Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If anyone collects shares at .70 today good for them. I don't see that happening much. Remember this AXGO guy said they can't afford to buy $5,000 of any stock so their volume contribution is insignificant anyway. A non-issue. When Ask hits .70 they can gloat if they want. Discussion over as far as I'm concerned.
Xeller
The real crux of the matter is even if I had the most charitable interpretation of the situation I would still have to answer that they don't have what it takes to get it together.
Doug is a non-entity. I never found him contributing anything. The only thing I know of is his phone calls with investors after I left, but I never knew him to do anything concrete towards getting this ship righted. He could tell you what he did to that end, but I never saw anything from him personally that amounted to a hill of beans.
Drew contols the shell and calls the shots. I guess you can call INXR D1 instead of D2 as far as I'm concerned.
I don't think D1 is organized enough to get it together. My guess is he is is not technically gifted as a programmer or a project manager. I know he is deceitful because he lied to the faces of several of my colleagues.
In sum, no I don't think he has what it takes and I don't think he is trustworthy.
My most charitable interpretation is once upon a time Drew had a dream of being a market data provider with a trading platform. But he lost his way and justifies his lies and deceit as necessary actions to protect the future of the company. That is putting it really nicely. However, it doesn't really matter what he once intended. The actions speak loudest and he diluted shareholders into the ground and refuses to ungag the TA for a reason. They have something to hide obviously.
No future for this company in my opinion.
Did you know that buying at .75 can actually be a sweet spot to enter a monster stock (if that is what this turns out to be)? I hold several hundred thousand shares of TBLC I own for under a buck. Same thinking. I have not sold a single share. I'm holding for $30 minimum barring any disasters, but I think it could go much higher with a few extra boosts of good fortune. My thinking is there are many penny stocks that come out of nowhere like this one is doing now from a nickel a year ago. If this was a fluke stock the one year rise would have faltered by now and the stock had heavily retraced. So the real psychological barrier is $1 now. As fundamentals bring earnings to the bottom line this looks it could be the kind of company that gets a strong forward valuation on projected earnings. After $1, the next threshold will be $3. After that, you can talk about uplisting to AMEX or wait for $4+ and Nasdaq which this company looks very capable of qualifying for with positive EPS coming. Long story short, if you find a stock that is quality, has risen from the floor and is knocking on $1 and the future is bright you might have just bought yourself a greyhound. We'll see. I need to do more analysis, but I got the vibe on this one as soon as I found it and that only happens to me a few times a year. Regards
Oh there are plenty of good stocks on the OTCBB you can go long on (NOT THE PINKS). iHub culture can convince some to never invest in penny stocks, but that is all I do and it is making me a whale. I'd be very happy if this is another great one. I took my position now just to get a marker in.
That is what I was doing Brikk. But others are in there buying too so maybe that is their M.O. too. I buy and hold. I have a portfolio with stocks I anticipate 5-40X gains on so I don't care if they take more than a year to grow. My outlook here is I buy 50K now under a buck. If it keeps trending higher and my DD proves this out then I will take some profits elsewhere and average up and own a quarter million shares when I'm done. For now, 50k is my starter position. Good luck
One of them
You can welcome me aboard as your newest shareholder. Bought 50,000 shares today. There are others in there buying at the Ask though. It looks like the mid-month jump from .66 to .86 is working out its retrace. It could be possible to get some shares below .70 again, but it neither looks likely technically, nor feels like it from my trading experience today, so I decided to take my first chunk now and then watch. This is a fascinating company people. I will enjoy watching this story develop now. Regards
Thanks RJC
I think there is no issue about using various services to put together your own. The question was their own claims to 100% original coding. It should be understood that no matter what they did themselves and what they put together using other outside elements, even 100% original coding requires data from a market data vendor. What any module is in effect then is what is called a "feed handler" which interprets the data for you the consumer. Additionally, the data that comes from whomever they are getting it from now whether it is CMA or otherwise has to be packaged by the data vendor and delivered to the middle man such as iFinix which acts as your data provider. Different trading exchanges have their data interpreted differently and the data provider must package that so it can parsed and used by a feed handler. The data vendor would usually have modules available to use which would already handle the feeds or else the data provider will have to consult with the vendor to parse their data stream to be read accurately by their own chosen or originally created modules. At this time, what is what and who their relationships are with are no longer clear. They promoted their CMA relationship, but is that still the data provider or is it Hyperfeed?/
OK thanks. I guess we don't have the full story anymore about who coded what and that remains to be explained as follows:
What happened to CMA?
