Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
$2.00 is more likely to happen given the current fundamentals in place rather than the nonsensical, ludicrous prediction of 2 cents.
This BS prediction has been out there for the third year now. LMAO
Exactly. I have been here long enough to know Nasrat has never promised no efficacy trial would be required.
The below quote came from a PR dated March 5, 2014. This is the alleged promise from Nasrat?. . .ELI-200 is expected to be filed this year. This constitutes a promise? Really? There is nothing here that is definitive as in making a "promise" would imply.
Well so far I have only seen unsubstantiated opinions. . . no links, no verifiable info, no FACTS for that matter.
Hmmmmmmm. . .no, not convinced at all. Thanks though.
The PR you reference is dated September 9/2014 and the more recent info I posted in the link is dated November 19/2014. Nasrat has repeatedly stated ELTP was in constant contact with the FDA in regard to ELI200 (SequestOx). Do you think in that period of time the FDA advised Nasrat of the possible efficacy trial that may be required? Hence the reference to the trial during the CC on November 19.
Provide a verifiable source where Nasrat actually said no efficacy trial would be required. I'll be waiting.
More BS as usual.
Thank you and GLTU as well.
Thank you for convincing me. LMAO
Has SequestOx been stopped as in. . .permanently shut down? NO. Delay. . .yes. The NDA process is continuing. Last I heard, ELTP is conducting BE trials in preparation for resubmission later this year. TMAX results are scheduled to be released next month.
I am still not convinced. Show me some specific, credibile examples of this "credibility gap" you speak of.
Please enlighten me as to who is saying there is a "credibility gap". Where is the source?
Complete nonsense. No pharma has ever posted the minutes of a FDA meeting and now it's expected that ELTP do this. What a ludicrous request.
Show me an example where another pharma has ever posted verbatim minutes of an FDA meeting. I'll be waiting.
I would disagree. If this was a complete restart on a new formulation then a new BE trial would be required and the expected results in July would not happen. No. . .in my opinion Elite/Camargo have recruited/are recruiting replacement candidates for the ones who were exluded and are continuing with the current BE trial.
The complaint was filed two years ago (May 17,2015). Obviously, the SEC has concluded the complaint is a non-issue otherwise we would have heard something (punitive action) by now.
OMG. . . the year 2014 had 198 mil IR scripts versus 25 mil (approx.) ER oxycodone+ER/LA scripts. Yeah, sure thing. . . 25 mil ER scripts are worth more than 198 mil IR scripts. LMAO
You are correct. This proof was posted on July 7/2016.
Just more unsubstantiated BS.
Thank you for the info.
I guess the underlying message I was trying to convey was that the one time milestone payments are not considered to be one of those ongoing activities of ELTP that produce revenues (i.e. sales of products, manufacturing fees, etc.). Milestone payments are not regular ongoing events nor are they a revenue stream. The misleading implication is that there will be a 2-3 mil shortfall from the previous fiscal period resulting in a financially unstable business. This shortfall, if it occurs, will be the result of diminished milestone payments and in no way reflects financial weakness. This is why Nasrat made reference to the approximate 10 mil annualized revenues to be expected.
Of interest, I did note (if I am reading the addendum notes correctly)in the last 10K the milestone payments were lumped in with the licensing fee revenues.
This is BS
Gee. . .I don't think Nasrat would have any difficulty in recognizing sarcasm.
Yes, I agree. Incomplete completion of DD would result in an opinion like this:
OMG You do realize the table being referred to was prepared by the message board poster and not Elite? These are the poster's time line estimates. Geez