If I am not gaming then I am at work
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Exobox's Bank Account,
I believe that account can only be seen by Director's & Officer's which I am neither. If I was a D or O you would not see any posts by me due to it being inside information.
As I said in post 30906,
-Kampa payed some of his back salary w/ the lien money (Around 20K)
-Kampa payed Copeland w/ lien money (Figure unknown, I think 6K-8K)
-Kampa payed priority bills w/ the lien money
-Kampa took the rest of back salary owed to him to lien on the technology
-Kampa did not leave enough money to file the Q or K
All the above was revealed by Mgmt.
Exobox raised $25,000 to file the Q & K, and secure SEC attorney Willie Briscoe. I have seen that term sheet & proceed distribution sheet.
Kampa did take some of his pay from the lien money.
I believe around $20,000
You stated:
"Just a question for you.
If Kampa had taken his pay and expenses from the 340K of funding how much would have been left for operating expenses and to file the K & Q?
I'll not keep you in suspense, there would not have been enough in the bank to file, Exobox would have been broke, again."
?????????????????
Kampa payed himself & others from the lien money. He also payed a few bills that were priority. There was $0.00 dollars from the lien money when Kampa left. The rest of Kampa's back salary was what he used to lien on the technology. That lien money was totally spent & Kampa left Exobox broke. There was no money left by Kampa for the Q & K.
Exobox raised $25,000 to take care of the Q & K, and to secure SEC attorney Willie Briscoe.
Why do you keep defending this guy??????
The mystery consultant..Not really the big question
I know of 6 people that were in on the liens of the technology.
-Kampa & his Doctor friend in Atlanta (Name Unknown)
-Wirtz & Wittenburg
-2 good faith investors that I know are not consultants (Names I will not reveal)
I only know of these 6 people.
Wirtz & Wittenburg should be removed or in the process of being removed from the liens.
The 2 good faith investors will likely negotiate how to recover their invested money & be removed. (Convertible Note, etc.)
Wirtz, Wittenburg, & the 2 Investors are now aware that a funding opportunity was passed to put liens on the technology. They are all bailing out leaving Kampa & his Doctor friend on the liens.
To me it looks like Kampa got all these people to go in on the liens w/ him to throw a buffer on his underlying agenda. This agenda was not to serve Exobox or its shareholders, but an agenda of self-serving interests. Now that all of the buffer agents are disolving, the light is shining pretty brightly on one person.
If this is all true, which more & more each day it looks like it is, The real question is: Can anyone calculate how badly Exobox & its Shareholders got F@#$ed.
-5,000,000 Funding pass to lien on the technology
-Kampa 6 month contract for CEO expires
-Tiptoeing through the tulips to Atlanta follows
-Exobox & Shareholders nearly bombed out of the water
The big question(s)
Where would Exobox be today had Kampa nailed down the 5,000,000 Funding Deal? The coding would have nearly been halfway finished by now.
What is the total amount of damage done to Exobox by liening on the technology & not taking the 5 Million?
Is the liening on the Technology criminal?
Who is going to pay for all the damage done?
Can anyone put some figures to this??????
I will start my figure of at least 5.25 Million.
Read my post #30811,
"I was also made aware by Mgmt. that they will strive for transparency w/ 2 PR Announcements Per Week. IMO, shareholders would be happy w/ 1 every two weeks w/ the way things have been going lately. Nonetheless, if Exobox can get two out a week that would be fantastic, but if they can get 1 per week that would be great to. Mgmt. stated PR Announcements will be coming soon, probably Monday."
I never promised they would, nor did I say when they would start these PR's. I was relaying the information I received from mgmt. to this board exactly how I received it.
Hey geek,
Would you be willing to assist in helping out w/ the coding when it starts. I know Scott has been speaking w/ coders to bring them up to date. If you are local then call Exobox, they may need you. Just a thought.
Take Care,
I M Bandit
The mystery lienholder,
I believe is Wittenburg, but don't hold me to it. It is my understanding that all lienholders are bailing out of this deal. They are owed money, & if they forgive the liens the real question is for what.
That is a great idea,
Do you think PR Announcement per Website Blog versus PR Announcement per Official Filings would get the word out to potential investors. Just a question because I am not sure.
If I had to pick one or the other that would reach more potential investors. I would go w/ the official filing of the PR Announcements.
Also, once Scott has his blog up & running it should be updated frequently.
