Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I not against vaccines. I am fully vaccinated. AS I SAID IN MY POST!!!! Might want to actually read what I write before you post.....
Yep bold face type “all food is safe” “all medical products are safe” and “Public health is advanced”. Looks like my definition is pretty spot on, but can’t seem to find “”Protectors of snake oil salesman”. Well if it’s in there in some subpart z it’s has only been done twice in the history of the agency. You have to ask yourself why they felt the need to do it. Your response was a hostile public?? Really, a hostile public?? Well if that is true we have a bunch of pansies in our FDA. The damage was done!! The drug failed the trial that was set up to fail. Was that not enough?? Mission accomplished according to FDA. Nope not enough!! Hey joe write a letter, we are getting hostile emails. Lol!! That letter told me everything I needed to know. So why the letter, why the letter? My conclusion (could be wrong) FDA did not want a viable therapeutic. It just wasn’t LL either. Again I can’t prove it, but by watching FDA’s behavior with the trial set up. The behavior about the good news in first 2 weeks and the response is “nothing to see here”. The behavior towards other therapeutic’s and a second time in history “hit piece letter”, said to me something is amiss. If you look up EUA approval, it says the only way you can get approved is if it’s an emergency and there is no viable treatment. Now everyone knows the big push for vaccines. Right or wrong there was a big push and even mandates. Maybe it did save more lives with vaccines. The point is a viable treatment would have made the vaccine push much more difficult.
Maybe the FDA should change it’s name to The Food, Drug, and protector of snake oil salesman. Let’s see,.... for short FDPOSOSA....
It’s not the FDA’s job to protect the people from snake oil salesman. That is ridiculous on its face. It’s so ridiculous that it has only happened twice. The FDA’s job is to approve food and drugs for the SAFETY of the public. PERIOD. Where did you read that the FDA’s job was to protect the public from snake oil salesman? You have lost all credibility with that answer.
Exactly my point?? Thank you. Look I don’t know for sure and I would never say that it happened for a fact. I do watch the behavior of people and what they do to draw a conclusion. Could I win in court on the statement in my post? No way. But, I find the FDA’s behavior very strange in several situations. So CD12 fails but there is very interesting data in the first two weeks. What did the FDA do? Not only did they not pursue the data from first 2 weeks they write a hit piece. Is that what the FDA does? I hear people say they were giving the CEO a beat down! Is that their Job? Were they saving investors from their investments? Is that what they do, what department of the FDA handles that? If NP was lying that’s the SEC/DOJ responsibility. If you are a thinking person you would have to ask yourself why not 4 shots after the DSMC said continue and not recommend what CYDY requested with 4 shots.That letter was a big red flag to me. Why the hostility to Naders PR. The drug failed trial end of story. Can you imagine the FDA responding to every CEO after every time they speak about good data within a trial failure? Oh wait, the letter was unprecedented. That wrote the letter due to “significant public interest”. REALLY!! How many people do you think in our country even knew about LL?? So after thinking about why the FDA would sabotage a trial and write a hit piece, I came to the conclusion there had to be a good reason. In order to allow vaccines approval with EUA there must not be a viable therapeutic or treatment
Your wrong
FDA said mask didn’t work. The FDA later said they did work. FDA explanation: we didn’t want there to be a shortage of masks for our healthcare workers. So they mislead the population for a reason they deemed necessary. Is it a big leap to sabotage a therapeutic so that they could approve vaccines through EUA?
FDA statement was unprecedented. Why???? The drug failed trial as set up by FDA. Denied four shots. Period. So why the need for the letter???? Was it to warn investors? Was it to shut up a CEO of an OTC tiny company?? Is that what the FDA does??? Is that the FDA’s job??? The FDA said they wrote the letter due to “significant public interest”. Does the FDA have a “significant public interest”department?? The FDA does not know who penned the letter?? Now that is bullsh#t!!! How many people do you think even know about LL. They knew they had a problem with early results of CD12 trial and didn’t want a therapeutic approved! Reason for not wanting therapeutics approved?? Would hurt the MRNA vaccine EUA and future mandates. They also felt that a viable therapeutic would not stop the massive overflow at hospitals….Look how quickly they went against other therapeutics not just LL.. Maybe you just don’t want to believe it. Hell, I don’t want to believe it….
