Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
you do realize you only know about the new ceo because the company told you? They could have no said anything and let you know after the fact.... Let the guy fix the deal.
again there is tons of evidence to back it... lol saying it doesnt exist doesnt make it disappear! LMAO
All i see in MO list is facts backed w supporting evidence... DD would show that
lmao thats just plain wrong. Believe as you please. lol smh
yeah so the deal is done and still on until inmed says otherwise its in default. Fix it toron! lol
OMG LMAO okay lets break this down shall we
they are in default of the terms of purchase and sale agreements, signed and dated October 28, 2018. As of February 25, 2019 the transaction remains in default
This is misinformation. Default is not no deal. Look it up.
more false information. InMed isnt using the information you listed in their DD with Toron. That isnt how M&A work. Also eveyrone knows that flagship is the investor supplying the cash for that portion of the deal and flagship and inmed are both getting 100 mil shares each for their part. More research on mergers and acquisitions would make it very clear exactly how easy it is to see that the deal is completely legitimate by both parties and the current state of the deal is its in default as to part of the agreement. Thats not finalized and its also not off. It is in default... this means that it can be fixed. InMed COULD choose to call it off but it would mean reversing many things which they have already set in motion which is why they have not done it yet. Does Toron need to step up and fix things? Yes! This is why I am glad the new CEO is not wasting his time giving us warm and fuzzies but is working to finalize the deal. The facts say that InMed is working with Toron to finalize. If they were not the update would say they cancelled the deal, not that it remains in default. Good DD backs all of this.
Thats just not reality though... A deal cannot be default if it didnt exist and it also cannot be just one sided. Mergers and acquisitions take months of DD by both companies deciding if its a good fit. The facts just plainly say your statement is 100% incorrect.
Thats not even remotely possible. For InMed to have agreed to a deal that includes getting paid in 100mil shares of Tron you better believe they know exactly what Toron is and isnt capably of doing currently as well as moving forward. There is so much DD both ways that has to be done for mergers and acquisitions that for them to have signed that deal in October what you are suggesting is just completely out of the realm of possibility. This wasnt an all cash deal so thats just completely far fetched!
yeah that is in no way facts to support your claim.
well that would be no facts lol....
cant be in default to a deal that doesnt exist lol
well there is not one bit of evidence of that. Thats completely made up. facts only please.
the deal being real and the status of the deal are two different things. It was asked if the deal is real. If the deal didnt exist there would be no post on inmeds site. The deal is clearly real. Thats what my post was replying to.
inmed posting on their site doesnt tell you the deal is real?
apparently you can make it up lol
Its only facts when convenient... then speculation is apparently completely acceptable
reading the case is pointless because it was overturned. That ruined its credibility. case closed.
hes not guilty so he didnt run it. twisting those facts doesnt change hes not guilty so stating he ran a ponzi scheme is just wrong.
actually the ponzi scheme is fake news courts decided he was not guilty of that. Thats fake news. facts say thats wrong.
please do. let us know how it goes.
thats an accusation but there is no evidence of that at all.
there is no evidence at all of that accusation.
yes it means hes not in leadership of the company. He just owns a piece of the pie like me and many others. Only my shares are easier to sell.
hes a stock owner... thats it. and that is all that matters.
but he is not and will not be ceo so its pointless to discuss...
Thats a false assumption. Again you have to think about WHY companys go public. Why do companys want to be listed. What benefit does a company have by being able to be purchased on the market. That will lead you to why we are not the focus right now since they are using private funding to get the deal done. If they needed our money to close this deal they would be doing exactly what you are saying. That is whats immediately important. THEN when InMed acquisition is finalized and all the board members are looking at this company which has income they will focus on us the investors because they will make money when we make money by the price going up. BUT the stock price is pointless right now if they are not finalizing the deal.
Hayes is in no way in leadership of the company. Hes a shareholder so all this talk of him is completely pointless and just distraction regardless. Those are the facts.
hmmm looking at the trade which happened right after my posting looks like clear manipulation. Ill just load up more tomorrow morning if it continues. LOL
LMAO what speculation! WHERE DOES THAT COME FROM!? lmao what terrible DD
did you ask who manages the website? lol This would have told you exactly what Ive been saying.
LOOK AGAIN ITS GREEN!
oh hes not the CEO... DD would show that. DD is something which should always be done in the stock market. Dr Patel is the CEO and before that is was Rene. Glad I could help.
another green day here. Slow and steady progress back up since traders got scared when they saw default. Looks like traders are starting to understand what default is and is not. LOL Glad I grabbed a bunch more at these levels!
seems to not be an issue then LMAO
hey look.... DD
lol not sure how you think this supports the argument LMAO
well hes just a stock holder in tron but people love talking about him so pointing out the law decided he was tried unfairly and that hes not guilty as well as that it was 30 years ago is relevent