Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Check the sources, the newsletters all owned by the same company, there is never a short squeeze in penny stocks. But when the pps falls like a rock, they will blame the non existant shorts.
A massive pump campaign, touts coming since the 8k filed, with plenty of their employees adding to the newsletters by coming onto IHUB, Yahoo to continue to get the unsuspecting to buy as they all sell. Buyer beware. The dump will happen.
Buyer beware, if fundamentals do not match all the hype....the cliff approaches.
Means nothing once again as Any corporation or other business entity having a commercial interest directly and materially affected by Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc. Standards development can join, and TEVE pays 2000 dollars annual dues to be a member. Another worthless idea to think this expense is changing one cent in revenue:
http://www.atsc.org/cms/index.php/policies/details/152-join-atsc
If the stock was worth that much it would be that much. It could not sustain $100 per share after the reverse split. And you won't have a choice what you get for your stock when bought out, it will be voted on by the majority shareholder, the CFO will recommend, the directors will have their opinion but it will be Mr Lenfest sole discretion what he is willing to pay to obtain the rest of the shares. Anything less than 70 and mr lenfest has a tax writeoff, so it really doesn't matter because the remaining shares are peanuts anyways.
Who mentioned a pump and dump. ETCC's stock just fell prior to the purchase from officers, see the month and 6 month chart, maybe nothing happened other then them taking advantage of a dip in the market, needless to say it does look fishy for the sudden drop. So with 93 percent of TEVE why not go private, get rid of the other 7 percent, have all the profit for yourself and totally eliminate the SEC from your operations. Why deal with all the crap just for the 7 percent minority, pay them off and be done with them. That's a business decision, not an emotional one.
First no merge, but expect both to go private, also if you looked at ETCC's one month chart, the market was manipulated, on the 8th they announced quarterly report, then the pps dropped suddenly, CEO and others bought at 1.31. Now pps back up to 1.75. Purely someone sold to drop the price so they could get market price much lower than it had been now it's back up. But back to TEVE and ETCC merging? Why would they, there is a negative earnings per share on both stocks, it would benefit the majority owner to go private and not have to share any potential gains, for a shrewd business man that makes sense.
Buyer beware, the pump is always followed by the dump.
I've already posted links and company names that have their service fees listed on their websites. No need to do it again. Enjoy your weekend.
If those numbers are true, which I doubt, TEVE will lose all the remaining PEG stations to the competition, you know those that have received awards in 2012 for innovative technology and are much cheaper. PEG stations are on strict budgets and will always look for the cheapest price as long as they support fits their needs. 321 a month for a server?? Not in today's market. I'm sure as contracts run out these companies are moving to a much more recent and cheaper technology. So you are also implying that all 1500 have the same contract??? Don't think so. Numbers you provide don't make sense in today's market. They also do not support the financial reports of the past several years. Don't believe me. Do your own research.
Check out www.pumpsanddumps.com and see how many newsletters are touting this at the moment, if you've made money, get out while you can before it tanks. Buyer beware
I guess you haven't called the transfer agent either, and what happened to TEVE's investor email address, only email listed is now sales@telvue.com
The news has nothing to do with the cloud, with PEG, nor any aspect of TEVE's revenue or lack thereof. If this is all the news they have the company truly is in trouble. Maybe this will be added to here resume when she is laid off. Wonder if she'll continue to get paid while running this panel.
Do your own DD!!!!
Alan please call the transfer agent and the company like a few of us have. There are no shorts!!
And what is each customer paying TEVE on a monthly or annual basis?? And how many of those are still current customers and how many have moved on to companies like Cisco, Brightcove, etc. 8 of top 10 MSO's or so claimed by TEVE yet no profit and very little revenue. All of 2012 they had 7 of the top 10 MSO's and burned through millions. This tells me its a one time sale for hardware, the rest is given away. But Joe is right, nothing said here matters. Less then a dozen posters, only 244 shareholders of record. A pink sheet stock with inability to move up onto any major exchange. Nothing positive here. It is admirable if not naive of people to ignore the financial aspects of the company. You also see that on TEVE's website they still mention awards they received in 2006 and 2007, still harping on outdated equipment. Customers listed mean nothing if it was only a one time sale. Good luck to all.
How are cheap shares available if no one is selling?? Must be someone out there realizing the truth about TEVE's future.
