Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Also if it were fake, they wouldn't promise anything, like offical filings, that couldn't also be faked.
What I was pushing for is a reason for the Schwab hard to borrow label on wrfx. If anyone claims to know that it does not mean there is a sizable short position large enough to make it hard to continue to short, then please come forward with an explanation for the label. Thanks
DJ if your referring to me I did not respond since I was maxed out on my 15 posts. If you took the time to read the start of the topic, you would have seen I posted the quoted price. Again, he said the fee would be .75 percent. I haven't gotten one person to respond to my theory that most of the WRFX shares available to short have been since last wed as now it is labeled hard to borrow at Schwab with an increased fee. You don't have to agree with the theory, im just looking for opinions about it. I don't know the margin requirements and I'm not going to test it, and allready heard all the opinis that shirtings not possible.
Again I'm just looking for some responses to my theory about the hard to borrow label at Schwab which implies to me that a number of readily available shares to short were shorted and if you want to short more then they are harder to find and you have to pay a higher fee now and how would that affect share price if the theory is true
Let's not go round and round. Please give the board swchabs wrfx hard to borrow label explanation. Is there a reason you won't ask the question and let the board know Schwab's answer so we can put this debate to rest. One more time so it sinks in. Don't ask if it can be shorted ank for the label explanation, that's when I was told I could short it and given a quote to do so
Ask the question about the label and you will get the same answer I did, you can short wrfx at Schwab. Please don't respond if your not going to ask the question as this is the crux of our debate.
Still waiting for you to tell the board the Schwab explanation of the hard to borrow label that showed up last wed.
I'm not doubting you were told schwab can't short pennies. I was told same at first. Please call schwab and get and give the board an explanation of the label from schwab. That's when the agent said it was new to him but you can short wrfx and quoted the fee to do so.
I know what I was told. Hopefully we can get another long to verify. And since you won't ask ,they need to be sure to ask for hard to borrow label explanation when they first say you can't short pennies
Isn't that a contradiction. Can't short but can if you meet the requirements. Which is it? I will call for the requirements. And why not ask ask about the label yourself. That's when I was quoted the fee
That's a big word. Is it being used correctly? It's relevant because I was quoted a fee to short wrfx at schwab
Whoops, did you forget to ask for the recent "hard to borrow" label explanation. I was even quoted a fee. Again I suggest a long call for further verification
Well that is not what I was told. I suggest someone who is long the stock ask Schwab. Or you could try again and ask them to explain why there is a hard to borrow label on wrfx. That is when I got the info that you can short against another Schwab wrfx long who has a margin account
Yes that is what I was told. He first said you can't shirt otc and then when I pushed about the meaning of the hard to borrow label. He put me on hold and when he came back said it was new to him but yes you can short wrfx. I didn't ask about the the margin requirement but please do yourself it would be good to get a second verification
That can't be true if it's harder to borrow since since last wed. Good news is if they want to short even more they have to pay a higher rate now
No squeeze if you can't short. But I just verified you can short at Schwab at least. And it is currently hard to borrow, implying most of the shares available have already been shorted
Good news, shorts are all over wrfx at Schwab. I just confirmed you can short otc at schwab against a longs shares in a margin account. Currently labeled as hard to borrow since last wed and rate is .75 percent. This is why we are being held down as we make more and more progress at wrfx. Can't wait for the onslaught of news to come that will force the cover
Thanks doc. New eyes must read
Kinda going round in circles right? Doesn't hard to borrow imply that there were shares to short but since this week they are now hard to come by? Also do you know the date of the finra short number
Is wrfx eligible to put out an 8k?
Wanna take a shot at explaining why Ampex is involved then? Good luck
You mean it's normal for a p and d to get involved with legitiment companies? And I don't know the short interest. That's why I asked you. All I know is that since this week wrfx is hard to borrow short.
If so then why is Ampex involved with wrfx?
Well Ampex disagrees. They are moving forward with parano. Looking forward to who will be embracing parano next?
Confirmation of tech leads to contracts which create revenue.
it's clear now that parano is legitimized by the Ampex involvement. But if your still on the fence don't worry there will be more confirmation of the tech
I'm glad your having a laugh. So Schwab wrfx shares are suddenly hard to borrow because there are no short shares? Whatever works for you. Hope your still here after several contracts
Finra records are delayed right? Hard to borrow wrfx to short at Schwab since this week. I can't wait to see how this board looks after we get several contracts
You call. Your the one claiming no shorts. Hard to borrow means there are no more shares left to short and the label just showed up this week.
Care to explain why schwab is labeling wrfx hard to borrow since last wed then
Axxar.io now says axxar coming soon
If today is the start of a potential squeeze, that would explain all of the "knowledgeable" posters of late giving out free advice on how to flip this. They all need us to sell imo
Nice leapord. Thanks for all of that
Sounds good tab. And don't listen too the wolves telling all margin accounts to set sells over a dollar. They want you to think your helping the long cause but they are ensuring our brokers are able to short more. If your in front of the screen. Just keep moving your sell up out of spike range imo
I'm sure you know more than myself but not sure your getting the point. Schwab, way over 90 seconds, and no, I would rather my slap over ask fill right away and drive the price higher as others slap as well. Only explanation is downward manipulation. It's happened to me before here and to others here too.
Is anyone else having problem getting filled, and also wondering who is picking up the lows of the day. Friday I got 160000 shares, my bid was over ask and it still took 5 min to fill. The shares available at a lower ask just sat there? Ask was .0348. So I bid .035 then got partial fill at .034. So basically I tried to slap and 5 min later it went through as a sell?
Don't do it. High sells will only lock shares in a cash account. The last guy who disagreed with me on this, who told me I had a lot to learn, claimed he was long and then sold today and pitched another stock
Not true. Only put your sells way above in a margin account if you want your broker to borrow them to short
Took 5 min to fill my bid over ask
Sounds good. But I think if anybody knew anything here with absolutely certainty, they would not spend there time here posting. Pick a side and good luck
Just trying to stop a "long" from seeding negativity here. Accept that you can't pinpoint a moass. And we can't pinpoint news. But the positive sentiment here feels both are coming. If you really own shares why would you take the time to cast doubt