Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Please show me where they said they will collect thousands of gallons from rain fall. And that it would provide 95% of there water needs.
Yes the double standard and bias toward Cen is very hard to explain in deed.! HC gives a denial of Bill's security clearance. Over releasing the inspection report. That's already Public information. And says he can't be trusted.. But says nothing about the video coming from inside other facilities. Please do explain that to me End User ?
Wow what a great idea ! Install condensers in the drying rooms to collect the water the plants give off through humidity.! Fantastic! And water collected this way. Is as pure and clean as it gets ! Near zero TDS LOVE IT !
Great information ! Please sticky mods !
"We submitted our business plan and third party engineering reports evidencing our proposed build-out to the 600,000kg capacity."
http://www.cenbiotechinc.com/PlatformApps/CEN/c1/faq.html
I will agree with you on that LongShort !
Your correct there is no spring that I am aware of on there property..but unlike me..they do have a waterline instead.. and I think you should actually talk to an engineer,, most industrial building have 200 amp service..
The waste water from the crop is filtered and re-used..you only need a septic system for the amount of bathrooms and number of employees.. WOW I just don't understand how any farmer grows any crop with all of these major requirements ! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!
The point is that you can simply add additional Amps to your service as needed. And it takes me less than 4 days to fill a 10,000 gallon tank from a low flowing spring. Yes I have one. I use it in dry years to irrigate 5 acres on a drip system. when our irrigation water is inadequate. And hydroponics takes a faction of the amount of water. I've also had to have water hauled in by water trucks as well.. not Ideal but doable.
The property does in fact have a waterline to the property. and have you ever heard of a septic system? Like most ALL agricultural zoned property have? And did you know that these Septic systems are designed and sized according to the property's needs? Will the utilities need to be upgraded at some point ? with a larger waterline, add 200 amp electric service..Well I would sure hope so as the facility continues to expand its operations. Go back and watch the open house. the owner from blooming Gardner. operates his greenhouse facility on the same size water line that runs to CEN;s facility now. and he states its more than adequate. for there needs.
I think its clear who was misleading and telling lies..
You can access all this information on OTCMARKETS.com
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/FITX/news/Letter-to-Shareholders-Regarding-Emails-Released?id=102782&b=y
We shall see if HC can prove this in the Federal Review.
Please provide where Bill Lied
HC letter - “These unresolved issues lead to concerns about appropriate municipal services being in place.”
The level of municipal services presently in place will be adequate to run the facility. There are no issues as to water, sewage or electrical consumption
CEN letter to HC dated November 18, 2014 with attachments.
DOES CEN BIOTECH HAVE THE PROPER MUNICIPAL SERVICES?
To quote the ‘Town Administrator, “...the property doesn’t have the water, hydro and sewage services that will be needed to support a facility which was touted to annually produce 600,000 kilograms of medical marijuana...”. However, we can honestly state on the record that our organization has been refused ANY further permits, pending Lakeshore counsel’s legal approval of every single permit since the time the amendment was passed in November, 2014 preventing our land use rights to develop the property properly to accommodate any further requirements of the municipality, or that of the facility. We submitted our business plan and third party engineering reports evidencing our proposed build-out to the 600,000kg capacity.
DOES CEN BIOTECH HAVE THE PROPER ZONING?
On the issue of the Town of Lakeshore, we have been very prudent to ensure that Health Canada knew that their untimely decision to attempt to exempt our facility is of grave concern, especially when a “Ready to Build” letter was issued and all parties agreed there were no issues around zoning at time of construction and substantial investment. (Please see the Minutes of the Lakeshore 11/12/13 Town Council meeting on page 31-32 which documents that zoning was proper resulting in a “Ready to Build” letter.)
We were provided a letter confirming our position that our lands and buildings, with associated permits, et al was IN FACT in conforming use and legal in the aspects of the Chief Building Official, Morris Harding on October 8, 2014 and was also forwarded to the MMPR officials. Key points are the property was zoned properly and in accordance with the Town of Lakeshore Zoning By-Law Number 2-2012.
On February 24, 2015 in the Windsor Star, Steve Salmons, Director of Community Development was quoted as confirming precisely our argument, medical marijuana is a crop, and as such is to be on agricultural land. A move of a facility like ours to industrial will only endanger the quality of the plant, and the end quality to the patient. The article can be found HERE.
