Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How can products be pumped out that have an incomplete value proposition here when OMVS seems to be completely incapable of providing third party videos supporting that their AI mobile robot tech really works? Ignoring that reality is unfair to all investors, imho.
Prudent for sure! The third party verification could be done in a parking lot? Or a shopping center? Or a school? Or a movie theater? Or a night club? or an open air concert? Lots of non-NDA opps?
ICYMI, in no way do I consider OMVS to be a "fraud." However, that said, why no independent third party videos to verify their development of AI mobile robot self-navigation?
Again, why no third party videos demo'ing AI navigation software?
Where in the video are the mobile robots swarming, like a flock of birds flying "in formation?" All I see are several people using radio control to teleoperate the robots and no "swarming" whatsoever. Swarming is not simply converging on a target, but also moving in like a phalanx of soldiers.
Again, all of this video is easily staged using RC off camera. Hence until such time an independent third party confirms, these inhouse videos mean nothing to confirm OMVS has any AI navigation mobile robot software whatsoever.
Not at all certain. Since not third party, easy to "stage" with radio control, human-in-the-loop. The first avoid is a stop/reverse as in 1982ish. The stationary car avoid didn't avoid lady, but parked car. Again, so what? Why just big hardware and software names and yet no demonstrable AI nav tech? So they bought their stuff and now partnered? LOL-
Apologies for my poor communication skills! Haven't said company is not real! I have tried to communicate that I have seen no 3rd party videos of any OMVS mobile robots sensing and avoiding either moving and/or unmapped obstacles. NOT having a video is a HUGE RED FLAG
I do not question the market.
They seem to have some management, but their CTO has practically no AI mobile robot expertise or experience.
So unless OMVS really can prove they "have" the tech, "staged" videos that they produced are just hype, imho.
LOL- It's a closed course with bots "line following!" That is 80+ year old AGV tech. No AI controlled unexpected avoids in this video demonstrated, imho. Not a third party, either. Hype?
Guess the "Simulation" caption on this video is easy to miss? No avoids of anything by anything RADsys?
Dunno for sure, but without 3rd party video confirming, one should never believe what is "written" about any mobile robot company, eg, OMVS, imho.
Proof of concept is for the AI nav software? Where are the 3rd party videos confirming they have that tech?
ICYMI, OMVS difficulty is lack of reason to believe that they have any #AI software at all! Discussions are all about "magic" hardware and never any 3rd party videos confirming existence of "working" AI navigation software. JMO-
So no substantiation of real AI mobile robot tech, except for staged(?) videos and NO company updates? STOP SIGN is not an accident, but deliberate? If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and hides toxic, variable convertible debt to stock, it's a P&D, imho-
Not seeking "special" anything. Standard specs of WCET and FOV are minimums necessary for safe operation around people. So by not disclosing, OMVS gives no reason to believe their RAD bot is safe to use- Except under off camera joy stick control by a human. Autonomy is on a continuum. It is not a 1 or 0. Low level,nearly worthless, autonomy is what OMVS has. Unless there is a third party video confirming high enough mobile autonomy to be safe, then this is really all smoke, mirrors and where's the beef?
Sure! Bet those folks are every bit as poorly informed if they bought in to OMVS without knowing WCET and FOV specs. "in the valley of the blind, the one-eyed is king?" is my take here-
Swarming is much, much easier for mobile robots than human quick sense and avoidance of moving obstacles. Those that ignore the importance of WCET and FOV specs here are buying into lots of hype with very little reason to believe, imho.
Sorry, but these aren't "my" questions. They are standard DD for any and all mobile robot companies like IRBT, COWI, etc. OMVS would be bragging, imho, about them if they were any good. No shyness from OMVS regarding "contracts," etc. So why no important specs revealed? But then they already are STOP SIGN for withholding SH info.
Actually no people avoided anywhere at all at anytime, moving or standing still. All easily done with RC joysticks off camera by a human operator. If OMVS has great WCET and FOV specs, why do they not brag about them? Seems they are not shy about hyping how wonderful they are, even with a STOP SIGN??
