Excellant!!! look forward to it!

since i was out of PVEC before the cert cutoff, i was never eligible.

However, i dont view this as a mess at all. As i told someone else, my issue before was with Peter, not DSUS. Loads of potential for semi long term, or short term flipping. Learned a long time ago to never marry a penny.

all i can say is investors trade in their own way. Some make a big splash with a single purchase, others peck away with many small buys. Perhaps they are tapped out....but i see no evidence of any "sub-contracting" going on here.

paint jobs work each way....welcome to stock trading.

We are down 1.84% today....this is "blood in the air"??? wow....tough critic!!!

ask your question this way: "How many exemptions have been granted to a non vetted "scam" company? NONE....Proves legitimacy.

im not saying any such things. Rapid fire changes by a company in it's formative stages are of no concern to me whatsoever.

The statements you refer to were made pretty much at the onset, and i fully expected some changes to occur. I recall quite vividly the on the fly changes i made to my company right after starting (albeit im private not public). It's normal....and expected.

Im also "ROTFLMAO" at your assumptions.

so, you have a copy of the lease with DSUS's name on this document? Please share with the board. Otherwise, the safe assumption is it's Peter's issue, not Joel's, as im quite sure PV signed the document with a personal guarantee. (that's the way most commercial leases work).

I'm afraid that's not much to hang your hat on. Clock continues to tick, and the arguments against DSUS are getting pretty weak.

Looking better with each passing day.

Dude...this is the OTC, and ebbs and flows are part of the game. At this level, this is a good buy.

No OTC company is a guarantee by any means, and there are a myriad of OTC stocks with many many more warts than DSUS.

IMHO

You protest too much. I still think this has great potential. This isnt PV and his bag full of tricks...its new management. Give it time.

Im out. Far too much drama here....just as bad as PVEC. (Big surprise)

The final tipping point for me was the PO Box as the new corporate headquarters.
Wasn't expecting Trump Tower, but seriously????

Too many opinions are bantered about here. Hopefully most investors can discern opinion from hard facts.

Well stated! Also, i might add in regard to those who are convinced PV is still calling the shots...if he was still in charge, i am convinced David Turner would still be posting, which he is not....

Turner isnt one to let go if PV were still running the show.

Who cares. PV is NOT calling the shots here...

PV is needed for one thing only...his world class maritime rolodex. After decades in the industry, his rolodex represents a ton of new business contacts in this sector, which will no doubt open many doors for DSUS.

DSUS

...look harder

What do you know...a startup with revenues?? keeps getting better!

DSUS is a 6 week old startup. You're expecting Apple? You say no manufacturing. I say prove it....

nope...nor can you prove the inverse.

The bottom line is many companies are making huge bank as resellers. It's just one of many viable business models. Your original statement implied they cant be successful as reseller, which is wrong.

Even if that's the case...who cares? How many products do Walmart and Target manufacture?? None, yet they are 2 of the most highly respected and profitable companies in the world...simply by "slapping a sticker" on the product.

IF your scenario is accurate (which i do not believe), the BOD brings excellent contacts to the table, which is 75% of the battle. Oh, and PV's rolodex in the maritime industry, after many decades has to be world class. More contacts. Mores Sales. More profits.

Business 101.

Well now im confused. Who will regret involvement , and why exactly will they regret this involvement?

Wrong. The office, im sure is part of the deal. It's 2015.... location of the officers in relation to a brick and mortar presence is moot. Teleconferencing is the name of the game today. It is more productive, and allows for a much better selection of executive talent without geographic constraints.

This bod is good....very good.

The verdict here is the BOD is smart to retain pv in a consultants role to establish a foothold in the maritime industry. The BOD is methodically to bring a startup to become highlg successful.

This company is poised to explode sooner rather than later.

While i have little respect for PV the businessman, you can not deny the decades of contacts he has accumulated in the maritime industry. If one doesnt have experience in business world, please understand one of the most important tenants in business, especially a start up, is take advantage and exploit ALL possible resources available to a new business. Peter is CLEARLY a resource in a burgeoning sector in the drone industry (maritime applications), and i completely endorse the desicion to retain him as a consultant. Its a sage business decision, and frankly a no brainer. I am confidant the Nevada SOS will be updated in due time.

I like the sector, the BOD, and the prospects available with DSUS. Just because one doesnt understand the myriad of nuances in creating a successful business does not imply corruption.

Does this mean Peter has to give back his "CEO of the year" award?? lol

At the very least they need to be GAAP compliant.

Add into the equation persuasive promoters, scammer CEOs, and the odds get even more bleak.

Never marry a penny stock. Always look at the financials closely. Never believe the hype. Create a sell position before you buy...and ALWAYS take profit when available.

One other thing, I find history always repeats itself. CEOs rarely change. If a CEO consistently puts out false pr's ...get out. (Or better yet, don't jump in)

PETER V FOR CEO OF THE YEAR!!!
Oh wait...never mind. (Did he win?)

Was there any doubt?

Caveat emptor. Turners conscience should be clean. He spoke the truth, those who chose to head his warnings saved money. Those who turned a blind eye...lost. Simple as that.

IMHO, ihub needs more like him and Cassandra offering alternative perspectives. I'll take those two over scamming CEOs any day.

Great board. Looking forward to following closely.

Disagree. Turner was warning about company ethics and financial woes from way back. Although the truth hurt current stockholders, I'm sure many didn't invest, therefore saving many from disastrous results.

One mans bitch is another's savior. All about individual perspective.

Got ya, but Peter lives in the grey area just outside the lines. He keeps doing this.

The statement is ambiguous at best, and is open to interpretation.

Exactly my point.

If someone else has a different take on Ahall's letter, I'd love to hear it...

"Parties identified as having participated in activities, firectly or indirectly, whether publicly or privately, causing harm to the company, its shareholders or share price, including but not limited to disclosing confidential company information, are not "eligible" for Preferred C share distribution."

This is very interesting. It's completely arbitrary who gets paid.

That caveat was never disclosed...Peter gets to decide based upon the tone of a post?

Yep, it's pretty rare to find posters like them. One speaks from his personal experience as a high level financial officer with PVEC who has conveyed first hand knowledge of how Peter conducts business without fear of scorn, and another comes with 10 years experience with conducting extensive and advanced DD, again with no fear of scorn.

Otc investments are truly caveat emptor, but all the facts make for better decisions.

IMHO, the whole premise of this website is to take her concept of censorship to other otc scams. Perhaps her wrath should also include obsessive pumpers also?

As an investor, I welcome both sides of the aisle.