To quote Mr. Salmons, “...The property is zoned agricultural,” he said. “Everything they have done so far – even though it might be visually unappealing – is legal as a farming operation. Farms can put up fences or agricultural buildings like a pole barn.”
The land upon which the premises are located are zoned “Agricultural”:
Lakeshore Comprehensive Zoning By-Law s. 4(5)
October 8, 2014 correspondence from Morris Harding
November 12, 2013 memo from Administration (Salmons and Foran) to Lakeshore Town Council
“Processing” of medical marihuana is not an allowed activity under the MMPR, so no processing or “value added” may be done to the crop. It must be grown, harvested and sold
No Authorizations are necessary to grow harvest or sell a crop in an “Agricultural” zone. Site Plan Approval must be made if there is Value added, which includes “a use accessory to an agricultural use, used for the processing and refining of crops and produce....”
Lakeshore Comprehensive Zoning By-Law s. 4(6)
Lakeshore passed new By-Laws and Official Plan Amendments on November 25, 2014. The by-Laws and Official Plan Amendment have not been approved by the County. As the facilities have been built for the purpose of a Medical Marihuana Facility, the new by-laws cannot be applied retroactively. Please see the doctrine of legal nonconforming use.
Central Jewish Institute v. Toronto, [1948] 2 D.L.R. 1 (S.C.C.)
Saint-Romuald (City) v. Olivier, [2001] 2 SCR 898 (S.C.C.)
Confusion between Town of Lakeshore and Health Canada surround comments made by Bill Chaaban. Mr. Chaaban wrote to HC on October 8, 2014 indicating:
“As per your request, a letter dated today, October 8, 2014 whereby the Town of Lakeshore confirms, in writing, we are properly zoned with no issues reported by the Chief Building Official, Morris Harding, whom is the official recognized under the Municipal Act.
Mr. Foran, for the Town, wrote to HC on October 15, 2014:
“The advice provided to you in the October 8th correspondence from CEN Biotech Inc. to the effect that the property is appropriately zoned with no issues relating to the use of that property for medical marihuana production facilities is simply incorrect”
The Applicant submits that they provided accurate information to HC, based on the statements and letters of Town officials. Mr. Foran appears to have misquoted Mr. Chaaban’s words.
Reference correspondence from CEN dated October 19 & 29, 2014 and from Baksh to HC dated October 30, 31 and November 6, 2014.
It is the Applicant’s position that there is no issue as to proper zoning or authorizations to operate the business of a medical marihuana facility on the site.
HC letter - “These unresolved issues lead to concerns about appropriate municipal services being in place.”
The level of municipal services presently in place will be adequate to run the facility. There are no issues as to water, sewage or electrical consumption
CEN letter to HC dated November 18, 2014 with attachments.
DOES CEN BIOTECH HAVE THE PROPER MUNICIPAL SERVICES?
To quote the ‘Town Administrator, “...the property doesn’t have the water, hydro and sewage services that will be needed to support a facility which was touted to annually produce 600,000 kilograms of medical marijuana...”. However, we can honestly state on the record that our organization has been refused ANY further permits, pending Lakeshore counsel’s legal approval of every single permit since the time the amendment was passed in November, 2014 preventing our land use rights to develop the property properly to accommodate any further requirements of the municipality, or that of the facility. We submitted our business plan and third party engineering reports evidencing our proposed build-out to the 600,000kg capacity.
http://www.cenbiotechinc.com/PlatformApps/CEN/c1/faq.html
Its called prejudice and its NOT legal to judge someone by action they might take in the future....
Did you actually read the reasons this forum gave for the denial? Because Bill posted the pre license inspection report on there websight? Bahaah!! The very same report that a Share holder obtained though the freedom of information act. And then released it to the public online? This Share holder also received the information before Cen Biotech had even seen it. because HC never provided them with the report. Just left them in Limbo waiting for them to reply. And once it was made public Cen under SEC law and was obligated to release the information to the public. This makes Bill a security risk.. Wow talk about grasping for straws..!
That is not what the inspector report noted. It noted that a further inspection MAY... be required. And I don't think Cen was trying to block any inspection from taking place. If there are issues. They need to be allowed to address them. And a re inspection needs to be scheduled. that's hard to do when HC wont even respond or schedule an inspection !
