Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Right now going out a bust is the only option. No Funds. No Projects. No IPWG.
IMO
I have been in this stock for about 5 years and agree as well that ipwg shold issue a pr or shut the doors. At this stage a write off seems obvious outcome.
IMO
If JB can't handle the criticism maybe he should step down? If shareholders are mis-interpreting the PR'S being released maybe JB should clarify what they are saying?
After all what is hard to interpret about a word like imminent? According to my Webster Dictionary it means ready to take place.
So far us shareholders have only seen the funds imminently not arrive as of this posting. Also, we have not seen the projects imminently happen, which is easy to interpret.
IMO
How about a Disney World day? For those of us on the left coast we could have a Disneyland day?
Maybe this will finally be are winter of discontent.
IMO
"sopranos going green". That's Amore
Mr B is doing his best at not informing us shareholders of what is going on in IPWG land. Without updates from our crack management team at IPWG all we have is rumors or nothing.
IMO
Was it with Fidelity or Options Express? I think Fidelity will make an exception to there opening amount. Something to check on.
I checked with the local Fidelity center and was told the initial opening deposit is $2,500. Options Express does not have a requirement for an opening deposit
Smart money investing in IPWG? Yeah Right.
Sell at TDA? My TDA account does not allow sales due to the chill
Talk talk talk and oh yeah more talk. That's all IPWG has had. The Irish are just putting a new jig on an over cooked turkey. Like the talk IPWG has always been profitable at some point in time. Now is some point in time and IPWG is still not profitable. IPWg still has no product or service it is providing. Now IMO is the time for IPWG to put up or shut the doors.
Received this message from TD Ameritrade regarding the chill on IPWG.
Sat Nov 20 2010 11:01:45 AM EST Page help
Yes there is still a chill on IPWG.
Sincerely,
Trade Resolution, TD Ameritrade
Division of TD Ameritrade, Inc.
Original Message Excluded:
Did not make any buy sell orders. Just inquired with Ameritrade if I could. Nothing mentioned about the chill. Asked a follow up question. have not checked back with Ameritrade yet.
No more Chill? I still have shares in TD Ameritrade and inquired if IPWG can be sold. Received a reply that stated IPWG I could place a trade for my holding in IPWG. Nothing about a chill mentioned.
That wish being a tax write off.
$40 or 50 bucks? Transfer back in the oo's? Obviously you have not doen your DD. Brokers charge $75.00 to transfer. It does not make sense to pay $75.00 to move around a bottle of bad canoli. I am not holding on to this bad canoli of an investment to just biotch about it. My money can be better spent elsewhere than paying $75.00 to some broker to move worthless shares to another broker.
How about that IPWG management working in shareholders best interest. Where's that "imminent cash"?
To give a way to sell would be to remove the chill. I would love to dump this dog, but due to the chill I can not. Sure I can go to Fidelity or BofA/Merrill Lynch. But, why would I waste my money to transfer this dog to just to sell it at the price it's at. It would be better IMO for the shareholders for IPWG to close it's doors.
When I first got introduced to IPWG that was the way that it was talked about as a "sure thing". To talk about IPWG as a risk or to ask questions was more than just frowned upon it was was not tolerated. Especially by people who do not and /or claim to not post on IPWG MB's
Let's follow IPWG'S lead to Barchart via IPWG's Website. I go to Barchart I see under Composite Indicators/Trendspotter Signal=SELL
Short term Indicaters Sell x4 Hold x1 80% sell All other indicators sell
Looking at what investor information IPWG leads me to plus the empty PR'S who would want to buy this dog of a stock.
IMO it's time to shut the doors this dog is a goner.
I for one have no problem stating IPWG is dead. As for a law suit that maybe a good idea. As ipwg investor said on another board all that will be left will be 12cents after all is done. Well that will be 12 cents more that IPWG has now.
IMO
Peter and John working hard? Well looking at the fruits of there labors one would have to ask a few things. Working in the shareholders best interest? Looking at what they both have individually accomplished and accomplished while both on board IPWG IMO one can only say no.
Why does IPWG put out PR's that are not followed up on or followed thru? Even with JB we have PR'S that state something that is not followed thru. For example the funds comming or the mysterious china trip.
Peter and JB working hard for the shareholder? IMO no they are not working for the shareholders.
Well said.
When I last talked to JB he stated that they weer waiting for money to get the additional reporting done. That was back in September.
I got the same response from JB when I asked him about the chill.
JB sould not be concerned with message board chatter. If an executive with a company is concerned with what people are saying about a company then that executive has there priorities in the wrong place.
The main thing a person in Mr Benvengo's position should be focused on is delivering the goods. Meeting goals and getting the job done.
IMO
Hey investor let me make it clear John Benvengo did not call me to give an update. In a message he did ask for a retraction. For what??? Then calls me later and states that are discussion was in confidence? No mention by JB about the conversation being in confidence or agreement between us that it was.
Investor sometimes things that are very stange to believe actually happen.
IMO
JB just did not call to give an update. IMO he called me and stated that what he did not like me posting what I posted. JB did not just pick up the phone to give me an update after talking to me earlier
Is there more to this call from JB it's with JB.
