Specifically tell us how the free VOD available on a VERY LOCAL(UTAH) basis will be a financial windfall. LOL

Nope....the current filing. Perhaps you should read it.

Here 'whateva77' this statement is from the RECENT 10Q on file :



"Management intends to finance operating costs over the next 12 months with PRIVATE PLACEMENTS of capital stock and LOANS."

What were the terms of the last round of funding? LOL Didn't it go something like: Company receives $55,000 and the lending party receives $50,000 cash or a number of shares which equal to $50,000 at the time of conversion AND an additional 55,000 preferred shares which can be converted to equal $55,000 at time of conversion. and all of this took place in roughly 9-10 months?? LOL. OUCH


On the other hand....The statement you quoted was from a PR.

You'll have to wait until the company wakes from it's scheduled nap....they have set the alarm for wake-up after the PPS falls below .005 IMO. Be patient....lower PPS is needed for the next round of funds which will convert into shares at a discount...hope this helps.

First of all...thanks Renee for the "year in review" Expo style...secondly--Sorry Veno...JD stated in a PR dated Oct. 2009 that etc multi-millions in revenues would not be booked until 2nd quarter 2010.

as a matter of FACT...JD stated in the same PR "The company expects $350,000 plus in etc SALES by year end." Again...the Multi-millions in ETC revenue/sales, according to JD was expected to impact 2nd quarter 2010 financials.



JD's very own words contradict your statement regarding 2009 "expected" etc revenue.


The fact that the ETC brand has been a complete and utter failure does not explain away JD lying in December regarding projected revenue for 2009. hope this helps.

No...they have not and most certainly do not share the same fate as "other" shareholders ......they have access to the feeding trough which is kept stocked by the "other" shareholders.

They had access to 400k in company loans paid for by "other" shareholders....they have access to perks paid for by the "other" shareholders...The new *ceo* is not a *wild card*...the new *ceo* is not a wild anything....the new *ceo* is unimportant and just another ruse. hope this helps.

Not this week...it won't be in the cards.....there are notes payable which can be converted into common shares......look for "news" after the PPS drops below .005 IMO.

oops.

Cool.....more dilution coming up....since each event loses money...awesome! I wonder if Peacock will 'help' again?? Thoughts? Why did Nerison issue the 55,000 preferred shares earlier this year? TIA..


Are you still of the opinion Peacock was behind the $55K note and the toxic terms involved? How close are Nerison and Peacock? TIA

Since the WCFC believes in non profit cause....do you think they will donate any money to the "Friends of Fiji" cause? TIA

Righty....the subject of oil seeps.....what did MRT conclude regarding 139 reported oil seeps? LOL


Righty....139 reported seeps..LOL....yet according to MRT.....


"The significant number of 'reported indications' and 'historical hydrocarbon occurrences' listed by BENDALL(1990) and BENDALL et al(1991) was based on these 'reports' being authentic."


Yet only 1 out of the 139 reported seeps was confirmed. LOL


In fact 1 was confirmed as being BAT GUANO, do you know what that is? TIA LOLL!

I agree.....a seat on the BOD?? nah....however, JD and Glenn could take into account a posters history and assess that persons strenghts and then decide if he/she is "EXPO-Material"...for example a poster who described Loans RECEIVED by JD and Glenn from EXPO HOLDINGS as loans made to the company By JD and Glenn may very well be in line for the CFO position....also...if that doesn't pan out perhaps Harrs-Remodeling is hiring?

Statements of that type should be sent to officers of the company and not to a poster asking questions.

What specifically is made up? Certainly not that the company went silent for a period this summer and the PPS sank below .0018.these are facts...are they not? TIA

Certainly not that the preferred shareholder was paid 50k(in shares or cash) and was entitled to ANOTHER 55k in cash or shares converted at free trading price at time of conversion...it's in the 10q. This is true...is it not?

Mr. Peacock is well versed at playing pink sheet games...is he not?


Bottom line...the 55 thousand preferred shares were issued... you claimed that Peacock orchestrated the issuance of these shares. At the time of issuance Mr. Nerison was the CEO and he remains the CEO......is this not true? TIA

You see, I think we can indeed be in agreement ...no?

should I address the email to Mr. Nerison...or Mr. Peacock?