Also don't forget,
Kampa is costing the company around 100 Thousand in back salary which he used to gain his lien on the technology. Also, we got some F#$%ed up reporting w/ the financials that had to be revised.
What did Kampa produce that benefitted Exobox, NOTHING
IMO, Mgmt. will have a field day w/ Kampa & the liens when negotiations commence. I would love to be a fly on the wall. Someone being destroyed at the negotiation table is always entertaining when your on the team of the destroyer.
I just got off the phone w/ mgmt.
I was made aware Mgmt. has been busting their A$$ for the last 2 weeks. The trouble w/ the previous filings should be cleared up. The lock that compliance officers had on the stock should now be lifted. All is well for now, but Exobox is not out of the woods yet. IMO, Exobox needs to move to step two of "The Rudimentary Plan," the settling of the lawsuits.
I was also made aware by Mgmt. that they will strive for transparency w/ 2 PR Announcements Per Week. IMO, shareholders would be happy w/ 1 every two weeks w/ the way things have been going lately. Nonetheless, if Exobox can get two out a week that would be fantastic, but if they can get 1 per week that would be great to. Mgmt. stated PR Announcements will be coming soon, probably Monday.
Olive Branch accepted,
It was never my intent to threaten, scare, belittle, etc. etc. etc. any Exobox shareholders. I wanted to relay the information from the meeting to all who did not attend. I was just being the messenger, & my a$$ was riddled w/ shot. I expected it though & no harm done.
Onwards & Upwards,
I M Bandit
Agreed,
There has definitely been a lot of fluff from the last CEO's. Hopefully Norm can produce. IMO, SVR might come back. Also, I believe there is no more Camp Kampa. It is my belief negotiations on the liens will be successful. Skipper is a pit bull when it comes to business & negotiations from what I have experienced. Let's see if he makes Kampa return 1,000,000 shares to the treasury & forgive Exobox of the back salary owed to him.
I bet 1 Million Pesos that Skipper goes for the throat.
Just my opinion & prediction,
Take Care
I M Bandit
You will hear no more bickering from me,
If my words get misconstrued & twisted by anyone I will clarify though. Until then, all things regarding Exobox I will Plea the 5th.
Going into lurk status
Take Care,
I M Bandit
Agreed,
When the Q & K come out in a few days, IMO any financials that may be hindering the restricted stock should be taken care of. I remember someone saying that there is a way to petition the company to release the restricted stock w/o having an attorney letter. Not sure though, I will check.
Sweet,
How did you come about restricted shares. Just curious, did you purchase someone's warrant from their PPM, PPM w/ the warrant, or was it something else. My family is having the same issue w/ their warrants, 5 in total are restricted.
I'll see if I can find out if the company can be petitioned to release the restricted warrants w/o going through an attorney. I am not really sure how that works. I'll post what I find soon.
For the record, I do not have insider knowledge. I am at a tremendous loss w/ my Exobox stock. The only thing I have is a general idea.
Well,
In 2003 I spoke w/ Scott who is a friend of mine. Scott asked me if I wanted to purchase a 1% block for 20,000. He was raising money to get the company started. I was the first 3rd party investor. The 3 investors ahead of me were Sherman Pernia, Jim Metts, Mark Wittenburg. They were the original board. I am not employed by Exobox, I recieve no stock, money or benefits from Exobox. I have no inside information.
I know it looks like bickering, but a certain poster likes to twist & misconstrue my words. So I am compelled to clarify. I do not want to mislead or state things that are not fact. If I post anything that is my opinion I will put IMO, I believe, It is my understanding, etc.
Take Care,
I M Bandit
Laser here is "The Rudimentary Plan,"
1. File the Q & K
2. Negotiate Liens
3. Settle the Lawsuits
4. Attain D & O Insurance
5. Attain new Board Members
6. Pursue Funding
IMO, everyone of them have to get done
10Q is priority, an extension I believe adds 5 days. June 17 is the day. De-listed if it is not filed by then. I believe an 8K will come out w/ the 10Q
Liens & Lawsuits are the next priority
Once insurance is attained, Exobox can add new board members.
Seeking Funding IMO, should be done the whole time.
IMO, Exobox will PR as milestones are achieved. They will not PR detailed hour-hour, day to day & so on. It would get real expensive to PR that much.
Laser might I suggest sending a resume to Exobox for an advisory board seat. I believe they will be putting one together.
