Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The PEG ratio enhances the P/E ratio by adding in expected earnings growth into the calculation.
The PEG ratio is considered to be an indicator of a stock's true value, and similar to the P/E ratio, a lower PEG may indicate that a stock is undervalued.
The PEG for a given company may differ significantly from one reported source to another, depending on which growth estimate is used in the calculation, such as one-year or three-year projected growth.
The price/earnings to growth ratio (PEG ratio) is a stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio divided by the growth rate of its earnings for a specified time period.
The PEG ratio is used to determine a stock's value while also factoring in the company's expected earnings growth and is thought to provide a more complete picture than the P/E ratio.
a few OTC pink sheet auto listings
Daimler AG (OTCPK:DMLRY)
Volkswagen AG (OTCPK:VWAGY)
Peugeot S.A. (OTCPK:PUGOY)
Renault S.A. (OTCPK:RNLSY)
BMW AG (OTCPK:BMWYY)
Hyundai Motor Company (OTCPK:HYMTF)
Subaru Corp. (OTCPK:FUJHY)
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. (OTCPK:NSANY)
Suzuki Motor Corporation (OTCPK:SZKMY)
Porsche Automobil Holding SE (OTCPK:POAHF)
Geely Automobile Holdings Limited (OTCPK:GELYF)
Kia Motors Corporation (OTCPK:KIMTF)
Mazda Motor Corporation (OTCPK:MZDAY)
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (OTCPK:YAMHF)
so there it is
I don't know who or what orgs are manipulating the GSEs, but it's obvious it takes many $ millions to do it
it's your $$, too
that's right
yep
that's a fact, that's the current reality, right now
Preferred did nothing today
and have stalled -- like the commons -- for some time
I disagree with your assessment
there are very powerful people
with an awful lot of $$
seeking to bring down this equity
maybe it's Calabria's timeline
out to 18 months?
Dead for 18 months?
That's what shorts are moving
less volatility
volatility has gone down a notch
good to see
however, its got to take many $ millions -- as far as I know -- to short FNMA & FMCC.
I don't know about things like "naked shorting" or the extent that it may go on with these equities, or the effect something like that would have, or the cost of such a "strategy", or how it would benefit the person doing it.
Really, can shares even be borrowed on OTC exchange?
There are quite a few foreign companies on the OTC because it limits certain things -- like options
that's my hope, too
that's one card definitely
on the minds of preferred holders
It would be great if the prefs are due all past/cumulative dividends compounded + par value
If I were Cooper & Kirk that would be my goal. They know Treasury & FHFA haven't a prayer in a jury trial or before Justice Sweeney.
So, yes: there is no way to determine how things will shake out in a settlement.
I'm in both asset classes, about 50-50, (full disclosure) in a rather large way.
"Shorts"
it's got to be on a very massive scale, yet nobody knows who or what institutions/organizations and/or hedge funds are taking that position.
They are known just known as "shorts".
There is no way to find out exactly the number & specific names behind that position?
thanks Rick
I have a regular job Monday- Friday
with the commute a little over 13 hours
no time for stuff like that during weekdays
last Monday
eh, bare knuckles vid
bare knuckles
newer video
Are Trump, Mnuchin running out of time regarding the release of GSEs from Treasurys Brutal '08 confiscation?
only so much can be said in 2:20 minutes
by the time it's taken & decided @ SCOTUS
it will take another 3-5 years
that is IF it's taken up by that court
not really
my take is that the preferred shares must be made whole before common shares may gain meaningful traction/capital appreciation
that assessment is correct: that's the law
thanks for that
yeah, I see many examples of sweep payments made on the very last day of a quarter
so long as there is no data entry
that the NWS was sent to Treasury, it hasn't
Who has the link to verify that?
In the past was the sweep done on the very last day of the quarter?
idk, but I doubt it
yeah, I'm inclined with Inmotion's take, too
it's a good compromise
"I do believe the LOA will come out Friday or Monday, but don't make the assumption that it's no sweep or not. The LOA could easily state that starting Oct 1st the government will allow GSE's to retain capital. This would mean the dollars for this quarter would be swept and anything going forward would be retained. This is not great, but definitely provide positive direction."
eh, Treasury has c'ship card as well
that's the 800 pound gorilla, not the NWS
the c'ship, SPS, warrants are more weapons in its arsenal
NWS is important, though
you got that right, Bucko!
something in return?
