I totally agree with you.
I guess most of us know who the obvious bashers are.
I sure hope the "bond holders" who need to get out, do so before the next major announcement.
Sure is a quiet board without you chiming in...so I thought I'd try to fill a small piece of the void, albeit at a more modest level.

Hang in there, and keep the faith!
ACTC will impress us at some point!

Apparently, It won't bump up because the winning plaintiffs that were awarded vast quantities of stock, keep selling along with what appears (IMO)to be market makers, keep bumping it down for some reason. Obviously, someone is making money depressing the price. I have never seen anything trade as this does.
When we get what looks like a small break out, the Ask price keeps going down even with reasonably good news...
At some point the news will be too good to allow the manipulation to continue.
Keep the faith, ACTC will move up.

That's why it's important to file a formal complaint with the SEC.

I little pressure may be useful here. Don't wait!

MadDog08,
One would think that we would be getting the benefit of some of this action.

It sad that the whole group of shareholders don't just contact the SEC with complaints.

I see that we had a couple of trades today...I'm guessing that people are just throwing in the towel and giving their shares away @.0001 perhaps back to the issuers?

I for one appreciate your info, and hope the powers that be will make an example of these people.

So, you're saying that this seer has "2020" foresight?
...and that we should release the prisoners? I suppose that would be we stock holders?
Any way, love the positive attitude. I think we are still seeing the bondholders selling on the sly.

We will get a good move up once we get some good news out.

If I was short ACTC, I would definitely be looking for the exit.
Do you know what a good squeeze feels like?
Gotta love it!

Go ACTC!

No

Well judging from the share price movement today, I'd say the CC was a disappointment to some...

From BBC news: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-17748165
A link in the last paragraph "Early results" brings one to the ACTC news from January.
Good exposure.

There are those too. I think they are getting smart at covering their sales. I guess there are plenty of ways to accomplish that.

Take a look at the size of the trades today....Looks like we have more sales from the bond holders...lots of blocks of 50,000 and numerous larger sales.

Yes the price got killed, but remember we had an enormous number of shares issued to bond holders; and when you dump that much of anything on the market all at once there is downward price pressure.

Too bad we lost the upward price move that would have happened (with the Lancet article) had there not been the share sale.

Conference Call @ 9:00 A.M. today:
Telephone 888-264-3177
ID 57426004

Louisa, Remember the old westerns where the gun slingers often used the cover of being a man of the cloth? Well these people are likely just sleazebags "Praying" on unsuspecting folks who believe anything that they are told. After all, "christians" don't cheat!
Go ACTC!

Louisa,

That's fabulous.. Thanks!

If anyone knows how to contact "our" team at ACTC, it wouldn't hurt to bring the subject to their attention. Busy people can sometimes miss news at times.

It would be great if Judi Dench fit the requirements for treatment.

Better they hear about it twice than miss the opportunity completely!

It would be great if someone was able to get her into contact with ACTC trials in the UK area. Obviously she is a very cool lady and it certainly wouldn't do ACTC any harm if they could cure her condition!!

Perhaps send the proposal to someone at ACTC ?

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7381/full/nature10761.html

Tell me if I'm wrong, but didn't the judge tell ACTC to turn over the millions of shares to the plantiff(s) in the recent financing ruling?
They are to sell the shares on the open market as soon as possible and put the proceeds into escrow... Wouldn't that put some major price pressure on the stock? I mean they have to sell a lot of shares in a short period. Of course we have the GERN news to pressure the price down as well.
Just a thought, it's gonna take some time to unload so many shares.

Keep the faith! I believe the science will prevail.

People are still in the dark on stem cell research.

http://yourlife.usatoday.com/health/medical/story/2011/05/Unapproved-stem-cell-treatments-causing-concern/47834510/1?loc=interstitialskip

As I stated previously, I'll give them to the end of May. Then we should file a law suit. I'm sure there are lawyers that would take the case.

Their website posts a regular phone # of 714-373-1984, and the toll free # is what you listed as the one that you dialed.
I'd love to hear if you get a response.

If they cared about their shareholders they could EASILY give some kind of update on what's going on. FACTS are NOT illegal to give out. It's when you streeeetch the truth that you get into trouble.