Okay...then who indeed was responsible for the issuance of the 55,000 preferred shares and the "repayment" terms? TIA

Was it our current CEO-Mr. Nerison? TIA

Cool....so after being paid 50k in cash ...or stock conversion equal to that...the holder also converted the preferred shares into common.....I bet the conversion was done at roughly .0018. Don't you agree? That sure is a whole bunch of shares..TIA


Sure was nice for the holder of the preferred shares regarding the dead period this summer which aided in the PPS declining to .0018 and below...didn't it? TIA


Have Nerison and Peacock ever banded together with other OTC/Pink sheet companies? TIA

Roger stated that Peacock was behind the issuance of 55,000 preferred shares....these shares were issued this year. Is Roger wrong? TIA

The ACTUAL filings tell a different story Roger. Which brings us to a very important question: What allows a safer haven for a CEO regarding carefully worded wiggle-room.....A press release...or an ACTUAL 10Q FILING?


Per the latest FILING:


The company loses well over $10,000 on each event they hold.

The company had a grand total of $5,439 on hand.
The company ..during the 6 months ended June 30th, 2010 issued 200,000 shares in exchange for..are you ready....200.00 bucks..LOL

The company also, during that same" 6 month period issued an additional 200,000 shares at a 50% discount on the then market price of free trading shares."

And of course during that same 6 month period issued , in exchange for $55k, 55,000 preferred shares along with the promise to pay the lender $50,000 in cash....

and this all... brings us to the following statement contained in the latest 10Q filing.

"Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with PRIVATE PLACEMENT of capital shares and LOANS."

what's a prospective shareholder to believe Roger?? A press release or the 10q?? TIA

Agreed, however if Mr. Peacock was behind the particular 55k advance to the company in exchange for 50k in money and 55k in stock conversion.....I would assume he and his COHORTS took advantage of the dead period(no press releases this summer) which contributed to the PPS dropping below .002......that way...the convversion works out to many,many more shares than 5.8 million.

The notion that Peacock and his COHORTS would convert the cash due them into shares at .01 when the price fell to .0018 this summer...well....Mr. Peacock is far too experienced at these games to convert cash due to him into shares AFTER a run-up... he would do this BEFORE the planned run-up IMO.


How many additonal "Notes payable" are out there now?

hey Roger...thanks...let me run this by you....you seem to have a pretty good read on Mr. Peacock...if Peacock converted his loan to shares......and lets assume he chose the conversion route AFTER June 30th of course.....given that the closing lows hovered between .0018 and .002 and given Peacock's expertise at this game....what are the chances Mr. Peacock's share conversion price was .0018?


Did the latest filings include language regarding the company needing additional capital to continue operations for the next 12 months? Did the filings give an overview as to how the company would access the needed capital? Sounds like business as usual...no? TIA

Hmmm..what's the price tag on the T-Shirt? 12 bucks? Hmmm....

1200 shares of AVEW or a T-Shirt..and you bought the shirt...You made the right choice IMO.

Is the preferred holder entitled to any cut of the t-shirt sale? TIA

What if Mr. Nerison still marches to Mr. Peacock's drum? TIA


Why would Mr. Nerison suddenly change? TIA

Do Mr. Nerison and Mr. "Toxic" Peacock have a long history together regarding pinksheet/otcbb companies? TIA

"ONLY PAYABLE for the first 4 fights.." LOL ONLY??


Okay...the CEO, MR. NERISON, agreed to pay the sum of 50k to a person who fronted the company 55k...and on top of that agreed to allow that same person to convert preferred shares into common shares equal in value to 55k on the date of conversion?? So for 55k CEO Nerison agreed to pay this person back 50k in cash AND 55k in stock?? And this all transpired in roughly 9-10 months??That exceeds the company's current pace for gross revenues... for the entire year!LOL

Why would Mr. Nerison do this? TIA

But Roger...the 10Q clearly states these shares were issued DURING the six months ended June 30th, 2010....under Mr. Nerison's watch.....are you saying CEO-Mr. Nerison DID or DOES take orders and issues shares at the behest of Mr. Peacock?

When, in your opinion, did Mr. Nerison stop issuing shares at the behest of Mr. Peacock?



TIA

Roger...you stated:


"Those shares were issued by the toxic CEO Stephen Peacock.."



Roger....how could that be?? According to the latest 10Q The Shares in question were issued "DURING the six months ended June 30th,2010.". Who was the CEO "During the six months ended June 30th, 2010? TIA

Lets look on the bright side....according to *some* .. ETC brand cabinets were slated to hit the big time... but this was derailed because someone DIED...... ETC brand cabinets were due to hit it big again.....but a MACHINE died.....you can replace a machine.

Of course there is significant dilution...they lose 10k+ on each event they hold...AND...on top of that...a $12,500 vig is paid to those that fronted the company a few bucks after each event...this is converted into shares since the events do not generate any profit .....at this rate....we are roughly 2 events from making the proposed 3-1 forward split an impossibility without an increase in the A/S.....OUCH

will it be booked as a shareholder loan on the balance sheet?