Two phone calls that I am refering to were out of the blue and not return phone calls. JB only made one return phone call to me and I mention that in post #11455 here on IHUB.
JB mentioned when I talked to him during his second call to me that he lost confidence in me for posting what we discussed. He mentioned that what we talked about was in confidence. There was no mention by JB that what was being discussed was in confidence or inside information. He did mention that people were calling him based on that post.
JB has stated to me that he does not know me. Which is true. We have never met. I am just a shareholder in IPWG. JB has mentioned to me don't go by what you here on a message board.
JB knows what and what not to say. If he is concerned what is said on MB JB needs to keeps us investors informed.
Getting the money? I don't know about that. Why would are JB have to make a call to me? Liitle ole power and ask mou about how difficult it is to deal with an overseas funding company. Of course there is JB mentioning in a July 27 message that he is trying to do "something that has never been done before". I wonder what that is? Could it be run a company without revenue from the sale of a product or service or sale of more stock?
Resign after the money comes. That's your new message from jack Wagenti quoting Peter "Pinochio" Toscano. Investor your the one talking about the resignation I am not.
IMO
IPWG getting the money? JB stating to me "do you know how difficult it is working with a sunding company" tells me he does not know how to work with a funding company.
I think the Italian company pulled out of the deal with IPWG. Why would they? Everyones guess is as good as mine. we are comming up on one year after the anouncement of the deal and it is still not going. The repersentative of the Italian comapany took his seat on the board and left. IPWG issued stock without telling us shareholders or getting our approval.
I am ready to write off IPWG I do not see IPWG going anywhere, but out of business.
IMO
Investor. In his first call to me he did not say what he was telling me was in confidence. JB asked me if I made a posting on a message board after we talked. reference IHUB Post #11455. JB stated that he had people call him in regards to his comment "the way things are in the world today". Apparently some people we calling him and asking about that statement.
Yes I did talk to JB on 09/14/2010 @7:58AM PDT and again @ 10:39AM PDT.
He talked about how could he have confidence in me if I am going to post what he said. Mind you there was no understanding or agreement about the info being communicated as being confidential.
To quote JB from a call he made to me in January of this year Mr Benvengo stated that he does not know me. Mr Benvengo and myself have never met In a message he left me on 07/27/2010 he stated some info that he had he could not tell me. because if he told me he would have to tell everyone else.
When John Benvengo mentions something to me in a call it is understood to be information available to everyone. I do not accept any information that is classified or can be considered inside information. If it is inside information or classified John benvengo should not be releasing such information to anyone. Even to me
In the last call JB made to me on 09/14 JB mentioned about how hard it is working with an overseas funding company. he did not go into specifics.
Also, he mentioned that he was not responsible for what happened before he joined IPWG. This is a topic he brought up. For what reason I don't know. He brought it up in a call made to me in January as well.
I think I am like other sharholders in IPWG. Wanting to know what is going on with IPWG. Management IMO ows us shareholders info as to what is going on it is there job to honestly communicate to us shareholders.
JB mentioned in his call to me that there were 3000 shareholders in IPWG. Minus John Benvengo, Peter Toscano and the BOD I think that the 2000 plus shareholders would like to know what is going on with the company we own stock in.
IMO
I myself received a call from John Benvengo myself recently regarding post #11455 that I made here on IHUB.
JB wants me to retract what I said in that message. he stated to me that what was said was said in condidence.
My understanding is what he tells me via phone is not in confidence and he can not tell me anything different than what he tells other investors in IPWG.
Clueless at best? sounds like the majority of IPWG shareholders since IPWG does not update us shareholders with any current PR'S.
IMO
Got a call this morning from Mr Benvengo. he stated that things are looking positive. Funds have not been received. The reason for the funds not being received yet is the "way things are in the world today". I take it as being the economy.
While you're at it how many relationships does John B have on his LinkedIn account.
To be redundant I have asking since 2006 when I was introduced to IPWG. What technology? Since I started asking this question no one has been able to name or describe one piece of technology that IPWG posesses, other than Add-Power.
IMO IPWG has no WTE technology.
The technology? What technology? The only technology I've been hearing about since from IPWG since 2006 are the non existant technologies mentioned by Peter Toscano.
Have not seen one of Peter Toscano's and now John Benvengo's synergistic waste reducing energy generating technologies actuated.
IPWG claims to have Add Power. But, since IPWG started testing we have not received any results or seen anything from IPWG to drive any potential Add Power users to purchase and use this "technology".
If IPWG is going to turn on a dime it will be a miracle. I personally do not believe in miracles and do not expect one here. The only thing IPWG management is experienced in doing is run a company based on empty promises utilizing non existent synergistic technology.
IMO
Forget the past? Anyone who does is doomed to repeat it. I don't like reapeating things. Reapeating things seems to be IPWG'S MO. Get a MOU regarding a project. Go on to getting another MOU or Letter of uderstanding or aggreement. Then repeat again and again. Then never follow up on previous anounced projects. This is way past nausiating.
imo