Thanks Laser,
I think you mean that through my clarification maybe TLG has seen the light. I have a hard time thinking that is possible because someone either does not get it or they just love to twist people's words around to try & make themselves look like they have a clue.
Good Luck w/ all your endeavors
I M Bandit
Laser you are mistaken,
The tune has not changed, I just clarified so that you could understand. If the solicitation of proxy was/is ever valid. All shareholders that pledge will be considered as one. "One" defined as shareholders are now Affiliate status, which means if any Exobox shares are bought/sold by any Affiliate, then the Affiliate is required to have approval through Form 13D & Form 4.
I believe that is an important detail that was failed to be mentioned to shareholders during the solicitation. If a shareholder is an Affiliate & does not file the proper forms they could get into trouble. I have also said do not take mine or anyone's word for it & to seek professional assistance. It is a clever attempt to twist my words but a failed one none the least.
Furthermore, I want to point out that I am in no way, shape, or form involved in any of your past or present endeavors.
Laser if you will,
You have stated swing & a miss w/ post 30212.
I gave you the go ahead to correct it if anything in it is non-factual. I certainly do not want to mislead anyone on this board.
You stated in post 30740
"I would have carpal tunnel syndrome if I attempted to correct everything in the referenced post."
I have good reason to believe that it cannot be corrected by anyone do to the material being all fact. However, if I am wrong w/ that assumption please be careful if you attempt to correct it per your statement in post 30740.
Thank You Laser,
Willie Briscoe is an SEC attorney. Remember, Willie Briscoe was retained to protect the company from certain shareholders. A shareholder posted "Emergency Shareholder Meeting" to be held at Willie Briscoe's office. His office in downtown Houston had a closed Exobox meeting that was crashed by shareholders. Many shareholders that showed up to Briscoe's office were under the impression the company was having a shareholder meeting. I happen to work w/ several of them that had that very impression. I explained to them that they were simply misguided.
Willie Briscoe has found 12 violations against SEC Rule regarding certain shareholders. Willie Briscoe is moving forward & the case will be approaching the discovery phase soon. I do not believe that any shareholder that pledged their shares will be involved in the suit. It is my understanding that Willie Briscoe will be pursuing the leaders & those closely involved w/ the leaders.
The above is not intended to be a threat, it is just information for shareholder's to know where some of their money went.
In post 30209 that keeps getting pasted by someone,
I was recommended to "Lawyer Up." Then I proceded to have my rebuttal.
If you are inferring from post 30209 that I am recommending for all shareholders of Exobox to retain attorneys then you are mistaken. Post 30209 was directed at one person & one person only.
If anyone invested in Exobox has any question about solicitation of proxy rules & what shareholders need to do when shares are pledged, Please do not take anyone's word for it. Seek professional assistance for yourself. I am in no way advising or recommending any shareholder to retain an attorney.
Take Care,
I M Bandit
Please elaborate,
What do you mean swing & a miss???????
Is there something you find non-factual w/ post 30212
If you do find anything non-factual in it, feel free to correct it.
It is my understanding Exobox has lowered its overhead tremendously.
Exobox is operating in Skipper's building w/ free rent & resources. I have heard they have lowered the monthly server fees as well.
If Exobox can stay in its current position (Low Overhead), while taking care of its priority issues in "The Rudimentary Plan". I seriously think the company can do some major catch up. Hopefully, everyone working there is not going to set themselves up w/ fantastic salaries, options, severences, golden parachutes, etc. That is what sunk us in the first place, & if they do that it will sink us again.
For right now my honest opinion is that I do not see bankrupcy & I see the liens being negotiated.
Agreed,
I hope noone gets in trouble or has to spend any extra amount of money on a technicality (for lack of a better word).
Onward & Upward
The rudimentary plan,
IMO, everyone of them have to get done
10Q is priority, an extension I believe adds 5 days. June 17 is the day. De-listed if it is not filed by then. I believe an 8K will come out w/ the 10Q
Lawsuits, probably need to be negotiated. Once settled Exobox can get its D & O Insurance.
Once insurance is attained, Exobox can add new board members.
Seeking Funding IMO, should be done the whole time.
You are not even the slightest bit interested to see the term sheet. C'mon gimme a break. That would be a fascinating Exobox topic for this board, rather than the same old flogging of the dead horses.
