Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Trusts recent stocks and posts. It’s toilet bowl time. It’s laughable that you still have the nerve to call out anybody.
TPTW- fail
Trusts quote….
“So what does all this mean? This garbage share price might actually go up or will it stay at this embarrassing level forever? I've held onto what I have. There is no point selling it. It's worth nothing…”
COWI-fail
Trusts quote….
“It might help if the buffoons running this company put out press releases more often than 10 to 15 weeks. Just saying. Holding but when you don't release news often, people tend not to think the company isn't going anywhere.”
GTII-fail
“Gtii back to sucking. Lol. Why am I not surprised. I honestly don’t know how people make more money keeping a stock down on the OTC rather than if they just ran it up”
GVSI- fail
“There was no news. A real company actually does a press release so people can see it. Companies run by a lawyer not a real CEO use social media to release some nonsense news”
BIEL- fail
“It's not going anywhere when you do 2 or 3 press releases a year. Sorry, but the people running this company have no clue how to raise this stock to .05 and higher. It's obvious. Yet, I still hold hoping somebody running things will get a brain one of these days.”
“Back to a pile of garbage. Why O why do I ever believe in this stock.”
QTMM -fail
“Let's hope this stock doesn't suck in 2020. So far they haven't realeased much to the shareholders. No issue with that as long as they aren't screwing things up.”
Wrong again Trust (or do I have to start going to your level ..,trustthedouche.)
But that would be too easy and really lame.
So just a simple - wrong again Trust.
I have only mentioned the 180 days once, and that was a direct quote from the FDA.
For some reason the phase “..up to 180 days” really upsets you.
Are you so incredibly negative that you can’t see the “up to” part.
Quit seeing the glass as half empty. Maybe the “up to” part comes true and approval (if granted) comes in 154 days, or even 142 days would be nice.
So when your night shift is over, get a good sleep and start the day with a smile.
These sound (or is it read) like the words of a short trying to get everyone to sell.
trusttheman
Re: Chrism0000 post# 11667
Tuesday, 06/27/2023 6:32:10 PM
Are all the longs still alive? Waiting for the clown college at Ueec to finish something. Lol.
So you’re saying there’s a chance.
This has been a busy day…
First there are no employees. Then I find out I was an employee and was fired. I hope I got a good severance package.
But wait, another insinuated that I also associate with Thom through my company Waveny Partners.
Last week I was a short.
My goodness this is a lot to keep track of.
How much were they paying me? Was I possibly getting $15,000 a month like Thom. Paid via shares if needed?
Wait, if Thom is my associate through Waveny, am I not entitled to some of the 15,000 a month he currently makes.
Hey now, hold on a second, If I am a former employee, clearly I would have been the smartest employee and thereby be the CEO.
And the CEO was fired (stepped down.) Hmmmm
Again, it is in your best interest to read all of my posts. Yes, all of them.
They have had one PMA that made it to the in depth review stage.
It was deemed Not Approvable.
Conditions were not met in a timely manner.
March 21 new application submitted.
We will now wait for UHP to let us know if/when it is filed.
It will then move to the substantive review.
I suggest you go back and read every single one of my posts.
Zorax too.
You’re never too old to learn from the master.
They have outlined the reasons it was Not Approvable in PRs. At least to the extent required.
Unfortunately, they weren’t able to correct the issues in a timely manner and therefore put in the position of a new submission.
I have noted many times that this company writes deliberately vague PRs.
I am the only one that seems to be able to read them with an open mind and interpret them correctly.
Whoa, total burn!
Have you ever heard a person that can “speak to an issue.”
One doesn’t say/type “I can text/write to that issue.”
Are you filling in for Trusttheman with grade school logic?
Their last PMA was deemed Not Approvable. Hence, the new PMA submission with updated product testing.
I will answer you this time, as I know I am the only one qualified to speak intelligently on the topic:
Zero Capital Gains in Nevada.
Their original office was in Nevada.
Former CEO and majority shareholder continues to live in Nevada. Hence, they may as well keep a PO Box and hope to go tax free after the big acquisition.
