Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
does it matter? some how it will be a negative
proof that thats were they are getting the drinks from. other than i typed some stuff into google and thats the first link i got so it must be them
not to mention the ceo over there that has 30 years in the beverage industry has also been involved with other public companies that have been highly dilutive
you keep saying private label and rebranding like its a negative. funny cuz the other company you have been comparing GRCU is doing the same thing
not true most business do a net 30/60/90 day term for payments. your goal is to expose scams, right?
no one thinks this going to be Red Bull or Monster. Its about slowly rolling out products and building value…
well that CEO w 30 years experience in the beverage industry had very minimal roles if any in those name brand beverage companies he list. he also dosen't list the few otc stocks he's been involved with that has been heavily diluted after he was brought on.
but remember you can't believe anything a stinky pinkie puts out. so how do you know thats whats really going on over there?
Holding the middle Bollinger band and staying above the 50 day moving average not to mention that it looks good on the weekly chart too
It's ok to admite u made a mistake
Because each bottle has 100mg of cbd. The dose on the bottle is 3.9mg because that's what a full dropper holds
milligrams is a measure of weight so it's impossible to have a 117mg when they only put a 100mg of cbd I infused oil in each bottle
it says dose which mean thats how much the dropper will hold
its a 100mg of CBD oil
one ounce bottle or thirty milliliters
each dose from the dropper is 3.9 mg per ml
he even mentions in his on due diligence that richard weed owned those shells and was the sole director, attorney, and so on and so forth. no of which he was here. he was hired to write one opinion letter that is it.
what he was charged with happen through 2006 thru 2010
for a company that benifited him
he was also way more involved with that company than just writing ONE opinion letter for GRCU.
the AS wasn't increased from 500million to 2.5 billion. they increased it from 2 billion AS to 2.5 billion so they only added 5OO million to the AS shares
you just took the highest percentage i mentioned and are trying to discredit me. I'm not talking about other cost associated with only what they will net per a can which 30% is based on figures you gave in one of your post.
monster bottles their on drinks and has been bottling energy drinks for coca cola for awhile they recently partnered with coca cola to help them get into the European market
Also the energy drink market is the fastest growing of the whole beverage market
the point is they are gonna make between between 10% to 30% profit per can on rico suave. which even at the low end is pretty acceptable in just about any industry you go into.
monster is also partnered with coca cola. they have been private labeling coca cola brand energy drinks for awhile
i also don't get why you're trying to turn private labeling into a negative either. many companies do it from clothing to food. why is such a bad thing in your eyes
i bet those 8.4 fl oz have some kinda liquid in them too. so, it must be them cuz I'm never wrong
just to humor you and what do u think monsters profit margin is per a can?
in not worried about it. you're the one that brought it up. so, i assumed it was a concern to you and it would just be further proof for you when you posted the lab report. until than you can't say that any product GRCU is selling is junk
why don't you spend the money and have tested yourself
you can make the same arguments with any otc stock. just insert stock symbol blah blah blah fear fear fear.
if this is what you do how come your only focus is grcu? why not post on all the other scam companies boards?
GRCU has never paid for any promos. he knows that
I have, as well as some others. when you reply with an actually intellectual response. it is ignored
what do you mean?
who is this barry baker guy. I've seen the name thrown around alot
they were never working together
you can say that just about any otc stock but GRCU is up for the year. this about the time the otc starts to heat up again
that don't have the cash right now for a stock buy back. they could however reach agreements to retire shares which would reduce the float and AS
THE A/S is how many shares that can be issued by the company
The O/S is how many they have issued
THE float is how many of those issued shares that are trading
i don't remember the company saying they would ever be back in stock in july. I do however remember people saying on here that it would be. so that it was never coming directly from the company. its one product. not the be all end all.
there is a pic?
can you post
if he was such a well known pump and dump attorney. how come you never brought it up until after the sec indictment? The info you provide here proves he was hired to JUST to do an opinion letter. He had no control over what GRCU did or does. he was not a officer, director, or did he have controlling interest. also, GRCUs has never paid for any promotions.
if he was such a well known pump and dump attorney. how come you never brought it up until after the sec indictment? The info you provide here proves he was hired to JUST to do an opinion letter. He had no control over what GRCU did or does. he was not a officer, director, or did he have controlling interest.
thats only if they include the A/S in the RS. I thought they just raised the A/S not to long ago so i don't know why they would reduce it
are you being sarcastic?