What is their current relationship to Hyperfeed?
Are they using white label product with modified iFinix skins?
How much did they actually code themselves as opposed to their claim of writing 100% of the code themselves?
Who is the current data feed provider, CMA, Hyperfeed or other?
Was the screenshot corrected overnight? If so, that would tell you the company is reading the board. What does that say about them now? Are they trying to hide their connection to hyperfeed after people discussed here yesterday?
True enough.
But you're still a cheap bastard who won't pay for a membership!!! Come on man, it is cheap. Go for it.
Beecuzz cussing in public is fun! I think
right vega?
Oh I don't know
Sounds fair to me. Good luck with that one. I've done really well with all of my other stocks if you need to make some money back. You'll be able to see their long term charts are solid. Take care
Shelly is going to restore my posting privileges to the INXR board. We can give them props for listening this time at least.
I offered all the suggestions to them that they promoted but never delivered so I know everything there is to know about trying improve iFinix products with solid suggestions.
The answer is:
No, they cannot compete in the marketplace. They don't stand a chance.
Thanks. You are much too nice to some of those people over there, probably because you are a sweetheart. But when people go out of their way to bury the truth don't be so forgiving. Seek the truth and you'll do better on your next one. Sorry it didn't work out for you there.
Thanks Brikk, I'm watching. Good luck with it
You have to do your DD no matter what. New York has plenty of scams, but it is still the seat of great companies, some incorporated there, some in Delaware. Nevada has many scam companies as does Florida, but they still produce winners.
OK, semantics are important though. But when you say the PRs aren't total BS how does that help you or anyone else for that matter? If they are 30% or 60% or pick number BS or true, how is that a good thing. They should only be 100% true. Anything less is a red flag and there have been dozens. Can anyone explain these PR claims?
Got a patent appplication link?
Where is Comtex?
Where is CMA?
What happened to the trading seminars?
Where is the deal with Legend?
Where are all of the features promised?
What are the supposed 100 new features?
Where are the financials promised by March?
Where is the share structure transparency?
Where is the respect for shareholders they pledged?
What happened to the anti-dilutionary stance they proclaimed?
I could do this all day long. Shall I go on?
I am presently banned from the INXR board. I do not understand how iHub is facilitating their cover up of the truth. If you make one tiny TOU misstep in the eyes of the accusing party they report you to the Admins to get you banned. It doesn't matter that I produced 40 great posts of merit. The admins don't seem to care. They just banned me without measuring me up against my content. If I made one post in violation of some rule I'm being reported against they should PM me with a warning, but not rip off everyone there from hearing the truth. It is not balanced or fair or what people actually need.
What did you just say? Insiders are shorting the stock? Come again? Huh? If that is different way of saying they diluted, fine, but actually shorting their own stock? What?
Posted by: TradeSwapper
In reply to: cashflo who wrote msg# 79127 Date:9/26/2007 9:05:41 AM
Post #of 79137
Remember their fallout with EliteTrader? The owner of the website Baron was not getting paid by INXR. I spoke to him 2 weeks ago. He said INXR made one partial payment after he exposed them on his website for nonpayment, but that when he tried to run their card again to get paid it was declined. The card was defunct. INXR defaulted again. Does that mean they spent what they needed to on advertising to get only so far and then pulled the plug? You guess, but I know they welched on their debt to Elite Trader.
