Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
To end F&F as we know it, it doesn't mean to dismantle them or eliminate them. It's the same thing as turning the page on F&F, this vague political sentences have many meanings and could be interpreted in different ways.
He said he wants to work in a bipartisan solution that will allow middle class Americans to get a home, refinance their home and help people who they can only rent. If F&F are the best choice, then they will change what's not working IMO.
If he wants to keep F&F, he won't be able to be to open about it yet, in order to protect Mel Watts nomination in September.
Most democrats are against the idea of eliminating F&F, look at their stands in congress and the senate.
Watt had a solid relationship with F&F in the past, I dont think his intentions are to eliminate them nowadays.
Most republicans don't want F&F because is a cash cow for the Obama legacy, it's bringing higher revenues than projected, therefore there are more funds available for the government to use on their agenda once the treasure has been paid off. Its imminent, F&F has been under conservatorship for too long, if they would have tried to eliminate them, they would have placed them under receivership from the beginning, so if they couldn't eliminate them few years back when they were on their worst face, they are not going to do it now when they are the most profitable companies in the world and they could totally affect and destroy the economic growth if they play the wrong move.
It's all political stage, see what they do, not what they say. From what's being perceived, keeping F&F alive is only fixing the economy in which it could jeopardize the next term elections for the republicans, and IMO that is why there is so much obstruction to free the GSEs.
I suggest to watch the Zillow's Q & A tomorrow, that has more weight than today's speech. And if you have any good questions, post them up so we can all wait for it.
Good Luck!
$FNMA
I meant on the week
There is no AH trading in OTC. Those $20k in trades are out of sequence from earlier in the day. Sorry for raining in your parade
I believe Romney has or used to have investments in Fannie and Freddie.
Anyone knows if we are getting a PR today?
Im confused, can someone please explain: Im not trying to bas, I actually own 10k shares and want this to go up the roof, but
According to Bloomberg, the House committee approved the 'Hensarling’s Housing-Finance Overhaul"
which from what I understand, its not good.
Why its going up? Are they any other news or post besides SAs from yesterday
Thanks
Ob, thanks for answering. Can you elaborate more on this?
I understand the future of the GSEs is not the brightest as it is, there is a lot of uncertainty and also hope for many... I understand you are very neg out about Fannie and Freddie, but to get to the point where your personal goal is the need to scare people by fabricating the subject of an article, which it was never the case on Forbes, it's pretty pathetic.
Go back to your lonely hole.
What's the name of the app? Thanks
He acknowledged that its an option considered by the Senate... He also wants to use good judgement to make the right decisions for both entities. Wants to work with ALL STAKEHOLDERS
He doesnt want to wind them down... Thats for sure!
Watt wants to work with ALL STAKE holders... Corker is an idiot! He is trying to burn Watt
Where can we see Mel Watts live interview at 10 am?
Bill is dead on arrival...
JOHNSON STATEMENT ON HOUSING FINANCE REFORM PROPOSAL
June 25, 2013
WASHINGTON – Today, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Johnson (D-SD) released a statement on the introduction of the Housing Finance Reform and Taxpayer Protection Act.
“I thank Senators Corker and Warner for furthering the discussion and debate surrounding housing finance reform with this proposal,” said Chairman Johnson. “Reforming the nation’s housing finance system is critical to the long-term health and stability of the American economy, and Ranking Member Crapo and I plan to turn the Committee’s attention to broader housing finance reform after we address the more timely issue of FHA solvency. Ranking Member Crapo and I agree that any reform effort that moves through the Banking Committee must be bipartisan and include ideas and input from all members of the Committee.”
http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=7cb6e8b1-e7c0-debc-cdbd-23b235064a4d&Region_id&Issue_id
President Barack Obama said on Wednesday he would name Rep. Mel Watt, a North Carolina Democrat, to lead the regulatory agency that controls Fannie Mae FNMA -24.84% and Freddie Mac FMCC -25.33%.