The deficiencies that you refer to as failures. If you took the time to read the report. they were immediately addressed. HC refused to acknowledge it and refused to re-scheduled a further inspection. A screen over a vent, and adjust the frame rate of the security cameras.. Really? how long do you think it took to address these issues? 30 mins,1 hour? ok ill give you a full day.!
What amazes me is that anyone would support a corrupt government agency and support there incompetent's I thought we all have had enough of that. No matter what county you live in..!
Every LP to date has built only what is adequate to begin operation. And then immediately started there expansion. thank GOD CEN took this route as well or god knows how much more money would be wrapped up sitting Idle in the facility.
You can download and view the inspection report yourself from this OTC link. There was no failure. Get informed.!
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=FITX&id=128236
Their are no lies told by Bill in the story you provided a link to. This interview was put out in May 2014 A month after Cen Biotech requested the inspection of the completed facility. And 2 months before the inspection was done in July 2014
I am sure that Health Canada will be asked to show copy's of all the decisions made by this "Internal Forum" of HC. On all Medical Marijuana Applicants. In the Juridical Review hearing. I wounder? Was it only created By HC to form an excuse to deny CEN Biotech? Seems very strange that this denial by the "forum" wasn't done until Feb 2015. 7 months after the pre-inspection was completed in July 2014. And even more odd that after Cen made the inspection request in April 2014. HC delayed the inspection. Saying that they were waiting on the security clearances to be completed. And that they could not perform the inspection. until the security clearances for all key employees had been passed.
HC informed Cen biotech in late June 2014 that the security check had been completed and now they could proceed with the inspection.
Hmmm....? intresting
End user,, I always thought the concept behind taking a company public was to raise Capital..? I must really be confused...
None of those allegation will even be coincided in the the Federal Review. ONLY information pertaining to the Application to produce under the MMPR. And if all requirement have been met. Nothing More Nothing Less...
Remember share holders and potential Investors. None of the the Media clams of misleading Statements,, All the hear say.. Will Make one bit of difference Or even receive a consideration in the Federal review of Cen Biotech's unlawful denial. The federal Review will be looking to see if they have met all of the requirement to become a producer under the MMPR Cut and dry.. Nothing else will be of any concern..
All the Wild Wind story's and half truths, that you will see in the messages boards hold Zer0 weight. If there was a Concern of Bill or anyone else in the company committing fraud. It would be the job of the SEC to investigate the clams. And as much of the Mud slinging we have seen. If there was a concern FITX would have been halted months ago..!
So if you are a Investor considering the potential Opportunity to Buy FITX at these levels after being beat down by Propaganda for months now.
Don't base your decisions on what you read here. Do your DD there is a ton of it available on FITX. take advantage of it.
There is a great deal of info at http://fitxlong.com/ well worth looking at.
And check the web sights They have been putting up some updates on the sight. And there will be more coming.
http://www.cenbiotechinc.com/PlatformApps/CEN/c1/faq.html
Speculating Hollywood.
exporting was applied for..
Many share holders and past share holders will pursue a class action suit for damages from Lakeshore and HC regardless of the out come of CEN case. and whether they are awarded the license or not. I have no doubt.! And rightfully so.. If I had sold my shares because of the claims lakeshore made in the media that CEN was not grandfather on there location. I would be all over it.!
If ether lakeshore or HC takes this all the way to a hearing. which I highly doubt. and they rule in favor of CEN investors though a classaction will simple walk into court with that judgment and be awarded there damages.! in a hart beat. Its a VERY dangerous Game Lakeshore is playing with this appeal. CEN has as strong of a case to win a judgement in both the Federal courts and the OMB as I have ever seen! neither one will ever see a hearing.. maybe the federal case? so HC can proclaim that the Court made the decision. so they don't receive any more criticism from the GLOB and Mail that they haven't done there job..
I guess that's up to the Federal courts to decide! Kinda of a strange move for a scam company to peruse a judgment in a federal court of Law.
They did file a report with the Police. And before the interview came out...
The ability to ramp up production over time is the goal. and is why they applied to export product to any county that become legal to do so in the future. as part of there application. And the sure to come refinements of cannabis into many different forms of delivery such as oils. that eliminates 90+% of plant material weight.
It the lack of vision by others. and Bills clear vision of where this industry is heading in the next ten years. That wins the Race.!
