audit report, then noted on Facebook, is only about consistency of reporting.
FB consistent assets report is allowed. The most recently audited financials have been upheld in court review. No property assets are reported. The accountants and attorneys have been upheld. The public reports are to be said consistent. Any verbal reports, captured in human memories, could even be in Chinese. Even that language is in dialects I myself, at least, know nothing about.
97% keep, likely for multiple devices per download. The increase of downloads is maybe 10% for the weekly reporting. The transactions volume is over 40% increase for the weekly reporting. Businesses with multiple transactions per device, per day, may now be involved. Several hundred thousand transactions per week is a lot.
Two SEC filings in 2017 are data. One is February 15, and one is April 12. Both are from company. Both are evidence in support of likely filings, different from posters clearly not competent, showing no data, or not showing exceptions to any "data-based" reporting.
Business Activity inferences are posted. Competent people will then await company filings: For estimates and inferences needing basis in that data. Audited financials for this company have themselves been audited. The lawsuit challenge of the company auditing company was dismissed with prejudice against the apparently: Not competent plaintiff. There are people not competent too! Many sides, many sides. There were really good people, out there, chanting and saluting, and even without all the new-fashion hoodies(?)! Others could say, "It was bound to happen(?)!"