I'm not getting that. From what I've heard Cooper&Kirk has just RAISED the stakes by appealing to SCOTUS
Raised the monetary stakes/damages AND even the constitutional underpinnings of the FHFA itself
C&K, it seems to me, is going for the jugular
however, I really respect your argument
so, you're telling me David H Stevens
is not Jesus Christ and NWS will not come back to life like Larazus raised from the tomb.
That is a soothing balm to a weary spirit
lol lol
yet there are way many FHFA/Treasury suits
still in process. Cooper & Kirk/5th en banc is only one
the inference you make is that the sweep will continue until all the suits are settled?
tough to know Cooper & Kirk's
motive for the SCOTUS appeal.
Is it to pressure the Sept. 30 sweep to stop? Has the law firm gotten signals the Treasury is reluctant to stop it?
Or is it a tact with a goal further away: to recoup every nickle of the sweep from day 1. And in doing so still keeping it relevant.
Usually gov is not concerned about issues down the road, but will respond only to the current situation.
eh, here's another take on that
by "Paul" on Howard's blog:
"Petition for cert almost certainly means still negotiating and Sep sweep made. Gl"
so at this point it is not about volatility, but price
it would suck to see $2.80 again, however if it comes to that I will pounce on more shares
a game of Brinkmanship, is it?
the possibility if "dead money" for another three years?
But the oral argument in Bhatti scheduled for October 15th, too.
And then there's Sweeney.
The Collins case remanded back to Lamberth.
That would be a MASSIVE move by Treasury to stiff the LOA.
imo its a tact
to keep Treasury from not doing the LOA
Push back to Treasury & FHFA
Plaintiffs leveraging recent en banc win to the next level
Birko looking for a more lucrative payday
It should turn out well for common shareholders,but it really takes a long time to resolve
ROLG asked to see the link
and I'm agreeing with that
no link= no credibility
After markets close on Friday?
The GSE fiasco/swindle continues.
Treasury states an announce will be made at the end of the fiscal year regarding a check on the NWS, however increasing the Treasury's "liquidation preference".
The proposal is disingenuous on two counts:
1) while permitting the Twins to increase its capitalization, Treasury also increases its SPS. It is very close to a zero sum gain.
2) Treasury professes that it does not want to disrupt the market by making the announce beforehand, but will wait until the last second to do so.
Well, Treasury has already disrupted the market by putting the announcement off. We've seen common shares drift lower and lower since Monday.
The 2019 fiscal year ends September 30. Fiscal year 2020 starts Oct. 1.
#FairholmeFunds should adjust its investment portfolio (result of 5th circuit en banc victory) & use it to guide its investment choices into the Twins common shares/fight for another windfall in Sweeney's court. Heaven knows Treasury & FHFA played Birko for years
some may call it trying to blackmail or extort a legal victory against
USTreasury & steve nmnuchin, FHFA, MarkCalabria
Goodness knows bringing to light 11k docs under seal would reveal a great deal. Why not move into GSE commons, too? Take advantage, etc Birko holds a strong hand
Besides making a ton of $$ on the investment alone, #Birko #Fairholme could be immortalized in history books by bring down the c'ship sham & its actors: peter j wallison Parrott, DeMarco, etc. Reveal coercive use of executive power (Hank Paulson)
sometimes Carlos is brilliant
but sometimes he goes way off the deep end
imo
I'm agreeing with that!
that other guy who said it won't be announced would be a disaster
when will end of NWS be announced?
mid-week?
after market Friday?
My guess is the latter
no tax write off on the Roth account
When can you claim a loss in a Roth IRA on your tax return?
The short answer is no. Because a Roth IRA allows investors to withdraw their investments, profits, interest, dividends and capital gains tax-free in retirement, losses occurring in a Roth IRA do not quality for tax harvesting. Within a Roth, any tax losses or gains are irrelevant.
yeah, I heard that
I'm doing some of that
bad thing about the Roth can't sell for tax losses
who knows how this will turn out?
I'm not as negative as Holden, but not as positive as Navy Commander
I'm in the middle
I'm way overweight in GSEs in Roth, both asset classes
it may make the difference between living fugal or very comfortably in retirement