Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
the company didn't shutter the doors until the scam was no longer sustainable.....EXPH's longevity had nothing to do with JD keeping Expo holdings/d&d displays as a viable business...JD had long since abandoned that particular 'venture'....JD found wealth in being a LANDLORD via Wilkes Holdings...JD needed EXPH as a source to funnel 'rent' into Wilkes Holdings...that is why he sold the land and buildings to NAFE..and instantly createwd Wilkes Holdings...and EXPH could not raise rent money without selling shares via *INNUENDO* and **ENABLING**...but that has run its course.
Why would ***ANYONE*** continue to TOUT ETC crapinetry as being a ***GAMECHANGER*** well AFTER it was PUBLICLY DISCLOSED that JD HAD ABANDONED the patent application AND TRADEMARK APPLICATION? TIA
'99leadballoons'..... that can not be.... i thought it was all
******HEARSAY****** meant to discredit JD and his **ENABLERS**
of course its not about *you* .....
its about a pump and dump scam run by JD and his **ENABLERS**
it has finally died... it was born- pumped-dumped and died.
*some* put JD up on a pedestal to boost shareholder confidence to ignite additional buying...
JD was portrayed by *some* as a sharp CEO .. a business genious of sorts.. why?
"quick study'....LOL yeah.. real quick!
How such a *brilliant* businessman could go undiscovered in North wilksboro is nothing short of a conspiracy against shareholders of EXPH concocted by a Market maker via *spiteful* trades
**AMAZING** isn't it?
What I find even more *AMAZING* is **SOMEONE** boasting publicly about JD's business acumen... unbelievable..
Why would **SOMEONE** do that ?
Perhaps to build credibility in a scamming CEO which would *enable* this share selling scam known as EXPO HOLDINGS ??
hmmm..
LOL....3/4 million 1st qtr 2009....that was a dandy spewed by the *honorable* CEO JD.
I also remember **SOMEONE** giving rave reviews regarding JD's business acumen..
can you imagine that... actually putting out for public consumption that JD was/is a sharp business man? Why would **ANYONE** state that?
Not talking about hearsay...JD published a PR in oct. of 2008 which stated no issues surrounding credit situation that would have any negative impact on the company....he also stated that if that changed he would notify shareholders IMMEDIATELY....there was no update issued by JD...so since *SOMEONE* constantly vouched for JD's character as being PRISTINE.....how can anyone reconcile the following?:
LATE 2008: JD states PUBLICLY- IN WRITING- company has NOT been negatively affected by current credit market- he goes on to state PUBICLY-In writing if that changes in ANY way he will notify shareholders IMMEDIATELY....no update was ever issued by JD BROWN.
on the other other hand there is conflicting info presented by *SOMEONE* which states that the credit "seize-up" had negatively impacted the company.
so again.. was JD lying late 2008 regarding the credit market and its impact on expo holdings? YES or NO
Understand again that **DEFLECTION** which attempts to provide cover for a scamming CEO is **ENABLING** pure and simple. don't you agree?
hmmmm.... illegal conveyance of shareholder assets is of NO concern to *SHAREHOLDERS*.....
I would think that actual shareholders would be vry concerned with such behavior......don't you agree?
Hypothetical prevents *someone* from answering?
Under what circumstances would such behavior be *OKAY*?
Would such behavior be *okay* if the participants- *JD* and **SOMEONE ELSE** profited ??
Would it be okay if the participants- *JD* and **SOMEONE ELSE** were acting in unison to **DEFLECT** and **ENABLE** thereby continuing the *SCAM*?
While we are on the subject of *wilkes Holdings*
JD sold the building and land which resulted in the rent factor soaring from roughly 5K per month to over $16K per month.
JD created a new entity at this time in history- Wilkes Holdings.
This at a time when the company was bleeding red ink.
JD..via Wilkes holdings claimed $150K+ in rental income.
Scott Nafe- Expo/D&D displays LANDLORD is still owed $151K.
Does **ANYONE** find such behavior honorable?
Does **ANYONE** find this to be an example of a CEO having shareholder's best interests in mind?
Or perhaps would such Behavior be a prime example of illegal conveyance of shareholder assets?
And finally..... should this behavior be defended via **DEFLECTION**? TIA
Nope..... accurate portrayal to the NTH degree.
