Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
VPLM Patent Status
18 patented or allowed US patents, 4 patents outstanding in prosecution
1. Lawful Intercept, 20100150138 Patented
13/863,306 which is Patented
14/802,929 which is Patented
15/385,555 09-27-2018 NOA
15/861,572 filed on 01-03-2018, Not yet published
2. Rating, Billing & Routing, 20100150328 Patented
13/966,096 which is Patented
14/877,570 which is Patented
15/396,344 which is Patented
15/405,188 which is Patented
15/730,600 01-30-2018 NOA
15/788,666 01-31-2018 NOA
14/029,615 which is Patented
14/325,181 01-31-2018 NOA
14/029,671 which is Patented
14/853,705 Final rejection, RCE 02-14-2018
3. Emergency 911, 20100172345 Patented
13/968,217 which is Patented
15/421,058 07-14-2017 Non-final Rejection, 01-12-2018 Terminal Disclaimer, 02-06-2018 IDS X4
4. Mobile Gateway, 20110122827 Patented
14/035,806 Final rejection, RCE 11-29-2017
5. Uninterrupted Transmission of Internet Protocol, 20120170574 Patented
14/092,831 which is Patented
14/802,872 02-08-2018 NOA
So this has been filed with the courts, not.
Please provide the link to the news release where the damages have been increased to $50B. TIA
At least they might be able to pay the bills once this gets to court.
Now show me the money Twitter
You surmise wrong, it's procedural and it's readily available information, DD.
I checked on both the PTAB and USPTO Public Pair, it took a while through their idiotic system and the constant high volume errors but there is nothing to report from the PTAB but a few items going on at the USPTO, I will put out an updated list later this week, going to take me a few hours if it works that well again.
They have spent a lifetime of thievery that they just can't go straight. But somehow I don't believe that can continue, they might need to think of protection, maybe we should look at shares in say Trojan condoms, they are about to start getting f..... well you can figure out the rest, or at least you can assume. ;)
Lmao. That must be it, a work of fiction!
That one got talked around, or through, or... moving on
Elton John, not a big fan. Moby, intriguing mind, Avril Lavigne sang one too and if I asked my daughter, Shinedown. I have a few hobbies but music is at the top and Alice has been used in many songs. Hope those are sufficient.
I tried, it returned no relevant results. I am well aware of the "Markman Hearing", I am also aware of the "Alice standard", I had not heard of the "Alice hearing"!
I assume it must be something new, or maybe not, perhaps I am not understanding the "hole" situation, or it could be "aboit" something entirely different and I am wrong but I doubt it.
What is an Alice hearing, never heard of this!
Entirely inaccurate, the first panel offered no ruling, they reviewed the initial facts and proceeded to institute the IPR trial on the basis that there "may be" a possibility that one or more claims may be invalidated, it proceeded through the process of both parties presenting evidence, "expert testimony" and the panel eventually concluded that there was no reason to cancel any one claim thus there is only one decision at hand, the one that found the patents valid on all claims. Just because a judge allows a case to go to trial does not mean he has rendered a decision... He/She is merely making it known there is a need for greater information...
Friday's 4-5pm EST.
Doesn't matter if it was Megan Brennan or Joe from accounting, the USPS is not responsible for a rogue act. IMOYIFF
Sawyer
More
He has the right to free speech and he was still not a person of control, imagine if an Apple employee went off in public letters to persons of influence, They would claim it wasn't us...
Fair enough, here is my final analogy.
If a former employee of the USPS comes into a post office that I am occupying and goes "postal" , who is responsible for my injuries if I am hurt whether it be physical or even emotional?
VPLM provided them to simply show that they had NOTHING to do with them...
Please explain in what universe is VPLM responsible for the actions of non-related parties, do you really think that VPLM is responsible for me sending an FU card to Timmy Crook.
Sawyer authored those letters after he left VPLM and was no longer responsible for any actions at/of the company.
If this for whatever reason is ruled in favor of Apple, The blatant irresponsibility of the actions of the PTAB will spell the end of many who work there and IMO, Oil States will not even matter, the whole thing will blow up. AIMOYDF
Thanks NM, I wondered how long it would take for someone to bring this back to light, Apple may have filled the divot and opened a crevasse with that one. I remember when I heard about this admission thinking it was akin to Apple shooting themselves in the head, sometimes it is better to keep your mouth shut...
Such eloquence and decorum. Could not have said it better myself.
Merry Hohoho
So the PTAB decimated the '233 patent through three IPR's and the federal circuit invalidated it, so please tell us the relevance, VPLM went through eight IPR's and not one claim was lost... Not even in the same league...
I guess we are not waiting till Jan for a number.
Not sure the reference for the East District of Texas but the reference to a few others is applicable here as the Nevada District court is actually a higher statistical court for success in patent litigation.
$.40, they must have been in and out quicker than a teenager.
Thanks for all you do.
I guess it will depend on when, sand or snow, or perhaps water.
So DB, remind us all when an institutional buyer can enter ownership of vplm.
Jim was here long before many of us, you could say he's an "OG" at VPLM . However, good to hear you again Jim, hope all is well.
I must have missed something, please tell me what patents have not been issued? Yes RBR from the EPO has only been given intention to grant, equating to NOA but what others have not been granted?
Jan 4, 2018...
One year from date of service!
You're welcome but I really don't feel like I am doing much.
It is a good location!
Thanks GBC, that is fantastic info.
One question for you, remind us what the deadline is for a party to file an IPR petition if they have been served in a civil case?
Not that it would make a difference but you need to add a 0.
Provocatively absent?
Twitter???
Nothing now, it just happened.