I have not tried to scare anyone on this board. What I have posted is nothing more than information a concerned shareholder may want to look at.
If shareholder's think it is a scare tactic to post information that Exobox has secured an SEC attorney to protect itself, then I do not know what to say. Willie Briscoe's meeting w/ Exobox was crashed by shareholders that were under the impression it was an "Emergency Shareholder Meeting". It is a fact that Willie Briscoe is an SEC attorney that was hired w/ shareholder money to protect itself from certain shareholders.
Willie Briscoe has found 12 violations & counting of SEC rules. All the information was stated by Skipper & Scott.
Exobox Term Sheet,
Post #30510:
"I just want to be sure we are looking at the same term sheet.
Obviously either it has been doctored, or the people reading it do not comprehend the terms."
Can you please post this term sheet you were looking at. This is important for Exobox shareholder's. Exobox could have had funding & coding started. This term sheet can shed a lot of light on things.
Maybe so maybe no, But................
Perjury is a felony in any U.S. court.
Perjury is considered a serious offense as it can be used to usurp the power of the courts, resulting in miscarriages of justice. In the United States, for example, the general perjury statute under Federal law defines perjury as a felony and provides for a prison sentence of up to five years.
The preceding taken from the Wikipedia
I do see your point,
I was stating that Skipper moving in & breathing new life into the company versus Regan liquidating the company, IMO he saved it. I am speaking only for myself on that one.
The forcing of the shares returned to the treasury & aquiring oil/gas assets for Skipper's fee of 50 Million shares, to me that seemed as a take the deal or the company dies type thing. Just my opinion.
If I was one of the guys that had to return 60 Million shares, I would be saying who the hell is this guy coming in here & strong-arming me in my own company. I would not like it at all. IMO
When the oil/deal was rescinded & Skipper returned 20 Million shares & kept 30 Million shares. No penalties, no harm, no foul. IMO, that was greedy. You & I are in complete agreement. I have no idea of Skipper's reasons behind that one.
I guess it could be fair or almost fair to say that he is finally starting to earn those shares. Again my opinion.
You stated:
"I ask you this... do you want to put your trust in someone that screwed Exobox and it's shareholders and who is struggling financially? I know that I cannot trust him until certain answers have been provided."
The way I look at it:
Regan was going to liquidate everything in 2009: He collateralized the SOS patents on a loan agreement, He was going to sell the SUEZ Technology for 1.2 million, & Exobox would have been finished in 2009. There were no deals on the table & Regan thought liquidating was the best route to go.
IMO,
Sam Skipper saw his opening & took it. Skipper offered a deal that Regan had to take because it was better than liquidating. Sam Skipper brought Exobox back from the dead.
Objective
-Sam's deal gave Exobox a positive asset value of around 8 Million in the books
-Skipper stated at the meeting "I know oil/gas does not go w/ technology, this deal was done to give Exobox value w/ assets not take Exobox into the oil business, I am no moron."
-Skipper stated at the meeting he "pays his taxes & has perfect credit." His word.....no proof
-Skipper is consulting for Exobox
-The return of shares from Copeland, Goodman, & Pernia increased all shareholder equity value around 22%.
-Skipper took his cut of 50 Million shares, & shareholder equity value still up around 18%.
-Skipper returned 20 Million shares & shareholder equity value still up around 20%
-Skipper is providing free office space & resources for Exobox
-Skipper is battling Kampa over the liens & trying to reveal to everyone how shady that transaction was.
Subjective
-IMO, if Skipper is proven to be in financial trouble & taking advantage of Exobox to get out of that trouble, then yes I agree he cannot be trusted.
-IMO, until I see proof of him being in financial trouble I have to give him the benefit of doubt (Innocent until proven guilty)
-IMO, if Skipper's equity position is truly in the way of attaining funding, I believe he will negotiate. "Take a dose of his own medicine" as you said......that was good by the way.
-IMO, I believe Skipper feels that his 30 Million shares are justified by at least the things I mentioned above under Ojective. Other people at the meeting could probably verify that.
-I heard from a reliable source there were actually 90 million in oil/gas assets. Acquisition PR's were going to be released incrementally to boost the PPS. Treasury shares released on the incremental SP rise to fund coding. Skipper's Master Plan to push to the AMEX that Kampa rescinded (the rescinding of the deal is Fact, everything else Hearsay).
