Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Here you go sony. Don't take it from me...look for yourself:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=22596724
Here, go take a look. They are still making excuses. This was posted just yesterday...
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=22596724
XT as in eXit Time...about 2-3 months ago...
Too funny...
I need a prostate exam like I need, er, TSXT...
I'm sorry for you...can't see the forest through the trees...
Thing is sony, I have been through this before and lost $12K+...trying to give you the benefit of my experience. I too was pumping the heck out of the stock/company that ultimately ripped us off. The CEO is gone; phone, fax and email still in tact, but incognito; No T/A and the stock still trades to this day...
Michelle has done exactly what she said she wouldn't do, to all the world ON HER BLOG!!!
There's an old Chinese proverb that goes something like:
One who learns from the mistakes of others is wise, but one who ignores the lesson is a fool...
Another saying:
A fool and his money are soon parted...
Don't look at the man behind the curtain, sony...just close your eyes and say, "There's nothing like a million dollars."
Go ahead, keep giving her the benefit of the doubt and watch what it gets you...
nada, zip, zilch...this is toast.
It's a sham...
Look at this hand, see? I am putting product on the shelves...
Don't look at the other hand reaching into your pocket...
Go over to the ACMG board...they have been saying the same things. Big block buys at sub-penny.
ACMG doesn't even have a TA...
The pattern is the same...
You don't own a real company. The product on the shelves is just a front. Once they sell the inventory, no more will be made and the co will dry up...
If you doubt, take a look at the CEO/CPA's last financial in the IBox...
Pathetic.
Because, unbeknownst to you, this is a scam!!!
See, unannounced dilution!!!
Must be some more dilution of the float that will "never happen again."
Shyeah!!!
American Bulls is hardly ever correct...
Yea, too bad you won't see any! They kept it for themselves and have flown the coup.
That's why they call it "pump & dump!"
Yup! They already made their $2 million on the dump. Run it up on the pump and dump unannounced shares into the float at the high...typical!!! Not a bad haul for 3-4 months work!!!
You mean the "Pill that Kills?"
TSXT alert. Hangover cure???
"Alcohol-acetaminophen syndrome. Even moderate social drinkers are at risk.
Draganov P, Durrence H, Cox C, Reuben A.
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
In long-term alcohol users, the syndrome of hepatotoxicity from acetaminophen taken in therapeutic or modestly excessive doses is distinctive. It is characterized by striking elevation of transaminase levels and the potential for acute liver failure with high morbidity and mortality rates. A high index of suspicion should be maintained; in any patient with evidence of acute hepatic injury, a complete history of over-the-counter drug use should be obtained and acetaminophen levels checked. If there is doubt about the dose or time of ingestion, one should err on the side of treatment with acetylcysteine, because it is both effective and safe. Therapy should be initiated as early as possible, but even late administration may be of benefit. Timely contact with a medical center that has liver transplantation capabilities should be made before encephalopathy becomes advanced. Heightened awareness of this preventable and treatable condition is needed by healthcare providers and acetaminophen users alike. Because the minimum safe dose of acetaminophen is not known in the setting of chronic alcohol use, it seems prudent in such situations to avoid acetaminophen altogether, especially during brief periods of abstinence.
PMID: 10649673 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]"
All one must do is take a look:
DELAWARE TAX STATUS AS OF JUNE 11, 2007:
Last annual report filed: 2006
Past due taxes: $66,585.15
Tax status: Delinquent quarterly
This is on the IBoard folks...BRF!!!
I know from experience (college daze.)
Don't need to look up what works...for me anyway...
Dehydration is what causes hangovers as alcohol absorbs water...
Just need to remember to rehydrate before passing out...
Don't get me wrong MD, TSXT is still on my radar, but I have 2 other pinks that I am following and whichever of the 3 makes the correct showing will get my gambling $$$ and then some. I've already reaped a whopping 200% (apx) on this one. I want the BIG DOG...
Sorry, I just can't make that leap of faith. CEOs are among the group I loathe the most; lawyers and CPAs. Michelle is 2 outta 3...
Lurking...
I'll bleed a river if this thing somehow resurrects from the dead and announce the plant, etc. I'll just bleed...that's - of course - after I pound my head against the wall for an hour and throw every sharp instrument I own at my computer...
...and that would be a bad thing?
Amazing anyone is still here at all. Stick a fork in it...D-O-N-E!
That's what i found, BUT am not sure if it is correct. That's alot of float and takes mountains to move PPS. Accounts for "seemingly" heavy volume with no proce action...
Is the float on IOGH correct as stated on the IBoard?
Also, what is the float on BLLN?
TIA
Tied to Redwood Consultants as is USSE/SSTP.
Thanks for the tip. Time for some DD.
