This is a Plaintiffs Allegations not a judgment of guilt.

Your court filing reference is very different from your statement in your DELETED POST # 239242(?)

"Eric was found liable in Court for Fraudulent misrepresentations that he knowingly lied to a lender to induce that person to make more loans, enuff said."

This is a disparaging statement
with intention to misrepresent the FACTS.

So why are you investing(?) in a company that is being managed by such an individual?

Sadly I don't see anybody coming forward with any constructive and beneficial suggestions, only harping on the PAST.

I belive the relevance of old incidents to today's activity is  (1/X3)%  [where X represents number of years past cubed].

"Eric was found liable in Court for Fraudulent misrepresentations that he knowingly lied to a lender to induce that person to make more loans, enuff said."

Can you provide the source or evidence for your statement?

So why are you investing(?) in a company that is being managed by such an individual?


"You remind me of someone."

Can you let me know who it is?

I have found quite a few inaccurate disparaging remarks.
Here are a few of them, I wonder how they belive that their posts will improve the stock value and the Company's financial standing.

Post  239078   resurgence of outdated technology like GT's...
Post  239096. nothing I or you, or anyone says, will have an affect on the stock value.
Post. 239181.  I don't think selling a subscription model to companies with products in grocery stores makes any sense. The floor panels will be subjected to heavy foot traffic, shopping carts, pallet jacks with full pallets loaded with grocery product, and floor machines that put pressure on the panels and potential smudge and crack them. How many shoppers will even stop and stare at the floor panels while shopping? Who is going to pay for maintenance? What work is going to be required to ensure the floor remains level so customers don't trip and file a lawsuit? Why would any grocery chain like Walmart or Target take this risk, when traditional in-store advertising is cheaper and easier to implement? This makes no sense to me, and I see zero chance of this happening in any of our lifetimes.

He needs to focus his efforts and not try and go in ten different directions, especially when he can't even successfully go in a single direction.

These type of inaccurate descriptions are the nails in your financial coffin, and your wondering why the stock is not performing.

Post 239201
Yes we know, this means Eric can BS all he wants then pull a reverse split when the going gets tuff and it is all legal.

If you believe what you wrote, why are you spending your money on the stock, or any other pink stock for that matter?

Post. 239206.
"so investors like me and many others can get the hell out."
It does not happen because you keep digging your own financial grave with all your disparaging remarks.

Post 239221
"The past is always the best present indicator on what the future holds on this & any other OTC table with the same CEO operating out of the same pos-land handbook glty"

[i]I belive the relevance of old incidents relative to today's activity is  (1/X3)%  [where X represents years past cubed]

I find it amusing and confusing how posters are describing the operation, dangers and the deficiencies of the CUBE.

The panels on the floor, their life cycle, danger to the public, dumb idea, stc.

Does anybody here know how it works, or tried to find out before they posted their desertion, and predictions of its impact on the consumer and hence the company fortunes.

Ladies and gentlemen, it is a PROJECTOR of images and messages with interactive abilities to engage and interact with the SHOPPERS.

I think the CUBE could be very INTERESTING to NATIONAL BRANDS that want to reach out and touch the consumer, while they are actually shopping and making a CHOICE of product selection for their shopping cart.

Has anybody read lately the Safe Harbor: paragraph at the bottom of ALL NEWS RELEASES from ALL COMPANIES?

To save time I have inserted it for an easy look;
Safe Harbor:
Statements contained in this news release, other than those identifying historical facts, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Safe Harbor provisions as contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relating to the Company's future expectations, including but not limited to revenues and earnings, technology efficacy, strategies and plans, are subject to safe harbors protection. Actual Company results and performance may be materially different from any future results, performance, strategies, plans, or achievements that may be expressed or implied by any such forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

After having read the above it becomes evident that the CEO does not have to report every micro move or course adjustment that the company makes in regards to any previous announcements.

The PERTINENT FACTS are reported in the QUORTERLY and ANNUAL REPORTS.

GREETINGS MEMBERS OF THE BOARD

I would like to know what is the purpose of this discussion board.

From the postings I have read I can't seem to get a coherent purpose.

Is there a significant number of members,  because I see very few people posting, almost always with the same recurring theme.

Is there a SILENT MAJORITY that is not participating?