So explain why the FDA didn’t approve 4 shots??? So they could write that bogus paragraph you posted. Simple
Nader is gone….
Psst, Nader is gone…..
2 cents today, pathetic...
Don’t you find it strange that Nader was canned and the SP only moved 2cents. Guess the market didn’t give a hoot about Nader either way....
We’ve been over this many times. Nader wasn’t the one who sabotaged the trial. It’s common knowledge that Nader and Co. requested 4 doses in the cd12. The FDA rejected 4 doses. So big surprise after the first two weeks which (showed great results against SOC) the last two weeks saw a massive drop off against SOC!! Wonder why that happened duhhhhhh. So ask yourself with years of usage and practically zero SAE’s why did the FDA said NO to 4 doses?? The FDA sabotaged the trial because vaccines could not be used under EUA if there was a viable therapeutic. LL would have been a big problem for the vaccine push, so the FDA not only sabotaged trial, they wrote an unprecedented letter. Also, not one FDA official will say who wrote the hit piece. ODD TO SAY LEAST!! Why the secrecy of who wrote the letter. It’s so obvious....
DEAD ON C20!!!
Lets say the new trial is run at 4 doses over 4 weeks and the trial is a success. Tell me, who will be responsible for the failure of CD12? CYDY requested 4 doses for the trial and was only granted 2 doses by our good ol’ FDA (A LITTLE HELP, IT WILL BE THE FDA’s FAULT!! ) Explain to me why the FDA would be worried about 4 doses when there have been basically zero SAE’s with LL’s previous history. I have another question, why would the FDA give a hoot about a drug that failed and deem it necessary to write a hit piece letter. Their reason “the letter was written due to significant public interest” and Nader wrote misleading statements in a PR?? Why would they give a damn what the public was saying or emailing. The trial failed right?? Were they warning potential investors that LL was no good so don’t lose your money? Is that what the FDA does? I can guess why, they didn’t want a viable therapeutic because they wanted to use vaccines to fight the pandemic and a viable therapeutic would put a wrench into that effort. They sabotaged the CD12 trial with only 2 doses and wrote that letter in order to squash LL and CYDY. IMO Ps. I don’t believe everything I hear when it comes to Nader or the FDA. Sounds like you would never believe Nader, but would lap up every word the FDA says.....Risky
Mind blowing!! Unfortunately, it doesn’t surprise me at all. Thanks for posting!
That was great.
Perfect answer… THANKS!!!!!!
Been quite juicy for me… looking fo huge monster gains again!!
Hey Black ops, should I buy back in with the short covering I made in 2020 (800%)… looks like a good time…
Super glad to hear this news!! Find it bizarre it’s been over a year to finally get to the “feasibility” of a new trial. Could it be that the FDA has figured out that vaccines are not the only answer?? Maybe the FDA wants to get in front of the news that LL may be approved elsewhere? Kind of a 180 from the “ghost written” FDA hit piece letter. Hmmm something may be up....Seems pretty easy 4 doses for four weeks. Why in the heck didn’t this happen a year ago??
