Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Anyone who has done any deep research knows that this is not your typical OTCPink stock. In time, everyone will know. imo
If they were paying them, that expense would have been in their 1st quarter filing, so I'm guessing it's minimal at best...if at all. imo
DryWorld Brands is on Amazon. SMH
Would expect nothing less of them. The writing has been there for a while. It's easy to see. imo
The details were in the PR. It specifically states partnership not sponsorship. Provide details showing it is a sponsorship.
Let's use the logic that has been stated so many times about IBGR. If it's not in the financials/disclosures, then it's inferred it doesn't exist or isn't part of IBGR. Right? So...since the partnership was announced in December 2021, any sponsorship fee must be in the 1st quarter filing/disclosure. So...if a sponsorship fee wasn't in the 1st quarter financials/disclosure doesn't that mean there isn't a sponsorship fee? imo
That's interesting. It references DryWorld (IBGR) in the partnership. How can people honestly believe this partnership is nothing but great for shareholders. It's 100% tied to DryWorld Brands (IBGR). Implying its anything else is misleading. imo
Wrong. This was all announced via the partnership PR from DryWorld Brands.
I feel for those selling right now. The regret will set in when they realize what they sold at vs. the share price in 2 months, 3 months, 6 months and a year. Oh well, it is what it is. imo
It's exactly what a growing and progressive company does. Continue to increase the product offering and sales. It's easy to see that they are doing things right. imo
DryWorld Brands has value, as they have contracts, as disclosed by the company. They have SLT and a premier team for their technical gear. In addition, we know that Saint Piran and 2 Rugby teams in Canada are wearing DryWorld gear. I don't call that worthless, I call it progress and it will only get better in time. The company is doing things necessary in order to move it forward for all shareholders...which the company/execs have shares as well. it's in their best interest to drive growth and value for DryWorld Brands, and they are doing it. imo.
SLT, 2 Canadian rugby teams, Saint piran, multiple manufacturing sites. They have either hired or contracted with some excellent resources in the kit design space. Appears that new ambassador could be coming on board. Multiple manufacturing/fulfillment locations. Shocking my last order shipped from another country not China, so it shoots down the alleged theory that Dryworld brands is a middle man ordering from he Dryworld China company. I would call that progress. Imo
I bet that’s a wrong assessment. Without any doubt in my mind. Imo
Care to provide facts to this allegation? The offering is what most public companies do…why go public otherwise? Imo
Cool opinion bro. Who are these alleged perpetrators you mention? Brian, Matt and Barrett are in control of the company. Anyone involved before is gone and not in control of anything. Imo
Lol, ok. Thanks for letting me know your opinion.
If they are shallow minded they might. Most logical people don’t hold the citizens responsible for their home country’s leader. If she were to come out I. Support of the attacks, then I agree, but she hasn’t and I bet she doesn’t comment. Imo
I am amazed that people don’t see the potential here. Imo
Making statements saying matt and Brian don’t own Dryworld industries is very misleading and potentially erroneous…unless you have facts to support. Imo
In my opinion selling now is only if people need the money now. We can already see the direction they are heading and moving this company/stock In The right direction.
Lol, that’s not happening. Imo
Ibgr Co-Ceo are legit. Imo
I believe the company is doing the right things and the potential is good, and time will prove it. DryWorld has not done any promo's whatsoever. The only insiders/officers now are Matt, Brian and Barrett, all old execs are gone. The company will address (like they have been) material events when the time is appropriate. imo
Indeed
That’s not accurate. Bill shaeffer has nothing to do with Dryworld. Imo
100% agree. The Dryworld team will further prove they are the real deal
And will generate shareholder value. Imo
What's odd is the contra promotion tries to paint the REG A offering as negative, but in fact, most companies go public to fund their growth. DryWorld is no different. I wouldn't care if they issued another 50-100 million shares if it meant they could achieve the continued growth. SMH
That makes two of us.
Wrong. People bought shares regardless Of China stores. Imo
There are a few things that have not been addressed by the company yet...such as Saint Piran and the 2 Rugby teams. that being said, it doesn't mean they are not associated. I'll wait until the company actually addresses. Until then, I'm not getting swayed one way or the other. imo
Show us where brands is paying a licensing fee to the Chinese stores to use their name…in the latest filing.
Since there is ZERO mention of Dryworld paying leasing fees to the Dryworld name in the recent quarterly filing, it MUST mean they have the rights to their own name in order to do business legally. Imo
One could say the same with brands. If they didn’t own the rights how could they be doing business legally? The fact is you, me and anyone else doesn’t know, Until the company addresses. Imo
Exactly why I asked. They own their rights, otherwise they wouldn’t have been able to sign the deals they have so far. Imo
if they had to sell their rights, how are they (Dryworld) still using them in their own business today? Imo
Indeed. It doesn't matter how hard they try, DryWorld will not be held down for long. They have proven by delivering, and I believe they will continue to do it. Time will tell. IMO
I agree. Getting the SLT televised, will definitely bring exposure to the brand. I can't wait for the first event. I bet we will see clips all over social media. imo
I’ll leave that to you. Again, I’ll wait for the company to address.
I believe the company is legit. The Chinese Stores are or are not part of it. However, SLT is and they will be opening a store in a minimum of one of A1 facilities, but also have a 10 year option on other A1 locations. They have a premier team to announce and I believe there will be a lot more to come. So if Chinese stores are of this equation the. That’s great. If not, it won’t change the fact that they have stated they will be growing the business. Imo
Facts to backup what? I have already stated I don’t know. I’m not
Claiming they are not, so I don’t need to back it up. I’m not saying they are, so I don’t need to provide facts to backup. Hence, why I’ve stated before, I’m waiting for the company to provide the answer. Imo
Whether it’s a Chinese company or not, the question we all want to know is whether or not Dryworld brands has any financial interest/ownership. Imo
Can you provide facts to support? When the pictures of the stores were put up, BS was called and it was nothing more than a promo, not real. I am not saying they are or are not, but to say they are now real/legit and not associated with DryWorld (IBGR) means there are facts via PR's by Dryworld or the alleged real owners to support the claim. imo