Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"May 2015 R&D agreement is with someone"
2014 BHAJANJIT S BAL Dollars for docs. CONFORMIS, INC. R&D for new product other than knee. HIPS. Interesting these transactions are not recorded through BAL CONSULTING, LLC. Not saying Bal doesn't have his own thing going on. In fact I think he's over stretched, hands in too many pies. Has too much to lose putting himself out there like this. We need someone Hungry for this. Someone with laser focus to give this 110%. That's why I suggest we hold a shareholder meeting to elect me as CEO.
Not a 100% believer in the buyout theory as delivered. But, if true, Options. Better to negotiate a buyout with a knife to the throat then on your knees.
The first US surgery for Valeo C+CSC, a product of Amedica was performed by Dr. Tarek Elalayli of Nashville, TN in Nashville. Wow, Looks like you can't walk 10 feet in Nashville without running into a hospital. here's 1,300 beds in Nashville just right here is this alot?
https://www.vumc.org/orthopaedics/rotation-facilities
I consider Dr. Tower from bleeding edge a legit Dr. who cares about the long term health and welfare of his patients over profits. Check out his dollar for docs rating. I figured I`d put this on his radar and actually got a reply back from someone: "thank you for passing along this information regarding a new possibility for hip replacement." Cool guy.
Nope, I was lost.Missed the part about trading days. So we're 70 days in? which is 10 days until (iii)b
kicks in.
Completely lost. If closing was announced may 14. Today is 100 days after closing. I assume any conversion today falls under clause (iii)b.87.5% of a 5 day VWAP on announcement of conversion with a .48 floor.
I don't know I must be lost. I thought conversion price is 0.48 as long as the stock doesn't go over 0.55-0.56, they convert at floor 0.48. I think your argument is conversion to sell off and dilute rather than consolidate. Seems like Amedica would take the 15M capital and invest it in development of the company and increase the original investment over time. So why dump it a day later?
I don't know what you`re suggesting here. A pump would hurt conversion anything over .48. If they got smart and held, I assume it cuts into converted shares having to come up with shares for Failure to deliver. Can always write off these shares on the books through a loop hole and never deliver. Smart thing to do in my mind is just deliver some shares you converted and take the loss. Probably a non issue for this wave as they seem easily shook.
I mean who dropped the analogy of pushing the balloon underwater? 9/10 gaps fill according to studies using Python to scrape and artificial intelligence to sort data.
ZBH float is 203mill with an 88% institutional ownership so a suspected 53mil float with 90% institutional ownership doesn`t seem so bad when you consider future growth potential. Before somebody starts crying dilution.
Forgot to mention not only do they know what they`re doing and have 15mill laying around. But they also appear to control the horizontal and the vertical and be the gas and the breaks on this beast, considering they magically pulled that .48 floor on the ticker. Not guys you want to R/S out of their life savings IMO. Could be wrong.
yes, Looks like floats infected Q1 float 2018 is only 4.3 mill. Which is 8% of a 53.3mill float. In my opinion this is a good thing. Who ever signed this knew what they where doing and had 15 million laying around. Definitely can't say the same thing if 90% of the company was in the hands of retail investors. The biggest reason I`m here is this.
so if all warrants are exercised its 10.3 mil new common shares printed. If all preferred shares are converted to common it's 31.2 mill new common shares. For a potential total of 41.5 million new shares for a new total float of 53.3mil. One buyer of all warrants and preferred intent on common conversion would be 77.8%. but I think float is already infected with conversion because the last time I did this it came out to 90%. Stop me if I`m wrong.
No reason to convert into common. if you like holding those preferred shares at a value of 1100 per share.
Looks like i`m wrong. The above looks good for converting under (ii)b which is conversion after 40 days and between 80 days. but (iii)b defines a rule of conversion after the august deadline of 80 days which then starts taking a 5 day Volume weighted average price from 5 days around the time they get the notice for conversion of a warrant.
I dunno. What I`m reading leads me to believe warrants can convert at floor price 40 days after the offers closing on May 10 or 14. which would be at some point in june then can convert at any time until they expire in 5 years.Between June 24 thru August 2nd lowest volume weighted average price for Common Stock determines the lowest price warrants can convert at.
All the science in the world deoesn't matter if it isnt marketed right. I could trick you into alot of things good or bad with the right marketing strategies. Lisa sue is my CEO bae on that one.
Seems like proof on life, as in Sonny hasn't forgotten he runs a Company. It costs $ to produce youtube videos and pay Dr. consulting and training fees. I guess a tweet is considered advocating or consulting. Not sure what 400K buys here.
$15mil divided by $1,000 price equals 15,000 units converted to 758 shares of common equals
11.3 million shares of common stock. 10k of which may have been reported on Fintel as of August 14. Amirite guys?
11.8M float. Barclays current shares: 10,703 = 0.09% of current float at .48 floor conversion price is about 5 grand.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fc3a/ec814fc1e49e1d5358892a061798d0af7ca8.pdf
"OXINIUM, oxidized zirconium is a metallic alloy with a ceramic surface"
"Oxinium
is produced by heating zirconium alloy in
air, and the outer 5 µm of the head is oxidized to form the hard zirconium oxide."