BTW I exposed the Uhaul location years ago.
You thought you were on to something big there, but …..different towns…different states.
Nothing gets past me.
You’re welcome Rodster.
Trust, I’ve noticed that you’re getting in the habit of posting right after me and pretending you didn’t see my post.
Hilarious, your childish behaviour is beyond compare.
Anyway, when you’re private messaging with dr5 in 3 minutes, tell him I’m waiting for a response.
dr5, when you come out of hiding I would like to know your motivation for posting 510k timelines and not the PMA.
UHP press release clearly states this Is a full PMA and went so far as to provide the FDA link to the PMA process. Literally inviting readers to follow along with the timeline. There is no confusion here at all. Yet, you did your “research” on the 510k.
How desperate are you? The sad thing is no one else here would notice.
But you must have realized I would expose you.
Here’s the Company quote:
The company confirms that it has submitted via the FDA eSTAR portal its Premarket Approval (PMA) application for its absorbable hemostatic gauze, which will now be reviewed by the FDA and Health Canada. Information on the FDA review process for PMA applications can be found on the FDA website at:
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-approval-pma/pma-review-process.
…..please don’t try to explain that the two are interchangeable and Hemostyp was fast tracked into the 510k process .
Chris, a belated Happy Birthday.
I wasn’t posting in March so I missed it.
I’m sure it’s been a long two years since dr5 promised you a happy birthday gift of approval. Hopefully, you didn’t believe his empty promise:
DR5
Re: Chrism0000 post# 8244
Sunday, 01/09/2022 1:57:57 PM
Your birthday present will come well before that.
And now here we are in 2024 and he’s still trying to make “educated guesses”
As always you are wrong Trust.
Sporty was replying to your reply to Zorax. If I thought he was replying about my posts I would certainly have replied to him.
Don’t worry you’ll be right eventually.
Ah the good old days in 2019,
trusttheman
Re: JHOGG post# 2083
Thursday, 02/07/2019 8:21:30 PM
Just shut your holes already. Just wait and relax. Jesus. You still don't know what you own. Wait and get rich. Insane product. Brilliant CEO. Let the moron doubters lose millions.
Here’s Trust’s educated analysis of how long human trials would take.
I was just a quiet and patient observer at the time. But the lemmings on here just kept letting him bully them.
Of course his two week timeline was absolute insanity and it took 2 years to submit the outcomes. DR5 thought 1-2 months max:
trusttheman
Re: DR5 post# 1491
Monday, 08/13/2018 10:25:40 AM
I'm thinking a week or two. Not a month or two. Way, way, too long. There is no reason for it to go that long.
What?
My 2023 post ruined everyone’s long weekend.
Pretty sure that would mean that everyone is listening.
Also, like all my posts it was accurate.
I stand by the statement that I believe they are cutting and packaging in USA with Hemostyp made elsewhere…likely original China plant. Though UHP has never said that.
Here’s my awesome post you’re always whining about.
I have just reread it. Thank you for reminding me of its absolute genius:
Waverunners
Re: None
Friday, 05/26/2023 1:01:58 PM
I have a feeling we will soon learn that UHP has abandoned their quest to produce Hemostyp in the USA. Hence, the emphasis that now the Cutting and packaging is happening in a USA plant, not the manufacturing.
Could be wrong (doubtful) but Either way, using two facilities seems like a logistical nightmare for a company like UHP and it is my assumption that this is a huge part of why the testing has returned unsatisfactory results which they essentially admitted.
These changes wreak havoc on the original PMA and were the reasons I stated repeatedly that major amendments were needed.
Just for weekendBBQ UEEC talking points. Hot take predictions:
$2-3.50 With PMA
12+ months to PMA decision
24 months to acquisition.
In the mean time UHP May be presented a low ball offer of approximately $0.48.
This excludes potential pump and dumps.
Have a tremendous weekend. And RELAX a little.
I’ll use a story from Trust’s life to help explain that there’s no fast track for failing the first time.
When young 12 yr old trust was entering 3rd grade for the fourth time, his parents asked the teacher “how long will it take this year?”