In an interview on Thursday, Mr. Watt offered few specifics about how he would lead the agency. On the politically charged issue of allowing Fannie and Freddie to modify mortgages by cutting loan balances, Mr. Watt said it was too soon to tell if he would revisit the decision of the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s acting director, Edward DeMarco, against permitting such write-downs.
What follows is an edited and condensed version of the interview:
WSJ: What would be the biggest difference between having you in that position and Mr. DeMarco?
Mr. Watt: I don’t know that I can answer that—perhaps none. I won’t know the answer until I get over there and get access to information… I don’t know that any decisions that I would make would be different from the ones that he has made.
WSJ: What should be the mission of the FHFA, and how would you measure success in achieving those goals?
Mr. Watt: I’m not sure I can answer that question, either. Obviously, the mission of the FHFA—the primary mission is to safeguard what is already there and, secondarily, to be a resource for people who are trying to work [towards] what the future will bring. But again, I think we may be putting the cart before the horse to start having me speculating about what I would be doing to advance those two things.
WSJ: What do you think are the most important issues facing the FHFA and the broader housing-finance space right now?
Mr. Watt: I don’t think I can answer that question…Obviously, I am aware as a result of being on the financial services committee and the whole series of … hearings we’ve had [that] there are challenges. We want to transfer as much of this back to the private sector as the private sector can take—and without an explicit or implicit government guarantee. But there are constraints to doing that, and we have to be very careful about how we do it. Those are challenges; safeguarding what we are already into is probably the primary challenge. How you do both of those things—I’m really not in a position to comment on at this point.
WSJ: For refusing to permit principal write-downs, Mr. DeMarco has faced a storm of criticism from the left, including many people who are supporting you in your upcoming confirmation hearing. Should that decision be revisited?
Mr. Watt: I can’t answer that question either. Again, I don’t have access to the information that Acting Director DeMarco has had. I don’t know what the timing would be of when I would get over there. It might be an issue whose time has already passed. And there may be information that would lead me to the same conclusion that they have already reached, if the issue is still a timely issue to consider. I don’t know how I would come down on that. The fact that I have expressed myself as a member of Congress shouldn’t be taken as an indication that I would necessarily reach the same position in a position where I was regulating the two entities….
WSJ: As congressman you supported principal write-downs, but you’re saying you might approach the issue differently as the agency’s director?
Mr. Watt: I was in a different position at that time. I was a member of Congress advocating for a different constituency with a different set of responsibilities. My responsibility as a director would be to evaluate all of the information and make a sound decision. It could very well lead me to the same conclusion that the existing acting director has reached. Again, we don’t even know the issue will continue to be timely.
WSJ: You may have seen the reports that protestors, upset over the decision, camped out at Mr. DeMarco’s home in Maryland. Do you feel pressure to support principal write-downs?
Mr. Watt: No. I wouldn’t. People camp out at my office sometimes—I’ve been through that before. You try to make a good public policy decision, and I think I have a strong reputation for doing exactly that regardless of what the pressures are.
WSJ: One criticism that was made yesterday by some Senate Republicans is that you did too little to push for tighter regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—that when it came to the GSEs, you were too comfortable with the status quo. Sen. Bob Corker said putting you in charge of the FHFA would be like having the fox guard the henhouse. What would you say to those critics?
Mr. Watt: I wouldn’t say anything to the critics. I think there are sufficient answers to all of those things, but I’m not getting into a public debate [right now] with anyone with this. I’m looking forward to going to sit with Sen. Corker…. I can understand how he would raise those concerns. If I were in his position, I might be expressing the same concerns. I will encourage him to look at my record and if he does, I’m sure he’ll find that I was the first person in Congress to file an anti-predatory lending bill. It was four to six years before the financial services meltdown. We actually got to about the same place in Dodd-Frank that the first bill was advocating for…We’ll have that conversation with Sen. Corker and with all the members of the committee. I certainly am not trying to debate that in the newspaper.
