Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
lao5023. Wildcat18 pointed out the antagonistic/adolescent/amateur response by NXT-ID to those dispelling facts about their scam stock. I will reiterate that come June all this nonsense will be toast.
Someone actually inquired about a special edition Wocket for so called pre-order customers. They can't be serious? You will be chasing a refund in bankruptcy. Good luck with that endeavor.
Ok kertzc. I think that explains it.
SMH
Beta Testing? Can someone please confirm the source? I am not in position to DD at this time. Thanks.
PAID FOR BY NXT-ID.
Breaking News: The Wocket has been Tested and Approved by CVS. LOL!
The only thing I got out of your morning rant is - "a company that was predicted to be $16 next year..."
Predicted by whom? Like an attorney does, I already know the answer but I'll wait for it.
Predicted by whom?
As if his 75% stake isn't fat enough? So at minimum were talking GREED and/or SMOKING MIRRORS?
SMH
As if the main points of what Wildcat has been telling you does not matter...LOL.
Wildcat continues to fire on all cylinders. Meanwhile, none of you have offered intelligent rebuttals. It's the same old - Let's try to bury the truth with these ridiculous links to regurgitated so called news.
Continued rumors of large buyout and government contracts. Really? Given what NXTD has failed to deliver thus far (Wocket), coupled with a highly doubtful partnership, NXTD is toast.
The good news is the NXTD madness will be over by June. Enjoy your Summer.
Thanks 300Gs. I'm sure the name 300Gs stands for your 300K in the trunk of your 300 Lexus with 300 Gangstas on speed dial just in case your foul mouth gets you in trouble.
Hollywood Celebrities...gotta love'em
Long. I mean long winded regurgitated press releases that don't hold water.
Has Anyone...I mean Anyone...seen a physical location for NXTD?
Has Anyone...I mean Anyone...seen a physical Wocket by NXTD?
Has Anyone...I mean Anyone...ever heard of a scam stock listed on the NASDAQ?
I'm sure one of these questions can be answered - Yes.
We are splitting hairs now I guess? A Tech Company at an MJ trade show is fine with me.
Go BLOZF!
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
Everyone has seen this HALF BAKED VIDEO in an undisclosed location - showing the dozen or so Wockets (Garage Door Openers) possibly built to date - and APPROVED BY CVS. More and more regurgitated so called news. It never stops on this message board.
Carry on....
How many shares are you long? Please eat more tuna. Maybe not? A lot of toxins. Like a toxic stock (NXTD).
Bump (Post #6878) not Pump
"Wocket TESTED and APPROVED in CVS Pharmacy". Hilarious by any stretch of the imagination!
I see we have an obsession for CVS. How about a more important picture of any NXTD location....Anyone?
Apple is the 800 Pound Gorilla in the room. Period! Regurgitated news.
Last I heard CVS/Whole Foods have always accepted Credit/Debit payments. SMH
Point taken. I would only point out MJ stocks are considered a moral hazard (sin stock) by many investors. I personally do not see it that way. However, it is my belief Cannabix Technologies Inc will win over more investor's (quicker) by projecting itself as the trailblazing technology company it is - factually.
Warren Buffet is the only successful investor I know (sadly not personally) that is not interested in Tech stocks.
So who is Cannabix Technologies Inc?
Cannabix Technologies Inc - Is Us (BLO/BLOZF)
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
Cannabix Technologies Inc (BLO/BLOZF) is not an MJ Sector stock!
Good night.
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
TIIIIIIMMMMMMBBBBBBEEEEEEERRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!
Just like NO ONE can confirm any of NXTD 3 addresses physically exist, NO ONE has been able to confirm receipt of a Pre-Pre-Ordered Wocket.
How about a Youtube video of some Willie Wonka busting open the gold wrapper on their Wocket and showing off their new toy? Crickets!
Just Like the Wocket is purported to be released to a limited audience, so is the regurgitated limited audience commercial slated for CNBC (NXTD has spent your money on this same audience multiple times - stock price ultimately lost nearly 50%).
Another classic playbook pump.
Also, the RUMORS about government contracts. That is all they are and will be - RUMORS. NXTD is a No Profit$ Guppy in a $hark Tank filled with e$tablished Biometrics Security companies.
Keep dreaming folks.
Another One Of Your Opinions.
I have shut down your nonsense talk before and will do it again. Pipe Down blue shoes. You have already refused to respond to questions asked of you by others today. Why? Gather some courage. Face facts. Instead, you spew pump rhetoric 24/7. Regurgitated news from weeks months years ago, and endless baseless in-your-opinion (IMO) nonsense. Anyone not riding the short bus does not take you seriously.
I love the red meat responses from future know it all's with no answers.
Trust me...I will be here when the wheels fall off the bus. Sooner rather than later.
Facts over Fiction.
"This is a Penny Stock." Do you mean there are not real dollars wrapped up in investors NXTD stock? Or, are you implying a penny stock should be considered as nothing more than a scam stock. Therefore, buyer beware?
I have raised multiple damning questions that have since been deleted by the powers that be on this board. I'm talking to those who want to hear the truth. It's that simple. I don't get involved in distractions.
Failure and/or refusal to execute is but 1 reason NXTD is by definition a "Penny Stock." NXTD has previously traded above $5 a share. Ask any Long or check the chart.
And the wheels on the short bus go round and round...
Good for you. Once you guys start asking the real questions about your money, and lift the hood on NXTD, you will realize it's just a hampster running on a wheel.