Connect some dots:
JD(WILKES HOLDINGS) rental income: $150K+
Debt owed to NAFE: $151K
oops
*wilkes Holdings*
*Etc being gamechanger*- even after it was pointed out trademark and patent applications were ABANDONED*
*Raising the A/S was part of *CEO* package*
*Management of high moral character*
*EXPH is TRANSPARENT*
*100 retailers by end of year*
*Equipment is worth 5X Market cap*
*Jay shott debt- **PAID OFF*
*TCF DEBT **PAID OFF*
*Operating at **BREAKEVEN**
*DOGHOUSES for sale at abandoned outlets equals **DIVERSIFICATION*
*COMPANY HAS A SOLID BUSINESS PLAN*
*T-Squared*
*MGMT has **NEVER** sold/DISPOSED OF a single share*
*death of window world CEO caused ETC to go south*
you see... for a scam stock to live long....**cover** is needed.
**ENABLING** pure and simple...all part of a service provided by *er*..certain entities.. positive MB presence.
Interested in vetting are we?
would not the 100 gorilla jumping up and down be:
Wilkes Holdings Income: $151K ???
apparently the POINT is missed...so again:
To think that JD and ***ANOTHER*** person would attempt to draw sympathy by using cancer as a way to deflect and ***ENABLE*** .... that would be DISGUSTING....don't you agree? YES OR NO?
Just a guess on my part SB.....
The Harrs and Browns have co-mingled debts/judgments..
Since JD and his bride have filed bankruptcy I think Glenny boy and his bride are seeking relief via indemnification...as for the contribution claim....in my opinion glenny doesn't want to get stuck for more than what his share of repayment should be...again ..just a guess...it could also be pre-emptive action taken by Glenny boy to sidestep any fraudulent conveyance claims arising from ticked off shareholders or creditors surrounding JD's decision to sell the building and land for personal gain via the creation of WILKES HOLDINGS LLC... and any additional conduct undertaken by JD and co. which fraudulently transferred company/ shareholder assets and best interests for personal gain
Jerry... that is very troubling.....
To think that JD and **ANOTHER** person would attempt to draw sympathy by using cancer as a way to *DEFLECT* and ****ENABLE***
Here's the rub.... ALL of the marked *PAID* examples contained in the post you responded to were NOT PAID...
Many times we all heard the following:
"*JD* has never lied to me"
So when you say: "those with interest could have made the call.."
Why would ANYONE call and ask JD anything? Since *vetting* and *Verifying* is something that you claim an interest in....
Did *ANYONE* *verify* or *vet* the true status of the Jay Shott or TCF UCC's BEFORE posting that these were *paid off*????
Did *ANYONE* *verify* or *vet* the true reason Wilkes Holdings was created before posting that Wilkes Holdings had *NOTHING* to do with EXPH or D&D Displays?
Did *anyone* *verify* or *VET* that JD and MGMT had never ever *sold* a single share before posting it 50+ times?
If no....and *vetting* along with *verifying* are important... why would *anyone* continue to post such false and misleading info
ENABLING pure and simple
The creation of Wilkes Holdings was a topic brought out on this board Many,many months ago... I recall that *someone* stated that wilkes holdings had no relationship to Expo or D&D displays in any way shape or form....
what say *you* now?
No jerry... I believe it is an objection hearing
Rent 150K....... Wilkes Holdings anyone?
the answer and/or link are easily ascertained via this venue.
Sleep well tonight... we'll *chat* more on Thursday.
I suppose you want the want the case # as well?
first things first:
Are you still Stating that JD never sold a single share? YES or NO
Are you still stating that JD selling the building and land was good for shareholders? YES or NO
Are you still on record stating that Wilkes Holdings was NOT set up to funnel "rent" money from the shaver street facility into JD's pocket? YES or NO
Sleep well tonight and we will *chat* some more on Thursday.
OOPS
Jerry... JD and his wife are due in court 4/13/2012 for a hearing regarding their bankruptcy filing... The Trustee assigned to their case is Steven Tate.. the Judge is Laura Beyer.... Western District of North Carolina......
Pump and dumps are pure manipulation.. and as I have told you on previous occasions.. displaying a positive message board presence is a big part of the ruse.. impossible to explain ..*er*... bogus info gets posted for all newbies to *ingest*....
I seem to recall *someone* posting that each indivdual is *responsible for what they post......
So which is it? Public or private?
And yes.. *aspects* related to EXPO must be *ascertained*..
Aspects like .. how many trucks are in the parking lot according to locals?
Did any *local* catch a glimpse of a Cert. ?
No amount of *deflection* and *enabling* will change what we all know... time is running short for the *insiders* and *ENABLERS*.
Good news... don't you agree? TIA
One more question: Are *you* still SURE that JD and Expo are and were *REMARKABLY TRANSPARENT*? Thanks so very much in advance- and please.. since the question has nothing to do with MM's or wash trading..or make believe CEO's please refrain from wandering into irrelevant subject matter with your answer. Toodles for now