I'm floored by the inability to follow an otherwise standard logical progression. Alas, I must remember that I'm engaged in discourse with someone who has held onto a single position for twelve years as it beat them around with nothing short of a spiked club.

Allow me to clear the air for you, dear sir:

I, myself, am a PM for an institution. As such, I found, worked through, and diligence'd CYRX, then put the trade on through my firm. I came to IHUB to get a feel for retail sentiment, at which point I found people attributing institutional rebalancing to a volume-lite selloff. Most retail investors don't know how to differentiate between rebalancing and more conventional flow, therefore I clarified.

In any event, again, I digress. I applaud you on your CryoPort purchase. You may have been a tad early, but a win is a win, even if it takes three presidential election cycles.

HA! Didn't realize /s was necessary.

I brought the trade to the institution, and, while I'm sure our definitions differ greatly, I can assure you that I did my due diligence. If you've held the name for 12 years, I pity you. I've held it for five months. You've endured an 8 for 5, 1 for 10, and 1 for 12 split in that tenure. I must say, though, that it must've been nice to expense the performance (or lack thereof) over all those years.

Sure - Sean Hannan, Jason Seidl, and Paul Knight have all been fantastic.

Enjoy your marks, pal. I sincerely hope that your twelve years of taking it eventually pays off.

Be well.

I can't seem to follow your logic, but as an institutional participant myself, I can tell you this:

1) Yes, you've seen significant institutional inflow since ~May.

2) While helpful and roughly indicative, 13Fs aren't the holy grail of disclosures by any stretch.

3) I don't know much about this board at all, but I sincerely hope you all (as a forum) don't overplay the value of technicals -- especially in a name like this. SMAs, EMAs, momentums & momentum derivatives, etc., are helpful, but cannot be used in a vacuum. By and large, technicals are attractive because anyone can use and understand them; not because they lend to positive expectancy trades.

4) As you noted, CYRX is undoubtedly a fundamental growth play. They're the only logistics provider in a space that seems poised to rapidly expand in a manner agnostic to the broader market. As such, the conferences you've mentioned (some of which we've attended) certainly drive interest and thus flow into CYRX. For the foreseeable future, I expect that to remain the case.

So long as we're all long CryoPort, we're aligned. But it's incredibly important for retail investors to understand why markets move a certain way, especially when that way is against their positions. Retail buying/selling isn't totally lost upon institutions. In other words, it's important for institutions to understand what retail's doing, and why. Be well.

??? We saw only ~205,000 shares traded yesterday. That's markedly lower than the previous 20D, 50D, and 100D average volumes. Not indicative of rebalancing.

What? Volume is/has been abysmal today and yesterday. Not indicative of long-term flow.