WSJ: Given that you are the president’s nominee for this job, what kind of relationship do you expect to have with the White House and the Treasury?
Mr. Watt: This is an independent agency. I expect it to be treated as an independent agency. I expect the director to act as an independent agent. But the statute does say the president has the prerogative to nominate, and he has done that.
WSJ: What are the most important components for any overhaul of the housing-finance market?
Mr. Watt: I can’t comment on that….
WSJ: Should Fannie and Freddie be wound down?
Mr. Watt: There is general—almost unanimous—consensus that we should move as much of this back into the private sector as quickly as can be done. There’s virtual unanimity.
WSJ: It’s not clear that Congress or the White House is going to address the future of Fannie and Freddie any time soon. To the extent that the current holding pattern continues, what sort of steps do you think the FHFA should take for that interim period, however long it lasts?
Mr. Watt: Whatever responsibilities Congress sees fit to the FHFA, we have to play them out in a responsible way. But I don’t think it’s my role to be defining what those responsibilities are.
http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2013/05/02/qa-what-watt-would-do-as-fannie-maes-regulator/
STATEMENT OF MELVIN L. WATT BEFORE THE SENATE BANKING
COMMITTEE
JUNE 27, 2013
Chairman Johnson, Ranking Member Crapo and members of the Committee, I appreciate very
much the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss my nomination to become the
Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and to request formally that your Committee
recommend that the Senate confirm me to this position. I am deeply honored by the nomination
and I am honored that members of my family and others are here to support me in this effort.
In the interest of time, I’ll give just a brief summary of my background. I was born and grew up
in a little community called “Dixie,” out in the country but with a Charlotte, North Carolina
address. I attended the Charlotte-Mecklenburg public schools at a time when they were still
segregated. After graduation, I gained admission to the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill where I graduated with a degree in business administration in 1967. I obtained my law
degree from Yale University Law School in 1970 and returned to Charlotte to join a law firm that
was best known for its civil rights reputation. However, the definition of “civil rights law” was
changing to include economic and business development and I agreed to join the law firm with
the understanding that my role would be to stand up a business practice.
Over the course of 22 years in the practice of law, I practiced business law, representing
individuals, partnerships and corporations of all sizes and descriptions. Over half of my legal
practice was real estate or related to real estate and I also became the managing attorney of the
law firm. Representing the City of Charlotte, my joint venture partners and I became the first
North Carolina lawyers to do the legal certifications required to issue municipal bonds.
When I started in Congress in 1993, I was fortunate to be assigned to committees that matched
my background, the House Banking Committee (now the House Financial Services Committee)
and the House Judiciary Committee. I have served on both of those committees continuously
since then. Like the Senate Banking Committee, the House Financial Services Committee has
general jurisdiction over housing, banking, insurance and other financial services matters. I
have served on subcommittees that deal with all the various matters under the Committee’s
jurisdiction.
Counting my 22 years in the practice of law and my 21 years in Congress, I have had 40+ years
of experience in housing, real estate and other financial matters.
As part of the nomination process, I have had the opportunity to meet with a number of
members of the Senate. During these conversations I’ve been asked two questions more than
any others. The questions are:
• “Why do you want this position?” and
• “What do you see as the role of the Director of the FHFA?”
For me, the answers to these questions are very much related and I’d like to roll my answers to
them together in the short time I have left.
Throughout my life, I’ve come to understand deeply just how important where you live is to who
you are. I’ve observed that having a place to live is “basic” and that’s true, regardless of
whether you rent or whether you own. I suspect that my recognition of this started when I spent
the earliest years of my life in an old house my Mom rented which had no electricity and no
inside plumbing. My brothers and I could see the stars at night through the tin roof and we
could see the ground through our rickety floors. I still get emotional when I recall, as a little boy,
watching a big, long truck maneuver what had been an army barracks slowly down the road
from the Charlotte airport to place it on a little lot that someone gave to my mother. That’s the
house I grew up in, four rooms – one bedroom for my Mom, one for me and my two brothers, a
kitchen and a living room. I also get emotional when I recall watching them drill the well on our
lot so we could have running water for the first time and helping my Uncle Leonard dig the
septic tank lines so we could have a bathroom inside.
