Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Selling? LOL, apparently you misread the latest filings.
Agreed, I had seen those properties before. Maybe they updated their website but nothing new. And I m not sure they own these properties, I was under the impression that they were just selling them and getting a commission like a real estate agent. I think it is part of their activities of wealth management, they encourage people to buy in Cyprus to become citizen and venefit from lower taxes.
And VYST pps wont go up... until it does !
And they have not diluted for 4 months (since Feb 4th). LOL
LOL, yes, in early January maybe, and also from our good friends at Firstfire and Crownbridge.
LMAO you are desperate!
PS: no need to send me more nasty PMs
LOL. Their cash increased from 50k$ to 440k in Q1. No problem on that side.
Very good advice, so we can all disregard your comments. If you at least brought some facts...
LMAO it is a red flag only if there is no other communication about the SS. All the twitter updates were correct as proven by filings, and SS barely changed since Jan 3rd (check 10k and 10Q). If you are afraid of dilution, look at the MMs during the day, there is NO toxic conversion. Again, as explained 1,000 times, they gag the TA to avoid paying too much each time someone asks for an SS update. And there is no reason to believe they are hiding anything, there s no dilution happening.
Reminder: VYST went up to 0.15 with about the same SS as now (most of the dilution was on January 3rd), so there is no doubt it can go there again, and even higher. What is currently holding it at 0.04 is that we are not sure what the conditions of the Rotmans acquisition will be. If they are favorable, pps will explode. Add to that 1 or 2 contracts for one of their branches (Vytex, RxAir and FEC) and we can reach the moon.
BS again....
LMAO. FEC acquisition was done with common shares, there is no reason why Rotmans would be different, so your RS argument is worthless.
Also the SS updates by the IR were always confirmed by the filings, so no worries here either.
Already discussed many times here, several shareholders were told the same: the acquisition will be half cash half shares. Cash will be paid on several years, so no worries here. Also accord8ng to the 10Q Vystar's cash increased from 50k$ to 440k$, so no worries on that side.
For the shares, I guess it will depend on the acquisition price. Back in January Steven told a few investors purchase price would be 4 million $, so 2 million$ is equivalent to 50 million shares at the current pps, so dilution is not an issue either.
But of course this is all speculation and we will have to wait for the official PR. But these conditions make sense, and the Rotmans know that if as they think the pps will go much higher, 50 million shares will be worth a lot more soon.
Nice 8K out! Two 8K in a row, looking goood here!
Awesome post once again Sterling!
Cant you remove the oldest one from StocksGoneWild? It s not very relevant now. Or the one from Tenkay, it s just a debate of opinions, stickers are not for this kind of messages.
Awesome post, very detailed, this deserves to be stickied! Vystar is a long term investment with great potential. People complain about the day to day price action but they do not see the big picture.
Where does that come from? Proof please
"The warrants are wortless"
How is this post a sticky? It is just an opinion.... smh...
Excellent point pug, I couldnt agree more.
Well said Cyber J!
PS: I cannot send you PMs
Re-posting:
Point #1: nobody knows what the net margin is yet. Maybe he did say 19%, maybe not. Let s wait for the filings on that point, it s only speculation at this point. And nobody can prove he actually said it, so no need in arguing if he crossed a line or not. If you have a proof then be my guest, contact the SEC.
Point #2: most of the dilution happened on January 3rd, it s all in the filings, look at the convertible notes. Additional dilution happened on February 4th but it was very minor compared to January. Saying they diluted 600M between Jan 1st and May 15th is misleading, which funnily is exactly what you are reproaching Vystar for....
Point #3: Agreed it was disappointing and I was also expecting more, but they also explained months ago that they had an issue with their bank and could not continue for now until they use another bank (Schwab was the issue). Also you re talking as if the buyback was over, but you cannot prove it, and it could restart as soon as these issues are fixed.
Point #4: I myself contacted Greg and got information, but all the information he gave me was also sent to other shareholders who shared it on iHub or twitter. No issue here.
Point #5: You compare apples and oranges for your calculation. I agree the filing is not clear, but you CANNOT say they gave 30+ million shares for 100,000$ or 200,000$. Convertible notes and warrants were cancelled too, that has a HUGE value! There are too parts, here is the breakdown: Crownbridge had 30.5 million shares for cancelling convertible notes and 125,000 warrants, AND they were given 666,667 shares at 0.15$ in exchange of 100,000$. FirstFire had 29.8 million shares for cancelling convertible notes and 286,875 warrants, AND they were given 1,333,333 shares at 0.15$ in exchange of 200,000$. So in total 31,166,667 for Crown Bridge and 31,133,333 for FirstFire. Notice how the total number of shares is actually showing these 666,667 and 1,333,333, it is not a random number.
