Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
$AEZS has been churning well since the prior support of .39-.40, & today it broke above the .43 area of prior resistance as we continue to hold & wait on more potential progress with AEZS.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159288349
(Tuesday, 11/03/20)
I have an average result cost near .34 (mid to lower .30s) for private followers. Looking good so far with it in the low .40's.
$AEZS is setting up to make the 10th profitable trade out of 11 for my private followers (as a recent period example since 2019)
AEZS ~ Daily Chart Below {12/2/20}:
It seems to have capitulated since .29 in the short term (as previously posted below) & could be setting up for higher yet. The volume was awesome today (11/20) & it broke thru prior .40 resistance with a close @ .42 near the intra-day highs.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159288349
(Tuesday, 11/03/20)
I have an average result cost near .34 for private followers. Looking good so far with it in the low .40's as of 11/20/20.
$AEZS is setting up to make the 10th profitable trade out of 11 for my private followers (as a recent period example since 2019)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=158461754
(9/22/20)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
$AEZS ~ Added near .30, with an average result cost near .34 for private followers.
Will keep holding for a likely short term reversal.
Not too worried about this in the short term. I like the chances here. Most of the negativity should be priced in finally in the short term. It's quite oversold
$AEZS, looks primed for a move up fairly soon.
Buying under .40 seems to have been good guidance. Let's see if it holds .34 support area yet in the short term
$VIVE ~ Took profits earlier today at 1.10+ with private followers (via e-mail 8/25). Profitable range of at least 67% up to 140% from my Alert @ approx .60 or less Limit Buy suggestion in July.
My public post below from July 21 that anyone could've made money on if they followed:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=157064325
Been standing by this stock privately with e-mail subscribers with a strict Limit Buy suggestion at .60 or less (as always) since July 17 Alert & waiting for a day like today to sell, especially on a day like this of huge parabolic movement after early morning biotech news & monster volume, which I always sell into with circumstances like this, & very glad we did after observing the late afternoon deterioration toward .70s.
$VIVE stock today makes 9 of 10 trades for a nice profit (and one was a very small loss) at my private service.
Just $500 low risk starting out would have really yielded very well following the trades with the provided strategy using the past several months alone for example.
$VIVE ~ thru mid-day 8/25/20:
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=VIVE&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=15&i=p50228171813&r=1594085480570
Market does not seem to mind about the July 23 news filing from the company shareholder meeting of a Pre-Authorization of a Reverse Split to be eventually enacted & determined at a later date by the board of directors. Seems safe in the short term to trade (as long as they don't officially announce detailed terms of a set Rev Split).
$VIVE still early in it's first NASDAQ probation warning period for being under 1.00, so odds are decent they'll wait a while before determining a Rev Split, allowing opportunity to trade it beforehand.
Anyhow, we'll see yet what happens in near future. It's still showing good support lately since the mid-upper .50's
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=VIVE&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=15&i=p50228171813&r=1594085480570
$VIVE ~ Looks primed soon to move up more in the short term. Close as of July 21 - today of .62 (up.02+).
My private followers in already under .60 approx.
We'll see yet what happens in near future.
Showing good support lately since the upper .50's
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=VIVE&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=15&i=p50228171813&r=1594085480570
Congrats to you if you are finally coming into profits as an 'investor'.
'To each his own'.... and I'm doing fine with my short term trade strategy on stocks like this.
$RWLK is my 7th straight profitable trade as part of an overall consistent record longer term.
I previously Alerted it privately on e-mail with suggestion of .45 Limit entry April 1 while it was .41-.45 & has performed as much as a 3x (triple). My followers had 4+ solid days to get in @ .45 or less near the apparent bottom since April 1, 2020.
Following me on scale out last week as it hit .90+ to 1.15, followers on average made 110-150% or more in a very short period of time & we are happy with that regardless of where short term exact top area might be.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154892038
We find good oversold stocks and trade them for a short term profit, then move on. It works and we are content with it. A person can't be bothered with not being perfect at selling perfect tops, because nobody can do it 100% of the time. Be happy with good profits, then move onward.
I personally don't like to 'invest' longer term with stocks like this--- It does not yield nearly as well.
GLTU
Well, ok, we sold already earlier because I see short term resistance risk since 1.15 and because I only trade these types of stocks short term.
Short term consistently works for me and my trade followers with these types of stocks, and is in my view the wisest choice in terms of risk/reward.
