wow Jay....you're putting it all on the line. You say there never was a merger even though Fracky says he read it. Does that mean if he can't tell us when he read it, or where it is filed, he must have lied about reading it? if so, once a liar, always a liar?

Did you read this when you read the merger? is it all on file?

I wonder? is any of this as accurate and truthful as when you posted you read the merger?

You said you read the merger....do you remember what county it was filed in? what state? how much was the filing fee? fess up and I'll drop it like a hot potato

Besides, from what I have read I think that other company has all the big deals already locked up and certainly ALL THE PATENTS in the field locked up!!!


you want to tell us about something you say you've read? Ok tell us about the merger you say you've read....something simple, like what county and state was it filed in? then maybe we'll consider other things you've said you've read

"Or I could check with the IP Lawyer of the Year or the Past President of the Nevada Bar Association. Yes, tough choice!"


all the titles in the world doesn't matter, they need to hire more lawyers, maybe one that dabbles in magic on the side and can pull a merger out of a hat, otherwise, this case is over

Hahaha!!! We are ALL still waiting for you to show us those merger papers you say you read, Or were you ready to admit you made it all up? .....hey I did a cut and paste, just like demented's countersuit

True true....I can understand why you wouldn't want anyone too smart.....someone might actually ask ,,, with what state did you file that merger?

So you post on here 2000+ times under the guise that you just want all shareholders "to know the truth" yet part of DD is knowing what other companies in the same industry are up to and you won't post the link? How is that helping anyone? sorry if some of us don't just take your word, but you have proven through your posts that you have very little understanding of court proceeding, and that is a lot easier to understand than all this tech....so....what is your real agenda for being here day in and day out? regurgitating the same old nonsense that no believes anyway?

You didn't answer the question. In the past you stated that the trial was continuing because the judge wanted the lawyers to get rich (corruption) and then tried to say the judge didn't read the case (incompetence)...both made up stories...the trial continues because TMMI has a damn good case. You say the merger doesn't matter, then why did the judge ask about it? The defendants know they are in a bunch of trouble, that's why they keep adding new lawyers. Maybe now they have someone that can come up with a better answer next time the judge asks about the merger....maybe they can take a page out of your book and just tell the judge "we don't need some stinking merger, we have an email"

correct you are....they are getting burnt so bad they had to hire more lawyers, probably need to hire a few more, maybe some more that specialize in bk, or maybe a blood hound to track down those damn merger papers

yet the Judge keeps granting extensions? hmmmm maybe you missed something in those 10,000 pages you claim to have read. Maybe you should reread them...then you can advise the Judge whom you claim has only read about 1% of them. Maybe this case is closer to being over than you realize, then maybe HP will sue whomever claimed to file a merger but didn't. Don't you have an email with that persons name on it?

Correct you are Doc....and for anyone to think that an email they have framed and hanging in their living room is of any importance, but a legally filed merger is not, is just plain laughable.
And maybe the Plaintiffs need to update their complaint because they have found more illegal activity by the defendants. Didn't someone say the defendants were filing for more patents? Maybe those too are based on TMMI's prior art and need to be included.....just a thought

Thanks for clearing that up,,,I thought you were stating fact, not guessing....I'll put my guess in at the $250 to $300 range not that it matters

wow $1000 an hour....well it's already been proved that the defendants have ripped of TMMI by having their 1st patent stripped good to hear they are now getting ripped off...btw where does this attorney post his hourly salary? Not saying your not truthful...just like to see it myself

And if you really believe that a lawsuit trial isn't starting til next year, then you need to answer these questions,,,,who were the last two lawyers that the defendants added to their team? and what are their specialties? and why would you add them to your team now? especially when you don't expect the lawsuit trial to start until next year? IMHO they wouldn't have been added now if I thought I wasn't going to trial until next year, and they wouldn't be added at all if I felt I was going to win the case. This case isn't going to trial, and you don't prepare for a lose and exit if you think you have a solid case. The writing is on the wall

ummm how about RTN give them a call they know all about TMMI

Really? a billion dollar company has more pressing issues than defending their reputation and good name from penny stock companies that issues false statements that their tech is 3 to 5 times better than anything Raytheon is using? I think not. I think Raytheon has a whole legal department that deals with issues like this all the time. If they didn't why wouldn't other penny stocks try to piggyback off of Raytheon's success all the time? I think your self proclaimed"100% correct statements 100% of the time" has been exposed. But there is a real easy way to prove me wrong....just go to PR.Com and release a Statement that you have tech that works 3 to 5 times better than anything Raytheon has. If you believe what you post, there wouldn't be any problems, since they have far more pressing issues than to bother with a penny stock company, I'm sure they wouldn't bother with an individual saying so in a press release..... I wouldn't do it myself because I'm sure Raytheon takes things like this very seriously. But go ahead and prove you even believe what you post

so a billion dollar company would just stand on the sidelines and not defended themselves, their technology or reputation, when a little penny stock tells the world we have 3 to 5 times better than anything they are using?

