Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished.
News out of Delaware is nice. Bigger news forthcoming. Can't wait.
Where is my boy action on here? Mr gap fill lol. A sound advisement
BLOINK!! That's the sound I make when I pick up lemmings' shares at support.
That's the best they can do is hope for mid day fade lol.
Holding STRONG support. Lotta nervous nellies lol. Still have some replies I intend to answer here btw.
This decade-long saga is coming to a close people. This might be my last post on here here now that I think about it. *MIGHT *fade out closing scene oceans 11 in front of bellagio* lol
When mnuchin ends NWS this month, commons go over $10 in one day, depending on time of announcement. That action by Treasury of itself will be strong enough for private capital to move off the sidelines--some all at once some gradually. $25-$30 pps target 12-18 months out. All of that my opinion.
People posting on here do realize Fannie Mae's fundamental business model has already changed to allow for flow of private capital right? It's called credit risk transfer and it was instituted BY FANNIE MAE starting in 2015. TWO THOUSAND FIFTEEN FOLKS. And what has to happen for Fannie to sustain this model? CAPITAL RESERVES. Too much bs on here lately.
THIS, is all you really need to know.
What does that even mean? Lol
Aaaaaannnnnnnnndddddddddd RED TO GREEN!
Green close on Sweeney news. Jmo.
I don't give advice on this site, but if I did I'd say you better cover before you have to trade in that caddirac for a Kia. BIG NEWS on a very short timeline won't bode well for your position. Just my opinion friend.
I agree with that 100%
Fannie Mae just @'d the Treasury about its upcoming $5.5B "expected" payment this month. If mnuchin stops this payment I'll be mnuchin on not one but several Costco hot dogs.
Nah it's a good thing ultimately for sure. Just surprised in the ease with which he got it done.
Trump actually put a GS exec at the helm of the Treasury. That happened. LOL. Good times
When Fannie Mae moves into its newly-constructed $770M HQ in the heart of the District in 2018 <--(There is no more to that sentence I just like saying that).
People are so quick to post what IS happening. It's just as important to be mindful of what isn't happening.
Matter of fact, I don't think I've seen 1 overtly negative story about the GSEs in the Wall Street journal in 2017. Last time was in December. Some of those carney articles were so obviously bought and paid for.
Lot of new handles around here lol. Most people cannot stomach the Fannie in the long term. There's a degree of ignorance involved there for sure. Still can't be mad at people if they can't handle it though. Bumpy ride if you're strictly long/standard issue retail. Of course this will draw more people in as the GSEs get more press. Remember when I was a noob with Fannie thinking things like "hmm now the WSJ just dropped this for the 14th time in a month on some highly spec bs again (borderline and sometime blatant lies), interesting." Notice how WSJ is no longer bashing the GSEs since trump took office? Or at least not with the frequency or intensity. THE NARRATIVE IS CHANGING PEOPLE.
Alex Jones = carnival sideshow.
Here comes the obligatory Friday afternoon short covering.
Big buyer baby $FNMA #askslappin #whalecall
The Future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 2.21.17--> last 2 mins of video: https://www.youtube.com/embed/2IoJSj3MTAc
Sell the farm, sell the house, second mortgage the beach house and put it ALL IN ON Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac commons. Do that, and you'll be happy. THAT IS JUST MY OPINION AND NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE DO YOUR OWN DUE DULEGENCE/THIS IS NOT AN ADVISORY. Or listen to wtf I'm saying, it's your choice, not mine.
Fannie Mae Careers' twitter account (run by Fannie Mae) posted an interview of Fannie Mae CEO stating that he now believes a "sensible outcome" will be achieved with respect to the future of Fannie Mae (and Freddie Mac)-->2.21.17 - last 2 mins of video
Did you hear the one about Fannie and the---just kidding no GSE jokes. Big day today folks, make it a great one.
That's an accurate prognosis whale balls. In my opinion, naturally.
Exactly. And of course they're downplaying to avoid bs from sen warren and company with their hedge fund/GS narrative. Writing is on the wall.
They did allude to public and private capital and made it known they have aggressive goals/timeline of august, less than 6 mos away. If part of the plan is to convert warrants for 80 percent of the shares (to help fund trillion dollar infrastructure initiative) then Fannie and Freddie will need to start building capital reserves ASAP. In my opinion well before the summer and as early as literally any time going forward.
Looks like they've split up the entire interview. Downside here of course is listening to cavuto for the duration.
Mnuchin interview part 2 inbound!