To which, the teacher replied “Trust will have to complete the entire year . No short cuts.”
Of course the parents were outraged. Expecting that since Trust already spent 3 years failing that he should get preferential treatment.
“I’m sorry, but Trust’s inability to complete the required learnings does not grant him special treatment. Believe me, I want him out of this class more than anything. But, we must follow the guidelines. “
Long story short - Trust never did get out of that class. He eventually grew to be an uneducated Trusttheman.
Hopefully the same fate doesn’t befall Hemostyp.
“ The fact that he disappeared for a long time when he predicted Ueec would complete the PMA in October tells you all you need to know”
You got me. Yes I thought they could actually complete and submit a PMA amendment in a timely manner. Especially when UHP wrote:
July 15, 2022
we conclude that the validation of certain elements of our manufacturing process are necessary to assemble a complete portfolio of information that the FDA can then use to complete its review our PMA application. We will work expeditiously with our manufacturing partner in the coming weeks to accomplish these remaining tasks.”
So ya you’re right. When a CEO states “in the coming weeks”. and the full application isn’t submitted for 21 months even I missed on how useless this company is at working “expeditiously”.
So you’ve exposed that when the CEO doesn’t complete his tasks as he says he will, it’s my fault.
And a logical (in Trust’s world) conclusion is that this would make me a short.
And by stating accurate factual FDA information I am creating a panic.
Well, that all makes sense. Good work.
Pragmatic, you nailed it here. You were accurate and strong in your opinion.
Then you folded like a cheap suit.
Why would dr5 ever ever ever have more insight than what you offered.
He took your accurate information and ran it through the dr5 make believe machine.
You were right. He (of course) was wrong.
Hey GR$. Nice article. However it was focused on a range (qfm/ qih) of products that have little in common with Hemostyp.
That being said it does shed a little light on timelines.
You should always read for what is real and not just what you want to interpret. Fake DR5 wouldn’t look for reality so he is a very poor reference. Like with all dr5 diagnosis you should always ask for a second opinion.
Here’s the articles concluding statement:
Conclusion
So there we have it - it takes on average between 154 (for QFM) to 201 (for QIH) total days to receive a 510(k) decision for SaMD products,
Trust, you don’t have to say someone told you I posted. You sound like a little schoolgirl. Man up. Let’s face it you love when I post. Deep down you know DR is a complete fraud.
Do you guys actually private message each other when I post? Creepy. Again, a bit schoolgirly.
Just take me off ignore and bask in reality for a little while.
trusttheman
Re: DR5 post# 7959
Thursday, 12/02/2021 7:48:35 AM
I actually wanted to hear what Wave had to say. The timeline he gave which so far has been accurate was completely opposite of what a few of us were told…..I wouldn't trust the FDA on any level. That being said, it would be interesting to see what he has to say. Also, why he suddenly came back. Maybe he feels conclusion will be coming soon.
Complete manipulation of the information DR5.
The guidelines are clear. You have simply pasted what a simpleton wants to see. So of course Trust is following your backward logic.
Do real homework and you can see from the FDA website:
FDA Action On a PMA
Within 180 days of the date of filing of the PMA (§814.40), FDA will complete its review of the PMA and of the advisory committee`s report and recommendation and issue one of the following:
an approval order under §814.44(d),
an approvable letter under §814.44(e),
a not approvable letter under §814.44(f), or
an order denying approval under §814.45.
I have never been wrong regarding the Approval process. Not once. Never.
You two dodo birds have both been wrong, non stop for 6 years.
I stopped posting because nothing changed. I came back after the PR and waited for fake DR5 and Rodster to start posting ridiculous timelines.
If you are joining their band of dopes, then I will gladly prove you wrong again also.
It’s been 6 years straight.
For the new readers, Trust once claimed human trials would take 2 weeks max.
Of course it took over 12 months and 24 to analyze all the info.
That’s just plain old Roddy the Rodman saying crazy Rodster stuff.
Their recent PR trumps the 2021 PR.
This is a brand new application. Estar or not, they are at step 1 in the process.
