Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You've basically posted the same thing 3 times - please, again, explain how declining revenues is a good thing, why you view this as a positive. Increased income can be the result of less cost for litigation and r&d, or currency fluctuations. We've seen the stats that MPE use has increased dramatically this past year, so how does that equate to lessened revenue?
I can't understand this first sentence. How can you qualify overall ( I guess) "year to date revenue" with "US revenue" for the last quarter - why is one used to offset the impact of the other?. Or, can that mean the revenue outside the US has been declining?. Or is it a good thing? This is accountant-speak for something or other.
Help me understand this: how then did ytd revenue decline? Was this increase in income due primarliy to decreased litigation (and r&d) costs? If "service revenue" declines, is that from MPE and Clipstream?
If so, what the heck is going on?
Good answer - I'm curious if you tried it on a tablet. I'll try again on my iPads soon, hoping for the best.
Sorry, I can make no sense of what you're saying. The only reason I mentioned ACAD yesterday was because someone asked me what were some of the other stocks I own. I'll keep in mind that you're available for advice.
If DSNY can break through current price level it's a definite buy. If it goes back down we've encountered a double top (triple) which is a negative sign. Last August it hit $1.06, so I don't get why everyone's so jazzed about .83
Exactly, I only take "advise" from stoners like yourself, although I prefer those who watch daytime talk shows over cartoons. If you remember 'The Big Short", almost every one of the acknowledged big time financial advisors, gurus, what have you, got the whole thing completely wrong. That's the true value of most experts in predicting the future in investments - do your own work and take what comes.
No, never heard of Courtney, but I see by the google that he's (?) some sort of financial guru. Basically, I don't want advice from anyone who's working at giving advice, I want advice from someone who doesn't have to work at all.
I'd rather cure my frustration by seeing the stock run up. Nothing is "that simple", my friend.
Not selling - when something like this happens, I move up either the trailing stop or stop market order, trying to ride the winners. A lesson somewhat painfully learned during a long period of selling covered calls.
You guess? Didn't someone say that luck is 90% hard work? I like DSNY, it's just frustrating to be so involved in a company that's doing nothing during a massive bull run.
Have a couple thousand shares of ACAD going into today's session. Any of you other guys own any? I love it when you tell me (repeatedly) that I don't know what I'm doing.
If new at nanocaps means having a lot of them that are totally outperforming, XXII, VSUL, and DSNY, then yes, I'm new. We're all on the same team here, this constant tit for tat is exhausting.
Thanks for the advice. I assume you are a fabulously successful investor who idles away your large blocks of spare time on this message board. No? Well let me tell you some things, again. The share price has been depressed since the re-purchase began, despite the good news. You think there's some conspiracy out there, fine, I'm not knocking that, but you're way above your pay grade to compare me to a novice. You think pre-release marketing would have not helped, would have been pure hype? Your showing your own obtuseness there. In the future if someone has a different opinion than yours, try to imagine that there's a slight chance you could be wrong.
a person who lacks self-confidence finds a need to try to demean others - can we assume that you're posting from your yacht somewhere?. opinions are like a-holes, everyone has one.
Well we hope so. Nevertheless, about 170,00 on the volume today, 180,000 on the volume yesterday - this usually considered not great, a lack of direction, can't really say there's momentum to the upside.
It's weird, because this volume down is almost equal to the volume up yesterday. Do you have a theory? The run-up could have been the usual hopeful expectations going into the conference call next week. Then push-back - if it's not good news re:earnings, it also becomes possible that a non-officer insider is dumping, I guess. This is most confounding.
Hah! working on it.
Thanks, another conspiracy theory shot to heck.
Here's a question for the wiser heads around here. Is it possible that the market maker is in cahoots with the short seller / low ball bidder? I ask this because very often you see either the ask lower than the bid or at the same price as the last sale. It seems to me, and I don't know better, that, for example, if the last sale was .79, you would then ask for something higher, why sit on the ask at the same price? And why in the world would the ask be lower than the bid?
their low bid, if that's what it is, would be to buy, correct?
I'm showing 126,582 on the ask side at .79 which is higher than the last price so that wouldn't be Destiny selling, but the 11,250 at the bid side at .77 might be for them.
How can you tell that offer isn't for Destiny? If they're still re-purchasing they don't want it to run up, yet.
we've been in a many months long channel between about .60 and about .80. It's important to have volume on this leg up and to stay above .80 - that's going to be either our ceiling or our floor.
If you do the test on the Speedtest site, when you're done there will be a "share" button, which will give you a "grade" based on the national averages.
"This content requires Adobe Flash Player, which is not supported by your device...." didn't Steve Jobs famously decide to make his products not compatible with Adobe because of some beef he had with them?
My iPad doesn't support enabling Flash v10+ so Speedtest doesn't work. However, at one of my locations, the laptop scored a Grade B in speed running on wi-fi and the iPad and mini were both used with same wi-fi - videos looked good on the laptop, not on the tablets. Mini also won't allow Flash download.
Hey, I'm here for the potential, too, just trying to understand what the potential actually is. I've reported the results of some tests, good and bad - you seem to think that if I don't mention the problems I've encountered that no one else will notice them. Clipstream works well on my iPhone, Mac laptop, and with the Mac Pro towers, only problem is with iPad - hopefully they can fix that, but if not, we'll have to deal with that reality.
Safari was much improved on my home laptop, which is about 6 months old, in full screen mode - the difference in time was about 10 days. That is also where the most recent test on my 1st gen iPad had poor results. Look, Clipstream can still be a huge success if it only works on PC's, which obviously dominate the market, but let's not have our heads in the sand about this.
So, let me understand - you yourself haven't actually tested on an iPad and you only want to hear about results that don't disrupt your fantasy narrative. I suggest that in the future when someone tries to tell you something you don't want to hear you cover your ears and loudly say "nyah, nyah, nyah" until they're through. As stated, I've tested on three, grow up.
Don't know the speed, but on the other hand, I'm not using dial-up in a mountainous area, either. I've tested on 3 different devices ranging in age from a 1st gen full size iPad to a fairly new mini. I've used 2 different wi-fi connections 100 miles apart and the Apple / AT&T connection and it looked crummy each time. If I'm a Joe Average consumer, what are we dealing with here? Please don't tell me to e-mail Steve because if he's crowd sourcing these tests and not testing Mac products on their own (everyone has been writing that Safari doesn't work particularly well), we're in big trouble.
videos are so bad as to be unwatchable on my iPad. anyone else getting anything on any type of tablet? This is currently not a cross platform solution.
And those companies' successes were due in large part to the response to demand created by am radio, which is very adversely affected by thunderstorms.
huge improvement playing videos full screen with Safari
How big of a screen were you looking at? Safari worse than Firefox in my experience, don't know about Chrome. Still think the Jump video is useless, too many quick camera cuts, I originally thought they put it up to mask choppiness - Guido seems to be the real standard, longish views of individual scenes. MPE demo was actually blurry when I checked it last week on my laptop, using Safari, so this is good news. Volume would look better if we were heading up.
Having trouble running the videos on the iPad - anyone else test that?
Important to break .80 and stay above - still an unfortunate pattern of less volume going up, more volume going down.
No, TDA, was not necessarily aware of the 30,000 share holding. That data is from mffais.com, a site that tracks institutional investments. I don't know where TDA got the 1.75% number.
Well, also, TDA lists % held by institutions as 1.75, which is none of the above, so I guess it's a whatever situation.