Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I would Call that a Passed Test ..
Relax ...Test of 50 Day M/A in progress
Added. EOM
If that is the way you see it ...
Why wouldnt you have sold all at .40 ?
I understand you Crapping on others $$ as you dont know them ..
But to Crap on your own $$ ..
Well thats just a special kind of Special ..
Personally .. If I had sold 100s of 1000s @ .40. ...
I wouldnt have the time or desire to continue to show people my ignorance on a mesg board ..
But you do you .. ..
Nevermind .. I dug it ...
What post # did you refer to that filing ?
Loc.. Awhile back your post included the .20 and .30 threshold shares info from the Filings ..
Series C I believe ..
Didnt It appear all those shares were excersized in 2019 .. ??
Dog ... Why do you care ?
If you were poo pooing the stock @ .05 ...
Surely you arent going to buy @ sub .20 ..
The Yahoo's would calm down if they revisited ..
Www.wacopatentblog.com
5-16-2020 Entry (scroll down)
Posted here almost a year ago ...
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=157772509
The "Albright Doctrine"
First, to be clear, the naming of the "Albright Doctrine" is mine, and hopefully no one (especially Judge Albright or the WDTX) takes offense. What I am calling the Albright Doctrine is simply the idea that a federal court can get to trial more quickly than the PTAB can both institute and and adjudicate an inter partes review. Judge Albright has been outspoken about this issue, saying specifically that "t's my job to give people the opportunity to have their cases tried in a federal court ... and I probably can get a patent trial resolved more quickly than the PTAB can."
In allowing patent owners their day in court in a timely manner, Judge Albright has single-handedly changed the tenor of patent litigation and provided a fair and reasonable jurisdiction for patent disputes. Now, the PTAB is jumping on board!
As indicated below, the PTAB has basically stated that if the invalidity challenges are the same in the IPR request and parallel patent litigation, then if a court has a reasonable chance of adjudicating the issue first, the Board will use its discretion and not even institute a review. In essence, the PTAB is saying, "yes, we believe that courts can move more quickly than we can, and if the issues are the same, then any IPR would be moot and should not be instituted."
This is what I call the Albright Doctrine: that a district court can moot an IPR by moving quickly to trial so that a jury can adjudicate validity rather than the PTAB. I am a fan, because I agree with Judge Albright that juries are wise and will make the correct decisions through the longstanding U.S. trial system if allowed to do so. I am sure that infringers and those that do not respect patents would disagree."
Snip
No .. Just NO ..
Its not worth talking about ..
Once again Grandpa .
The judge and Court were chosen SPECIFICALLY to avoid that scenario ..
The Case will be decided before the review is done ..
And the patent court will accept the Courts decision ..
Review the Links I posted about a year ago for Confirmation ..
Sir .. If you havent figured out a way to profit here in 15+ years ..
You have been wrong way more than 4 times ...
Some here have made good $ multiple Times starting with DWCM
Looks like its 14-2 in Other circles ..
AGAINST Wanting to hear from the company right now ..
Ever heard of Sell the News ????
Sold some more @.39 over 500% return
It may keep going ..
But too much profit to Risk on a pink..
Still own 6 figures shares
So a Guy who has been here for 15+ years without managing to make a profit is going to make an "exactly" Call today ...
Too Funny .. Cant make this stuff up..
Your point ??
As Yet ..
Nobody has referenced the details ...
Locwolf was close but all he did was show people there are 180 million options and warrants that will be added to the 404 million issued once the shares are excersized..
No details on when that occurs ..
Any guestimates should include a base shares of 585 Million before expected dilloution ..
17 Million were traded on the Run to .20+ intraday ..
This was I believe on the lawsuit announcement..
Buylow ..
Authorized is currently 900k ...
While u may see 400k outstanding ..
After existing warrants are exercised that figure will be wayy closer to 900k...
Toss in some expected Dilloutions .. Some more options for directors next spring ..
So yes .. 1 billion out could ve the reality ..
Bet most here are not aware of what happens if the stock is above .20 for 30 days ...
And again @ .30
Its in the filings ..
Dig Deeper ....
During the Weekends Posting excitement I saw 2 guesstimates as to a potential stock price ..
$5 and $60. ...
My bar napkin note is fairly simple ..
Before its all over my guess is we are at 1 Billion shares Out..
With a $2 Billion Settlement ..
Go ahead and figure half of that will go to lawyers and directors ..
Left with 1 bill shares ..
$1 billion dollars ..
Leaving the price at My Target of $1 before any multiples.
It would then take management actively persueing other infringers or customers to get any multiple ..
That is the upside potential for now ...
The alternative everyone should be aware of is ..
If HDVY loses this Intel case the stock will be under .01 in days.
