observations from asia

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KG14Dj06.html

occidental claims that they never released anything

maybe resistance at 43 44?

here is a hint. if I give 300,000 dollars to one party and I give 5000 to another, maybe one is a little more affiliated than another, dont you think?

by the way Bernie madoff was a big contributor to the democratic party and the " I dare not mention " whathisname.

did you know that?

well its odd to me that i was talking about illegal immigrants and you change subjects completely and you usually do not do that

following the money ( not about GS) and the hypocrisy

very funny: who was the front man for those sub primes?

http://washingtonindependent.com/59633/suit-alleges-trusted-black-figures-drew-minorities-to-high-rate-loans

by the way the suit is by a state attorney general, not to be taken lightly

follow the money Syl. you willing to take my bet, and if i prove it, you have to promise to not vote democratic the rest of your life. is it a deal?

and the test will be follow the money, ok

. this is a good story

so you dont mean immigrant?

yes syl that is what most of the posts directed to you are trying to help you with, will you bet me 1000 cyber dollars I can show that you are wrong about both the rating company and the bank?

you used the word immigrant. was this on purpose?

http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0909/wolf_bombs_on_jeopardy.html

very knowledgeable

yes i am giving you quotes to write and assemble the paperwork for it

syl, what party affiliation is goldman sachs and standard and poors. your heart is in the right place, but you have blinders on

ask yourself, from general economic terms, 2 things

increasing the size of the labor pool does what to wages?

how have wages changed in the past 10 years?


then from social terms, ask yourself:

is it morally or legally correct to encorage people to come to a place and make them slaves?

Is it morally and legally correct to ask people to do something which violates the law and destabilizes the country?

is it morally and legally correct to count slaves as voting citizens for political gain, even though they cannot vote?

is it morally and legally correct to prevent enforcement of immigration laws?

is it morally and legally correct to take money from people to pay for slaves that they didnt want or desire in the first place?

is it morally and legally correct for a leader to say that there will be no benefit to illegal occupant slaves, and then say that the slaves will be made legal and paid for by someone else other than the slave owner or the slave?

how are the immigration laws and the enforcement thereof exactly the same as the chicanery in the massacusetts house regarding kennedys replacement?

washer dryer harder than computer as long as software works

syl, warren buffet owned s and p or one of the other rating companies during the crash and you know what side he is on.

you are really not seeing the picture

no i meant just to do the reg d filing. then you need to get a shell corp, or have sufficient investors invest to file

actully syl, i was talking to my local slum lord, who happens to be a black guy who now rents to rodriguezes about the 2004 election. he was very peed off that all his tenants had the same drivers license, and that they were allowed to vote as citizens. It was one of my first personal data collection points, so i remember the conversation well

i dont know about green cards, but i have no reason to think mick is lying if he has seen it

skunk, if you just lost your job, are on food stamps and had your life savings foreclosed, I think its the biggest evil in the world to do what you said, and it is killing the country.

now you get how polls are done. you spin the entry data to get what you want.

that is the real trouble with all polls. heck I could get a poll in which obama is liked 88 percent or disliked 88 percent

oh you do mean counterfeit cards?

sorry dont know what you mean. green card can only be obtained after rigorous vetting, but i do not know if it can be faked

if you only knew when i sold stocks. fabian could write a book

i know, so why even say it? doesnt make sense to me

what does it have to do with the phrase before, immigration broken.

did you know that about 2-3 million citizens are leaving every year?

mick you only have a green card if you are here legally. a green card holder is a legal resident and subject to all laws and taxes the same as an american citizen

most kids i know want to be stay at home moms. they dont think its demeaning

when did he say that: this wednesday? OMG

Even though I do not believe we can extend coverage to those who are here illegally, I also don't simply believe we can simply ignore the fact that our immigration system is broken," Mr. Obama said Wednesday evening in a speech to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute. "That's why I strongly support making sure folks who are here legally have access to affordable , quality health insurance under this plan, just like everybody else

legally?

what the heck does that mean?

syl the poll only asked GOP members who were taking anti depressives

it means that the law is just something to be manipulated for their interest. more generally it means the same. which means that if they vote to give joe blow 4 billion dollars and its the law, then its perfectly ok with them. there is no intrinsic value, no meaning of fair play, basic rules of conduct or anything else

when you see this, you know nothing means anything to them

move along son, nothing to be seen here

it depends on whether the opinion is spun. I do not think people can tell anymore. they are so framing and spinning all the time that the sources you quote are prespun for your consumption. its like obamas speeches. I do not think he can tell whether what he is saying is good or bad, right or wrong etc. he doesnt put any definable ideas in them that can be interpreted without further interpretation or guessing

what if quoted hannity to you all the time?

what if obama had said we are not going to put anything in czech/poland because it was the mark 67 which will take 4 years to get operational, but now we have the mark 89, which costs 3 dollars and 12 cents and can be ordered from sunnyvale and elivered in october and deployed 3 years earlier with a 50 percent increase in accuracy and 1/1oth the cost.

but we dont get that. we get platitudes and generalities, we get uncertainty. its the uncertainty which breeds lack of trust: you never know what someone is saying

keep it

skype, probably 5-10 cents a min to call regular phone

i was agreeing with you. but the data is not conclusive so i would not hold large positions but would set alarms at predicted confirmation levels so you can know what they do

faz and srs both have decent sticks today and have positive rsi divergence worth a watch/trade

usually there is a quid pro quo in the agreements that causes a lot of money transfer as guarentees if there is a downgrade.

that is how AIG got stuck originally

call them and talk to the IR guy

https://secure.realchocolate.com/Countdown.aspx