Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
More cheapies, love these dips, adding more, someone please hit me on the bid again....
Silk, .05's would work for me as well. I'll bet we close above .0015 today, and I think that is being conservative.
LOL, he's funny, I am holding what I've got and adding where I can on the dips, I figure anything below .002 is a heck of a deal, 5 bagger from there at least. I don't mind profits like that.
If you have any shares and are certain that it is going to dip, please feel free to hit me on the bid, I will gladly take them off your hands.
If you have any shares and are certain that it is going to dip, please feel free to hit me on the bid, I will gladly take them off your hands.
Guess we will have to wait and see, I am hoping it is sooner rather than later, if it dips, I will gladly just keep adding on the dips until we get the news.
I am hoping the dip continues so I can add more, when they announce the R/M, this should go at least to .01
Great find Street, I keep buying on these dips, waiting for the R/M announcement coming, going to be an awesome play.
I believe monday they are supposed to be updating the pinksheets info along with the r/m info is my understanding.
Keep 'em in your bra for safe keeping... They will keep growing for ya!
Ms. Berry, what have you been up to hon? Yep, we are still all holding here...
Morning Berry, what's up?
I normally charge $150.00 per hour, once you send me payment for the prior time spent educating you with an additional retainer for future services, then I will answer away, until then, hit the G.E.D. books and buy yourself a calculator.
So you were able to confirm that pinksheets.com is correct, great, thanks.....
I'm not an educator or teacher, and even if I were, I don't remember you sending me a check to tutor you, so figure it on your own, if you don't know math, then perhaps you need to order a G.E.D. book.
You need to look closer at you chart, its sad that math isn't taught the way it used to be in schools.
College, lol, I crack myself up. Vocational training more likely. Have a good weekend everyone.
Well, I am done helping the bashers make maoney to feed the kids, they will have to find someone else for the rest of the weekend to help them earn money for the college fund.
LOL...... Sad, but true. Don't you hate that? Its awful how SUGO is taking advantage of us.
I believe I speak for most of those who actually own shares here, if it bothered us, we would have sold and moved on. I believe:
1. That there are thousands of companies who have the same issue with the BCSC, and that a company being accused of irregular trading because people have bought their stock on the market makes no sense, otherwise all stocks that are traded would be considered "irregular".
2. That it will be cleared up, hopefully at the hearing that was conducted today, and that the trade halt that was only for Canada, will be lifted.
3. That there are plenty of others who are not bothered here in the U.S. proven by the continued trading of the stock.
If someone doesn't feel comfortable with this company due to Canada's stance that a stock shouldn't be trading shares otherwise it is irregular, then they should move on to one of the thousnad of other stocks to choose from. Here in the U.S., it is still for the moment a free country.
Yes, you are correct that the I-Box has not been updated, unfortunately, I do not have the ability to update it.
It was 9,750,000 as of Apr 14, 2009, as the I-Box shows, but if you remember, if you can, the stock did a forward split of 5 for 1. Now if that is confusing to you, let me explain what that means for those of us who actually own shares. If you take that number, 9,750,000 and multiply it by 5, you may need to get out a calculator, unless you were born with more fingers and toes than most, and you should arrive at 48,750,000 shares. So if you had bought shares prior to the split, and between you and me, we know you didn't, you would now have 5 times as many shares as you did prior to the split. I know this may be all very confusing, but if you would like, you can go to pinksheets.com and look for yourself.
Let me take a look at it and will gladly answer your question, although a quick trip to pinksheets would jsut as easily answer your question, or a phone call to the TA, but don't worry, I will do your DD for you.... Wouldn't want you to hurt yourself picking up a telephone.
What's the drop, was that your question he failed to answer to your satisfaction? If not, what exactly was the question so you can give him or one of us a fair opportunity to actually answer it?
Whatever, don't you really mean stocks you are being paid to bash?
How I-Hub can continue to allow you to attack people in this manner is beyond me, if we attacked you, probably a paid basher, in the same manner and tone, we would be banned from posting on the board. What is it that you feel that you have to personally attack anyone who isn't bashing a stock?
Skunk, it doesn't matter what you say or what happens with SUGO as it progresses through each step of its plan, they will continue this nonsense, to put it politely, and there will be no consequences for it. I-Hub has become a vehicle for paid bashers to earn a living while legitimate investors are pushed away to other venues. I know that the group of us who have been following patiently the progress of this company will have the same opinions irregardless.
