Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SFF,
If the info we get from the T/A does not hammer the pps, then many of my theorys will be pushed to the way side.
Any former eastern block company & russian company of any size has several english speakers. I was in the international section for a while and have called there before.
I will call Sunday night/Monday morning to see what is going on. I guess you did not notice the "ENGLISH" tab.
I guess this has been posted;
http://www.pmo-komex.pl/html/en/?contact_us
Would that involve a torch,,,,,,,lol'
"There are pictures showing sales revenue from multiple building supply products. Read all of his posts and then make your comments. But don't ridicule the guy over composition errors."
If I sold Wood Products and had a Website. I might get the products area operational. But then again that would break the trend of getting things operational around here. Besides why should they get anything operational? I would not do much myself after selling 300,000,000 shares @ .12 - .21
Hell, I would be taking it easy and issuing fun PR like "Moving to Alberta" to keep the people interested and maintain the ability to flip.
PS;
Waiting on the side lines for any news of financing of further ops.
not after a 400 to 1 R/S.
PS;
BHP is still a FSRU, good luck
I think there are only 260 trading days in a year.
Sound Energy Solutions is dead.
Not sure about the BHP facility. It has been a while SINCE I spoke with a development person about it.
BHP Billiton Cabrillo Port LLC Docket # 16877
Not sure how active this one is.
The LNG Terminal planned for long beach is dead
http://www.energy.ca.gov/lng/projects.html
http://www.energy.ca.gov/lng/documents/4_WEST_COAST_PROJECTS_PROPOSALS_STATUS_UPDATE_2.PDF
http://www.energy.ca.gov/lng/documents/1_WEST_COAST_LOCATION_CAPACITY_PROPOSED_LNG.PDF
Dave;
TORP is TIDE's technology partner;
http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResultsSimple.cfm
Put in Docket # 24644
Notice that they have filed for a deep water port Lic in the Gulf of Mexico
The;
Clearwater Port LLC Clearwater Port Docket # (TBD)
Is a filing up the coast by a group here in Houston but it involves rehabilitating platform Grace, environmentally crappy
Could you add the current FERC filings to the ibox? They will also have to file with the USCG here;
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/mso/mso5.htm
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp
Category/
Accession Doc Date/
Filed Date Docket
Number Description Class/
Type Files Size
Submittal
20070209-0136
Document Components
01/31/2007
01/31/2007 CP07-74-000
CP07-76-000
CP07-77-000
Sonora Pipeline, LLC submits an application for certificates and necessity to construct and operate natural gas pipline facilities etc under CP07-74 et al.
Availability: Public
Highlighted Version Application/Petition/Request /
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Image 5042K
FERC Generated PDF 6858K
INFO
FILE
Submittal
20070209-0145
Document Components
01/31/2007
01/31/2007 CP07-74-000
CP07-75-000
Sonora Pipeline, LLC submits an application for a certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity with an applicant prepared Draft Environmental Assessment and 3 volume Environmental Report under CP07-74 et al.
Availability: Public
Highlighted Version Application/Petition/Request /
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
Report/Form /
Environmental Study & Report Image 5751K
FERC Generated PDF 5291K
INFO
FILE
Submittal
20070220-0235
01/31/2007
01/31/2007 CP07-75-000
Sonora Pipeline, LLC's application for authorization to site construct, operate and maintain facilities for the Importation and Exportation of Natural Gas at International Border between US and Mexico etc under CP07-75.
Availability: Public
Highlighted Version Application/Petition/Request /
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Image 519K
FERC Generated PDF 704K
INFO
FILE
http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercadvsearch.asp
Completing a FERC document is no easy task even when it is in Texas. Read it. Several hundred pages. Independent environmental firm to evaluate and another one working with TIDE. Go dig around TORP and see what you find. This is real enough, it is a question of money & partnerships.
Been tracking these guys for years;
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation Looking to Mexico for New Opportunities
HOUSTON--October 19, 2004--Researched by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources, Incorporated; Houston, Texas). Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation (OTCBB: TIDE) (San Antonio, Texas) is planning to make some major investments in Mexico's natural gas sector. Tidelands is planning to construct a new underground natural gas storage facility near Reynosa, Mexico. The government of Mexico will own the facility, and Tidelands will have the right to construct and operate it.
The storage facility will be based on an existing depleted reservoir and will be constructed in two phases. Each phase will have a natural gas storage capacity of approximately 25 billion cubic feet (Bcf). Surface facilities to support the project will include a 50,000 horsepower compressor station with a high-throughput dehydration unit. The compression will most likely be based on internal combustion engines.
