Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I am confident we will be lucky, just not to sure how lucky (hopefully my 3.7 is low). I think i may have over shot with my date but i will stick to my guns.
I propose that we do not take additional guesses until the final one on the current list is done, therefore i also hope we don't play this game anymore! :)
I have a feeling that the majority of all the issued shares listed in the latest report are still sitting in certs in someone's drawer, i do know a couple of those people and that's how their shares sit for now, and for them, it will not change until a sale is made. And no, they dont have any better idea of how this is going to unfold, I have asked.
If you are refering to UI, i agree, it's done however. If you are talking in regards to the seven continuation patents, they are definetly not as important but still valuable, they will be approved whether it is under the guidance of VPLM or any buyer, it's just a matter of time IMO.
As far as i am concerned, every investment is an unknown, you can make your best guess, do your best DD but unless you are on the inside there is no guarantees unless you buy a TD/GIC and even that can end up missing the boat!
And thats why I picked June. 1 down 6 to go, yes they could sell without them complete but it seems that they proceed very quickly relative to a parent, I expect that there is a good chance the majority of the children will go soon.
"This is Dr. Crane, I'm listening"? ...and your reasoning would be?
I disagree that IR will dump in may, if he has been told to quiet down, don't you think that may very well be more info than we have and thus give him the justification to hold, JMO.
For sure, the BOD especially did not come here to play for a few hundred grand, they are in it for the millions, I cant see any of them selling a current levels, I don't see any of them needing money.
Actually a little more than that, 53.454 mill with todays close on around 302 mill shares.
Thanks CSJ.
They are not abandoning the Voip platform, they are growing it and enhancing it, great news for VPLM.
Actually it was brought to my attention that Smallcap was relieved of their Moderator duties, if it was their sticky then it came down, only the mods can put them up, perhaps mrrhodes or clueless could put this one back uip.
That's what I figured, perhaps someone else would mind sticking this updated version in...
DD Notes
The yellow sticky note posts that are kept at the very top of these posts!
I would like to know what happened to the DD sticky post? Anyone, Mods?
It all depends on when the stock was issued and what type of restriction if any has been placed upon their shares.
I really don't want to see any more white papers, just a sale agreement.
When was the last time you spoke with him directly, curious because there was a period there he was not answering and the call backs were even more scarce!
As per VPLM press release
Voip-Pal.com Inc. (“Voip-Pal”, “Company”) (OTC Pink: VPLM) announced that they have increased their Authorized Shares from 900 million to 990 million. The increase was necessary to provide the Company ability to fulfill all of its remaining contractual obligations prior to any potential acquisition. Management does not envision the final outstanding share issuance to approach the new limit, but provides flexibility in planning if required to enhance shareholder value. Any additional issuance will be restricted Rule 144 shares and thus subject to a one year holding period.
As per The McGeary Law Firm website
SEC Publishes Amendments to Rule 144 and 145
The SEC published the final rules amending Rule 144 and Rule 145. The primary changes to Rule 144 include shortening the holding period to six months for restricted securities that are subject to the reporting requirements and substantially easing the restrictions on resales by non-affiliates. The Rule 145 amendment eliminates the presumptive underwriter provision.
Additionally I find it interesting that Tejas Inc, an Austin TX Based brokerage has shown up more often of late and McGeary is just up the road in Bedford TX.
My sentiments exactly, any NDA may very cover all parties to the company, especially IR as they are responsible for getting the info out to the general public!
I agree but I do see some undertones to our UI patent.
That is such a great quote, all you have to do is be able to read between the lines!
You also have to look at the bigger picture, let's take LI for instance. This is a technology that the NSA basically asked the industry for and offered to pay billions of dollars for. That is not about enforcing, it's about giving the consumer, you, me or the NSA what they need. Let's keep in mind that Microsoft tried to get this technology and failed miserably, with it they could operate in regions such as India, you guys know India right, it will be the most populated country in the world shortly. Population means consumers and consumers mean revenue and that my friends is the end goal for any coporation!!!
Precisely, another good sign that there is going to be an announcement soon, tying up loose ends.
Of course they did, its a natural reaction, but again, I agree with you it was a waste of time and so far off the new business model that VPLM has headed in.
Not from/with Bleam but invested in it!
You do realize this was a case that VPLM filed against Bleam right, at the very least, perhaps VPLM just said forget it, they may have been asked to wind it up by a purchaser before any announcement of a buyout.
Not in R&D but all good and I know.
BTW, here is your opportunity, you asked why I said you were with Bleam, please see your own post #5270.
But you just said, and I quote "because we all know just how many companies want to buy them out"!
Let me clarify, IP for me equals Intellectual Property.
I don't, please enlighten me since you do!