Point #6: already discussed 100 times on this board. The TA is gagged for financial issues. Updating it on twitter is fine to me, and recent filings showed that what they said on twitter was the truth.
Point #7: I havent seen any issue so far, but This is just my opinion, just like yours.
His message was sarcastic, no worries here.
No that is not what the 10Q says. You voluntarily skipped a major part. The shares were given in exchange for cancellation of remaining toxic debt and issued warrants. I agree it is not clear but you cannot say they got shares at 0.0006.
20 million $. 2 years back and 20 years forward.
Thank you for this insightful DD, you must have spent a long time to get to that conclusion!
Even though Hughes is dead, the statement in the PR is still valid. And he died 5 years ago but not his patents and technology. smh....
Agreed, DD is tiring, but that s what it takes to make money! Only lazy traders will fall for these tricks if they dont check what is said on this board. I actually like seeing new information (good or not), because it forces me to check by myself and each time I learn something else on Vystar that comforts me in my investment. Tonight I learned that all I-Glow are easily verifiable BS and I learned new stuff.
Patience will make us rich!
Jeanette is Nathaniel Hughes wife. And check the filings on California SOS, it lists Bryan Stone as CEO, and Jeannette as CFO and secreatry.
Hum so what were you saying?
https://businesssearch.sos.ca.gov/Document/RetrievePDF?Id=02432319-18028959
Yes it is sad. But how is this relevant? The technology and the patents are still here.
smh...
LOL your stats are irrelevant. 95% of patents are not produced but it does not mean they are bad ideas. Big companies create tons of patents just to make sure competition or small companies cannot use them or to sue them if they do. Check that very interesting article:
www.wired.com/2015/01/fixing-broken-patent-system/
I think Nathaniel Hughes was a brilliant engineer who found that great technology but he is not a salesman and failed to sell it to manufacturers. Now Vystar will take care of that and promote the multiple applications to monetize the technology.
And then you can find all the 21 patents created by Nathaniel Hughes:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=hughes%2C+nathaniel&FIELD1=INNM&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PTXT
By the way, where do you see that the "Adaptable Flow Meter Device" patent has expired? It does not say that AT ALL on the page. Spreading fake information wont work....
LMAO, you dont even know how to search on the websites you send!! By following your advice I found the FEC patents on the USPTO website. In case you had not noticed, they have several patents, and a 2 minutes DD made me find them:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PTXT&RS=AN%2FFluid&Refine=Refine+Search&Query=AN%2F%28Fluid+and+Conversion%29
Not sure if the link works, so type "AN/(Fluid and Conversion)" in the quick search box and you will find them (AN is for assignee name becassue these patents are assigned to FEC).
FEC acquisition was only an appetizer. Everyone is now waiting for the main dish: the Rotmans acquisition.
Yes I also think it is a 2-man company, and yes Nathaniel Hughes is probably old. So? What is your point? Because of that their technology has no value??? Of course not!
Many start-ups do not produce anything but are purchased for their patents/technology, I think it is the case here.
FEC value is in the technology and the patents, they dont have any factory or dedicated office, they just do R&D for applications of this technology and sell them to investors (which is what is described on their website under the section "Investment & Licensing"). Why does it surprise you that the address is the same as his medical company? That is probably where they do the R&D.
Vystar was first interested in their technology for their air filters, but now they see it can be applied to many other devices and purchased the company to own all of it.
Bryan Stone is the CEO of FEC and already owns 12 million shares of VYST. He does not need to sell FEC for more, it is in his own interest to see the VYST pps go up.
Also the purchase of FEC for 100,000$ was mentioned a couple of months ago, how come today it is an issue while back then it was not?
He is the CEO of both companies because merging them was the plan all along! Why do you think he went through all these hurdles (audit of both companies, payment of all toxic debt, etc...) in the last 18 months? He prepared the way for what we will see in the next few days: the merger of all these companies under VYST, and the huge financial assets of Rotmans will be used to fuel the growth of the other branches: Vytex, RXAir and obvioulsy now FEC!
Haha apparently you did not read the PR!
He meant 50k$, how did you not get it
So what does it mean? Were these T-trades buys or sells?