Float is over 618 thousand shares, what do you think will happen if Mr Lenfest decides to sell? And I'm still waiting on someone to explain the technicals of how the pps will rise if no one is selling and all shares are already in the hands of people who will never sell.
You mean you didn't already know MIT was with TEVE?? So much for DD, wonder where all the profit is going?? Maybe Harvard is next, or univerity of China
Sounds like they are slowing down, but must mean 6 thousand more dollars for TEVE.
That's just what I want to do, get Roku and listen to lectures, I'm sure there is a ton of money in that. And I'm sure TEVE is getting paid thousands per lecture, and yet still not a cent of profit....
How do you propose the pps to go higher when no one is selling?? No one is buying?? since the company has deregistered all unsold shares, the only way for pps to move is to put more stock into the market making shares available to buy and sell, that means dilution at a massive scale, even a split does not change ownership percentage and since they are all accounted for and no one is selling, pps will never move. The spread continues to be 100percent, liquidity zero. So please explain how the pps will rise??
Sure, I always listen to the Chinese and what they have to say. Jack and Joe are well aware of Chinese delegations supposedly visiting companies and hosting others. But let's be real 4K per PEG station, and TEVE claims to have how many stations?, thousands, yet no income, so its either a one time payment and that's it (a losing proposition) or maybe the financials are lies as they aren't reporting all the income each year per PEG station?? or maybe the figures of 500 in the last year and 4000 a piece is unsubstantiated at best. You see the financials of the company do not support the posters numbers. I believe the financial reports are very accurate and shows a serious dilemma for TEVE continuing past March. So that means the aforementioned numbers are BS, and why would the poster not want to prove their statements? That's easy, they don't have it. SO that being said, they are either factual or lies, without proof and the current company financials not supporting the influx of funds I choose the latter.
And to think the PPS is going to rise on their own while you all collect small amounts of shares under the radar is insane. Buying and selling with strong liquidity is what raises or lowers the PPS. And if no one is selling, then no one can buy. Either way does not effect the company one bit. Look out for another stock offering if the company really becomes desperate, and Bankruptcy is pushed down the road a bit.
That's usually the response on these boards when there is no proof of statements. You see the financials do not support the comments so therefore I ask for proof as without it its worthless. You see credibility should mean something here, have opinions but have them based on your interpretation of the data. So far no data to support the statements, so they are meaningless. Good Luck in your future as TEVE only has luck to rely on.
Show me the 4000 per PEG Channel that is paid to TEVE?? Tell me what 500 PEG stations were added. 2 million dollars added, yet financial reports do not show that, nothing in financial reports mention that, so where did you get it from?? I have an idea but it would soon be deleted. And 4 out of 5 is only 80 percent. And PEG is a losing proposition, always has been for TEVE, if they made that kind of money, why aren't they profitable?? yet after years and years of trying PEG is a negative. Not only did TEVE spend Mr Lenfests 30 million but also blew through any revenue they received. So since the "cloud" is not working we are back to PEG?? Sorry, if all this good news was coming, they would have received the capital guarantee and the 250K they were looking for, not to mention continuing SEC reporting requirements. Nothing positive here.
Why should they, what is the cost basis vs other companies, what awards have been recently given for their servers dealing with the cloud. None, now look at the competition for the 2012 awards, and you'll find why not many are using princeton servers. Good luck in your DD. Its still funny.
Your quote from post 10008. And yet you say no one said what you just said? Now this is getting funny.
Please let me know who it is that has left them in the dust because who ever is cloud computing is using Princeton Servers.
So it is your opinion that everyone in cloud computing is using Princeton servers?? As that is what you said, I'll let you have your opinion, and yet there are people who have followed you into this stock not knowing the truth?? Sad, Very Sad
I'm only reading their financials, the company is telling us they are making no money, the company is telling us they are seeking financing, the company told us they could not afford the interest on Mr lenfest debt and had to do the reverse split and shares for debt conversion. The company told us that they still cannot pay the current accruing interst on the preferred shares. The company is telling us they are in trouble by going dark. The company is telling us that the cost of revenue is outpacing revenue itself. They've had layoffs, trouble in obtaining financing. PEG losing money, Cloud computing new arena for them with only a handful of clients with very little income. Nothing TEVE has done in the last year has made them profitable. Mr Lenfest was always the main reason for people to buy, and now his support is gone. Doesn't leave much room for continued growth without the money to aid in the venture. You need money to make money, you need money for R&D to stay current in the business, awards given for technology two years ago, no money to improve or pay top of the line engineers. Company is telling us all of these, you just have to be able to listen.