Scaled out in 2 parts, starting 2 days ago as it was nearing 1.15 on April 14. Then finished exiting between yesterday and this morning April 15-16 (And no, we did not affect the price).
Many made over 110% and up to 150% as it turns out following this trade since alerted privately on e-mail April 1 with .45 suggested limit entry.
$RWLK Trading @ .90+ yet as I post this.
Keep in mind ~ Where a stock once was in price, is not necessarily indicative of where it will go. Maybe you'll be right about $RWLK returning to $10, but odds are slim.
I see many others post over the years where a biotech or medical stock like this has been in price, and usually it becomes a mistake using its very old past trading price as a relevance for their price expectation goal.
GLTU
LOL, I see now you meant Bold type, when you said 'Caps'. I thought you meant caps on the price outlook or something else. I used some bold type, but that's ok. Nothing wrong with it in my view, and it was not excessive, that i used bold type just in some e-mails & only in parts of them.
I've posted nothing misleading or wrong about $RWLK in any event. I think you are being too critical and judgmental. Using some bold type does not make a person a stock manipulator or associated as such, LOL. If I only used CAPS LOCK & all BOLD, then I'd understand your point better, but I don't do that.
I'll keep to myself, and you do the same, ok? I do not like feuding and arguing over petty things like Bold Type, Caps, etc, it is a total waste of time. If you have a problem with me using some bold type, then the problem is yours perhaps as a psychological disorder (OCD), it's really not my problem, and you should not make it anyone's problem publicly.
Kind Regards
Since a week ago when it was just starting to break into the .50 area, I have been mostly saying in my posts that it looks poised for higher, has more potential, etc (which became true later), so you are not understanding me correctly. I've put NO 'CAPS' on the stock in my posts, other than mentioning some about the short term technical barriers (resistance levels) day-by-day, and that is being an objective analyst, and NOT a 'manipulator'.
You apparently have longer term outlook goals for this stock and company, and that's fine, but you have a different frame of mind with this stock, so you need to keep that in perspective when judging me or others. Just because I do not apply a longer term strategy as you apparently do, does not mean I'm doing anything wrong at all.
I've posted zero bad info here & I am only replying to your post with apparent incorrect allegations towards me.
I'm not a promoter trying to hype stocks, and do not lead mislead the pubic. Using a disciplined strategy -- I base everything on short term trading rather than long term, that is it. Whether it is public info posted or my trades put out privately (vie e-mails), I actually help people with consistent trades & info.
Most public board persons are not trustworthy, I understand that, but I'm not like that....and again, I've posted nothing wrong or misleading, and if you think that, then you are mis-interpreting my posts.
Let's be done with this matter & move onward.
Have A Good Day
3-D-T
$RWLK ~ New high of 1.15! What a Beast! This thing just keeps going up-up-up. I don't know what exactly got into this thing, but my private followers are happy again. This makes approx 7th trade in a row for profits.
Up 120-150% since our entry Alert April 1 @ .41-.45. (With Limit Entry suggestion of .45)
I'm in this $RWLK (with private followers) @ .42-.45 suggested Limit entry range since alerted on April 1.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154892038
$RWLK ~ As of 4/14/20 close:
This is turning into a BEAST!! I'm Up 110% from Lows on this!
I'm in this $RWLK (with private followers) @ .42-.45 suggested Limit entry range since alerted on April 1.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154892038
$RWLK ~ Up nearly 50% from recent lows. It's still showing higher break out potential
I'm in this $RWLK (with private followers) @ .42-.45 suggested Limit entry range since alerted on April 1. We're up so far about 40-50% on it, since apparently calling the short term bottom
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154892038
$RWLK ~ As of 4/13/20 (mid-day):
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=RWLK&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=15&i=p10519962171&r=1586366373263
---------------------------------------------------------
Even better, a high of .60 later on developed since yesterday (4/8)! however, watching .60 as near term resistance potentially forming
I'm in this $RWLK (with private followers) @ .42-.45 suggested Limit entry range since alerted on April 1.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154892038
$RWLK ~ As of 4/9/20 (late afternoon):
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=RWLK&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=15&i=p10519962171&r=1586366373263
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and now you can look for .40's!!
It appears the scenario of a quick move up of about only 2 days from lows is playing out as I mentioned 2/24 could be possible & to watch for.