Yes for 11 months now.. You really need that ability if your going to ask for an inspection of the facility. And is confirmed in the inspectors report.
"The applicant will be ready and able to meet the requirements of the MMPR"
That is completely false the municipality. was absolutely informed of the location and scale of the proposed facility.
Applicants Clear all issues though the application process and before being awarded a ready to build letter.
There has been nothing of substance to implicate the company of fraud.
Only lies and propaganda spread through message boards and Media. Any one that has done there DD on this company has seen first hand the pre. meditated attack on the company.!
How much fear is out there of Cen Biotech becoming licensed to produce 600,000 kg. And how much funding is handed over to them for expansion of the company with a license that size..Hmmmm
All these accusations have one the delay only. HC will let the courts decide. and the court will only be interested in knowing if they have complied with all of the condition laid out by HC to become a producer. and by there own admissions, in granting the ready to build letter. and there own inspection report . it is clear as day that they have.!
6 months tops you have bough in delays. then Cen Biotech will become a produce
Facility has been ready now for 11 Months! FACT!
FAQ
WHY DOESN’T THE COMPANY SHOW THE INSIDE OF THE FACILITY?
Under the MMPR, it would be a violation of security.
DOES CEN BIOTECH INTEND TO SPIN-OFF AND UPLIST TO A HIGHER EXCHANGE?
CEN Biotech Inc. has given notice of its intent to spin-off CEN Biotech Inc. from Creative Edge Nutrition, Inc. It has hired a PCAOB auditor and is far into its audit. CEN Biotech intends to be a fully audited and fully reporting company.
CEN Biotech is planned to be spun-off from Creative Edge and subsequent plans to be a new publicly-traded company.
Announced in this press release.
WHY WAS THE PRE-LICENSE INSPECTION REPORT MADE PUBLIC?
A known shareholder to the company did a Freedom of Information Act request, and received from the Privacy Commissioner under the Authority from Health Canada, the full inspection report. So as to not allow this shareholder sensitive inside information, CEN Biotech, Inc. immediately released the inspection report per their legal obligations to the SEC.
The press release states clearly: “As CEN Biotech Inc. continues in its effort to be transparent, it releases its Health Canada Pre-License inspection report.” The report can be viewedHERE. - The press release can be found HERE.
To address your concern around our inspection report being released; that report was never provided to us after inspection by Health Canada. A shareholder filed a Freedom of Information Request with the Office of Privacy Commissioner to obtain that report. Once that report was released under the scrutiny of the Privacy Commissioner, in full, it was considered public domain; such as other media outlets rely on in their reporting of facts. We were confused as to why Health Canada refused to provide us with the report and we were apprised of the result of the inspection by a shareholder. Only at that time, was CEN Biotech sent a copy of what was intended to be released via FOIA. As a matter of fact, Bill Chaaban denied the request to release any of the information, but was advised by Ms. Vicky Straby that the report had to be released. Once that report was disseminated to one shareholder or individual outside the company, Securities law dictated the company, and Mr. Chaaban as its CEO, was legally responsible to immediately disseminate so as to NOT promote insider trading or an unequal opportunity via market trading. The report had to be disseminated so-as not to put him in a position of liability for providing insider information due to Health Canada’s actions. In fact, Health Canada released a press release in regards to releasing pharmaceutical inspections publicly in an attempt to transparency.
DID ANY OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES OF CEN BIOTECH CLAIM TO HAVE SPECIAL ACCESS TO THE MINISTER OR EMPLOYEES AT HEALTH CANADA?
Roger Glasel personally replied to these allegations directly to the Ministers office as follows: “My involvement with the Minister's activities were peripheral and limited to her constituency office's efforts at citizen involvement, locally. This was in 2010, long before she was appointed to her current portfolio. If anything, I made CEN aware of that brief involvement in Minister Ambrose’s constituency office ahead of participating in the company, for the purposes of disclosure so CEN Biotech Inc. could vet any potential conflict.”
Not I, nor anyone in this company, ever represented that CEN Biotech Inc. had special access to the Minister or anyone at Health Canada. The rate and progression of our application would be evident proof of our claim.
WHY DID THE COMPANY USE A NOM DE PLUME FOR ROGER GLASEL?
