Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
that will be a nice change.
It was not settled months ago. You can be as bullish as you choose. I support your right to be that person. However, don't misstate my circumstances to make your point.
It wouldn't be the first time.
It's defunct.
Peter owns Sector Five.
That was a company owned by Peter that was delisted. Why would hpnn be buying this seems like a circuitous use of funding and liability recognition.
I know he doesn't have it. I am so over the fantasy.
He believes Peter has companies he has an interest in running simultaneously on the OTC, and when one dries up, the pump is switched to another.
Nothing but outbursts of a nonsensical nature. You should be asking what other companies does Peter have active on the OTC. He is drawing resources from one of them.
Document one thing, Harold. One thing that can be attributed to a third party off of Twitter that adds credibility to all that has been said.
Affiliation does not imply they do not have any ownership. A question that would put a finer point on the answer is how much? And who controls it?
When and where did they disclose that?
Thank you.
Do you have the exhibit list?
This is legit.
no it isn't a share selling scheme. And that is not imo, that is a fact.
and to you as well.
I am a smart woman. And now, a seasoned trader. As such I gathered over 4 million shares in the last few months.
Congratulations on your buy.
You do realize in order for a sell to happen there has to be a buy? And the possibility exists for leapfrogging over the previously held highs with enough momentum from the catalysts in the forthcoming p/r?
Why not let $MEDH reputation fall or rise on its own merits. Those who came before simply came before.
I can say no, all day. Sellers be warned. Money is easy to lose and hard to find. $MEDH
Nope.
Wrong. Assumes outcome not backed by a substantial trail of discovery.
I would rather burn through them now then at .10. All part of the process.
waiting on the P/R has been a test of patience. I do grasp the importance of timing. After we are current makes sense and is best. Just have to temper my impatience. I am not looking to liquidate so you would think it would be easier to wait.
no. Really nothing more to say than that. $MEDH
Let Hans be responsible for his actions and others own their choices. It is only fair.
Let this play out. It isn't what you think it is.
this is the MEDH board, right?
extrapolation based on findings that do not exist.
I understand, I do. Look at my posts on twitter. Han's is coming at this fresh, it takes a little bit to clear up "old" business.
and it doesn't mean that he has.
Who?
nice to have good things to look forward to, positioning of the company for growth is exciting. The fact that this is an ongoing business is reassuring.
Again, this is "your" take on it. This ticker has been sporadic based in large part on past associations of key figures seen to be still in play. Once people are reassured that is truly no longer the case, things will warm up quickly. I am not held in high esteem by those passing out and the feeling is mutual. I wouldn't be here, if they were an ongoing presence moving forward.
Such hard and fast lines for something you have no bankable numbers on? I own 4 million plus. Perspective.
Yes. The man is a nonentity for MEDH moving forward. This is Han's time to move into a position of solid, unilateral leadership. Yes?
Good news on its way.
if you have been trading more than a day, you know the answer to that. And it isn't Han's trying to buffalo the shareholders.
I am looking forward to a great P/R. I have over $100,000 invested here and no way would I have done that without doing my discovery with a scalpel.