To supply this proposed storage facility, Tidelands will construct a total of 100km of 30" and 36" diameter natural gas pipelines from Texas to the storage property in Mexico. The first pipeline will connect Progreso, Texas, with Nuevo Progreso, Mexico. The second pipeline will connect Mission, Texas, to the storage reservoir.
Tidelands hopes to begin construction on the storage and associated pipelines in late 2005 or early 2006, with commercial operation slated for just over a year later. The government of Mexico hopes that this project will help protect its economy from the price swings in natural gas originating in the U.S., which affects the market in Mexico, as well.
View Project Report - 65000473 01010078 01010055
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tidelands Oil & Gas Studies Possibility of Constructing an LNG Receiving Facility Off the West Coast
SUGAR LAND--August 11, 2006--Researched by Industrial Info Resources (Sugar Land, Texas). Esperanza Energy, LLC (San Antonio, Texas), a subsidiary of Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation (OTC:TIDE) (San Antonio, Texas), is planning to construct a new LNG receiving facility off the coast of California. The proposed platform will be located twelve miles offshore of Long Beach, California. The platform will use TORP HiLoad LNG Regas technology and could have a regasification capacity between 600 million cubic feet per day and 1.2 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas. The proposed facility will incorporate a single platform fitted with two HiLoad regasification buoys. There will be no on-site storage of LNG. The LNG will be re-gasified as it is offloaded from a docked LNG carrier.
Tidelands Oil & Gas Corporation has retained the services of ENTRIX, Incorporated (Walnut Creek, California) as the project’s environmental permitting consultant. The proposed LNG receiving platform will carry an estimated capital cost of $450 million, which does not include the cost of the 14-mile, 24” diameter natural gas pipeline that will be needed to be constructed in order to deliver the gas to the local pipeline grid. All things considered Tidelands Oil & Gas expects to begin construction some time in 2009, with a completion date targeted for in 2010.
View Project Report - 06004854 06004855
Industrial Info Resources (IIR) is a Marketing Information Service company that has been doing business for over 23 years. IIR is respected as the leader in providing comprehensive market intelligence pertaining to the industrial processing, heavy manufacturing, and energy-related industries throughout the world.
no buys here.
there are over 80 foreign Consulates in Houston representing a wide range of people and their communities here and believe me South American food is very well represented here.
was issued early, kind of like a Mexican dinner piled on top of 6 bars of X-Lax. Now we await part 2 (I think it might be BBQ this time) and I hope no one gets hurt by the sprey.
I guess we will see. If it returns to the old PR days when good news came out and the shares rained down and pps closed red then you have a point.
But,
The Gagged T/A can mean only 3 things;
1) They lost control of the company
2) They are laughing their asus's off seeing that the more they open up the A/S the more we buy.
3) There really are not 1.7 or 2.85 billion issued.
At Least D-Day is near and the truth will finally come out. No company could recover from a PR like "Sorry guys we found a Mystery Tire not a Mystery Buyer".
So it works or I have TP
Kind of makes one understand the relief of the Bulge.
without a proven buyer...... it still sucks today.
Just glad I put it in Connacher the other day and saved just enough to get some sub-penny for a good flip on Paul.
Worst post of the day;
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=OC%252fek5CzwFAul0UF%252fLVRFg%253d%253d&CorpName=PHOENIX+ASSOCIATES+LAND+SYNDICATE
OK Paul, I think I feel the HILT now.
Lakedweller2;
Einstein once said that 2 objects can not occupy the same space at the same time.
Exception: If one of the objects is separated by infinite time then both can exist in the same space (Even less that .0000001 of a second).
Keep the first in mind;
Without a billion share buyer; then the current “extension” of the preferred deal would not make any sense at the same time as introducing new shares into the market. PBLS knows the pps would go sub-penny fast.
Only three things can be afoot:
1) This is really what they say it is and the buyer will suck shares up faster than the pps can drop.
2) This is really a 5 year loan on the preferred shares at a loan shark rate (.012 to .06 is a tough payoff plan). If there is no buyer then PBLS will only get .005 then (.005 to .06) is a crusher.
3) This is 1,000,000,000 x .005 for a last dump for $5 million and PBLS learned from SLJB not to name names.
The Gun has now sounded, the D-Day Scenario we are all familiar has begun:
See Link
https://esos.state.nv.us/SOSServices/AnonymousAccess/CorpSearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=OC%252fek5CzwFAul0UF%252fLVRFg%253d%253d&CorpName=PHOENIX+ASSOCIATES+LAND+SYNDICATE
Asus;
I like this better;
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=CLL.TO
You held PBLS for over a year; care to hold this 9 months? Read the first PR; and that is just the surface.