Hey Joe, not touting TSXT anymore? What happened?
From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_takeover
Read the contradictions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Reverse_takeover
"Additionally, many shell companies carry forward what is known as a tax-loss. This means that a loss incurred in previous years can be applied to income in future years. This shelters future income from income taxes. Since most active public companies become dormant public companies after a string of losses, or at least one large one, it is more likely that a shell company will offer this tax shelter.
It is highly unusual to preserve any benefit from the tax loss carry forward in a shell company. The tsx regs. normally reduce the loss carry forward by the percentage of the change in control. In a well structured reverse merger the private company should end up with 95% or more of the stock after the mergr, thus reducing the tax loss carry forward by this amount for greater.
== Normally, U.S. tax law dramatically reduces the available of a loss carryforward if a change in control has occurred. I believe that when a "ownership change"(as defined in IRC Section 382(g)) is deemed to have occurred, Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code reduces the availability of a loss carryforward to an amount equal to the product of the value of the old loss corporation and the applicable federal long-term tax-exempt rate. 12.40.239.4 16:20, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
That's not true. You can apply tax losses to different items on the balance sheet. Tax loss carry-forward is one of the great benefits of a RTO.--Getaway 14:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
In this case, the contradiction remains, because the article is saying that it is highly unusual to preserve the tax benefit. Can anyone clarify this point? Merry07 22:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)"
Be weary...about this debt indemnity BS. Hayter's been doing this a LOT longer than Michelle. I smell wool...
And if he doesn't pay the debt? Supposedly, he has indemnified TSXT from all priors...This is Ed Hayter!!!
The split was 1 for 1000 - do the math - yup, 50 billion shares. You don't just give 50 billion shares of a company you own away and indemnify the new holders of ALL debt without getting something in return. As a biz man, I would've kept 10% (at least.) That way, if it goes to $3 (for upper listing,) I have $15 MM to pay off my debt and still have some $$$ leftover.
Assume for argument's sake, he holds stock (restricted for 1 year) and it is a sizeable amount. Can he hold TSXT hostage for the debt with his res. shares??? Can he weasle out of the indemnity??? I want to see it in writing...to date, we still don't know the actual structure of the deal, do we?
I trust NO CEO. Remeber Tyco, WorldCom, Enron, MCI and now Dell (restating earnings for 4 years.) Especially ones with $$$ dancing in their heads.
Definite cause for concern...IMO!
As far as Arizona and Sony are concerned...the reason I am still here is that TSXT is still on my radar. IF (and that's a big if) anyone can put forth compelling evidence that Hayter is NOT still involved and that they are in fact taking care of their debts, I will be back on board with my pom-poms. Until then, this is just another pinky that should be played as such....by flipping.
to_profit: We'll see if we have a bottom...
To understand how Hayter MAY be involved, one must understand how reverse mergers work; it that is indeed how TSXT came to acquire this shell. It must be paid for either in cash or in stock. If paid for in stock, then the old "members" hold stock of the new co, TSXT. How much? One can only guess, BUT if they paid for the shell with cash, where did the cash come from? Revenues?
My bet is it was a stock swap for the shell and Hayter is still involved, albeit indirectly...
Puhleeze!!!
That's what marketing and advertising companies are for, like Leo Burnett, etc. Oh that's right, they blew all their advertising budget on car racing and blimps...so I guess this is all they have left; asking shareholders for ideas.
I certainly am not going to put my money where the likes of this board has a say in how to run the company.
Why don't we ask Joe Natural...he's got great ideas........NOT!!!
Telling you what you want to hear, maybe? Any good con "person" would know what to say and when to say it. I know, I've been conned...out of $12k!!!
If he wants nothing to do with pub cos, why does he keep fiddling with pinks? They're public...
What gets me is the blog...asking for marketing ideas when she has staff for that...at least that's what she said.
He's still involved.
Dimes to doughnuts he owns some restricted shares and maybe even warrants...that's how these "guys" stay in the action...
Done did it...
Too much competition even if it (the company) is for real...
I'll keep looking.
<<They dont have to>>
Great basis for an "investment." I thought this was a small company that wanted to go BIG TIME!!! If she wants to be a big player, she should act like one...
Was it announced? NO..
Did we know it was coming? NO..
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice...
Get the picture?
The amount of the dilution is of no matter. The fact that it happened without warning and that it almost doubled the float is of great concern...
Wondering and watching in amazement as I see the old adage still has merit: "There's a sucker born every minute."
Is she still on vacation during this action packed month? I wonder if she's spent all of the $$$ she made from the first dilution...expect more to come.
When the going gets tough, Michelle goes shopping...LOL! With OPM...LOLOL!
Duh! Ya think?
Is it in TARGET yet?