-IMO, Skipper is one of the very few that is on the shareholder's side. The other being Scott Copeland. We will have to see about Norm
-IMO, Norm, Scott, & Skipper at least need to be given a chance as long as the company is alive.
-IMO, is 30 Million shares too much, I guess if one person has that huge of an equity position versus my family, friends, & myself losing every bit our money w/ no chance to ever get it back I think I would learn to deal w/ it.
-IMO, Skipper saved Exobox from liquidation in 2009
-IMO, if it was not for Skipper in 2009 we would not be here
-IMO, if it was not for Skipper now we may not be here in September 2010
All the above under Subjective is my personal honest opinion as a concerned, reasonable minded shareholder, & advocate for my family/friends.
Kampa has liened on the assets. If he gets them noone will be able to follow & invest in the technology. Exobox will implode.
Objective: The terms sheet was made available for scrutiny at the recent meeting. Also, Laser Guy Stated in his Post #30510:
"I just want to be sure we are looking at the same term sheet.
Obviously either it has been doctored, or the people reading it do not comprehend the terms." Maybe LaserGuy could post this term sheet so everyone can see it.
Kampa will create a brand new company. Not from Exobox but a brand new entity w/ a new name. Kampa's company will not be public. The stock you now hold in Exobox will turn into a dung pile.
Subjective: That was the plan I heard from a very reliable source....Apologies
If this was a last resort w/ no deals on the table for Kampa then maybe it would fly. Subjective
It has became apparent that there was a deal on the table but Kampa chose not to pursue the opportunity. In doing that right there shows me that he had an underlying agenda which puts him in breach. Not a very smart thing to do in a company that does not have D & O Insurance.
Objective: The proof has been made public via term sheet, & Exobox does not have D & O Insurance.
He was not the only one on the liens. Several lienholders have removed their names & that speaks volumes in itself.
Objective: Wittenburg & Wirtz have removed their names from the liens. Verified at the recent meeting
If Skipper is battling against the liens, providing office space & resources for Exobox, while increasing every shareholder's equity 20%. I could not give a $%#t if he had 30 Million or 50 Million Shares. I want to be on his team. It is much better than the alternative.
Objective: Skipper is providing office space & resources in his building free of charge @ 3315 Marquardt Houston, TX. Skipper increased everyone's equity percentage when Copeland, Goodman, & Pernia returned their shares.
Yes, absolutely I care that people are losing money. My family & myself are down around 250K. I just would like to see the intelligent people on the board come up w/ solutions to fix the company.
Lately it seems like everyone is just fine on predicting how the company is going to fail & beating a herd of dead horses. IMO, that is killing your own investment. Exobox is not done (I was wrong), it is still alive & everyone's investment still has a chance to come back to even money or profit.
I am not asking/telling anyone to spend more money or follow me anywhere. Just start coming up w/ solutions......that is a good topic right. The beating of the dead horses is getting old.
You stated: -Not without giving away 85% of the company
-Maybe if Dillon and Skipper gave back all of their
FREEBIE shares.
OK, that is a start. Solutions
Ok, first of all this is exactly the kind of post that damages the company.
Although you stated it is your opinion. Your opinion is based on pure speculation, furthermore you stated finance is your livelihood but I do not see any credentials.
You stated: "So what is Sam's plan?" & you followed that up w/ subjective conjecture as if you wrote the business model yourself. Have you spoke to Skipper about his plan? Is what you explained here what Skipper told you?
I don't know about anyone else, but I would like to hear Skipper's plan from Skipper before I begin to break down & analyze what I speculate his plan to be.
You stated: Sam's only plan can be to raise the PPS as much as it can be raised and sell his stock.
Again, have you spoke w/ Skipper on what he intends to do w/ his stock. Did he tell you his divestment strategy? Personally I hope he takes the company to the AMEX & becomes filthy because I will be filthy to.
You stated: I am not saying that Kampa and Co.'s lien on the patents will be good for me, but at least I stop my bleeding.
I take it you are ready for it to be over & hope Kampa gets the assets.
If people want to invest they to contact Exobox or there broker. I am not contacting people.
If you are truly a finance guy, why not pour your energy into finding a viable solution & post that.
Not a swing & miss,
Mr. Griffith apparently was terminated for cause.
Termination. The agreement should contain provisions regarding the circumstances under which the parties may terminate the agreement and the obligations of each with respect to such termination.
