Too risky and data contradicts doesn't it ? Show me different , but got to fill bids somehow("would not hold") right ?

Sorry to hear of your failed digging efforts. Best of luck.

If u follow the daily to a T I suppose so , but how does weekly look more specifically , where is the 20 that has held during the uptrend . BTW did you get your bids filled ?

Company would have been served better if I just kept my mouth shut and let the traders flip themselves out as we moved higher slowly.

"We"? Worst mistake I have ever made to date was unloading DD here ...and you hitched on ever since bringing a volatile company opinion and no facts. Show me your DD Tauby ? Interested.

Sure ?

Bottom may be the Weekly 20 Imo.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/offeringmemorandum.asp

This feels familiar.... lol

Thank you for your candor.

Nice to see you back , been busy It looks.

How long is a mega trend defined as ? Block and bit hit basically this year and we came off bottom... 1 year won't look so bad in 1 year Imo.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/m_read_msg.aspx?message_id=132575295

Patient.

Weekly looks intact and healthy actually, linking back for you Mario. Look at that line of old support we are on.

Here is the head of EU operations for BTC. I trust he will be able to since Copenhagen is his backyard.
https://gr.linkedin.com/in/peter-gelardi-mikkelsen-6400b34a

A good write up.
http://www.cs.tufts.edu/comp/116/archive/fall2016/rosgood.pdf

"Despite being a better, more secure technology, the main problem with blockchain voting has to do with political adoption both in the United States and abroad. There are a few obstacles to adoption. First of all, the technology is still relatively new and unknown to the general public. Second of all, political gridlock and red tape is always a problem and even if the technology is approved, bipartisan issues as well as the massive scale of governmental elections might mean adoption of blockchain voting could take years. Additionally, in the United States, voting is not under federal jurisdiction but is governed at the individual state level and “states are sensitive to federal encroachment”, which means country-wide adoption will be near impossible. Another problem is that blockchain voting requires a powerful and reliant internet infrastructure and access to expensive and energy-hungry voting machines, requirement not guaranteed in a lot of regions around the world. Finally, some states might simply not want fair and tamper-proof elections as their government might control or gain advantage from their current voting systems. Given those hurdles, blockchain voting systems will most likely first be adopted in tech-savvy and democratic countries that have an efficient central government that dictates country-wide voting procedures (unlike the United States). The first use of blockchain voting technology happened in Denmark when the Danish Liberal Alliance used a blockchain voting system to conduct an internal vote in April 2014 during its annual meeting. Furthermore, BTC used the VoteWatcher system on at least two separate occasions to count votes at the Libertarian Party Conventions in the United States. The first time was in April 2016 at the Party Convention in San Antonio, Texas. The second time happened at the Libertarian Convention in New York City in May 2016. Additionally, Rand Paul, the Libertarian presidential candidate in the 2016 elections has spoken favorably about the blockchain and bitcoin in the past. "

And nice mention in the line up.

Can't believe it has been called out for years and none jumped on votewatcher - Blockchain & Paper

"but we can demand a return to paper ballots. 78% of the world’s democracies use paper ballots."
"But it’s up to us, the voters who want to track the ballots, to do the counting."

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/8082384

Or

"If you’re an election official, losing votes is a very big deal, but it presents a special problem in Tennessee. Most counties in the state don’t keep paper records of ballots, so there are no physical votes locked in a room somewhere, ready to be recounted."

https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-voting-technology/

"Far too many states use unreliable and insecure electronic voting machines, and many states have made their situation worse by adding some forms of Internet voting for some voters, which cannot be checked for accuracy at all. Even in states where verifiable systems are used, too often the check on the voting system’s function and accuracy is not done. The voting equipment now in use are aging; resources are severely impacted by the state of the economy over the past several years; shortages of both equipment and human resources are likely. After all the effort necessary to overcome the other hurdles to casting a ballot, it is patently unfair that once you get to the ballot box, that the ballot itself fails you. Taken together, these problems threaten to silently disenfranchise voters, potentially in sufficient numbers to alter outcomes."

https://www.verifiedvoting.org/resources/voting-equipment/

Has been all over the place since first posting opinion of company here, even so far as to say ... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/m_read_msg.aspx?message_id=131504766

Who knows where the arrow lands when he shoots, lol.

Freak jump ?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/m_read_msg.aspx?message_id=132618778
We are back where we should be , did u see the weekly chart lower trend line ? These so called "freak" jumps happens on OTC tickers don't they ? Or Current must be a big deal down here.

Does look like it's coming , jump back on that upper band soon enough.

Agreement drumster.

Sorry , I should have said started averaging down , directed at copilot :) I know how you feel.

I bought shares with this PR

"enhance the rapid expansion of our election services business."

http://m.marketwired.com/press-release/global-arena-holding-sub-buys-into-blockchain-with-btc-purchase-otc-pink-gahc-2066987.htm

Enhance what again ?

Stew does.. and I do, Thats part of our investment into BTC and happens to be the patent that our core business needs to outgun their market , right ?

Linking back to this stew and Tauby.

Not at all lol , I told the reasons behind the patent office meaning for having a abandonment status , and just delay for regulation and government issues that deal with patent probably. Not saying GES might put up greater revenue, referring to my conversation with jrf, or that slidechain won't more than what's needed to take this next level.

Who are you claiming to be?

You can say what you wish as long as it is on the topic or subject matter of the company, personal attacks on any level are subject to deletion

Someone didn't like me bring up the abandoned voting patent ?

Is Smartmatic involment and that givrée article with CEO talking blockchain voting with kiosk mass producer meaning he can use tech without us now since it's been abandoned dec 13 and article was early jan .. right

Use a links like this whisky.. it works better

Here is abandoned voting patent I went off about weeks ago.

Use publishing number 20160028552 A1

http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair

See for yourself.
How does that make you feel knowing our core business was sort of reliant on the next gen voting tech not just sustained of the 10% of one patent

If you don't underhand the way I negate the BS on the board doesn't give right to personally insult imho

Sure.

Next. What fact did I post wrong ? Again.

Haft to learn to dig a little yourself to fully understand what I am referring most times if not just plainly put.

Give a man a fish teach a man to fish River man

"Went dark"
Agreed.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/m_read_msg.aspx?message_id=132539057

Like said before best entire shareholder base before just one. Why is one more deserving than all.

We have a whole company conference between tom and pizza lol

Talk to Pizza on the board atm, he will contest your one man band theme. He talked to a company office not long ago.

Did you talk to Spanos like Cheek said to ?