If any of the lawyers will take the case on a contingency basis; I say we inflict some pain on the ACLH "team".
I'll give them 'til the end of May before attempting to get a law suit going.
We may not recover our $$, but these folks should not get off scott free!
I suggest that we re- convene at the end of May.
Perhaps we can put together a better plan than I might do on my own.

GLTA

...so if the company still has its assets, hopefully they really are working on the re-listing as stated? ! ...

Well if management can't give us any kind of update and be (a little) more above board, then we should make the attempt to sue them.
We've been very patient with them, giving them the benefit of the doubt, but there is no reason we can't get some lawyers to cost them some more money if they are truly crooks.
If they transferred assets from our company that's fraud. There will be a paper trail.

Let's give management 'til the one year anniversary of the shut down. If they have nothing for us by then, I say we should rally whomever we have left here and start a law suit.

I called the company about a week ago. I spoke to a guy who said he was a secretary. I asked to speak with someone who could give me an update on the company. He took my name and # and no one called me back.

I came across this info today regarding a capable law firm handling the PUDA fraud case. Perhaps we should give them a chance if we don't hear anything by the end of May.

Any thoughts on this? I don't think we should just drop the issue, no matter who is to blame for the delisting.

Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, with offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville, is a nationally recognized law firm committed to advancing the rights of investors and promoting corporate responsibility.
Since 2003, the National Law Journal has selected Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs' law firms in the nation. In compiling the list, the National Law Journal examined recent verdicts and settlements in addition to overall track records. Lieff Cabraser is one of only two plaintiffs' law firms in the United States to receive this honor for the last eight consecutive years.
For more information about Lieff Cabraser and the firm's representation of investors, please visit .
This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
SOURCE: Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP Sharon M. Lee, 800-541-7358

Do you suppose this is OUR citrus based cleaner?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_oil_sands

Most people that buy a stock leave their shares at the brokerage firm, ( in the street name). Therefor your broker is the stockholder. If you get the certificate sent to you, you are considered the stockholder of record, because the stock is issued (on the certificate) in your name.

A few more days and it will have been 2 months since the corporate posting on their website. Do you think they have gotten around to placing a request to get back on the board?

Nothing new posted on their site.

You'd think they would at least let us poor folks know that the app. is in!

Hey, If anyone wants to give you a deal on their shares, it's their loss! Good luck!

I'm going to propose a guess that we hear something about a reinstatement of the company to Pinks around May 25, 2011. Somehow, the one year anniversary of the suspension may be the key.
Someone will benefit from the long term nature of the deal. IMO

Can't wait to get this trading again!
Go ACLH

Thanx! Seems reasonable.

How does one post a message without it being a reply to someone's message? I can view public reply or private reply but no Post a message...

I don't know who can short penny stocks. I have accounts w/ TD Ameritrade and Scottrade; neither will let you short shares under what I think is a $4.00 minimum. Prob. MMs doing the dirty deeds to our little ACTC. I'm sure they know all the angles to force prices in their direction.

Good news on our stock should push the price up, and the shorts out,
(at least for a while).

It makes little sense to short a stock with great prospects unless you have the ability to manipulate the price to your own advantage.

A short sale is where you borrow a stock from your broker and it is sold immediately; presumably at a high price. You are looking for the stock to go down so you can buy it back at a lower price. There is no time frame stipulated. If the stock price moves up, against you, you must have enough equity in your account to cover the increased paper loss. The higher it goes the more it will cost the shorter to cover their short sale. Eventually they will have to buy it back unless they are very well off. This covering at increasing higher prices causes a short squeeze and even higher prices...

A put is also used to bet that a stock is going to go down. There is time value with puts and calls. They erode in value as they get closer to their expiration date.
With Calls, you are making a bet that the stock will increase in value.
With "options" (puts and calls), you can only lose the premium that you pay for them.

Shorts theoretically can lose an unlimited amount...asuming the owner was not paying atten.

Hope this helps.

I see you posted it ...sorry I'm a little slow getting this started. Better twice than not at all.

Have you seen this new article?
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fighting-diabetes-other-diseases-with-live-cells-2011-03-10?pagenumber=2
Can't hurt the cause.
I'm new to this board so I just popped in on the last post.
Should be a better day today.