LI
Methods and apparatus for intercepting communications in an Internet Protocol (IP) network involve maintaining dialing profiles for respective subscribers to the IP network, each dialing profile including a username associated with the corresponding subscriber, and associating intercept information with the dialing profile of a subscriber whose communications are to be monitored. Intercept information will include determination information for determining whether to intercept a communication involving the subscriber, and destination information identifying a device to which intercepted communications involving the subscriber are to be sent. When the determination information meets intercept criteria communications are established with a media relay through which communications involving the subscriber will be conducted or are being conducted to cause the media relay to send a copy of the communications involving the subscriber to a mediation device specified by the destination information.
Continuation app #13/863,306
RBR
A process and apparatus to facilitate communication between callers and callees in a system comprising a plurality of nodes with which callers and callees are associated is disclosed. In response to initiation of a call by a calling subscriber, a caller identifier and a callee identifier are received. Call classification criteria associated with the caller identifier are used to classify the call as a public network call or a private network call. A routing message identifying an address, on the private network, associated with the callee is produced when the call is classified as a private network call and a routing message identifying a gateway to the public network is produced when the call is classified as a public network call.
Coninuation App #'s 13/966,096 pending
14/029,615 approved
14/029,671 pending
MG
A method of initiating a call to a callee using a mobile telephone involves: receiving, from a user of the mobile telephone, a callee identifier associated with the callee; transmitting an access code request message to an access server, said access code request message including said callee identifier; receiving an access code reply message from the access server in response to said access code request message, said access code reply message including an access code different from said callee identifier and associated with said callee identifier; and initiating a call with the mobile telephone using said access code to identify the callee.
Continuation app #14/035,806 pending
911
In accordance with one aspect of the invention there is provided a process for handling emergency calls from a caller in a voice over IP system. The process involves receiving a routing request message including a caller identifier and a callee identifier. The process also involves setting an emergency call flag active in response to the callee identifier matching an emergency call identifier pre-associated with the caller. The process further involves producing an emergency response center identifier in response to the emergency call identifier. The process also involves determining whether the caller identifier is associated with a pre-associated direct inward dialing (DID) identifier. The process further involves producing a direct inward dialing (DID) identifier for the caller by associating a temporary DID identifier with the caller identifier when the emergency call flag is active and it is determined that the caller has no pre-associated DID. The process also involves producing a routing message including the emergency response center identifier and the temporary DID identifier for receipt by a routing controller operable to cause a route to be established between the caller and the emergency response center.
Continuation app #13/968,217
UI
A method apparatus and computer readable medium for facilitating uninterrupted transmission of internet protocol (IP) transmissions containing real time transport protocol (RTP) data during endpoint changes. When an IP transmission is received at the caller RTP port or the callee RTP port, a call record having a caller RTP port identifier or a callee RTP port identifier matching a destination port identifier in the IP transmission is located and when the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the caller RTP port identifier of the record, a source IP address identifier and source port identifier from the IP transmission are set as the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier respectively of the record when the caller IP address identifier and caller port identifier do not match the source IP address identifier and source port identifier respectively and a received SSRC identifier in the IP transmission matches the caller SSRC identifier. When the destination port identifier in the IP transmission matches the callee RTP port identifier of the record, the source IP address identifier and source port identifier from the IP transmission are set as the callee IP address identifier and callee port identifier respectively of the record when the callee IP address identifier and callee port identifier do not match the source IP address identifier and source port identifier respectively and the received SSRC identifier in the IP transmission matches the callee SSRC identifier.
Continuation App #13/863,306 pending
It's possible, however it is also possible they are prohibited from doing so or they simply do not know which company they were looking at as many large companies will actually only allow employees a small part to analyze just to keep them under control.
Additionally, here are my thoughts upon the issue of the increase in authorized shares. I don't quite remember how it was said specifically but did MALAK not say he basically had a contract that would not allow the board to increase, if this is the case, can we not agree that the only reason he would relent upon this would be the pay final costs, legal and accounting and perhaps the issue fees from the USPTO to get this thing sold, just my logic kicking in here but its always open to discussion...
You are both right, it gives confidence now that there won't be a dump of up to 100 million share into the market and yet it wont matter what the hold once it is sold...
With all do respect to makeugush, the only layoffs at Microsoft last week were within their Xbox entertainment division, I have yet to substantiate the claim that it was a division designed to analyze this portfolio. Not saying it didn't happen, just cannot confirm it at this time! and still, why would you shut an R&D division down, as far as I am concerned it is either failing or has succeeded in completing the objective! Just saying.
hour and a half by my calculation.
Ah, but is it to soft really out, or have they just completed their analysis and are now moving forward with solid offers. They are floundering with the XBOX, need to make Skype work better than ever.