Thought you went long at 1.40

Feed AG_Short instead

'publicly'??? geezus

I don't poo-poo undercoatings anymore. If your car's over 250k miles, I recommend you check your brake lines very carefully.

Thanks HMan. Especially glad you all complained about the lack executive stock purchases.

Pretty sure the 3.50 warrants expire Nov 2019. Not sure exact date.

Vaguely recall there are some 4.30 warrants but not trading as APDNW...or not tradeable I'm not sure.

I think Sabby's selling warrants at .40-.50 which puts their equivalent stock at 2.20-(.40,.50) = (1.70,1.80)

Yeah feel like someone's lubing us up prior to the annual meeting.

What happens to warrants in a buyout under the strike prices?

You don't listen to you! You went long at 1.40, you should have shorted.

You should've shorted (say 90K shares). Or did you hear they set the bottom?

160M is only 2% of US annual production I think. That's a lot of room to improve on. If they can convince the producers.

Think he's talking about bulk lots of pellets

Is blood cotton scaring retailers yet? Especially with our history of cotton slavery in the US. Look at how UnderArmor is getting hammered with one wrong tweet.

Funny. Typical ugly American thinking. Blame the sl*nts or mud people for the crimes of your own ruling class.

50-100 microns per tag is no competition (Trutag)

Spectator, right.

Why not just tell us who you work for?

Let me know which. I'll do some research.

Are any of those competitors edible?

Cotton already answered that. Who wants a shirt chock-full of RFID chips? Too scratchy.

When you're prepared let us know. Proprietary tech that can compete against 1 billion years of evolution would interest me.

Are the patents defendable? If you can't answer that, then what's the competitive alternative to DNA for taggant information storage and retrieval?

Re you're bleating about R&D budget. Why don't you find the weaknesses in the patents.

Advice SOL: kick Hayward, don't talk science.

Anyway, another example that APDN doesn't really have to do sh*t in R&D so long as their patents are solid:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170111131101.htm

https://news.vanderbilt.edu/2017/01/11/dna-duplicator/

But I thought SOL said he wasn't short

yeah even 12 hours is real-time in forensics or qc. An automated 5 hour test is nothing when you're sampling large batches of chips, parts, pills, whatever. 90 in-parallel not enough? then buy another machine, no additional operator time.

I agree multiple days ain't real-time, but this ain't grocery checkout.

I agree about the management/marketing fails with this company. Still wondering why you're so so motivated if not invested.

It's real-time to any Quality Control engineer.

Good book: Molecular Biology made simple and fun
https://www.amazon.com/Molecular-Biology-made-simple-fun/dp/1889899097/ref=sr_1_sc_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1485880412&sr=8-1-spell&keywords=molecular+biology+made+fund+and+easy

http://adnas.com/signify/

SOL,that's a pink elephant in your room. Real-time PCR off-patent, been on market 18+ years, no need to r&d that. Pricing, already explained you thousands of researchers open-sourcing PCR among hundreds of other molecular biotechniques, bringing the price down, down, down.

BTW, why the stick up your seat if you ain't invested?

HMan, that is really neoliberalism, not conservatism.

Right McSharkey, and every CNC machine in the world too.

Well, I don't agree with your neoliberal analysis, but I won't get in that, except to say that I think if worker and environmental protections existed in Asia, then our labor could compete.

I remember something called 'dignity of labor'

And yeah I'd pay more not to buy sneakers made by a southeast asian pre-teen forced to wear diapers to stay on the assembly line.

I'd pay more for food that wasn't part of giant toxicology experiment on us.

It ain't just about ethics, it's security. e.g, we don't even make our own ball screws anymore. Do you realize how vulnerable that makes us?

Got it McSharkey, will keep lid on rhetoric. Praying P-elect will keep word on US manufacturing.

Reflects the vast moral divide between investor- and working- (or formerly working) classes. Banksters love slavery 'you can't beat slave labor' hence only recourse is demand-side pressure (consumers). Either that or slave revolt.

Trump idk....brings in Goldman alligators to drain the swamp? I can only hope it's a case of 'it takes a thief to catch a thief'

I think the US working class starting to realize they're on the road to Uzbeki cotton slavery?

Skimmed plasma pretreatment appl 20160326511. Appears using a room-temp plasma of one gas you clean substrate of oxides, etc, then a second gas plasma create functional groups (reactive sites) on surface that DNA can covalently (or some kind of strong bonding) bind to. That means it can't be washed off easily. Hard surfaces as well as yarns.

Skimmed perturberant-polymer application 20160362723 it's impressive. Really well written too. Dont have the knowledge to analyse the Claims. Anyway, I hadn't read about this technique before. But appears basically covers any kind of taggant not just DNA where you don't just add the taggant to a coating, but first mix it into a primary solution that creates pockets of sorts, like a suspension, in the polymer. Why? Because you can then use a solvent that only dissolves the perturberant, not the polymer, thereby extracting the taggant non-destructively. Imagine sampling an epoxy coat or a powder coat. You'd either take a chip or use a nasty solvent that would mar the surface finish. But here you'd swab it with say water or etoh or whatever, which doesn't do a thing to the coating, but the swab extracts a few micropores of the perturerant-taggant. If this actually works (they must have data to show the examiner), well I'm impressed, and if granted I think it would be difficult to create a robust taggant coating that doesn't have to be destroyed to verufy, without at least licensing from Apdn.

Chloroplasts have a circular DNA loop and each plant cell has hundred or thousands of clones, so a lot more to stick around). Can id species breed just like with mitochondrial DNA (ancestry info like 23andme.com or FTDna.com)

Re the patents, I meant whether the company can defend them or someone's going to violate them at will. I have zero doubt that DNA coded taggants are going to be used a lot, and may be being used now by certain agencies. DNA non-volatile memory too. Scores of other applications....