I might get banned from posting on the SUGO board for the comments I am making, but frankly, that is fine. It would only show the one-sidedness that I-Hub has developed in fostering and aiding (aiding and abetting) the bashing of companies on their website, while legitimate investors attempt to keep each other informed in an unbiased forum. What passes as opinion and TOU allowable negative perspectives in the redundancy of attacks and comments, directed at people who are not even desiring to be engaged by people they don't know is ridiculous. Why is it we are allowed to be aggressively attacked by "people" (to be nice) we aren't speaking to nor want to, and it is considered perfectly acceptable, but when we point out that they may have an agenda, like direct attention to their extensive posting history in regards to attacks on other stocks, we are the bad guys. It frankly is becoming too one-sided in support of bashers, and if this continues, I will NOT be renewing my subscription. There are plenty of other investment websites that we can go to to discuss our investments without the harassment.
I don't know why I even bother having a subscription to I-Hub. When people who actually purchase and have an interest in a stock try to inform each other as to DD they have found and share it with each other, they are attacked, unprovoked attacks at that mind you, by people who the conversation is not even directed at. Typically, this occurs by people who if you look at their posting history, have nothing better to do than to post negative comments about whatever stock or group of people has caught their attention at that particluar moment. I and others posting on this board have actual money invested in this company and have tied ourselves to it with a financial commitment of money. How about those who have nothing better to do than bash various companies.
Berry:
We don't have to bash I guess, I just would rather make sure that we get our fill before the news comes out, we know what's coming......
Walker & Berry:
Thin yes, but we shouldn't mention anything about how this is going to pop when we get the news on Friday that the BCSC has lifted the halt in Canada and cleared us for trading up there, or how that makes way for the deal to be completed as scheduled, and the huge pps jump that will bring. If we do, lots of people may start running this up before it hits and keep us from being able to continue to add at these low prices. I would rather be able to add down here than have to buy like we were at 2.40, 3.80, etc.
Sorry Rich, its just when someone gets it factually incorrect, I can't help but set the record straight.
Excerpt from the ICOA website:
http://www.icoacorp.com/?pid=24
Erwin Vahlsing, Director and CFO
With nearly thirty years of corporate finance experience, Mr. Vahlsing served as Chief Financial Officer of ICOA from his appointment in 1999 through October of 2005.
Mr. Vahlsing’s numerous fiscal leadership roles include serving as: Vice President and General Manager of Connect Teleservices, an $8 million call center; Senior Financial Analysts for Monarch Industries, a $35 million manufacturer; Vice President and General Manager of Arctic Air, a $2 million contractor; Vice President of Finance for ROLO, a $12 million manufacturer; CFO for Bloom & Son, a $35 million manufacturer; Corporate Comptroller for Trimont Chemical, an $18 million chemical manufacturer; and Corporate Comptroller for Paul Alfred, a $15 million manufacturer.
Mr. Vahlsing holds an MBA from the University of Rhode Island and a B.A. in Accounting from the University of Connecticut.
Performance of ICOA from 1999 through October of 2005:
Apparently, the company began trading publicly in 1999, with a share price in the .05 range. From there it traded between .05 and .11 the entire time he was with the company, with spikes as high as .39. It wasn't until he was no longer there that the share price fell to its more recent lows. That tells me that we don't want to let Mr. Vahlsing go once he starts to work for us.
Obviously, to me, it seems that Mr. Vahlsing has been involved with many companies who saw him as an asset. Although he is no longer with ICOA, they still have him listed as someone who brought great contributions to their company.
Regarding Webcenter Technologies:
I think the wrong person is being tagged there...
http://www.manta.com/company/mmdd887
Mr. Vahlsing per the ICOA website left in 2005, if that is the case, then Webcenter Technologies, a subsidiary of ICOA, has not updated their information with the State of R.I.
Whoever the current CFO of ICOA is should be the listed person of responsibility for any sales tax due to the State of R.I.
Interesting what a little more research than just a simple google search can turn up, if you really want to know the facts about a company or person.
Rich, you know SUGO sucks and no one other than us should be buying it, it is our duty to buy as much of it as we can to prevent others from talking the risk that they may owe large capital gains taxes.
Got more of those cheapies just in time, looks like tomorrow our ability to get them that cheap will be more difficult, don't forget, no one wants to buy this....
Very Smart, wow, I've been called a lot of things, but not that. Guess I need to buy some more tomorrow then to keep the title.
Shhhh!!
Everyone disregard the possibility that anything such as drilling, gold mining, may happen here or that SUGO may be pulling out x number of ounces per ton, etc. As far as anyone is concerned, this is just a start up gold mining company with no immediate potential. Just skip on to another board and forget the stock symbol SUGO. Come back when its on the NASDAQ, AMEX or NYSE and think about it then. I am just buying shares because I am bored and thought I may as well preoccupy myself with accumulating this crappy old mining company stock.
In what? No one should buy this stock, everyone needs to stay away, only a few of us are foxily stupid to keep accumulating this. Everyone else can go buy a real stock in some big board company, or at least until this becomes a big board company, then they can come join us here. Until then, everyone needs to keep their hands off my cheap shares.
Very true, plus if people catch on that this has some potential, we won't be able to keep accumulating shares at these prices. Sorry.