Fauci himself said SEVERAL times along with the Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams “mask should only be used by the sick and that wearing mask can actually lead to other health issues.” at the beginning of the pandemic. Then it was Fauci and the rest who said several times “that we didn’t want there to be a run on masks and were worried that there might not be enough masks for the front line healthcare workers. So we said mask didn’t work. Those statements lead to a problem, once there were enough masks they wanted to mandate there usage!!! They had to come clean!!! You can pretend that didn’t happen but I can guarantee you that it did indeed happen and that is a FACT……So I used in my post “THEY”. I don’t know for a fact that the FDA purposefully sabotaged our CD12 trial by only allowing 2 doses (CYDY asked for four doses). I do find it odd after seeing the data from the first 2 weeks of CD12 for the FDA not wanting to pursue more testing immediately during a pandemic (especially after the huge drop off in results after the third and fourth week when LL was not given!!) AND the big kicker!! They send out a hit piece letter that no one at the FDA will own up to writing?? That has my eyebrow raised. Was there a reason FDA didn’t want LL to succeed? Maybe a viable therapeutic might hurt the vaccine push to fight pandemic? Maybe BP was whispering in Fauci’s ear “you won’t be able to force vaccines with an effective therapeutic” or a therapeutic won’t stop the overflow at the countries hospitals”. I don’t know if that actually happened but it’s a legitimate question. Ps. If you want to here it from the horses mouth about Fauci and mask not working look up the interview on youtube. He actually mentions that a run on masks could lead to a shortage of masks for our healthcare workers so he downplayed the effective of masks and said they should only be used by people who were sick. Point is they were misleading people for what they deemed a greater good. Now I bring up the take down of LL, was it because of a greater good deemed by the FDA…. Legitimate question
Hey by law is the FDA allowed to lie about something (mask not working) if THEY deem it necessary????
So did you believe the FDA when they said mask didn’t work?
Really, I thought it was a genius move!!!!
Hey I heard Nader where’s disco pants on Saturday night!! Unverified….
Hey I heard Nader doesn’t clean his plate before eating his desert… unverified
Hey I heard Nader sucks helium out of party balloons….. not verified
FOX worked until they F’d it up......
Drrrrrrr...... billionaire
So with your reasoning, Nader hires Amerex so he can tell them not to file a complete BLA so there isn’t approval for LL. Hmmm.With your reasoning Amerex would say, hey that’s ok we will file it without all the info... So Amerex would put its reputation on the line to appease NP?? Doesn’t seem like the FDA is buying your scenario in the RTF. I don’t think the Judge in the CYDY lawsuit is going to buy your scenario either. You might say Nader not paying Amerex and filing a lawsuit against Amerex would be very DANGEROUS for Nader if he told them to file an incomplete BLA. That would definitely come out in court. EXCEPT he is not worried about that!!?? If he is not worried, maybe it’s because he didn’t order the incomplete BLA be filed and knows in the investigation Amerex will have to divulge why they did indeed submit an incomplete BLA after the FDA had already spoken to them....
Now that was a post worth reading!! Thanks Buddyboy20!!!
According to the knowledge of the attendee at the event (how many times was this written? Three times?). That my friends is how the New York Times is able to feed you BS with zero accountability for the story. No facts, just some guy or girl who happened to be there. Can’t disclose who they are though, ohhh noooo...
I’m sure you mean LSAT. Just blame the mistake on a typo! I think the LSTAT is when you need a L in a hurry while performing surgery....
Hey Doc, got a question for you. Was covid 19 a variant of all previous covid viruses (disregard the gain of function test for now). I mean covid 19 hit us in 2019 so I was told that’s how the virus receives its name (a covid virus that occurs in 2019 receives the name covid19). If that is the case why haven’t the new variants been given the name covid 20 or covid 21... Not a doctor here, but to me it seems purposeful to leave the virus named covid 19 and call everything else a variant of covid 19 because it would make the vaccine method of fighting the pandemic look ineffective ( new vaccine for covid 20, new vaccine for covid 21 etc....) So the ”powers that be” are talking about booster shots!! My question to you, is the booster just the same vaccine as before or is it another vaccine to deal with new variants?
Your words....
MD Anderson must really believe the drug works to be working with Cytodyn knowing everything you listed. THEY also must believe the drug might work and don’t believe it is SALINE. Your reference to LL as SALINE makes you and MD Anderson at odds with each other, but hey what does MD Anderson know??
“Cydy is a failure on every level”
Except when it comes to beating the 13D in court!!
LAUGHING!!
Hilarious!!!!!! Can’t stop laughing!! Thx