If you are a True Long....it does not matter. Accumulate Accumulate Accumulate (AAA Stock).
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
Very funny...and another name to add to the pile of - Grasping At Straws.
You have made the point crystal clear.
No one knows IF/WHEN Cannabix will pull the trigger. Period.
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
"I don't have proof.." I'm sure that gives everyone great confidence in the light at the end of the tunnel not being a train/wreck.
Does anyone have proof? Anyone? LOL
P.S. Did anyone ever confirm if NXTD is physically operating out of any of the 3 addresses listed on their website? Proof Anyone? LOL
Additionally...There is nothing new under the sun as it relates to Cannabix potentially revealing/displaying a disruptive Patent Pending Product. Companies reveal prototypes prior to patent approvals all the time.
Look up NXT-ID (NXTD). Perfect Example.
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
Agreed to a Degree. The Third Party Confidentiality is in relationship to parties involved in the design/application/material construction of the breathalyzer - KLN Klein and Field Forensics.
Showing or demonstrating a prototype to Roadies is not the same as placing the product on a retail shelf for competitors to take apart and examine (Engineers).
Having said that...we are still in Speculation World.
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
The bottom line as I interpret the patent process - is having the Patent Application - Already gives Cannabix Technologies Inc the leg up on the competition. Revealing the prototype IF Ready will not hurt/hinder the process. Cannabix Technologies Inc applied a Multiple Patent Application Approach to the Marijuana Breathalyzer.
The Patent Application is the Brains/Blueprint/Cart. The Prototype is the Horse. The cart is already out the barn, we now just need to attach the Horse/Prototype to the Cart.
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
Is it possible the prototype will be revealed at the BIG SHOW? The answer is Yes. Anything is possible right? Is it smart for Cannabix Technologies Inc to reveal the prototype at the BIG SHOW? We don't know. Only Cannabix can/will answer the question. We are merely speculating. Having said my piece, the following is an article that may provide further clarity on the matter.
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
Should I create a prototype before applying for a patent on my invention?
By Eric Waltmire
You are not legally required to create a prototype before filing a patent application. However, depending on your invention and the circumstances of your case, it may be beneficial to develop a prototype before filing a patent application, as explained below.
The U.S. patent laws do not require that you create or build your invention or otherwise create a prototype before filing a patent application. However, the law requires that your invention be described to the level of detail in your patent application where one skilled in the technical area of your invention (skilled in the art) can recreate your invention without undue experimentation by reading your patent application. We prefer to error on the side of more disclosure of details regarding the invention rather than less when writing a patent application.
Enough Detail
Therefore, if you have a general idea about how your invention would work, but if you can’t describe how one important component of your invention would interact with another important component of your invention, then you may need to further engineer or prototype your invention before applying for a patent. On the other hand if you know for example your device needs a motor to operate certain components and you know how those components would interact with the motor, it may not be necessary to know all the internal details of the motor in order to proceed with a patent.
Further Inventing During Prototyping
It is well known that oftentimes when developing a prototype you will learn additional details about your invention and you may make changes and improvements during prototyping. There are at least two ways to deal with the possibility that prototyping will result in new details about your invention.
Multiple Patent Application Approach
The first is the most protective procedure. The first approach provides that you file a patent application on your invention before prototyping. The first application will record the details known that that time. Then prototyping proceeds. If additional details or changes are discovered or made to the invention during prototyping, then your patent attorney can evaluate whether a second application should be filed on the new material discovered or invented during prototyping. Further you can decide from a business perspective whether the new details are sufficient to justify the cost of a second application.
Prototype First Then Patent Approach
The second approach is to develop a prototype before filing a patent application. You will want to have any third parties that you work with to develop a prototype sign a nondisclosure agreement (NDA), because it is important that your invention be maintained as confidential before patent filing as explained here. After prototyping is complete, when a patent application can be prepared including any new details discovered during prototyping.
Evaluating Novelty of New Details
There are some details that might be discovered during prototyping that would not warrant a new patent application. Such details depend on your particular circumstances and invention. For example, if during prototyping you discover that the overall length of your invention should be longer than previously anticipated. That discovery might not warrant a new application. Generally the scaling up or scaling down of an otherwise scalable component that produces expected results from such scaling does not substantially impact the patentability of an invention or a feature. The exception to this rule is when the scaling was achieved when such scaling was not previously possible or thought possible in the relevant art. Your patent attorney can advise you whether any changes or invention that occurred during prototyping is likely to warrant inclusion in a second patent.
Conclusion
We often evaluate inventions to determine (1) whether further engineering is recommended before patenting or (2) whether it is recommended to file a patent application first. The approach depends on the particular circumstances of your invention and the extent to which the important details of your invention have been developed or might be further developed during prototyping.
A personal attack. I'm "ignorant". Really? You are the ihub police right? So the narrative changes for 24 hours to Truth Telling and folks like you cant handle it. Attack the messenger. Click your heels together 3 times and you will be back in Kansas Dorthy. The Wizard has spoken. Next!
P.S. If you stop replying to my posts I'll leave you guys to your own twisted reality. Think about it!
That sounds like a classic pump and dump if I ever heard one. I'm sure the Longs are grateful for your input. Next!
Blind Faith.
Press releases are not contracts.
Blu Lite On Z Flames!
A Google aerial view of some building, somewhere, that has multiple use space. OK. Which Google address is that? What about the others as well? 3 Locations remember? LOL.
Yes, plenty rebuttals. No Concrete (building) Evidence.
Keep Digging For The Truth Folks or Ignoring It.