Seabiscuit, September 30th is an arbitrary date that has no bearing on anything discussed thus far, anything said by INXR thus far or anything that should have been done already. Besides they did put out a PR after their denial of involvement with the other crooks, so I am not sure what you are referring to. Sorry, you have been loyal, but your loyalties have been completely misplaced.
Remember their fallout with EliteTrader? The owner of the website Baron was not getting paid by INXR. I spoke to him 2 weeks ago. He said INXR made one partial payment after he exposed them on his website for nonpayment, but that when he tried to run their card again to get paid it was declined. The card was defunct. INXR defaulted again. Does that mean they spent what they needed to on advertising to get only so far and then pulled the plug? You guess, but I know they welched on their debt to Elite Trader.
Paw, you're on iHub. There are many garbage haulers here and some actual investors and some clever traders. You can find all kinds here. I would advocate buying DJRT, TBLC and GORO.
I hold several hundred thousand shares of TBLC for under a buck. At $30 I will have a forty bagger. I consider the stock to have $20 in its future and with good results it could be a major mining conglomerate worth $50-100 a share. It is very high quality. Go look at the recent PR with a link to Goldseek and there you will find a superb slide show online that tells you all you need to know about this company. You'll dig it because they have an elite drilling company that has tripled its rigs to 20 in a year and blue chip clients. They have a half dozen very high quality properties too they expect to drill out and then JV with the majors they already work with. It is why this is called a blue sky company, because they have a growing revenue base that will make them profitable, but then the upside on the properties is quite large. Long term this has to be a major favorite to produce real wealth. They just did a very successful presentation and the stock roared awake so it is climbing again after its retrace during the August market correction. Buying around $4 should position you for 500-1000% gains long term.
GORO is just the damn hottest property that may be around, but I'm no gold expert. I followed those funds in that did their DD and sent their geologists to the field and there is some serious cash invested here. This has $20-60 potential and I think could be as high as $25 by the end of next year.
TBLC has less risk. GORO may be the biggest annual mover though.
DJRT is a 40 cent stock I have a $2-3 target for by the end of next year. After that we'll see if they can expand, uplist and grow some more. I'll hold a big stake if they are performing well. They are the best choice for racing on Nascar tracks recreationally. They have positive EPS of a cent already and I expect revenues to be on a trend towards quadruple revenues by next year which with leverage on their margins can produce 7 cents a share next year and support 1.50 to 2.00 a share. Long term the upside is pretty big. OS is well under 30M, management is conservative and not flashy and they are serious about growing their company.
Those 3 making up a portfolio could potentially triple to quintuple your money by the end of next year. Then you do it again and again and you're rich. It really is that simple.
His support of Israel would be pragmatic and/or cultural, i.e. long time progressives have a historical post-holocaust belief the Jews should supported in their nation state which is not a religious conviction, but a moral one. That does not make one a Zionist and it does not mean you disrespect Palestinians and other people wanting their own piece of turf. Even a non-republican can easily see that even with a large amount of dirty politics and spy games with Israel it should matter to Americans that Israel survives. It is a strategic country geopolitically, but for many that is not the primary basis for their support of Israel.
Thanks. Will DD. I have such a great portfolio now I'd have to cannibalize it to acquire another stock, but I'll start watching. That chart is mystical looking. My stocks have fine multi-year charts, but no single year was so consistently up throughout that interval. If this stock keeps going for another year like it has the past one you'll rack up exponential gains. Very impressive chart. One of the best one years you'll ever find. A 15 bagger or so already from that bottom. Congrats to anybody who nailed it at the beginning.