Company officers and employees have received multiple death threats and threats of physical harm via email, telephone, and personal visits (some of which have been saved by the Company). Police reports have been made with the appropriate law enforcement agencies. Health Canada was appraised of these death threats via email on December 19, 2014. The email follows:
On December 19, 2014, we notified the Office of the Controlled Substances via email that “As the CEO of a public company, I am being personally harassed, threatened, slandered and defamed because of the time it has taken for our company to complete this process. I do not write to you seeking special treatment, I write requesting a timeline on when our license will be issued or most importantly the Issuance of our license.”.
Bill Chaaban and our company had received in excess of one dozen emails and numerous phone calls threatening bodily harm. Reports were made to the appropriate law enforcement departments. It is this very reason why a nom de plume was chosen to protect the life of our executive team and their families.
WHERE DID THE COMPANY GET TIMELINES FOR PRE-LICENSE INSPECTION?
CEN Biotech was given timelines for inspection via email from Health Canada. CEN Biotech was told by Health Canada officials via email that inspections would be conducted one to two weeks after a call for inspection. This was materially false as it took three months.
WHY WASN’T CEN BIOTECH ISSUED A CONDITIONAL LICENSE?
We felt, from our perspective, we did everything reasonable to ensure we addressed any concern, or requirement, even if those requirements were not required by other LP applicants. We feel that Health Canada, at any time, could have and should have, issued a conditional license pursuant to Section 25(k), since at least June of 2014, and gave CEN Biotech Inc. some indication on final steps, if any, were required.
DOES CEN BIOTECH HAVE THE PROPER ZONING?
On the issue of the Town of Lakeshore, we have been very prudent to ensure that Health Canada knew that their untimely decision to attempt to exempt our facility is of grave concern, especially when a “Ready to Build” letter was issued and all parties agreed there were no issues around zoning at time of construction and substantial investment.(Please see the Minutes of the Lakeshore 11/12/13 Town Council meeting on page 31-32 which documents that zoning was proper resulting in a “Ready to Build” letter.)
We were provided a letter confirming our position that our lands and buildings, with associated permits, et al was IN FACT in conforming use and legal in the aspects of the Chief Building Official, Morris Harding on October 8, 2014 and was also forwarded to the MMPR officials. Key points are the property was zoned properly and in accordance with the Town of Lakeshore Zoning By-Law Number 2-2012.
On February 24, 2015 in the Windsor Star, Steve Salmons, Director of Community Development was quoted as confirming precisely our argument, medical marijuana is a crop, and as such is to be on agricultural land. A move of a facility like ours to industrial will only endanger the quality of the plant, and the end quality to the patient. The article can be found HERE.
To quote Mr. Salmons, “...The property is zoned agricultural,” he said. “Everything they have done so far – even though it might be visually unappealing – is legal as a farming operation. Farms can put up fences or agricultural buildings like a pole barn.”
The land upon which the premises are located are zoned “Agricultural”:
Lakeshore Comprehensive Zoning By-Law s. 4(5)
October 8, 2014 correspondence from Morris Harding
November 12, 2013 memo from Administration (Salmons and Foran) to Lakeshore Town Council
“Processing” of medical marihuana is not an allowed activity under the MMPR, so no processing or “value added” may be done to the crop. It must be grown, harvested and sold
No Authorizations are necessary to grow harvest or sell a crop in an “Agricultural” zone. Site Plan Approval must be made if there is Value added, which includes “a use accessory to an agricultural use, used for the processing and refining of crops and produce....”
Lakeshore Comprehensive Zoning By-Law s. 4(6)
Lakeshore passed new By-Laws and Official Plan Amendments on November 25, 2014. The by-Laws and Official Plan Amendment have not been approved by the County. As the facilities have been built for the purpose of a Medical Marihuana Facility, the new by-laws cannot be applied retroactively. Please see the doctrine of legal nonconforming use.
Central Jewish Institute v. Toronto, [1948] 2 D.L.R. 1 (S.C.C.)
Saint-Romuald (City) v. Olivier, [2001] 2 SCR 898 (S.C.C.)
Confusion between Town of Lakeshore and Health Canada surround comments made by Bill Chaaban. Mr. Chaaban wrote to HC on October 8, 2014 indicating:
“As per your request, a letter dated today, October 8, 2014 whereby the Town of Lakeshore confirms, in writing, we are properly zoned with no issues reported by the Chief Building Official, Morris Harding, whom is the official recognized under the Municipal Act.