"A ceramic is a non-metallic solid"
"Zirconium is a lustrous, greyish-white, soft, ductile, malleable metal"..."Metal"
Biolox Delta-"Aluminum oxide matrix consisting of approximately 80% alumina, 17% zirconia and 3% strontium oxide."
"This case highlights the extensive bone
reaction and destruction caused by depo
sition of zirconium debris resulting from
accelerated wear of a zirconium head in
the absence of hip dislocation."
I don't think this case fully proves it's findings against zirconium. Could be the plastic. Not sure how an oxidized metal can be labeled as a ceramic either. Sounds similar to "Almond milk". You can't milk an almond.
Alright, I`m starting to feel a little guilty here mentioning the oxidation of plastic without mentioning VitE doped plastic compared to non doped. So I`ll just leave this here. Although note the extremely short time frames in this study compared to real world. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4598683/
yeah Oxygen scavenging ability. I think I've dealt with this plastic fully oxidized as a gear and it just crumbles to dust. The muscles and ligaments are used to pulling taught to push the ball against the cup along with 240+ lbs. pressing down on this wear point.
Anecdotally, it takes a retard to not understand Galvanic/Dissimilar Metal Corrosion from stem to femoral head which is more toxic than wear particulate as it's now more easily bio-available thanks to corrosion. I mean a plumber would realize this. Pretty sure your body will reject plastic wear as a foreign body as it has no way to absorb it, unlike cobalt.
https://journals.lww.com/op-rs/Abstract/2007/09000/An_Infected_Porous_Polyethylene_Orbital_Implant.18.aspx
I don't think your body needs these levels of any heavy metal. Even Iron supplementation we have to be cautious of. It's hard to convince me making aluminum into ceramic won't eventually degrade to it's base materials or cause galvanic corrosion relationship, just like Silicon Nitride degrades to base material in vivo.
oops. 70% of wear particulate is plastic. Looks like the debris causes aseptic loosening and bone loss. MOM needs less revision and reduces the risk of dislocation.
https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm331960.htm
I agree with chow COC is best out of these options.
https://www.chowhipandknee.com/what-is-the-best-bearing-material-for-my-total-hip-replacement/
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4110214-Document-1.html
Anyone know what that pop on Amedica's stock around this date was? a reverse split? This is when the FBI got involved in metal on metal.
Solid DD CL101. Excellent High valuation thesis.
No money means no money to speed up R&D and pay physicians "consulting fees". Luckily Magnum group kicked back this 15 million to keep this thing breathing a little longer. Definitely on life support here. LOL
https://www.exac.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/hip_revision-femoral_biolox-delta_with-crown-cup.png
Notice the lack of grooves on the Amedica unit to fix this plastic spacer compared to biolox delta.
https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/_b57679377060e7e1de02e73f28b9a46c/amedica/db/249/957/image.png
Does the cup and ball in this photo need a plastic spacer? or is this a silicon nitride on silicon nitride implant similar to the metal on metal? Metal on Metal is just removing this plastic spacer. Sounded like a good idea at the time.
citing source literature for boston.
https://www.exac.com/hip/biolox-delta/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2782734/
Maternal dietary exposure to excessive amounts of aluminium during gestation and lactation resulted in neurobehavioural abnormalities in mouse offspring.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361106/
"strongly demonstrate the role in osteogenesis of the nitrogen scavenged from the substrate"
Silicon minus scavenged nitrogen oxidized = silicon dioxide surface layer in vivo. Cant find my source on that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_dioxide
It is unclear in what ways silica is important in the nutrition of animals. This field of research is challenging because silica is ubiquitous and in most circumstances dissolves in trace quantities only. All the same it certainly does occur in the living body, leaving us with the problem that it is hard to create proper silica-free controls for purposes of research. This makes it difficult to be sure when the silica present has had operative beneficial effects, and when its presence is coincidental, or even harmful.
Doesn't look like the leading ceramic Biolox delta is immune to metal poisoning look at the metals it's made from. Only other sane solution looks like Hydroxyapatite coated wear surface. How does this compete against Silicon Nitride? In vivo I believe wear particulate is reduced to silicon dioxide. Hard to get a bearing on what levels this is beneficial or toxic. Silicon is way to prevalent in the organism.
What happened to US spine? such as Javelin MIS? US spine held 30 patents and a list of products. but I don't see where sales where reported for these beyond screws. Lack of funding for production of US spine products? Considering screws look like their bread and butter. Tried to contact Investor relations but no response on this.
Doctors are creatures of habit and depend of sales pitch. Supposedly not uncommon for salesforce to stand in on a surgery.
Danger with gap ups is 9 out of 10 gaps get filled. I`m seeing gap downs on no news. Not a penny stock. Penny stock's are never financed to ever have a chance. Usually because they`re hot air and only a fool would invest.
Drop 5 cent EOD not sticking. My guess is attempt at rolling thru stop loss for either further consolidation or naked shorts covering failure to delivers. If naked short its a profit of a few cents instead of a IOU on their books for every share they capture this way.