Holy Mackerel. That is an insane one year chart. Just saw it. Anybody here buy a million shares at a nickel and still holding? Yowsa
Posted by: TradeSwapper
In reply to: TradeSwapper who wrote msg# 79080 Date:9/26/2007 1:48:55 AM
Post #of 79121
P.S. to this prior post .... remember when the stock had a momentary high of 0.0027? Mostly it was in the low twenties when that volume broke it over the 0.002 mark. I do believe there was plenty of trading action going on with profit takers and such, but we were poised for a fine move and probably consolidation in the twenties, but it never seemed it could hold on to that. I wonder why. Was the money men they sold their stock selling into our run? I would have to guess so.
I didn't sell in the twenties. I knew people who paid as high as 18 or 19 and they got hurt badly. I don't know if they sold when I told them I was selling, but some of them never responded to me or accused me of screwing them. You see? You get on board with a dodgy company and try to help some people you are friendly with to get in on the stock and it backfires. What a mess.
It was out of my hands because I gave absolutely everything I could to salvage the situation for shareholders. I really hammered on these guys to not dilute prematurely, to protect the stock and shareholders, to deliver transparency and I did soooooo much to advise them on refining their product planning and their feature set.
I even wrote that damn commercial you guys saw on TV. I wrote that script. I spoke to the animators in India. I went to the mat for everyone because I was trying so hard to see this through. So if you really need to ask anymore why I was not so forthcoming about my doubts when I took leave of the board just consider that it now seems all of the best of iFinix came from me and not from them. They took my ideas, they issued PRs they had no intention of living up to and when I was gone from the board they now knew they needed new blood on iHub to support them.
But I never spread their rumors via PM or passed around their whispers. Drew sure tried to get me to do that for him when he said he was going to India for a month. When he got back and called me I told him to take a hike because he had left everyone in the dark while he was gone. Remember? There was another silent period between the time I left and the launch. Remember? Well I told him he left everyone hanging and I had given him everything I could and there were no more free lunches from me and he owed it to the shareholders to get his crap together and start communicating again. Last time I spoke to him.
He told me about Legend in February and it happened half a year later and it was just a LOI? Promoting a brokerage relationship when you have no trading platform? Are you kidding me? Well, nobody on iHub got a PM from me about Legend. No way. I didn't play that game. So think about what people have said and done and realize I never manipulated the story. I told what was relevant and did what I could to actually enhance the company, but they are just not competent and they are not shareholder friendly.
When I knew they were willing to publicly state things they never intended to do I still tried to help them create a great marketing plan so at least the stock would do well when they launched. Yes, I did what I could to help even when I knew I was looking for an exit.
When I left I wasn't even sure any more they ever would launch. So I zipped it and watched and waited. And it did come out and the TV ad did air. You got one more pop into the teens. Around then I posted very briefly I thought this was a farce. I hoped some of you would wise up and sell without me having to be too blunt about it. I then began to speak more frankly via PM to those who asked.
But for you guys who held all I've been doing is saying what you really need to hear because waiting for them to perform did not seem to produce the higher exit price you wanted and I wanted for you. This has not gone well in spite of my best efforts and I'm telling you that if it weren't for me I know many of you would not be in the stock. I'm not proud of that, but at least I have the best vantage point from which to tell why I think the situation does not look salvagable.
If you think I should have never said so I can't please everyone. Some listened and were very grateful. Some are not happy about it. But it is what is truthful according to my viewpoint. There are always better stocks around the corner. Don't get fixated on recovering your losses by holding losers. It usually doesn't work. Good luck
Lisa, did you watch the last Bill Maher show with Salman Rushdie and Janeanne Garofolo as guests? They talked all about how the war in Iraq is one big profiteering scheme. Disgusting how they are spending out tax dollars (and diluting our dollars via paper printing). Hmmmm, that sounds familiar .........
P.S. to this prior post .... remember when the stock had a momentary high of 0.0027? Mostly it was in the low twenties when that volume broke it over the 0.002 mark. I do believe there was plenty of trading action going on with profit takers and such, but we were poised for a fine move and probably consolidation in the twenties, but it never seemed it could hold on to that. I wonder why. Were the money men they sold their stock to selling into our run? I would have to guess so.