I still say they would have been better off spending that $35 Pr explaining where they filed the merger

you have also stated many times that TMMI is guilty as charged I guarantee that that has not happened. This is the United States of America, not sure where you are from but millions of Americans have fought and died to protect the constitution of the United States of America. Ever hear of it? read the 5th, 6th and 14th amendments and tell us when and where did Tmmi get due process and was found guilty of anything...until then all you post is meaningless

Larry say what? Isn't that the guy that lied about filing merger papers? Why would anyone believe anything he says? Especially when it cost $35 to put it on pr.com. No one to verify what you say. Lol. Maybe he should have spent that money on a pr release as to where he filed the merger that you once claimed to be the only person in the whole wide world to have seen?

Did they decide Google and Facebook infringed their non-existent prior art?

wonder if they would fold as quickly as demented did? why would you give up without a fight if it weren't true? no need to answer...we all know the answer

so does that mean when someone is posting on the TMMI message board, they shouldn't be posting about Grupo Tmm S.A. American Depos (tmm) on this board? shouldn't those posts get deleted?

I agree with all of that stockie, just wondering if there is any word out there if those future jailbirds were able to cry, beg and plea their way out, or if they got what they deserved and got hammered for being the thieves that they are. I'm sure Jay will post when he hears thanks

Hey Stewie, any word on how those thieves that were stealing from TMMI do with the adverse judgement that was slapped on them? they needed to get on their knees today and plea and beg not to get slapped around again. any word yet?

oh? did they steal more tech from another company that they are going to try to pass off as their own only to have it stripped away again?

yep you have an adverse judgment coming in a few days

from that link you posted, demented has until Monday to show why they shouldn't have an adverse judgment against them

Maybe you should put that up on your website. because other than you, the whole world knows you gave up without a fight....just kinda rolled over and played dead. You should be able to post something.....you guys figured out how to cut and paste a counter claim and then post it. but then again, I remember a story about LOI's....lol

ok...let's see if I got your latest story correct....you now want us to believe that Simpson and Fernandez took millions of shares of a company that you say will soon be worthless to "join them in a conspiracy to commit fraud and theft? ... lol, ok , whatever, I'm just glad I don't listen to your posts....I've made some nice money the last few days believing the opposite of what you say

demented SUED for FRAUD, THEFT AND CONSPIRACY!!! And guilty as charged!!!

I noticed you no longer put in "guilty as charged" in your fictional rants. maybe your handlers informed you that a guilty ruling can't happen until the end of the trial?. but the thieves have been called out. just one of a long line of stealing and lies from this group. Hey do you still have one of those letters telling you about a merger being filed? probably one of the first lies these gang of crooks have told....

On February 19, 2015, TMMI filed a petition that requests that the Board construe Dimension’s actions as a Request for Adverse Judgment under 37 C.F.R. Sec. 42.73(b) to formally end the proceedings since Dimension as Patent Owner has canceled all of its patent claims involved in the IPR Petition such that there is no remaining claim in the trial (37 C.F.R. Sec. 42.73(b)(2)) and Dimension has stated to the Board its decision to abandon the contest (“Patent Owner, has elected not to defend its interests in this Proceeding.”); 37 C.F.R. Sec. 42.73(b)(4).

WOW!!! looks like TMMI caught someone with their hands in TMMI's cookie jar. I know if I actually developed some tech and then received a patent for it, I wouldn't fold like a cheap hooker to the first person that challenged it.

thought you were going to answer the question from Nesurk. Guess you have to wait until your handlers tell you how to respond. but when you mention liars and thieves, we know who got caught with their hands in the cookie jar. And if you want to claim you are 100% correct you need to tell us about your source from deep inside Raytheon, you know, the person that was telling you TMM only did a few lame demos? I would ask you to ask them how the TMMI demos went, but we already know. Your ship is caught in a whirl pool, spinning out of control, and soon to sink....maybe it's time to jump ship...

yes you should probably stick with the information that comes from your unnamed source deep within Raytheon. As you have reported here, TMM has ONLY done a few lame demos....as for me, I'll go with the information TMMI (the company we post about), has posted in their open letter. Good luck with your TMM holdings

sue HP? Trial in Sept? lol you still don't get it. it will never get to trial....your boys brought in the negotiating specialist in hope of getting out of this with enough money left over to walk over to the subway shop and have lunch

I wonder if this announcement indicates that the demented boys are ready to settle up for their evil illegalities?

if any of that were true, dimension wouldn't need to bring in a guy that specializes in getting cases overturned and monetary penalties reduced.

Dan Polsenberg is a partner in the firm’s Appellate practice group. His strength is trying to get monetary judgments reduced, and working on appeals. Seems like the defendants see the writing on the wall and want to get him in early so he will have a better understanding of the case. If it looks like you will lose the case, or already have lost it, he's the guy you want to call to try and get the judgment overturned or penalties reduced.