Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
“or reduction in the reverse count” is that even possible? I thought that figure was locked in atp. I’m uncertain of the rules in this regard.
The “option” part goes away tomorrow icymi….
Well apparently they do need to do one lol. My big question is, is this the necessary evil to finance or is company going belly up? TBD
You’ve never “countered” a single post. Just a one liner on 10 different boards a day for the past 15 years and running. I’ll change dumbass to weirdo if you’d like. All of a sudden you have a voice? Lol. Anyways as much as you’d like it I’m not going to bicker w you an get banned. Smell ya later.
We just made breakout boards!
You are ya weirdo lol. I’ve done well idc if I go down w the ship. Question is, if the company goes down will you continue to post here?
Dude we don’t even know if financing is a part of all this lol
Holy shit the dumping is MASSIVE
Womp wompp wompppppppppppopp
An I suggest you stay true to your original talking point lol. Ok so now we’re back to “US companies”. US companies and SNPW are in the same boat as it relates to competing with China. I’m not trying to debate whether or not US companies are in a better position in the industry vs China. Clearly they are not. Geeze dude just talk straight up without trying to appear witty and all knowing then moving the goal post with every question. Have a good night.
Let’s stick to your original question. You question whether it makes sense to manufacture solar products in the US vs China due to sourcing materials, labor costs, yada yada yada. Simply put, (does it make logistical and financial sense?) That question applies to every solar manufacturer in the US. They’re all competing with China. A customer base, sales an marketing team isn’t a good enough answer for me…
You’ve asked the same question somewhat repeatedly and that question applies to all US solar manufacturers whilst you single out snpw for trying to do the same. You can see how this comes across as you perhaps inadvertently questioning the business model of all US manufacturers not just SNPW can’t you?
You got big beef w all US solar manufacturers.
Na I was just laughing cuz I was today years old when I found out the informal usage of that word lol
Idk but sometimes the account acts like it’s ran by two different people.
It doesn’t necessarily have to be completed. Usually the owner inherited this issue. Which also likely reduced the buying price at the time of sale. Very common. The landlord can choose to either spend a boatload and rectify the issue (if possible) and fully remediate. Or agree to a long term attenuation plan. Both of which bring the property into good standing. I’m far from an expert here so correct me if I’m wrong. I know someone who’s been through this so I know a little bit.
I don’t agree here.. The employees work inside. Contaminants in the soil are not airborne and pose no health risk by merely walking by. I find your opinion unfounded but feel free to outdo me with due diligence. If they were, it would be cited in the environmental agencies evaluation. Basically if this was Chernobyl we would know about it. What I wouldn’t do in this situation is drink well water from there or from an adjacent property lol. As to your question on drinking water, the affect is on the groundwater and perhaps leeching to adjacent properties or nearby natural bodies of water. Again, this is the burden of a landlord not a tenant. The site logically has municipal water running to the building. I’m familiar with this topic. Topics are fun to talk about rather than the all too common one liners I’ve grown bored with.
So what you just laid out is contaminants in the soil, not the interior. A lot of old buildings have this same problem due to lack of regulation in factories/warehouses back in the day. This environmental remediation burden falls on the landlord of the property, not the tenant. The landlord follows the guidelines the environmental agencies set forth or gets fined. That particular location would be leased not bought. Would have zero effect on snpw. My 2c fwiw.
“would you want your name on today's printout?” This is a wild thing to say, even for you kazi cmon.
Lol poison doesn’t know Jack shit. He’s just on his hands an knees (crying perhaps) begging people to sell so he can “finally” get those
50m shares he’s always wanted.
Singing for their supper is actually pretty funny lol
The dumbest poster here strikes again!
Yet we’re all here to discuss it regardless. I tell you what, it’s hard to say. Things happen fast. I recall reading that same tone before the last run up. Tis why I don’t believe a damn thing anyone says on here.
Also this “NOTE;It is important to point out that Solar Group was able to get a solar panel manufacturing facility up and running from scratch in two months, November 2022 to January 2023 per the GEO New Energy Vietnam website”. Impressive and awesome yes, however they didn’t have to ship equipment halfway around the world fwiw.
This line “our partners FoxESS and Tsingshan Group” is what sticks out to me here. If the goal was to just be distributing their products, Tsingshan would play no immediate role in that relationship. Interesting nonetheless.
After all the shit you talked an now you want to buy back in? Pathetic
It says “in relation to the sales of battery” with a US ev manufacturer. What he’s inferring to is in the event foxess had a US manufacturing site those batteries logically would come from a domestic source.
On the solar side , half going to their patented panels. What has been stated by the ceo is they want to UL certify the product and process with full control rather than by third party. The other half….. I really don’t know the answer to that question with validity because to my knowledge, it was never stated by the company. The third party contract manufacturer sounds plausible. Also, it would make sense if it were GEP panels but that’s purely a guess. On the battery side, I’d imagine they wish to receive the components from foxess or affiliates and just assemble stateside. Anyone can feel free to chime in if any of what I just said is inaccurate based off available public information. This is a very guessy post lol. Happy Sunday bud.
When one seeks out milk, they must first acquire a container lol.
In the event snpw does secure financing and a location I feel as though in the meantime, you’re right and we can expect a rollercoaster of up an downs. The thing is, we have no idea how close we are or aren’t to that conclusion. The recent rise was in anticipation of getting news last week following the site visit. We did not. So flippers, realizing this, took advantage. Which is exactly what I would have done if I were actively trading snpw.
Omg lol I thought your message to wallstreet was to me. My iHub alerts are blowing up and I got confused. I was like wtf mf!!! haha. My apologies.
Listen buddy I’m in no way shape or form a part of any “g-squad”. I am not new. I’ve been here since 2019. I have followed the company very closely and want nothing more for it to succeed. I’ve defended the company countless times for YEARS when I thought bashers were spewing nonsense. I don’t like bashing, I don’t like pumping either. I will call out any person here I believe is pushing their agenda and that is one thing that will never change. At this juncture we are conversing upon speculation. I’m not taking sides with any “group” here I just keep it real and freely speak my mind. I would leave the chat before I’d ever bash Nick or the company.
Well, I have a litany of conspiracy theories as to why and how things have developed here. I believe Nick will avoid an rs at all costs. I also believe he will get this plant going at all costs. So if it means plant with rs vs no rs= no plant, he will rs. Now, if I were to give you my gut feeling, I’d say the rs if it were to come would be down the road into development for uplisting purposes. Not concurrently with financing. I think he uses rs as potential leverage to further the company in the event it may be needed. That seems logical to me.
Yes I agree it would go in that order. My take is the financing is waiting on the location an will be filed in close succession.
Since the contract expiration last summer on that particular property is officially expired, we can’t guarantee or expect the site visit was at that same location. “Officially” there is no location via filing nor promulgated by the company since. Whatever Nick is doing is behind closed doors I expect is purposefully dragging out a material event to not file an 8k until “after we are ready”. All I’ll say is if in the event it’s not in that location, I’d hope the incentives are underway at a different one.. Provided it was in a different state of course. I have many questions yet I understand why the company chooses to be only as transparent as necessary at this time.
Yea sure. Close on loan, close on property, cancel rs, 8k it all an do evil laugh.
Well you’ve stated your opinion of the building at 2251 Old Curtis to be an outdated dinosaur before. Now you’re saying we’ll be surprised when we find out the address…. Which is it? I don’t like that Tom foolery.
Yea the location, size, zoning, acreage, parking, layout, price, none of that matters! Lol
“Why does it matter the location of the site.” It matters a great deal actually. I shouldn’t have to explain this to you.