And just for fun
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/070731/marathon.html?.v=2
It is not Gold itself that will push the move. In the late 1990's there were over 100 proposed gold mines around the world that were deemed feasible at a steady gold price of $325 - $350 an oz. It takes several years to bring a medium to large gold production facility into operation using something like a CIP process.
Now find who owns those mines that are now headed into production.
just after 911 gold went Nutz.
Sep 2001
Now add in a year to make sure the price movement past $300 - $350 is not just a fad. Add a year for completion of any adjustments to the mine studies and financing. It is now Sep 2003.
Now add in 2 - 3 years for construction of the first round of mines. Now it is Sep 2006
Now figure out what was built in the first round and what is left. Add in a year for final studies plus E+P+C & financing.
Now it is Nov 2007
Round two is beginning. A boat load of production began to hit the market in late Sep 2006 affecting the supply side of the S/D.
Round 2 is now at bat.
Second Q's are historically weak... Now add in the price of Oil. Find me a reason for the increase beyond the usual. Oil has no business over $70.00 MAX. We have had rumors of Hedge funds piling "Long" into oil since June 1st.
They are betting on a Storm in the Gulf and 2 political events that could happen. If all three fail; oil crashes through the $60.00 - $55.00 floor in mid - late September.
Ask yourself what happens to the DOW if oil crashed?
Now this will be fun.
Welcome back chief, any DD from you would be nice.
17russia
If they sign one of three deals that have been brewing then there will not be any resistance and it will look like Cheniere action all over again.
Tic Tock, Tic Tock, Tic Tock
http://www.marathon.com/News/Press%5FReleases/Press%5FRelease/?id=1033961
Connacher Oil & Gas Nears Completion of $261 Million Pod I Great Divide Oil Sands Project and Files Permits for Pod II
SUGAR LAND--July 25, 2007--Researched by Industrial Info Resources (Sugar Land, Texas). Connacher Oil & Gas Limited (TSX:CLL)(Calgary, Alberta) is nearing the construction completion date of the first phase of the Great Divide oil sands project. Connacher anticipates that the Pod I bitumen production facilities will be completed on August 10, 2007, and that plant testing and start up procedures resulting in first steam injection will be initiated on August 15, 2007. Approximately 90 days after the August 15, 2007 date, Connacher will realize first bitumen production. By the second quarter of 2008, the Pod I facility should be producing approximately 10,000 barrels per day (BBL/d) and will have daily production average of 7,300 – 7,500 BBL/d for the year and exiting the year at a steady 10,000 BBL/d.
The Pod I project is a bitumen production plant utilizing Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) technology to produce bitumen locked in the oil sands. Pod I is the first of 5 or 6 separate phases (Pods) to be constructed on the Great Divide oil sands property located approximately 80 kilometers southwest of Fort McMurray, Alberta. Connacher awarded the preliminary engineering contract for Pod I of the Great Divide project to the Calgary office of WorleyParsons MEG and the E+P+C contract to Bower Damberger Rolseth Engineering, also located in Calgary, Alberta.
Construction on the $261 million Pod I project had begun in late 2006. Unlike many other companies experiencing huge cost overruns in the oil sands patch in Alberta, Connacher managed to limit the cost overrun to 13%. This limited overrun stands out in an industry that is now experiencing cost overruns in the neighborhood of 50% or more. Costs for oil sands projects have sky rocketed in the last year or so. Recently, Petro-Canada put the finishing touches on plans for the Fort Hills oil sands and upgrader project, the cost of the project, today, exceeds $15 billion CND. Petro-Canada and partners have confirmed that they will proceed with the 170,000 BBL/d project.
In addition to the Pod I project, Connacher has filed permitting for the Pod II project at the Great Divide called Algar. The Algar project will almost mirror the Pod I project and will have a production target of 10,000 BBL/d. Connacher hopes to begin construction on the Algar project in the first quarter of 2008, with a facility completion and first steaming date targeted for the second quarter of 2009.
