Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
we've had 30 minutes with no trades before during the course of the day.
This isn't exactly a liquid stock right now. Those that have it have it, those that got rid of it did, and I don't think anybody "new" besides Pike is diving in.
Go back and look at trades on some of the super low volume days, you'll see this has happened before.
first trade just came through at .03.
Is it one and the same?
http://www.thegarden.com/corporate/advertising.html
Under their properties, they list the Mets as one of them.
Could "The Garden" be the actual company that had the contract with SPNG to advertise for The Mets?
your thoughts on the Yahoo suit filed by Steven?
No Pacer documents on this one...different system.
that would be a company issue though, wouldn't it?
did I ever say otherwise?
and why would Steven be going after Yahoo?
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASSearch
Search Steven Moskowitz, or the index number.
enjoy.
Steven going after Yahoo? Case type, other special proceedings?
Court: New York Civil Supreme
Index Number: 116808/2009
Case Name: MOSKOWITZ, STEVEN Y. vs. YAHOO!, INC.
Case Type: Other Special Proceedings
Track: Standard
RJI Filed: 12/15/2009
Date NOI Due:
NOI Filed:
Disposition Deadline:
Disposition Date:
Calendar Number:
Jury Status:
Justice Name: GOODMAN, EMILY
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
BROWN RUDNICK LLP. Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
SEVEN TIMES SQUARE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036
1-212 209-4800
What is your thought on Steven filing suit against Yahoo?
or you could just post your actual thoughts about why he has a suit filed against yahoo....
instead of taking some jab.
Why would Steven be going after Yahoo?
Steven going after Yahoo? Case type, other special proceedings?
Court: New York Civil Supreme
Index Number: 116808/2009
Case Name: MOSKOWITZ, STEVEN Y. vs. YAHOO!, INC.
Case Type: Other Special Proceedings
Track: Standard
RJI Filed: 12/15/2009
Date NOI Due:
NOI Filed:
Disposition Deadline:
Disposition Date:
Calendar Number:
Jury Status:
Justice Name: GOODMAN, EMILY
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
BROWN RUDNICK LLP. Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
SEVEN TIMES SQUARE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036
1-212 209-4800
I'm not quite sure why the "lawsuit" isn't showing up on the New York civil court system search..
Search the New York State Civil court system:
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASSearch
there is only ONE case listed and it is this:
Court: Suffolk Civil Supreme
Index Number: 040171/2009
Case Name: SPONGETECH DELIVERY SYSTEMS, vs. CRESTA CAPITAL STRATEGIES, LLC
Case Type: Contract
Track: Standard
RJI Filed: 01/08/2010
Date NOI Due:
NOI Filed:
Disposition Deadline:
Disposition Date:
Calendar Number:
Jury Status:
Justice Name: DCM-JUSTICE
Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:
GERSTEN, SAVAGE, KAPLOWITZ ESQ Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
600 LEXINGTON AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10022
(212) 752-9700
Attorney/Firm For Defendant:
SHELOWITZ & ASSOCIATES, PLLC Attorney Type: Attorney Of Record Atty. Status: Active
11 PENN PLAZA, 16TH FLR.
NEW YORK, NY 10001
(212)937-9785
Appearance date is stated as 1/25
All I want is a case number for what was supposed to have been filed in court.
There is none on PACER.
A bit odd if you ask me.
I've searched PACER high and low and have not turned up any sort of lawsuit in any court.
ever think about looking at what Dicon has?
http://www.google.com/patents?q=dicon+technologies
Spongebob showing up in the actual brick and mortar CVS's around the country is old news?
Odd, considering it was "new" news to many.
And even more odd, considering they just started arriving in the past week.
what does that even mean, "wasn't there supposed to be a PR today"?
I surely didn't say that Patchy. So please help me understand why you stated that directed towards me.
That's not "old" news Kitt, that's fresh news. CVS was NOT carrying Spongebob, now they are. That would be new...not old...right?
And your "prediction" about trading at .03 has been wrong for 6 weeks, guess you got 1 trade right this week. So, you're what, 1 for 7 on your weekly guessing?
Throw enough darts and you're bound to hit something..
Thanks for being concerned with what I do and if I "ride it down", I'll be sure to send you a Christmas card for your concern and love.
no comment on the fact multiple CVS's have been reported to stock Spongebob, something many swore would never happen?
Or are we hoping to bury that with discussions about 9000 shares traded at .035?
appears Spongebob has made his true unveiling these past few weeks in the retail sector.
The retail sector that spongebob was never supposed to get too.
Spongebob purchased at CVS.
I just bought a spongebob sponge from a CVS here in
Indianapolis. Anybody care to argue that I'm faking these too?
Store has 5 left it appeared, said they got them in stock LAST Monday
and have sold a number of them but didn't know how many were in the
original packaging. There was no tag for it on the shelf I found them,
but the store itself looked like a holiday mess.
I purchased it and scanned the receipt just like I did with the pet
sponge. The sponge is the third item on the receipt!
This is the same CVS that I purchased the pet sponge at 3 weeks ago.
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/thanley/Image12.jpg
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d196/thanley/IMAG0085.jpg
you're right, news updates that show company action and it's grasping at straws.
Somebody's grasping at something, and it isn't me. But keep throwing whatever you can against the wall, maybe one of these days you'll get something right.
Did that make enough sense for you Kitt?
Why certainly, because apparently you didn't read the 8K (which by the way, is read left to right, top to bottom)
Check the date that Metter signed this
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1201251/000114420409063031/v168199_ex10-1x34x1.jpg
That would be OCTOBER 11, almost 2 whole months ago.
And then there is this
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1201251/000114420409063031/v168199_8k.htm
Which states that the agreement was effective back on November 14, but they had yet to receive the countersigned copy back.
Would you like me to read you anything else?
but in your logic, wouldn't it be even easier to sell more shares at .03 becuase all those stupid longs would buy it right up?
And if they can dump more at .03, why not do it at .02?
I mean, all these stupid longs would just jump at the chance to throw even more money away, wouldn't they? Isn't that your song and dance?
I fully agree with you, this story is far from over, as much as some would like to paint this as a dead stock.
There are easier ways to "pump" the stock than working for several months signing a deal with Marvel and keeping the other day to day operations going. SM and MM would have been some place much warmer than New York by now if they only were only running a scam.
you mean we're not at .00011 yet?
And I can buy this in CVS?
Wow...shocking
I fully agree with you John.
But there are others who think M&M (who already come from a wealthy background) are willing to further their jail time because they are stupid enough to keep dumping into an SEC investigation.
I think they're "wrong" (most appropriate word so I don't get deleted)
come on, isn't that TOTALLY obvious?
*sarcasm*
it certainly is not equally weighted.
In regards to the stock that is.
This is fully about SPNG.
JMHO
(that should make this stay, no?)
Interesting indeed.
Also fits into the claim that SM stated he was at the Europe office the weekend before last.
Gosh Kitt
You've been saying this for 2+ weeks now.
You've been wrong so far, on your very deep and insightful thoughts.
Keep guessing
what was the tweet?
no sweat, the joys of google.
well actually, the market is only open till 1PM on Friday after Thanksgiving.
http://www.rightline.net/calendar/market-holidays.html
no, it wasn't.
It was there before the SEC stuff.
My K and Q predictions?
Please don't put words in my mouth when I have not said them.
Let's focus back on your claims that seem to never happen versus what I post that tends to have proof to go with it.
Kitt...what happened to your .035 prediction for last Friday?