Thank goodness the CNC machines are....well...never mind.


Time to rally the troops...can we get more pictures of the doghouses sticky-noted?

Market integrity has absolutely nothing to do with the blatant lies spewed by JD and company.


Calling the T/A....for what?? LOL
And of course *the* other calls supposedly made...again...for what?? LOL


On September 15th Did JD and Company state that there would be NO change to the A/S?

Was the A/S raised today?

Will calling the T/A change the fact that JD & co. LIED?
Will calling JD & co. change the fact that they LIED? TIA

p.s.- any nonsense regarding the 50 million additional shares being part of the *new* CEO's financial package will not pass the smell test...after all.....on September 15th JD and Co. had knowledge of hiring/naming a *NEW* CEO...and on that same date JD and Co. stated- 'NO Upcoming CHANGE to the A/S'.....so be sure to come up with something other than the incoming CEO being bestowed with 50 million newly authorized shares.


get ready for business as usual ..i.e. REVERSE SPLIT...its-a-comin.

ah yes....the STOP sign is still there...BUT...that particular stop sign really means GO......if you don't believe me just call the company and ask for JD.


ah yes....the company's latest filing lists 2009 GROSS revenue at 1.6 million dollars.....BUT.....those are GHJD dollars and the exchange rate regarding 1 GHJD dollar to U.S. dollars is 5.70...if you don't believe me call the company and ask for JD.



as for the dilution...hmmm.....the company only has control over certain events and the former CEO of WW passed away unexpectedly.


You see...its all good....if you had called JD you would know this!

I don't recall asking for your opinion on the matter.However you have given us your take on the matter. Your take is that the COMPANY loaned/advanced money to JD and GH....not the other way around as posted by pennyguru... I agree....JD and GH TOOK money from the company till...and alot of it...right when the economic situation surrounding the company was.......precarious at best..

ODD...don't you think?


Bottom line.....if you think a company bleeding red ink....has it's till raided by the officers....is sound business...then buy away...if you don't think it is sound for company officers to take SIX-FIGURE loans/advances while the company bleeds red ink...then don't.


If, as a long term investor, you don't care if JD and Glenn raid the till,.......what do you care about? TIA

The board would like an answer...are you stating that Pennyguru's Statements regarding the loan made to Harrs/Brown are FACTUAL?


Yes or No? TIA

Ouch....hmmm....Stop sign still in place....no retailer named..2009 financials were a disaster
dog houses haven't saved the day.....I KNOW!!!......



maybe *bid-sitting* will help turn this thing around!

Yes it is. although I believe it may be the greys??


the number of lawsuits .....25+ that I'm aware of...mortgage fraud. The American Residential Funding Bankruptcy filing took place in July 2006.

Another claim to fame in the Bio posted by Roger was a company called Bravo realty...LOL a nevada corporation.


IMO

Well...Mr. Villarreal was, as Roger posted, the COO at American Residential Funding Inc.


Anyone care to take a stab at the number of civil cases filed against American Residential Funding, Inc. ? TIA

Perhaps someone high up on the food chain at Lowes came down with an illness.....If that is the case I sure hope he or she pulls through....I'd hate to see EXPH shareholders disappointed again due to a mega-gazillion dollar deal falling through because of *health* issues beyond JD's control.

Crestmark has a UCC covering ALL ASSETS....CNC machines and all..
Supplies, inventory....everything......if you for one minute believe Crestmark went all-in based on the ETC farce...well....good luck with that.


IMO

I happen to work in the "Make some shelf room" business(most don't realize it's even a business...and it may not actually be one), and to successfully launch a new product shelf space is alotted in advance........anyway.....if you have "seen very few distributors not do well with this kind of product because it is unique."

um...if this product is unique how could you judge past performance of a distributor who has never offered this product?

If all performance is based on unique....how about this....a high performance SUV muffler that, without the use of any tools, is easily converted into a sponge which oozes soap and once the soap runs out you put it under your pillow and the next morning you discover that it turned itself into a dog house which when exposed to a tanning bed becomes a bathroom vanity that changes colors every time you flush your toilet.....that is unique...isn't it? TIA

The information you have posted has absolutely nothing to do with the dormant patent application which Malcolm claims to be worth gazillions.

since you chose to post, verbatim, information regarding REAL flare gas recovery technology....I think we should see the source of this technology.....after all...give credit where credit is due....right?


The information contained in your post is taken from John Zink LLC. How will John Zink Flare gas recovery units benefit EEGC?

notice the chart contained in the link...look familiar?


http://www.johnzink.com/products/fgr/html/fgr_jz_benefits.htm


John Zinc patents:



http://www.johnzink.com/patents.htm