In addition to the Algar project, Connacher also intends to construct a 20 mile dual pipeline to transport diluted bitumen to a pipeline interconnect with the recently completed Access Pipeline system in Township 77. The pipeline will have a capacity to transport 50,000 BBL/d of diluted bitumen through the 24-inch diameter pipeline, and it will have a separate 12-inch diameter pipeline to function as a 20,000 BBL/d diluent return system back to the Great Divide property. The Access Pipeline system is a joint venture of MEG Energy, Incorporated (Calgary, Alberta) and Devon Canada Corporation (Calgary, Alberta), the Canadian business unit of (NYSE:DVN) (Oklahoma City, Oklahoma). By constructing the pipeline interconnection, Connacher will be able to improve operating costs as its bitumen production rises and economies of scale come into play. Until the pipeline is put into operation, Connacher intends to truck its bitumen to existing terminals which is not uncommon in the region. Japan Canada Oil Sands Limited (JACOS) (Calgary, Alberta) has been trucking its product for several years.
After the Algar project, Connacher intends to construct at least three more Pods on the Great Divide Property to increase its production of bitumen from that source to a total of 53,000 BBL/d in the next five to seven years. In the same time range Connacher expects to increase conventional production to 5,300 BBL/d. Connacher could spend in the area of $300 million on expanding existing refining operations or seek to acquire additional refining operations to increase total refining capacity to 40,000 BBL/d from the present 10,000 BBL/d. Connacher is currently studying several expansion proposals for the Great Falls refinery located in Montana, operated by Montana Refining Company Incorporated, a wholly owned subsidiary of Connacher. Connacher had acquired the Great Falls refinery from Holly Corporation (NYSE: HOC) (Dallas, Texas) in late March 2006 and has since increased its capacity from 8,300 BBL/s to the present 10,000 BBL/d or better.
Connacher recently completed a new 150,000 BBL asphalt tank at the refinery and is studying the possibility of constructing a further five new storage tanks to increase the storage capacity of gas-oil, diesel, and asphalt. The new tanks will range in size from 20,000 – 25,000 BBL each and should be put into service during 2008. In addition the new tanks, Connacher is also looking at the possibility of adding a new 10 million cubic foot per day (mmcfd) hydrogen plant in conjunction with a hydrotreater proposal that could take the total refining capacity of the plant to 15,000 BBL/d – 17,000 BBL/d.
Connacher Oil & Gas plans to precede with all three sector growth plans in parallel to achieve its 5-year plan. Industrial Info has been tracking the progression of Connacher Oil & Gas since November of 2004. In that time Connacher has grown from a small office in Calgary into a company with operations in three countries and a staff over 150 people.
View Project Report – 56001140 56000889
Industrial Info Resources (IIR) provides marketing communication services ranging from industrial database solutions to market forecasting, custom analytics, and specialty promotions that support high-level image campaigns.
http://www.industrialinfo.com/showNews.jsp?newsitemID=117012
If the Hedge Funds keep driving oil prices by buying for no reason and there is no storm in the Gulf this year then there will be some dead hedgeeee's out there. Now that will be fun to watch.
not saying that it is a bad thing at all, they know we assign the end of the conversion date as the time period that they will open up. It also stopps sub-penny (90% chance) before they complete what ever they are doing.
"Back By Popular Demand" the preferred exchange continues. I told you all this would happen.
"Everybody is tight fisted today"
Our tight fists are a signal of grinning and taking pain from the real fisting that has been going on.
Just from the chart, where do you think this will end in the short term?
I see that there has been insider buying.
I spoke with both the environmental & engineering companies working on their FERC documents. (Seems to me that no one does a 200 - 300 page FERC filing for 7 - 8 miles of pipeline w/ an international crossing just to sell shares).
I spoke with the company that owns the TORP technology and they are hot for the Calf. proposal since it is the most environmentally friendly one along the US west coast.
I have been speaking with them for years and finally took a possition a while back but had to cut losses.
I spoke to them in my job role which is to find out if they are inthe market for engineering and (or) equipment services.
I had a party on the Cheniere (LNG) stock and sold too soon at $23. just wondering what you would consider a good point for placement.
If they file with the USCG & FERC for the Calf. offshore LNG terminal, they do not have to build it. An Exxon or Woodside would buy the project from them in a heart beat.
PS;
They also have a working proposal for 50 Bcf of Natgas storage in Mexico and are reworking some permits with them that needed some changes (But were once approved in another form).
102,000,000 in the float....
I am in all honesty thinking that this is not some company that is full of BS to sell shares. They had that chance years ago.
PPS;
Looking for rope for Phoenix
Coydog,
What do you think of the chart for TIDE? They are the only traded stock with ties to LNG trading under a dollar.
Ren;
"In this case, other DD pointed to what this PR said before it came out. It was BIG confirmation. And most who followed this at least expected an increase in the A/S."
Connect the dots for us???