Mr. Foran, for the Town, wrote to HC on October 15, 2014:
“The advice provided to you in the October 8th correspondence from CEN Biotech Inc. to the effect that the property is appropriately zoned with no issues relating to the use of that property for medical marihuana production facilities is simply incorrect”
The Applicant submits that they provided accurate information to HC, based on the statements and letters of Town officials. Mr. Foran appears to have misquoted Mr. Chaaban’s words.
Reference correspondence from CEN dated October 19 & 29, 2014 and from Baksh to HC dated October 30, 31 and November 6, 2014.
It is the Applicant’s position that there is no issue as to proper zoning or authorizations to operate the business of a medical marihuana facility on the site.
HC letter - “These unresolved issues lead to concerns about appropriate municipal services being in place.”
The level of municipal services presently in place will be adequate to run the facility. There are no issues as to water, sewage or electrical consumption
CEN letter to HC dated November 18, 2014 with attachments.
DOES CEN BIOTECH HAVE THE PROPER MUNICIPAL SERVICES?
To quote the ‘Town Administrator, “...the property doesn’t have the water, hydro and sewage services that will be needed to support a facility which was touted to annually produce 600,000 kilograms of medical marijuana...”. However, we can honestly state on the record that our organization has been refused ANY further permits, pending Lakeshore counsel’s legal approval of every single permit since the time the amendment was passed in November, 2014 preventing our land use rights to develop the property properly to accommodate any further requirements of the municipality, or that of the facility. We submitted our business plan and third party engineering reports evidencing our proposed build-out to the 600,000kg capacity.
DID CEN BIOTECH RELY ON STATEMENTS MADE BY HEALTH CANADA OFFICIALS?
When relying on the Affidavits of Todd Cain, also of Health Canada, I depose the following facts extracted from his sworn and duly filed affidavits:
CEN Biotech relied on assurances and statements made by Health Canada employees. In particular, the timeline given regarding how soon an inspection to take place after it is called and the issuance of a license after the inspection has been conducted. CEN Executives utilized this timeline to raise funds to build and operate the facility.
Todd Cain stated in his affidavit dated Feb 7, 2014 that he “worked with the Licensing and Permits team to streamline the application process to make it accessible to potential applicants for production licenses” (emphasis added). It appears that this streamline process was not equally afforded or applied to all applicants in the process; especially not CEN Biotech.
In his affidavit, Todd Cain stated “one of the primary strategies has been to conduct an information campaign for production licenses under the MMPR. The goal of this campaign was to generate awareness among potential applicants for production licenses and businesses who could support them, about the legitimate business model created by the MMPR.” CEN has the ability to operate as a viable LP but was unfairly refused to do so by Health Canada.
In his affidavit, Todd Cain stated that Health Canada had created “streamlined processes for processing applications”. Upon information and belief, CEN relied on this statement and watched other LP’s as they progressed to full licensing. CEN was never afforded the opportunity to a streamlined process.
Todd Cain stated in his affidavit, a case management plan was created for triaging applications for production licenses, “this triage system was created to foster efficient and appropriate approval of qualified applicants and start-up of Licensed Producers. CEN was not afforded this opportunity.
Todd Cain stated in his affidavit that “a case management approach was also adopted, which involves appointment of case managers to work with applicants to complete the review process and to enhance timely processing of applications.” CEN was NEVER to its knowledge assigned a case manager.
Todd Cain stated in his affidavit, “Providing applicants with “Ready to Build” letters, upon the completion of the paper review process, upon request. These letters advise applicants that if they complete their site build as described in their application, if the site is verified by a pre-license inspection, and if security clearances are granted, the applicant’s license can be issued. This letter is intended to provide applicants with the documentation they may use to make necessary financial and other business-related arrangements”. CEN fulfilled all of its obligations and met the requirements as set out under the MMPR.
Todd Cain stated in his affidavit, Health Canada is “Providing a “phased licensing process”: If an applicant has completed the paper review and met the regulatory standards for cultivation of dried marihuana”. Health Canada has NEVER afforded the opportunity to CEN for a phased licensing process. CEN asked Health Canada months ago for a phased license and was denied without reason.
We, as an organization, can safely say we were never afforded the same opportunities as others in the MMPR program; clearly by our timeline of events alone.