I guess the below don't use princeton servers either as they all use Brightcove technology, and looks like they have a lot more customers. So care to redefine your statement that everyone in cloud computing is using princeton servers??
Broadcasters
A&E Television Networks
AMC
British Sky Broadcasting
Canoe TV - Quebecor
Channel 4
Discovery Communications
Discovery Networks Germany
Disney Buena Vista Television
Five
ITV
Jewish Television Network
Lifetime Networks
LXTV
Marvel Entertainment
Minnesota Public Radio
NBR - Nightly Business Report
NRK
Rogers Sportsnet
Showtime Networks
Sky Deutschland
Smithsonian Networks
SnackTV
Sony Pictures Television International
SPOX.com
Starz Entertainment
STV
The Weather Channel
Turner Broadcasting
TVO.org
UKTV
Virgin Media Television
Businesses and Organizations
AARP
Academy of Television Arts & Sciences
Accuweather
Addleshaw Goddard
Adventist Healthcare
AFL-CIO
American Federation of Teachers
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
American Standard Brands
Anti-Defamation League
AOL
Appliances Online
Avid Technology
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
British Academy of Film & Television Arts
Broadway.com
California Academy of Sciences
Careerbuilder.com
Carnival Cruise Lines
Cars.com
Cheil Worldwide
Chicago School of Professional Psychology
Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation
Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
Citrix
City Search
Citywire
Cleveland Golf
Commonwealth Secretariat
Corporate Disk
Council on Foreign Relations
Cypress Semiconductor
Dannon Company
Daryn Kagan
Diageo North America
dLife
Drum Corps International
Epson
Experimental Aircraft Association
Express
FindLaw
Full Tilt Poker
Futek
Gaiam
GEC
General Motors
Genzyme
Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy
HarperCollins Publishers
Health Guru
HealthiNation
Hearst
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
IAC
ICPlaces
IDG TechNetwork
International Academy of Television Arts & Sciences
Intuit
Japan Airlines
Joyce Meyer Ministries
Kauffman Foundation
Kohler
Liberty Medical
Macy's
Manchester City Football Club
Master Lock
Math Tutor DVD
McKesson
Merrill Lynch
Miami Dolphins
Morningstar
Motorola Solutions
Moviepilot
National Association of Realtors
National Automobile Dealers Association
National Collegiate Scouting Association
Natixis Global Asset Management
Nestle Purina
NHS, Inc.
Nissan
Nissen
Ocean Spray
Old Mutual
Philips
PUMA
Rhode Island School of Design
Roland
Royal Opera House
Sadler's Wells Theatre
San Diego Zoo
San Francisco Ballet
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
Sapporo Breweries
Scholastic
Sears Holding Corporation
Shure Incorporated
Simon & Schuster
Society of Petroleum Engineers
Staples
Stop & Shop
Sundance Institute
Suntory
Tate Online
Teaching Channel
The City of Malmö - Malmö, Sweden
The Heritage Foundation
The Humane Society of the United States
The JESUS Film Project
Ticketmaster
TQMadrid
TradeKing
U.S. Army
U.S. Department of State
University of Colorado
University of Oklahoma
Vail Resorts
Virgilio
Magazine Publishers
1to1 Media
American Express Publishing Corp
American Media
Atlantic Media
Bauer Consumer Media
Bonnier Corporation
Condé Nast
Congressional Quarterly
Consumers Union
Crain Communications
De Agostini Editore
Discover Magazine
Emap
Farmer's Almanac
Gruner and Jahr
Grupo V
Hachette Filipacchi Netherlands
Hachette Filipacchi UK
Hachette Filipacchi USA
Haymarket Media Group
Hearst Magazines
IDG
iMedia Communications
IPC
Jupitermedia Corp / Web Media Brands
Kelley Blue Book
Kiplinger Washington Editor
M. Shanken Communications
MCC Magazines
MediaPost
National Magazine Company
Newsweek
Nielsen Business Media
Orange Page net
Reader's Digest
Reed Elsevier
Rodale
Rogers Publishing
Scientific American
Smart Money
Streaming Media
Taunton Press
Technology Review
The Boston Phoenix
Time Inc.
