Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No worries. Just seems weird him traveling halfway across the world in the last month of this administration. Thought he would be transitioning with Yellen.
Nats, do you know why Mnuchin is going out of country in Jan. Also, are there specific dates? EXAMPLE..... Like he’s leaving Jan 9 and returning Jan 15...
thanks, and regards,
We should be seeing a hit piece in the next couple of hours. Probably wsj, maybe bloom, how about the street with Cramer. Hopefully enough people now see through the corrupt nature of many of the news organizations, and will shrug it off.
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice , shame on me.
Good luck to all,
Let’s rock Fannie and Freddie!!!!!!!
Ackermans email is at bottom of column. I emailed him, got a reply saying he is out of office Tuesday and Wednesday. There’s a phone number, but no one picks up.
He never states when the interview was. He had an article nov. 20 and never mentions an upcoming interview with Mnuchin. Mnuchins calendar is being reviewed as we speak. If it can be proven there was no interview with Ackerman, Ackerman should be charged with stock manipulation, a federal offense, and should be sued by every shareholder of Fannie and Freddie..
Shareholder rights move with each sale. It doesn’t matter when the shares were held, it only matters who holds the shares now. This subject came up with Judge Sweeney earlier. This is why she will only allow derivative claims and not direct claims. It allows her to get around this conundrum.
Robert, please excuse my ignorance, but what is Humphrey executor?
Thanks
When is next Sweeney session?
Does anyone understand the point Mooppan was trying to make when he said it’s like Fannie bought a coin from treasury for all their profits in perpetuity? Roberts just said thank you and moved on.
Why do you have Calabria picture on your alias?
Absolutely agree with you. What motivates a so called journalist to write such one sided and biased article. I mean what does he gain. Don’t they have proof readers at Reuters?
Great question! Hope someone with legal background can enlighten us.
Listened to the whole thing. It’s a shame that they barely talked about the main issue. The govt illegally stole money from a shareholder owned company. Instead all they did is walk around whether the director who signed the deal was constitutional. BULLSHIT. Then Breyer tries to kick the can down the road by saying this should be a takings case. What a joke.
Both side attacked the attorney presenting, I suppose that’s the norm. This is the first SC hearing I listened too. Interesting but also, disappointed. Seems all they (judges) did is try to find an easy way out.
With that said I believe it will be 5 to 3 in our favor, with Roberts I’m not sure anymore. So it could go 6-3 or 5-4.
Yes, it will be by party line as usual.
I think Thompson saved it at the end when he was asked if he was expecting billions be awarded (question by Barrett), he said no, just call the loan paid off and void the NWS, and not allow a similar amendment be put in place.
This gives the judges a simple solution and easy way out.
All in my humble opinion,
It’s supposed to be a link to real time coverage of tomorrow’s oral arguments.
Here’s a note from Amy Howe. She writes for the blog.
Yes, CSpan will have it (as will others, but that's the one most people listen to). SCOTUSblog will have a link to the live audio at the top of the page on Wednesday. The one thing I don't know is when the audio becomes available if you don't listen live, because sometimes it seems like there is a delay (or maybe it is just hard to find). But it will definitely be available live.
Cheers,
Amy
Guys,
Google scotusblog and read the darkened block titled... briefly mentioned... about 2 inches down from top of page
Google scotus blog. Go to shaded block titled. ‘Briefly mentioned’.
I believe it is 10:00 am est.
VOX....lol
What does asking about scotus hearing being audio or visible have to do with shorts?
Navy, is this a video feed or an audio feed? And will it be live?
Thx
Unfortunately, it has gotten to the point, my own rep/senator doesn’t even reply to my correspondence other then maybe a form letter .’thanks for your interest, we’ll look into your concern’. Then nothing. I’ve written,emailed, and called. We have no voice anymore.
Did c and m really not file brief for Collins vs MNUCHIN. the dec 9th SCOTUS hearing?
There was no NWS law passed! It was a letter agreement between Tim Geithner and Ed Demarco. It is the reason for many of the lawsuits and is unconstitutional by the 5th amendment’s takings clause.
Agree!
Me too!
His last post was last night 8:46 pm EST. Him and chess master were discussing a possible OP-ED in WSJ, through an undisclosed law firm. Nothing has been posted from chess master since..either.
Thanks, appreciate your patience and knowledge.
What’s the 700 code?
Thanks for the explanation. I didn’t know that. I do now.
Ok, but it published the correct data one hour early. I guess I’m just not understanding how this works. I suppose he could have predicted the close exactly and built this chart. If he/she can do it again tomorrow, I want to be his or her, friend
But it posted on this board at 2:57 pm , my time, which is 1 hour and 3 minutes before close. I’m sure there’s a logical explanation. Hope he replys..
But the time zone automatically adjusts. For example it’s 5:00 here but post shows est time 7:00
How did you get a closing 4:00 p.m chart at 2:53 p.m. ?
I think what your saying is if the 3rd is severed. Any damages or financial consequences are to be decided by the 5th circuit court. Is that right. If so, and judge Atlas rules govt owes $200B(example) can’t the govt appeal, that is to high? And back we go to Supreme Court. I guess I’m hoping SCOTUS can set some criteria for damages allowed, so we aren’t in a prolonged circle.
So there asking to make the 60 documents public?
Why don’t they just leak them? Seems to be the norm in Washington politics.
Agreed. Hate to be a downer, but we have seen time and again, govt will ask for more time and Sweeney will grant it.
Also , last week this subject came up and some people on this forum claimed the documents had been turned over to plaintiffs attorneys..
Thank you for your due diligence. Above and beyond.
From your understanding, can SCOTUS provide damages to the shareholders in the Collins case?
Or, can they order payback of all payments above the original $187B plus 10% interest to the GSE’s.
I’m not asking if they will, just asking if they can.
Lastly, can they send it back to the 5th with instructions on how to proceed? If so, can’t the 5th new decision be appealed back to SCOTUS, which could turn into a never ending circle?.........
1972-1976. Got you by a few years.
Thanks for your service.