Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
100% in 18 months ain't too shabby.
just curious, about when was that?
Thanks, very reassuring
Didn't notice that - and it still appears before Destiny which doesn't appear at all. The larger question remains, that is, if transcoding will be a naturally decreasing cost as technologies improve.
I'm not a tech person, but I started wondering if Destiny isn't getting traction with Clipstream because companies expect transcoding costs to naturally decrease, sort of like phone bills. If you Google something like "decreasing transcoding costs" you get responses like this:
http://www.techrepublic.com/whitepapers/video-services-provider-to-reduce-transcoding-costs-up-to-half/1200177
and there's more. So is this competition? Also, Destiny probably needs some SEO help because they don't appear anywhere in this search.
This is good news, although it remains weird that the CEO has enough time to promptly answer e-mails from the public - shouldn't he be too busy building an empire? The web site situation is long overdue - the current one looks very amateurish which is strange because it doesn't cost too much to throw up a nice one. You don't go and pitch the big boys in a cheap suit - optics count. Hope today's speech isn't the same old same old (next quarter...end of the year...).
Yes, but he seems to be correct about this. I was at the investors conference in NYC last fall and heard the CEO say he was committed to getting DSNY on the NASDQ this year and that support for share price was a priority. Was he just saying what he thought people wanted to hear? I see no evidence of any activity to these ends, completely frustrating esp. on a day like today. Why is this paradigm busting video delivery tech co. trading below .80 again? Anyone?
I realize that, but who do you think is the moderator and how do you think dissenting opinions are dealt with?
It's good to hear from you both, why not come up with another bet? The more opinions the better, differing ideas never hurt anyone and don't impact share price. It's even too bad that Vangorilla took his ball and went home, although his nasty henchman won't be missed.
I don't know it, but I will shortly, thanks.
The biotechs are very satisfying to me in that they either pass their trials and zoom up or don't and crash. No muss, no fuss, no waiting around forever. If you see large institutional investment in one that's below $2 (below $1 is even better), then you know something's afoot.
Thanks and here's one re: GALE, that Destiny might keep in mind, from S.A.:
"the stock's performance has been more a result of excellent execution on behalf of the company's ability to market itself."
which I would gladly take until G2 becomes fully functional.
suit yourself, of course, not my experience, though. caveat emptor.
I subscribe to the newsletter, too, but disagree with him on this point. Baby biotechs are doing very well, look into the regenerative (stem cell) medicine space for example.
ok, that's a good perspective - how have the other ones been doing?
maybe this is what's keeping share price down:
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/dsny/guru-analysis
well, alright!
I tried to put up a link and wasn't able to, it seems more and more companies, like Time Warner, are advertising that their programs / videos are available on all platforms. It's hard to tell if they're paying to transcode or if there's another solution out there. Hoping for the former, big time.
You bring up an interesting point. Much to our chagrin, the investing community, at large, hasn't rushed in and fully embraced DSNY. I wonder if, also, it might be some combination of them not liking the business plan, not believing in the products, not liking the management team, not understanding the technology (doubtful), or whatever. That would also explain the persistent short position of several hundred thousand shares. Personally, I doubt the whole death spiral financing scenario, a little too boogey-man ish for me.
I completely agree, but tell that to the "Random Walk Down Wall Street" fan club, or John Bogle. My larger point was that a fair number of folks don't hold technical analysis in high regard. I'm all with trendlines (and volume a little less so), but Elliot Wave, Fibonacci, stochastics, etc. have no more value to me than astrology, not that I'm the world's greatest authority.
Good points - my point was that there are respected investors who have no use for either, i.e., the efficient market crowd.
someone talking Fibonacci retracements who mocks astrology? Don't see the difference.
exactly - although there seems to be a reading comprehension problem here - when I posted that some people think it's a time of volatility, that is a fact. I never said that it was necessarily true or that I believed it. It's an interesting thing to consider, and as I also said, we can have a look to see how the theory pans out.
wow, I said some people believe it's a time of volatility. Since you don't know, I'll tell you, "volatility" does not mean "reversal", you can look it up. In case you're wondering, I'm completely not clever.
It claimed....Destiny said. ...many feel...you can see ....Who do you think
not much meat on them bones
why don't you explain to everyone how initiating a conversation about the theoretical
effects of a solar eclipse on markets is like "anyday" so we can all fully appreciate how very clever you are.
well, we'll see what you guys are made of in a little bit, eh? (buying vix options?)
Tim Bost, is that you?
Volatile doesn't really equal evil, not making moral judgements, here.
"Near the date of the eclipse, before and after, there is a marked increase in volatility. Eclipses have coincided with market reversals in either direction."
" Study has gone into exactly how long an eclipse has influence, yet there is actually no definitive answer. Some say energy from a solar eclipse can be felt for as many months that are equal to the minutes/hours the actual eclipse lasts, or the amount of time the shadow of the eclipse can be seen. Some simply say the energy of a solar eclipse can be felt up to 6 months, or until the next solar eclipse; Lunar Eclipses, not quite as long."
solar eclipse this thursday morning, about 8:30 eastern - some believe that this is a portent of a very volatile market, before and after, we shall see.
JP Morgan : “Millionaires don’t use astrology, billionaires do.”
angry much?
Facts? please, these are just a bunch of theories, believe what you will.
Thanks, now let me ask you a question. Can you conclude that Destiny's not continuing to buy shares through the German exchange or the Canadian one it's listed on?
How can you possibly back up the last sentence in your statement? Please, believe whatever you want, but your constantly insulting style demeans the message board - another know it all writing from his yacht.
Not gonna happen - they have to finish the re-purchase at $1 or under before any big announcement will be made.
That's not to say they're all winners, unfortunately. If you like baby bio-techs, you might want to check out TZYM, intriguing because there's a lot of institutional ownership ( I know it was much higher not too long ago) for a .50 stock and Baker Brothers are heavily involved.
And I did, put that money to some other use, and have been buying back in as this has been getting stronger. If this stock goes up to anywhere even remotely near what some have been predicting, I don't mind paying a small premium. I was discouraged, the other stuff has worked out, so it's a win-win.
For you chart reading fans out there, this is what I've been waiting for, a clear break though .85 with good volume. Additional good news is that since about mid-Feb, volume has been increasing as share price has gone up and decreasing on the dips.
p.s. - read the transcripts of the CC. There were so many internal logical inconsistencies to what was said that I couldn't even begin to delineate them.
I'm now looking to sell 25% of my holdings at a meager profit of about 10%. With this company's complete aversion to generating publicity, I see no catalyst to push share price higher until the next quarterly report, if it is an improvement. I'd like to see this stock break through the .85 mark with good volume, but probably won't buy more until it's $1+. I'll check in then, good luck to everyone.
Again, to you morons who think I'm short, I'm not, it makes no sense to me to short a .75 stock. In the past I've only shorted BP, after the Gulf spill, and Barnes & Noble because I didn't like their business model. Otherwise, I use inverse etf's to "short" commodities.
One of the first rules of investing is not to fall in love with stocks, which a lot of you have done here. It's pathetic that you attack me instead of asking hard questions of the company. You don't know what you don't know.
Whatever, for a good lawyer you're a terrible shrink - this morning I saw an ad for a dish tv network that guarantees you can watch your favorite shows on any device. The problem with this management is that either they don't know how long it's going to take to fix the kinks or they do know and aren't saying. What I object to is their constant next-quartering.