Over the years, home ownership and home equity have become the primary asset and source
of retirement security for many families. A place to live is a basic necessity, however, whether
you rent or whether you own. Having a place to live provides a sense of stability. It impacts our
decisions about schools and transportation. It impacts our sense of community. Growing up,
there was nothing more basic for me, except family, food and the little Presbyterian Church that
adjoined our front yard and made it impossible for us to get to the road without crossing the
church lot. I’m still a member of that church. So where I lived even guided my choice of
religions.
A place to live is basic. So over the years, I’ve worked to eliminate homelessness and I’ve been
active in community development and neighborhood revitalization. And, of course, I’ve walked
hundreds of families through real estate closings, which for many of them was the most
important financial transaction they will ever make. So I was devastated when our housing
finance system started to lose its way. And I was among the first to realize that which is why
Representative Brad Miller and I became the first to introduce anti-predatory lending legislation,
four years before the housing meltdown became obvious. And much of what was in that that
legislation became a central part of the anti-predatory lending standards in Dodd-Frank.
I really can’t think of anything I’d rather do now that would be more important than helping our
housing finance system find a reliable way forward. I believe we’re at a unique moment in the
history of how housing finance is carried out in our country. Coming through what is arguably
the worst period in our history related to housing, we’re struggling to find the right path out of a
status quo that no one believes is desirable.
The good news is that a broad consensus has emerged on the direction that our next steps
must take us – towards a system driven by private capital that minimizes the risk to taxpayers.
The legal framework for getting to that destination will, of course, be up to the House and
Senate. But in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, the House and Senate authorized the
creation of the FHFA and provided clear statutory directions on the role that the FHFA will play
in the interim to help get from here to there. That statutory role directs the FHFA and its
Director to carefully and prudently “oversee the prudential operations of each regulated entity”
through the transition in a way that protects the interests of the taxpayers and to make sure that
each of these entities continues to “foster liquid, efficient, competitive and resilient national
finance markets” in the meantime, until decisions are made about how housing finance will be
done in the future. Acting Director DeMarco and the FHFA have followed these mandates
effectively and I applaud their work.
I want to be clear about my role and the role of the FHFA under my leadership should I be
confirmed. The Housing & Economic Recovery Act clearly defines the role of the FHFA and the
Director. And, if confirmed, you can be assured that I will rigorously follow the statute in an
open and transparent manner working with all stakeholders. You can also be assured that we’ll continue to build a solid bridge from where we are now to whatever you decide the future
housing finance system will be, we’ll continue to test risk-sharing models that move housing
finance aggressively to the private sector and we’ll cooperate fully and be a resource to
members of the Senate and the House as you decide the future of housing finance.
I look forward to answering any questions you may have.
http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=64c0ae9f-45b8-4629-b414-e1a93cb29d9b
Does anyone knows when is the voting for Corker's bill is set up for?
When is the voting on the bill?
Great! Thank you!
Any idea where can we find how this event went?
Thanks for sharing, can you post the full article? Thanks
Great Article! Thanks for sharing!
Awesome news for Freddie!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/freddie-mac-receives-above-average-161431914.html
Huge bid at $1.97, 417,000
Fnma Berlin is 11.51%
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FNM.BE&ql=0
You are right, facts matter, however, the congress is the only one that can make the final decision whether they want to wind them down or not, and they most likely won't do it, it will tank the economy. Here is a link of the actual conservatorship definition in regards with F&F. Your shares do have market value!
http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Documents/fhfa_consrv_faq_090708.pdf
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac: Mortgage Serious Delinquency rates declined in April, Lowest since early 2009
12h 32m ago
by Bill McBride on 6/03/2013 06:11:00 PM Fannie Mae reported that the Single-Family Serious Delinquency rate declined in April to 2.93% from 3.02% in March. The serious delinquency rate is down from 3.63% in April 2012, and this is the lowest level since
http://content.usatoday.com/topics/article/Organizations/Companies/Banking,+Financial,+Insurance,+Law/Fannie+Mae/04aog0m2YVcrp/3
That's amazing! Clearly the housing market is getting better and this time is for reals! Great find Blue! Now, let's hope for good news with the unemployment rate.