This video reveals Tinker toys on top of a Roomba? That is the OMVS RAD bot for outdoor paroling?
Very interested in learning the key performance specifications of the RAD bot. Such as WCET and FOV specs. Also the URL's for any third party verification of their level of autonomy. Thanks!
Right now the SuperDroid security robots seem far superior to OMVS. And Knightscope just raised $20M as compared to OMVS funds raised? Why no millions to RAD? No real AI robot tech that they can third party substantiate. Read up on the levels of autonomy. OMVS ignores that topic because?
Not third party videos. Since OMVS is refusing to disclose key performance criteria like WCET and FOV specs, probably all avoids done by people with joystick RC'ing the ATV robot mockups, imho.
Sounds like lots of hype to me. Need know WCET. Where is it? Need know Field of View and range, granularity, accuracy and update rate. Where is it? WCET is not disclosed because drunken slow reaction time? Since those are not addressed, is, imho, why no independent third party videos confirming the "level of autonomy?" This is sounding more and more like OMVS is a 1/2 buzz word deep and no real AI robot tech here at all.
So no third party video confirming the RAD robot can do anything "autonomously?" No proof that all the demo's were not staged using a joystick with no moving obstacles, either? And no discussion of WCET or Field of View? No technical specs at all? Not even battery life or run time?
But no third party videos anywhere proving the RAD bot can human quick sense and avoid moving and/or unmapped obstacles? Does OMVS reveal the Worst Case Execution Time (reflex time from seeing, processing to doing)? If not human quick, then autonomous operation around moving people is unsafe.
Where in the video does their robot automatically sense and avoid a moving person? I don't see any anywhere in any video URL provided so far. Where is an independent third party video verifying their robot can do anything autonomously?
Where are the videos of the RAD robot sensing and avoiding moving obstacles? Without that ability, their robots cannot be safely used around people unless there is a human operating the robot with a joystick. Need "reason to believe" their robot actually is useful. Otherwise, all hype, imho.
Is SuperDroid Robots more advanced than OMVS?
They build and sell mobile security robots that look somewhat like RAD's?
https://www.superdroidrobots.com/
Where are some live action videos of these 'bots?
Looking good! Where are some videos of their robots sensing and avoiding moving obstacles? Very important!
SEC attorneys are not limited to one state? So Wallace is now an SEC attorney and that is how he can legally represent his mother in Florida despite his license in FL being revoked for failure to pass the required FL psych exam? Really?
Wallace practices law in FL without a license?
http://tinyurl.com/gou7bcf
So Danielle Sims IS a Neil Wallace racketeer?
6.
Neil T. Wallace is an associate of Mr. George I. MacLeod who, upon information and belief, has vigorously orchestrated naked short selling of the Plaintiffs' stock for many years. Mr. MacLeod resides in the UK at an unknown location from the U.S. Securities authorities. It is believed that he and Bette Wallace's son, Reed Wallace, were involved in similar stock manipulation schemes regarding SushiTrend. Reed Wallace was sued by SushiTrend for illegal use of their restricted stock and they received a Default Judgment against him. (U.S. District Court District of Nevada case #07CV1129.)
. . Corporate HQ is his mother-in-law's house,
7.
Neil Wallace, brother of Reed Wallace, has spread false information about the Plaintiffs' company on the internet, to the courts, its attorneys and in numerous correspondences at times using his parents and family to assist in these efforts directly and indirectly. His public disparagement of the company has put false rumors, and therefore doubts, in the minds of the Plaintiffs' business associates, potential customers, attorneys, and stock investors.
. No GOSY revenue is a "false rumor."
This SCOTUS decision is most significant for companies that are small and technology driven such as GeckoSystems. Many of those companies have suffered for years while they have seen their stock manipulated by naked shorting and false rumors, all done to drive the stock price down for excessive and illegal profits to brokerages, such as Merrill-Lynch. On July 10, 2015, GeckoSystems' senior management and majority stockholders filed a Georgia Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act suit in the Rockdale County Superior Court in Conyers, GA. tinyurl.com/qhl3uzu