Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Again no.
1: that's a different case.
2: any aid or sympathy to those who did or tried.
What's your endgame here. Do you think if you keep lying to me I'll wear down and give in. Cause that doesn't work with me
Acquitted by Congress has no bearing in court. United States vs Andrew Jackson.
Best of luck. 😘😘😘😘😘
Don't need luck.
1: that's a different case.
2: the words before the action is what counts in court.
Best of luck. 💕😘😘😘😘
Actually that is correct. The defense waived their right to a jury trial. They also waived their right to a defence when the were unwilling to respond to the complaint. This is what led to the summary judgement. Hence forth there can be no mistrial.
It's only dismissed until after the nomination. Then they can reapply.
Read my previous message
No I'm right. It's a fucking summary judgement idiot. Its impossible to have a mistrial
OMG. It's not. It was summary judgement and a jury was waived. Any mistrial was shot when they refused to answer. Oh my God!!!!!!!!
Actually its not. The Jury request was waived
Actually he can't. The Constitution and rules of court say so
So is your plan to keep spouting the same lies until you wear me down.
Again learn to read. I'm right you're wrong. Dead wrong
I used to be a prosecutor idiot
That's a lie on the face of your argument. That's not how the 1st amendment works.
Again learn to read
Yeah. He screwed himself badly and already killed his appeals.
I'm right again. The first amendment does not grant the right to say whatever when ever.
The right to a defence is to face your accuser and answer questions and provide evidence. Giving political speeches and attacking is not a defence.
I believe it's the Chicago 7 defense. This is where the defence has no defence and antagonises the judge so he will make mistakes.
So when they appeal they can over turn based on errors.
This was first used in the 80s by mobsters.
What's more and likely to happen is the judge will notate the evasive answers and that trump had the chance to answer and was unwilling.
This will be a serious strike against him during appeal.
Any argument made in appeal could have been answered during trial and he was unwilling.
That makes no sense. Before you type a comment might I suggest you read it to someone who's educated
What part of the Constitution gives him that right. It's not the first. It's not the fourteenth. Give the exact wording and context.
Let me give you a hint. It requires reading and comprehension.
Bill of rights is consumed by the fourteenth
Actually he doesn't. Answers have to direct and to the point. Upon elaboration they can be explained.
Having a political rant is being evasive. And that's being hostile.
RIGHT
The right to defend does not mean the right to say whatever you want. Questions have to be answered honestly and supported by evidence.
Did you ever learn how to read???
So once again. Someone who doesn't know how the world works is trying to sound smart by saying half truths and misinformation.
Again it's not a constitutional right. The only constructional right he has is the right to remain silent. But since this is a civil trial and not criminal the judge could if he wanted compel him to answer. I've actually seen people sit in jail for several weeks before they decided to comply.
Actually you're not allowed to speak and say whatever you want. Avoiding questions and being evasive is considered being a hostile witness. The judge is accurate in stating he is only there to answer questions. That's Court rules going back to pre magna carte. That's the foundations of a fair and accurate justice system.
I see them everyday. 3x as bad on Monday morning. 30 - 40 year old adolescents. Drinking and blaming everyone else for their mistakes in life. It's the blacks fault. It's the chinks fault. It's the Jews fault. It's the liberals fault. Now it's the wokes fault. And the best part of my mondays is that they all think they know more about law than I do. They all think their Atticus finch. Or Matlock. Every Monday I wish I stayed in columbus.
By the way. Pacer is federal. You'll have to go to the osba for civilian lookups. Ohio State Bar Association
Ohio. Highland county. Advocate and pd Shawn ervin
The judge myself and one of the prosecutors got lunch from the taco truck and watched it. You weren't there. Judge coss sat right there and said he screwed himself. You weren't there. You are an absolute brainwashed idiot
That makes no sense. If you want a case number. Here. 21 cv 079. I argued that case.
No. Learn to read.
A what? A citation for what. J walking.
Again never said that. Thanx
That doesn't even make sense to what I wrote. Wow.
He screwed his appeals today. We were in the court room at lunch watching the trial. Even the conservative judge said trump was an idiot and screwed himself.
Actually there is no censorship except for truth social. These are all facts and proven time and time again. What you are doing is helping a propaganda campaign. The same kind Russia did in the 80s. Those are facts.
Actually we had run away inflation since 2018. There was always deflection and changing narratives when questioned.
Actually we didn't have energy independence until 2021 and 2022. Both under Biden.
Actually there wasn't peace under trump. Shadow operations were being carried out.