I didn't sell in the twenties. I knew people who paid as high as 18 or 19 and they got hurt badly. I don't know if they sold when I told them I was selling, but some of them never responded to me or accused me of screwing them. You see? You get on board with a dodgy company and try to help some people you are friendly with to get in on the stock and it backfires. What a mess.
It was out of my hands because I gave absolutely everything I could to salvage the situation for shareholders. I really hammered on these guys to not dilute prematurely, to protect the stock and shareholders, to deliver transparency and I did so much to advise them on refining their product planning and their feature set.
I even wrote that damn commercial you guys saw on TV. I wrote that script. I spoke to the animators in India. I went to the mat for everyone because I was trying so hard to see this through. So if you really need to ask anymore why I was not so forthcoming about my doubts when I took leave of the board just consider that it now seems all of the best of iFinix came from me and not from them. They took my ideas, they issued PRs they had no intention of living up to and when I was gone from the board they now knew they needed new blood on iHub to support them.
But I never spread their rumors via PM or passed around their whispers. Drew sure tried to get me to do that for him when he said he was going to India for a month. When he got back and called me I told him to take a hike because he had left everyone in the dark while he was gone. Remember? There was another silent period between the time I left and the launch. Remember? Well I told him he left everyone hanging and I had given him everything I could and there were no more free lunches from me and he owed it to the shareholders to get his crap together and start communicating again. Last time I spoke to him.
He told me about Legend in February and it happened half a year later and it was just a LOI? Promoting a brokerage relationship when you have no trading platform? Are you kidding me? Well, nobody on iHub got a PM from me about Legend. No way. I didn't play that game. So think about what people have said and done and realize I never manipulated the story. I told what was relevant and did what I could to actually enhance the company, but they are just not competent and they are not shareholder friendly.
When I knew they were willing to publicly state things they never intended to do I still tried to help them create a great marketing plan so at least the stock would do well when they launched. Yes, I did what I could to help even when I knew I was looking for an exit.
When I left I wasn't even sure any more they ever would launch. So I zipped it and watched and waited. And it did come out and the TV ad did air. You got one more pop into the teens. Around then I posted very briefly I thought this was a farce. I hoped some of you would wise up and sell without me having to be too blunt about it. I then began to speak more frankly via PM to those who asked.
But for you guys who held all I've been doing is saying what you really need to hear because waiting for them to perform did not seem to produce the higher exit price you wanted and I wanted for you. This has not gone well in spite of my best efforts and I'm telling you that if it weren't for me I know many of you would not be in the stock. I'm not proud of that, but at least I have the best vantage point from which to tell why I think the situation does not look salvagable.
If you think I should have never said so I can't please everyone. Some listened and were very grateful. Some are not happy about it. But it is what is truthful according to my viewpoint. There are always better stocks around the corner. Don't get fixated on recovering your losses by holding losers. It usually doesn't work. Good luck
Most trade shows will list their vendors scheduled to exhibit on their website. But you can pretty much expect they won't be at any trade shows. They really don't have much to show. If you are a real badass trader walking around an Expo what are you going to do with a L2 module? It would be meaningless to pro traders or even informed amateurs.
It is a fine photo of Stefan. Makes me chuckle. But he is nowhere as good looking as the Canoe Lady.