Mnuchin interview is NOT over yet folks. Keep calm and watch cavuto.
News out on fed vacancies. Probably just a coincidence they're all pro-fannie and freddie.
President Trump Will Be Able to Recast the Fed by Filling Vacancies
DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC. 12:44 PM ET 2/20/2017
President Donald Trump will be able to recast the Federal Reserve by filling three or more vacancies on its seven- member board of governors, and is leaning toward candidates with banking and financial world experience rather than academic economists.
After his campaign criticism of the central bank's low-interest-rate policies, many observers speculated he would seek more "hawkish" candidates who would favor higher borrowing costs. But his choices may be driven less by these issues and more by their practical experience, judging from his early picks for other top economic policy posts in the administration -- drawn from investment banking, private equity and business -- and the pool of early contenders for the Fed jobs.
So far, his team is prioritizing the search for candidates to fill the role of vice chairman for supervision and a seat for someone with a community banking background, as required by law. His team has interviewed several candidates, including financial executives with experience in government, according to people familiar with the matter.
David Nason, an executive at General Electric Co.'s financing arm and former Treasury Department official during the 2008 financial crisis, has emerged as a leading candidate to be the vice chairman for supervision, the people said. The position was created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank law, but the Obama administration never named anyone to fill it.
Other potential candidates the administration has considered include former BB&T Corp. Chief Executive John Allison, and Rep. French Hill (R., Ark.), a former banker just re-elected to his second House term, these people said. Mr. Hill said in a recent radio interview he hasn't had any conversations with the Trump administration.
The White House didn't respond to a request for comment.
Such choices would mark a departure from the trend of recent decades, when most Fed officials were economists, many with extensive experience in academia or the central bank. It could usher in a return to the Fed's earliest years, when bankers, lawyers and other businesspeople had a much larger presence.
Mr. Trump's views on monetary policy are unclear -- he both praised and criticized the Fed's low-rate policies during the campaign. He also promised to roughly double the pace of annual economic growth to 4%, which would be harder if the central bank boosts interest rates more aggressively to restrain inflation.
"There's no reason to think Trump would go for one of these really predictable, hawkish academics who's schooled in balancing inflation," said Sarah Binder, a political-science professor at George Washington University who has studied the Fed's relationship with Congress. "He seems to want people, as best we can tell, with a background in finance or a background in business that brings some sort of real world -- from Trump's perspective -- appreciation for the good stuff that low rates can do," she said.
The seven-member Fed board has two vacancies and will have a third in April when governor Daniel Tarullo steps down in April.
Janet Yellen's term as Fed chairwoman expires in February 2018, and Stanley Fischer's tenure as vice chairman will end in June 2018. In each case, Mr. Trump will have to decide whether to nominate them for a second four-year term or name someone else.
The topic is of intense importance to the financial world, where analysts and lobbyists have speculated feverishly. In their client notes and conversations, the possible candidates for chairman include former Fed governor Kevin Warsh, who once worked for Morgan Stanley & Co. and now serves on a forum of business executives advising Mr. Trump; former Fed governor Larry Lindsey; University of Chicago professor John Cochrane; and Stanford University economist John Taylor, who has worked closely with congressional Republicans on legislation to limit the Fed's discretion in setting interest rates. It isn't clear whether the Trump administration is considering any of these people for the job.
Mr. Trump has so far relied primarily on business and financial executives to help shape his economic policy, rather than economists. He hasn't appointed anyone to the White House Council of Economic Advisers, which is typically filled by academic economists, and his top economic adviser, National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn, was a top executive at Goldman Sachs Corp.
Mr. Trump said during the campaign he would probably want to replace Ms. Yellen. But he could ask her to stay on -- the last time a new president didn't nominate the Fed chairman to another term was in the 1970s.
If Mr. Trump doesn't renominate Ms. Yellen and Mr. Fischer to their current positions, they wouldn't have to leave the board. Ms. Yellen's term as governor expires in January 2024, and she hasn't ruled out staying in that seat beyond her term at the helm. Mr. Fischer's term as governor expires in January 2020, and he hasn't commented publicly on his future at the Fed.
The last time a Fed chairman stayed on the board after losing the top job was during the Truman administration.
Looks like they're already getting after it at the trump tower super bowl party because Mnuchin just tweeted "shorts are gonna burn next week" and then retweeted a promo from courvoisier with #Lit.
Very possible that more specific DF news is floated over weekend. That would be devastating for shorts unless quick to cover in pm Monday. JMO
Nice close. Opens over $5 Monday. Just my opinion.