Sorry, here is the article!
Sales of bank-owned homes hit 5-year low in 1Q
ALEX VEIGA
Published: 5/30/2013
LOS ANGELES (AP) - Sales of bank-owned homes have plunged to a 5-year low, the latest evidence that the nation's foreclosure woes are easing as the U.S. housing market recovery gains momentum.
For the January-March quarter, sales of bank-owned homes fell 16 percent from the previous three months and were down 23 percent versus the first quarter of 2012, foreclosure tracker RealtyTrac Inc. said Thursday.
The last time sales of bank-owned homes were lower was in the first quarter of 2008, the firm said.
Sales of homes in a stage of the foreclosure process also declined, falling 20 percent from the October-December quarter and the first quarter of last year.
Combined, bank-owned homes and properties already in the foreclosure process also accounted for a smaller share of U.S. home sales in the first quarter. They made up 21 percent of all home sales, down from 25 percent in the first three months of 2012, RealtyTrac said.
Foreclosure-related sales' share of all U.S. home sales peaked in the first quarter of 2009 at 45 percent.
The decline in foreclosure-related sales comes as sales of previously occupied homes have risen nearly 10 percent over the past 12 months. Greater demand and a scarcity of available homes for sale in many markets have helped propel U.S. home prices upward.
Earlier this week, the latest Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller home price index showed U.S. home prices jumped nearly 11 percent in March versus a year earlier, the biggest 12-month increase since April 2006.
Rising home values make it easier for borrowers to refinance their mortgages or sell their homes if they lose their jobs or otherwise become unable to make payments, increasing the chance they will avert foreclosure.
That's been a key factor in the steady drop in U.S. homes completing the foreclosure process. That means fewer properties ending up as bank-owned homes.
Nationally, the homes repossessed by banks fell 20 percent in April from the previous month, and were down 32 percent from a year earlier, while fewer homes entered the foreclosure process, according to RealtyTrac.
All told, 190,121 U.S. bank-owned homes or properties in some stage of the foreclosure process were sold in the first quarter.
Georgia had the biggest share of foreclosure-related sales at 35 percent, followed by Illinois with 32 percent and California with 30 percent. Foreclosure-related sales made up less than 10 percent of all home sales in Massachusetts, New York and New Jersey, the firm said.
Bank-owned homes sold, on average, for $147,810 in the first quarter. That translates to an average discount of 38 percent compared with the average sale price of homes that were not foreclosure, RealtyTrac said.
That's a bigger savings than a year earlier, when it the discount was 34 percent, but down from 39 percent in the last three months of 2012.
Homes already in the foreclosure process sold, on average, for $187,040, which amounts to an average discount of 22 percent versus homes not in foreclosure. That's up from an average savings of 20 percent a year earlier.
Awesome news!!!
A story from AP Mobile:
Sales of bank-owned homes hit 5-year low in 1Q
LOS ANGELES (AP) - Sales of bank-owned homes have plunged to a 5-year low, the latest evidence that the nation's foreclosure woes are easing as the U.S. housing market recovery gains momentum. For the January-March quarter, sales of bank-owned homes fell 16 percent from the previous three months and were down 23 percent versus the first quarter of 2012, foreclosure tracker RealtyTrac Inc. said Thu...
Medical Marijuana Inc., Posts 1st Quarter Audited Financial and Disclosure Statements Net Income Exceeds Quarterly Projections
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=57597346
Ready for some GREEEEEEN!!! Good job MJNA
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=57597346