There are no other opportunities for the company if this fails .
Locwolf ..
As noted in a article I posted at least a year ago ..
The patentability review will probably not be finished by the time the court case is over..
The patent office will defer to the courts findings ..
This is why this venue and Judge were targeted by HDVYs legal team
Alan ..
I distinctly remember a post where you stated..
Intel doesn't Settle
How has that become ..
Intel will avoid a Jury trial at all costs ?
Will go ahead and say it now ..
This Trader sold 1/3 of position over .13 ..
Cost basis under .05
Most of original capital back..
Plenty of shares left ..
Just avoiding being greedy and any Rug Pulls along The way
I have said it before ..
Ignorance will not be ignored .. It should countered more often than it is ...
But some of us have more to do than watch mesg boards all day ..
For now the chart shows a successful test of the 50 day moving avg ..
Even Intel is "practical"
https://www.cnet.com/news/intel-to-pay-amd-1-25-billion-in-antitrust-settlement/
Short info on Pinks is usually Very Unreliable ..
Mms play by different rules and have to short on runs to stay neutral at end of day ..
Other times same share shorted multiple times ..
And counted each time..
Markman was a Win Win for HDVY..
The question is now has the Judge set a date for intels dismissal hearing..
Or as I suspect just sign off on it as not needed ..
From reports Judge was ready to go to trial before Intel mentioned the dismissal hearing..
Uhh fellas if hes ready to go to trial ..
He isnt going to dismiss the Case..
With calls like this...
Its no wonder you have been stuck for 20 years ...
If I made a call like that ..
And got the results that happened ..
I would be too embarrased to post ever again ..
Still look bad ?
That was only 5 trading days ago ...
Choose who you follow closely here folks..
Apparantly something alien to you ..
Plain and simple Truth ...
If you have no idea what you are talking about ..
(Markman hearing)
Best to be quiet and let people think you are a dummy ..
Than to say something and people KNOW you are a Dummy ..
The Board "Guru" totally dissmissed the Markman hearing in Post #15871 ...
So much mis-information here ...
Blind leading the blind..
Once again had Loc bothered to read the articles I posted ohhh last summer ..
He would have understood the plain and simple approach favored by the Judge ..
And the importance of the Markman hearing ...
When a guy posts near daily you expect some credibility ..
Its a Shame the expectation is not always met ..
Anything after "I thought" in your post was more useless dribble ...
Staaaaaaaap please ..
If you wont think about your own investment.. please think about others and just stop with the useless commentary for a month or so ..
Dog .. You are a Dreamer also ..
This isnt about 10 or 20 million ..
Would not have been looked at twice by the law firm if it was ..
If you really are selling why didnt you takeout that .032 bid for a million and a half shares ?
Things that make ya go hmmmmmm...
Locwolf ...
Is there any more Dirt you want to tell the board about the company..
Go ahead and do it now .. Today ...
The EVERY Weekend whine and Cheese parties you have been hosting every weekend are getting Moldy ..
Crapping on your and our investment and then wondering why no shares trade during the week is ignorant ..
With longs like this who needs detractors ..
You are doing a great job...
I am sure your momma told you ..
If you dont have anything nice to say ...
SAY NOTHING AT ALL ...
Regarding IPR ... Not usually an issue ...
https://www.patentprogress.org/2020/05/27/meet-the-western-district-of-texas-npes-certainly-have/
https://dunnamlaw.com/alan-albright-united-states-judge-for-the-waco-division-in-the-western-district-of-texas/
Many of these questions were answered last Summer in my posts ..
Markman will only take half a day and is VERY important ..
Many cases are Settled shortly thereafter as the Judges direction is usually tipped ..
He Apparantly did a couple markman hearings on public Zoom last fall ..
So maybe we will all see which way he leans next month ...
Some Updated info on Court Procedures in Tx.
Jury trials were not permitted at one point ..
And may not be in the future after some Covid exposure during a trial in East TX ..
Some neat takeaways from this article ..
The first being only one Patent Case has gone to trial Via this Judge ..
He really tries to get parties to Settle ..
And wants straight answers ...
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/busy-ip-judge-albright-holds-first-patent-trial-four-takeaways
King .. Lucky ...
Whos responsibility is it to update the company information at the top of this page ?
Please update the 10 year old sharecount information at the top of the page ...
How about the Moderators Update the information at the top of the page regarding sharecount and remove the outdated info above ?
Stalling is not an option in the court chosen ..
Do not waste this judges time is a theme in every article I have read about him..
Current directors have loaned $$ when needed and been rewarded nicely ..
No reason to think they wont again ..
NITE taking the day off ..
Along with several other MM's ...
Only 4 on each side ..
Unusual...
NITE has had the 300k sell order @ .06 for days .....