WILL CREATIVE EDGE NUTRITION, INC. DO A REVERSE IN 2015?
There are no plans for a reverse.http://finance.yahoo.com/news/creative-edge-nutrition-inc-ceo-120000433.html
http://www.cenbiotechinc.com/PlatformApps/CEN/c1/faq.html
Sure let's ignore all the facts.. FACT, CEN was issued a Ready to build letter by HC.
FACT, all municipalities must be inform of the applicants intent to operate a medical marijuana facility as a condition of HC application with sight approval by HC and local government. Before a Ready to build letter can be issued.
FACT, CEN built a facility in accordance with agricultural zoning guild lines and proper permits for such.
FACT, CEN informed Health Canada in April 2014 that the facility is ready for inspection.
FACT, Health Canada did inspection on July 31 2014 (3 months) after inspection request was made.
FACT, Inspection report showed two minor deficiency's. 1) a metal screen must be installed over vent in vault. 2) security camera frame rate must be adjusted. Application meets all other requirements and is ready to proceed with operations.
FACT, CEN immediately corrected the deficiency's and informed Health Canada of the completion.
FACT, No follow up inspection given or rescheduling of inspection done by Health Canada or license granted. No reason given.
FACT, November 2014, LAKESHORE votes to pass new bylaws to regulate medical marijuana facilities. Facilities are required to be located in industrial zoning. (7 months) after CEN informed Health Canada that the facility is ready for inspection. And to ready to begin operations.
FACT, A municipality can not pass new bylaws that effect pre existing facilities. In effect changing there status from complaint to non compliance. Even if they are not fully operational at the time. Only the intention of future operations need be established.
FACT, CEN Biotech has made all efforts and taken any and all steps in accordance with Health Canada's application requirements to become a licensed producer.
I can completely understand share holders angry and loss of capital from selling at great loss. But you should seriously look at source of the decline in the share price of FITX this past year. I think you will find that the actions of lakeshore with the welcoming of the company. There acknowledge and permitting of the CEN facility. And there illegal actions to block and interfere with CEN applications to become a producer under the MMPR along with Heath Canada's delays and failure to act. Is the responsible parties. For unlawfully effecting your investment. And by all mean should be perused and held accountable.
None of these things were cause by the actions of Cen Biotech. Its very clear that for some unknown reason this company came under heavy fire from all directions. through constant delays and accusations. in an attempt to bankrupt the company before getting a foot hold. But I would guess that the 600,000 kg is the most likely reason. And that is cause enough for competition to go on the offensive in a collective effort.
NOT even Close Buddy! LOL!! All Health Canada Had to do was file this 1 simple document. the 305 doc. By Monday March 2nd And they failed to do so.! Why ???? because they are giving Cen Biotech the Licens...
FORM 305 - Rule 305
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE -- APPLICATION
(General Heading -- Use Form 66)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
The respondent intends to oppose this application.
(Date)
______________________________
(Signature of solicitor or respondent)
(Name, address, telephone and fax number of solicitor or respondent)
TO: (Names and addresses of other solicitors or parties)
Service of notice of application
304. (1) Unless the Court directs otherwise, within 10 days after the issuance of a notice of application, the applicant shall serve it on
(a) all respondents;
(b) in respect of an application for judicial review or an application appealing the order of a tribunal,
(i) in respect of an application other than one relating to a decision of a visa officer, the tribunal in respect of which the application is brought,
(ii) any other person who participated in the proceeding before the tribunal in respect of which the application is made, and
(iii) the Attorney General of Canada;
(c) where the application is made under the Access to Information Act, Part 1 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, the Privacy Act or the Official Languages Act, the Commissioner named for the purposes of that Act; and
(d) any other person required to be served under an Act of Parliament pursuant to which the application is brought.
Marginal note:Motion for directions as to service
(2) Where there is any uncertainty as to who are the appropriate persons to be served with a notice of application, the applicant may bring an ex parte motion for directions to the Court.
Marginal note:Proof of service
(3) Proof of service of a notice of application shall be filed within 10 days after service of the notice of application.
SOR/2004-283, s. 16.
Show table of contents
305. A respondent who intends to appear in respect of an application shall, within 10 days after being served with a notice of application, serve and file a notice of appearance in Form 305.
SOR/2013-18, s. 7.