***After I saw that .65 resistance yesterday (2/25) it was suggested to my private e-mail followers early Tuesday morning (2/25) to start scale Out & to finish exiting before market opened today (2/26) when it was still in low .40 area.
***We were in $CORV between .27-.32 since February 5 when I alerted entry @ .32 Limit or less.
Made 50-60% or better in most cases, or 30% or better in worst cases following me on this trade.
I always take profits on these, especially when I see strong short term resistance forming.
~~~GLTU~~~
My recent prior posts here:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153996295
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153993520
----------------------------------------------------
Chart:
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=CORV&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=15&i=p94093937001&r=1580938910125
$CORV ~ 2/26/20:
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=CORV&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=15&i=p94093937001&r=1580938910125
Glad it wad helpful. You're welcome
I would not rule out $1 as a potential target. Biotech-pharmas like this have been flying huge after major sell off periods more than usual over the past several months, but I'd prepare for anything (such as if it's just a one or two day bounce). I'd play it based on technicals progress day-by-day & intra-day going forward. Unless some solid news surfaces publicly to substantiate the movement, then I'd treat each day carefully with some skepticism & be ready to take profits when any real resistance becomes apparent (such as applying scale out of shares in increments around a short term perceived top at some point because gauging the timing of exact tops or bottoms is never easy 100% of the time by anyone)
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153993520
I think a lot of very bad news has already been priced into the stock (recent NASDAQ bid price warning, class action law suits, recent share offering, and prior issues with their drug in past couple months), so it fits the scenario that simply it was just due for a 'technical reversal' move upward.
In this very oversold type of scenario for $CORV, it can easily cause a strong move suddenly (short squeeze, etc.).
It's also possible some one knows news that has not yet been released. But otherwise in my experience this is a technical move following being excessively oversold and pricing in many multiple bad new items already (in the short term).
My followers via private e-mail fortunately got $CORV alerted to them 2/5 with .32 or less entry suggestion.
It's up 50-60%+ or better so far for us.
FYI ~ Since late 2017 I have not been posting most of my trades for entry publicly because I prioritize my private e-mail list, and is the reason why i have not posted here about it until now
https://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=CORV&p=D&yr=0&mn=5&dy=15&i=p94093937001&r=1580938910125
Just always remember to take profits in the short term with any stock if you are applying a short term trade strategy (excluding longer term investing).
Don't be so hard on yourself or dwell on the mistake excessively. Just learn from it & force yourself to apply more discipline next time & don't fall into any hype while it's in an upswing like late January.
I have always thought $VVCIF has good points & specific fundamentals better than most cannabis OTC companies, but I don't let those things affect my profit strategy. Overall with short term trading, they're all just tickers with trade-able volatility to be taken advantage of for profits (if your strategy is short term trading as mine usually is)
Did you take profits? It re-visited .30's (up to .395) after your post about wishing you sold over .30+.
I scaled out of $VVCIF that week in 2 share block increments (January 22 & 24) for a profit in the .30's along with my private e-mail followers.
Prior to that I also carefully scaled into it this time in a similar manner
I always take profits because I'm a short term trader. Also, this stock typically pulls back after a few days of good upward movement. This is approx 5th time I've traded $VVCIF since about 2017 (all for a profit), & it tends to behave the same, except the recent dump in late 2019 that was extended for the sector longer than usual made timing a bottom on this one harder than usual, but in the end it worked out from an average cost near .20 --- and later sold over .30 for average exit. Not my best timed trade this time with entry, but realistically trading is not always a perfect thing
I warned about this back in December, that $RTTR was low on cash & represented high risk for a bad news surprise to raise cash (dilutive share offerings).
For good reason -- I learned long ago as a principle to always avoid short term trading biotech-pharma stocks low on cash (under a year's worth of cash burn).
Today (2/4) the filed Securities Registration statement was predictable for anyone who spent just 5 minutes on DD, & also it demonstrates why it's a good rule to avoid trading biotechs with very low cash.
Following that rule for many years already has kept me safe consistently from getting destroyed by surprise bad dilution news while trading a biotech-pharma stock.
December 2019:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152724595
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152931835
Yep! Well said RickNagra... I'm in total agreement with you about that... LoL
I was very clear in my prior post on December 10. They're very low on cash. That's a set up for future cash raising and needs for dilutive stock offerings, especially with Pharma or biotechs like this.