Lisa, I'm already wealthy. I do it by investing in small caps and buying and holding primarily. I have hundreds of thousands of shares of stocks that are trading anywhere from under a buck to several dollars and all are poised for 5-10X gains during my time holding them. One I think I will make about 40 to 60 times my money over 2.5-4 years holding it. That one could make me $10M by itself. I disagree about the markets being without real opportunity. There are 9M millionaires in the U.S. right now. Some of them did it with an internet connection and a brokerage account. If you take $25,000 and hold it to $150,000, reinvest that two more times, in only 3 good plays you can have $1M in several years. But most of the people you call sheep would rather chase these garbage stocks hoping for a miracle. Screw miracles. Go for the good stuff and in 5 years you are rich. Its really that simple. And all without being a daytrader. Most people lack the proper aggression to build big positions and hold their ground long enough to reap the gains. You can go several months trading sideways and then bang you're up another couple of bucks. And this can go on from $1 to $10 or from $3 to $30. In a couple of years you wonder why you ever bothered flipping sub-penny stocks. Sure, some get rich off them, but they are usually in on the game or leading a trading cartel and they are here on iHub and some follow them around which is what they want. But what I want is something I can buy in great size and not worry too much about it. I cannot buy $300,000 of a POS stock and not worry about it. I just bought a quarter million dollars of DJRT the last month and that should give me a 5 bagger by the end of next year, thus a million dollar gain. It may then grow into a bigger company and if it goes to $10 I make $5M. I can wait. It is more profitable than trading unless I swing trade to make $75,000 a week, but I don't need the hassle.
I had no real good reason to waste my time on iFinix. They had a sterling and unprecedented opportunity as we all know which was to cater to microcap trader needs and simultaneously win the hearts of minds of the same community holding its stock. Man, talk about a slam dunk, but these freaks sold into the rallies and took the money and ran. Talk about jerking us around. These guys gave all the usual lip service about loving us long time and delivering what the microcap community needed, but they did not. They ripped us all off. And the schmucks will plead mea culpa and claim they had to support the company. Bullshit. They printed paper way too readily to be believed ever ever evah evah again. I got out with a small profit and was thankful for that. I hoped the same for everyone else, but now I hope some realize they could lose it all if they keep sucking up to these pathological liars.
It could mean they broke up with CMA and went with hyperfeed instead, but are still struggling to deliver a viable product. They were all giddy about their relationship with CMA. Review past PRs where they promoted that relationship and how it could translate into moving iFinix into the Latin American markets and other such malarkey.
I suppose they didn't want to promote the new relationship if that is what happened because it would mean their previous hype about CMA and the big potential of the relationship had to be scuttled.
But I think we can probably put to rest their claim they wrote all the code themselves.
Strange. They claimed 100% original coding in their PR. If it is powered by Hyperfeed then that claim was false.
Did they Stefan? No one has produced a link to their patent application yet. All it would take is one email from the company to a shareholder who posts the link to the USPTO database showing they filed their patent application. That is all it takes.
OK, that clears that up. So the question then should be:
Are they built on hyperfeed?
If so, does that mean they primarily just put their own skins on hyperfeed product?
If so, is hyperfeed product buggy
or
is CMA data parsed with outdated code and hard to translate
or
INXR simply doesn't have the ability to integrate the two?
And if it is hyperfeed product base plus CMA data then how does their assertion the product was 100% originally coded by them stand up?
OK Stefan, I don't know about hyperfeed. But even if we are being charitable your statement about it being a wrapper for CMA data feeds is correct. As you and I know, the translation of data from various exchanges can have diverse coding considerations. They said they were getting their feed from CMA as everyone here knows from doing their own DD. If CMA has been in business providing data with their own modules for years and it works why INXR had so many issues with it could be one way of explaining they were trying to use non-CMA product to translate CMA provided data. I'm open to the truth, but since we never get much truth from them we are left to guessing what the truth is. Did they use CMA product, hyperfeed's, their own and try to adapt the CMA data feeds with one of them for iFinix users? We don't fully know. But it is buggy. Many have bailed on the product already as it is well known. I just think they are not competent regardless of the software's origins. If you can't get the data to display properly then you don't have "rock solid" data. Oh, and I gave them the phrase "rock solid" by the way. Too bad they couldn't deliver on the promise.
I got 50 emails for that today. I didn't bite, uh, I mean buy