United Business Media
World Politics Review
World Screen
Ziff Davis Enterprise
Music Labels
Cherry Red Records
Sony BMG Australia
Sony Music Canada
Sony Music Entertainment
Sony Music Entertainment (Japan)
Sony Music France
Sony Music Germany
Sony Music Italy
Sony Music Spain
Sony Music Switzerland
Sony Music UK
Universal Music Australia
Universal Music Canada
Universal Music Group
Universal Music Group International
Warner Music Group
Warner Music International
Newspaper Publishers
Abu Dhabi Media
Al Nisr Publishing
Associated Northcliffe
Axel Springer
Capitol Hill Publishing
Cox Newspapers
Express and Star
Freedom Communications
Gannett
Grupo Godo
Grupo Vocento
Guardian News & Media
Hearst Communications
Huffington Post
Johnston Press
L'Express
MediaNews Group
Mirror Group Newspapers
New York Times Co.
NewsOK.com
OMS
Philly.com
POLITICO
Register-Guard
St. Petersburg Times
Sun Media
Times Online
Tribune Total Media
Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive
Winnipeg Free Press
ZEIT ONLINE
Silly? This is your statement below. Care to back it up?? The fact that someone would make this statement and believe it to be true is what's silly or just plain misleading.
Please let me know who it is that has left them in the dust because who ever is cloud computing is using Princeton Servers.
I said they have the best servers money can buy
So you're saying even the competition is using princeton servers?? Cisco, Brightcove, Google, Microsoft, Dell, HP, IBM, ???? No one is believing your statements. And as you said about other items, that the information you state about having the money for a year is six months old. So they are on the down hill side of going out of business, plus no additional financing........Remember on TEVE's website they only had listed about 13 companies that used TEVE's cloud services, so much for everyone who is in cloud computing is using princeton servers; and if that was the case, they wouldn't be on a tight budget now would they??, they'd have a monopoly. So again, your statements are only wishful thinking and knowingly false.
No If I'm to waste my money I'll buy lottery tickets, atleast then I know I have a better chance then TEVE does. Now really why would an investor want to buy a stock that one, will have to pay ask for, and two won't be able to sell except at the bid? With the spread so high no way to make money. And your statement shows just how gullible people are. 10bag was being facetious, and yet if it fits into your criteria for success it must be true. No, but it is sad. Have a great 2013, I'll check in on TEVE or what's left of it later.
Please show me where you get that this is the best cloud computing company in the world?? SHow me an award they've received or any recognition as to their cloud computing capabilities. last award was the hypercaster in 2011???? And had nothing to do with cloud computing.
Please show me the leaps and bounds each day. Show me something that happened in December and the first half of January other than the inability to get financing, and the inability to maintain their employees, and the inability to continue reporting to the SEC. If those are your leaps and bounds, good luck.
You can't buy unless you expect to lose, they don't have money to spend, financing fell through. Don't believe me CALL THE COMPANY. For someone who lost 700K you'd think you'd be calling often. Money spent in the past has been Mr Lenfest sponge going dry. The money spent in the future....ooops no money in the future, no capital, no line of credit. Now what??
So now Neon Alley is provided how many servers at a cost of what may be a hundred dollars a piece?? Not much revenu even if they do need to expand. Bottom line is TEVE all of 2012 had 7 of top 10 MSO's and failed to profit one penny, number 8 will not help and trying to reach out to the success of other companies because of a small server from teve is a stretch. Can't wait for the year to end. I recommend you buy other companies in this field that actually trade on NASDAQ with an increasing profit. TEVE Is not one of them. Of course since TEVE is so successful they obviously wanted to go to the lower Pink Sheet Level. Now that's a good plan
Well if its on autopilot and all this money is coming in, with only 30 thousand shaares why would TEVE want to share. buy up the 30,000 at a dollar a share, then report massive earnings, and you are screwed. I'm sure Charter wrote the check before the work was started, would be pretty stupid of TEVE to do any work before getting some payment. How can you add when "no one is selling". Obviously you and others do not get the liquidity problem. That's ok, take it to the grave along with the 1 dollar share price. Good Luck with the hopefull thinking.
And now you are clairvoyant, no one sold for a loss out of the thousand or so shares traded this year. Now that's a gift. Problem is if you want to sell TEVE you will take a loss, period, that's not an investment strategy
Not sure why you keep posting presplit comments, 7.60 is 7.60. Costs a lot of money to buy a company going nowhere and one that if you do acquire shares the only way you can sell is to take a loss? Liquidity matters, even if you convince yourself otherwise.