PMA has been submitted, they will now wait to see if the application is filed for further review.
They even included the FDA link in the PR this time so you can follow along with the steps.
If it accepted for review the wait will be up to 6 months.
No debate, FACT. As always.
No timelines, due to no meaningful communication.
Last PR with any substance was July 2022 and they have completely failed to meet any of the goals set forth at that time.
All subsequent PRs have been further evidence that this management team has failed shareholders, the FDA, and anyone else that has invested their time or money in these guys in any way.
The only guarantee right now is……
It’s Payday for Thom tomorrow. Another hard earned $15,000.
At this point I just want a PR. Thom has reached a new communication low this time around.
Good news, bad news or further delays, investors deserve to know.
Most here know my contempt for Thom. However, I still thought he’d follow up by end of July at latest. The 20th would have been admirable.
You’re right. I really got sucked in.
All three are now on ignore.
I pride myself on intelligent debate and guiding others to a higher level of PMA knowledge.
By debating with these lost souls, and using words unbecoming of educated debaters, I let myself and this board down.
As two new moderators, do you guys delete your own posts after learning how stupid they are, or do you get the other guy to do it.
Either way, your idiocy is clear from the posts that remain.
The debate is over and I won. Look at the post I replied to idiot.
In the past I only had to argue with other shareholders, who at times were just misinformed or a little too pie in the sky. But you three are a complete waste of energy.
“Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how well you play, the bird will just knock over the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it won.”
Before your tiny brain explodes, I should let you know JnJ owns Ethicon.
Only I can bring this idiotic debate to an end.
Shoondale you are a moron.
Of course UHP is the sponsor you fool. Who else would sponsor it you imbecile.
Here’s a JnJ Surgicel clinical study for reference. You are out of your league here, you absolute loser:
ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03762200
Sponsor Ethicon, Inc.
Information provided by Ethicon, Inc. (Responsible Party)
Last Update Posted 2021-07-26
SPONSOR
Ethicon, Inc.
COLLABORATORS
No information provided
INVESTIGATORS
No information provided
Not confrontational at all.
You asked a question and I answered it.
BTW here’s the response you gave to a well thought out intelligent post by me:
“No Shit”
So quit your whining. You’re lucky I responded to your uneducated drivel in any way.
I know exactly how long you Claim to have been a shareholder and CLAIM to have worked in the industry. I just don’t believe you.
Patent to 2029. Which you should know if you’ve really owned Ueec as long as you claim. The rest of your post is too foolish to respond to.
July 15th has passed. Likewise July 10 - 20th. So however one chooses to interpret mid month, the test results must be in.
I suppose Thom’s last PR didn’t commit to a actual timeline for his follow up to those results.
However he wants to play this, to me it is further evidence of his blatant disregard for shareholders.
Trust’s words stand the test of time:
“I don't believe anything they say Dark. Learned my lesson a long time ago. If you took the amount of crap they told people that didn't come true, you would have a dinosaur pile of crap about 10 feet wide and 7 feet high. You would think the fools running this thing would be put under a deadline. Get it done by this time or you are history. That would motivate them.”
Trust“
Your last 7 posts have been directed at the “paid bashers.”
You are quite the puzzling person Rodster.
In Fact, a few posts back you lectured to Not reply to these bashers. Then your next post was a reply to Scumbag.
Check out this post from the Scumbag whining away to admin about how unfair Ihub is.
Though he tries to act like nothing bothers him, just read to see the depth of his suffering.
Some of you are even quoted as he begs to be treated fairly.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172399747
So if you’ve ever had your post removed for replying to him you know why.
He’s just a scared little boy with no one to play with at recess.
If he’s suffering he wants everyone else to as well.
That is really sad, and again, help is available. Please seek it out Scumbag.
Good luck with your future self.
That confirms it.
You’re more disgusting than I thought.
Only you could find victory in getting banned for posting videos of wife abuse.
If it took getting my posts restricted to make that happen, I’d do it 100% of the time.
Again, you are a horrible person, but you can change and ask for help. I truly hope you do. That would be a best case scenario.
Good luck with your future self.