Termination "for cause." The association should retain the right to terminate the CEO "for cause"; e.g. actions by the CEO involving gross negligence, willful misconduct or material breach of the employment agreement, or other grounds agreed to by the parties. The agreement should include provisions for due process in which the CEO receives prior written notice of the reasons for termination and an opportunity to respond to them in a confidential hearing.
I have not seen his employment contract so I do not know the reason for his departure.
Also you said: "You are also accusing some pretty big names of "crooked $@#t" as you know some very staunch Exobox supporters put money in on this transaction to save the assets of the company from expiring worthless."
I say, I also know that several individuals in on the very questionable transaction have removed their names completely. Which speaks volumes in & of itself.
Continual negative postings are part of the (problems), they are not the sole problem. The preverbial spamming of the dead horse (e.g. pump n dump, Skipper has 30 millions shares, crooked past mgmt.) are not helping. A company that does not have support of its shareholder base will fail (guaranteed).
I was once part of the negativity because I took a major loss & did not have a clear understanding of what was happening at the time. I swallowed a big dose of "Kampa Koolaid" believing no funding due to legacy issues & proceeded to have my tirade on this forum in April.
When I got Skipper & Scott's side of the story which is what I posted in #30586. My position has changed.
About the war, I think what you are referring to is Exobox addressing the initiative. Exobox has not declared war on the shareholder's, it needs each & everyone of its shareholders behind the company. IMO, Exobox believed the initiative was skewed to one side of the story & fueled by mis-information. The company needed to do something of a shock & awe manner to open shareholder's eyes to the whole story. There may be suits, depositions, reimbursement, fines, etc. bestowed upon certain individuals involved because it was detrimental to the company & the initiative was not approved by the SEC first. It is what I have heard anyway.
I look at it like this,
Kampa has liened on the assets. If he gets them noone will be able to follow & invest in the technology. Exobox will implode.
Kampa will create a brand new company. Not from Exobox but a brand new entity w/ a new name. Kampa's company will not be public. The stock you now hold in Exobox will turn into a dung pile.
If this was a last resort w/ no deals on the table for Kampa then maybe it would fly.
It has became apparent that there was a deal on the table but Kampa chose not to pursue the opportunity. In doing that right there shows me that he had an underlying agenda which puts him in breach. Not a very smart thing to do in a company that does not have D & O Insurance.
He was not the only one on the liens. Several lienholders have removed their names & that speaks volumes in itself.
If Skipper is battling against the liens, providing office space & resources for Exobox, while increasing every shareholder's equity 20%. I could not give a $%#t if he had 30 Million or 50 Million Shares. I want to be on his team. It is much better than the alternative.
Also during the oil/gas acquisition,
I posted the 2009 listing requirements for Amex per OTCBB.
Posted by: I_M_Bandit Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009 4:32:42 PM
In reply to: ucantfoolmee who wrote msg# 25730 Post # of 30578
AMEX list requirements:
Regular Financial Guidelines
-Pre-Tax Income of 750k for most recent yr. or 2 out of the most recent 3 yrs.
-Market Value Public Float of 3 Mil
-Stockholder's equity 4 Mil
-A Min. initial bid price of $3.00
Alternate Financial Guidelines
-Market Value Public Float of 15 Mil
-Stockholder's Equity of 4 Mil
-3yr. Operating History
-A min initial bid price of $3.00
AMEX is the most lenient on list requirements compared to NASDAQ or NYSE. Also AMEX is making great efforts to get more tech stocks to list on their exchange. Let's hope EXBX will eventually be one of them.
If you go way back to before the oil deal was canned.
22.5 Mil in assets was initially acquired. I did hear from a reliable source there were more oil/gas assets that were going to be added to Exobox. A total of 90 Million in oil/gas asset value. They were going to be added in increments to boost PPS. The plan was to increase PPS incrementally & secure funding incrementally as the PPS rose. Kampa did not like this plan & squashed it.
Check out my Post 25489, 25693
I have never met SVR, & we have never spoke. I did see him at the cookie fest standing up front. I have never heard anything bad about SVR. I will not comment on his compensation or job duties because I don't know.
I hope Mr. Skipper gets filthy rich. I hope his PPS in Exobox goes into the dollars.
Remember its not just Mr. Skipper its Mr. Copeland to. Let's see what Norm has up his sleave.
I will refer you to my post 30490.
I receive no money or stock. All shares I have are shares I personally paid for.