Maybe this $RTTR will have some upside volatility in the short term, but this is very high risk regarding negative news surprises such as possible upcoming filings for stock dilution.
They're low on cash, so everyone should wait until after they announce a round of financing (dilution) or strike a strategic deal.
My rule is never trade these things, particularly biotechs/pharma unless they already have nearly a year's worth of cash burn to reduce risk that typically crashes a stock while trading it. .
$RTTR only had $2 mill in November's qtr report. They need about $10 million or more to be sufficient for one year to reduce risk of a bad news stock offering that typically crashes a stock.
In addition to low cash, they have to deal with being de-listed which is apparently pending a review:
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/ritter-pharmaceuticals-RTTR/stock-news/81226873/current-report-filing-8-k
Show a web link to that claim you stated..... It would be interesting to see if true.....
"Offering never closed yesterday SEC complain filed"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152496988
It's great news for the sector. $VVCIF & the sector have been getting slammed. Perhaps this is a turning point for while for them to contradict the bear trend that has been affecting the cannabis sector this year.
It's the reason why $VVCIF has been going downward. On individual merits (growing revenues & good cash balance), $VVCIF is among the better MJ companies, but has been getting beat down due to the sector.
Very Low Cash here, so I never touch a stock in this scenario..... especially this type of sector stock in the science field, biotech area, etc.
>>>I prefer 1 year's worth of cash burn or more on the company's balance sheet usually before I trade a stock to go long. That rule I learned to stick by a long time ago usually curtails risk of share offerings while I trade it.
***The low cash on $YTEN foretold this event was due (that's the lesson anybody should be learning today).
***Also, the recent S-1 filing(s) were portending dilutive share offering(s) due out.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151999020
I've posted here in recent weeks that I'm watching this & posted awareness of the S-1 filing, but have waited because of the low cash.
After dilution news today gets priced into it, then will be a good time to start entering it for a trade
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/yield10-bioscience-YTEN/stock-news/81158273/current-report-filing-8-k
Still holding support as of 11/7/19
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151857484
Starting to top out and pull back from 1.40 area it seems.
Not regretting taking the 200% profit (from .43 Limit or less suggestion) within 3 weeks as posted a few days ago since 1.30+ area as it was developing.
$ONCY is an interesting biotech with a lot of news catalyst potential, but my protocols on these types of stocks from many years of experience have taught me that trading these short term is the best consistent strategy, rather than 'investing' longer term as many common retail sheep like to do.
These stocks are not good investments most of the time due to their inherent risks such as dilutive tendencies, etc.
I believe as a rule it's always best to trade them quick & move on to the next stock by taking advantage of short term circumstances. These types of stocks overall are not trustworthy for longer term investments, but serve as good shot term trade mechanisms.
Most people who apply a long term 'investment' concept on these non-profitable junk stocks under 1.00 (for example) tend to lose a lot of money---- that's a statistical fact
Was a nice ride for my private followers from low .43 area after being suggested in early October. Approx 200% gain into the 1.30's today.
Happy to take profits here!!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151983902
Always take profits with discipline!!
Never become emotional with these stocks!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOL ~ Then today's price is 034-.035 (THREE+ cents) if we would apply your .25 in 2016 December without the Reverse split adjustment that occurred since then.
Reality Check:
December 2016 low was 2.50 using today's correct chart & price ratio.
***The latest new historic low is .34 as of 10/31/19.
.25 Is not in reality the lowest it's ever been when comparing it to today's price.
You need to stop posting incorrect propaganda
According to this chart below, $YTEN was at a low of 2.5 area in December 2016... The FACTUAL latest historic low is .34 that occurred recently this week.
There is no .25 low as you stated.
You apparently are not adjusting for a reverse split effective basis since late 2016 (which I said in my prior post to you).
These are the simple facts that are UNDISPUTED, clear & easy to understand. It's strange to even argue about something so simple. anyhow---- Take these facts as you want to perceive it for yourself.
When you posted a short while back to warn people 'Sell People Sell" based upon a .25 low from 2016 which you claimed as a mis-stated fact, it is incorrect and misleading when you are applying it as a technical indicator as a prior low from 3 years ago.
https://c.stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=YTEN&p=D&yr=3&mn=6&dy=0&i=t9370200459c&r=1572550739243
3 Years + 6 Months: