Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes There may be some question.
A 43-101 document by a non-NioCorp 3rd party who is legally liable for the numbers has lots of requirements. One of the the things that I have been concerned about is the spacing of the drill cores being analyzed. My experience with the gold, silver and other miners is, depending on the degree of homogeneousness ( adj. 1. Consisting of parts that are the same; uniformness in structure or composition: tight-knit) of the ore body. Some require 25 meter, other 50 meter, and maybe with a very homogeneous ore body 100-200 meter spacing (Tudor Gold??). Since it is expensive to drill through 200 meters of overburden there may not be a tight enough spacing for a 3rd party to take on the legal liability.
I think this is the reason why Scott has stated he is so anxious to be able to drill from the bottom of the shafts, horizontally while in the ore body and vertically down to find the bottom of the ore body..
Thanks for posting the link Grunt23
Lone Clone - Thank you for sharing the thumbnail note about the stocks.
Thanks AO for the link. Nice list of the REE element names & Symbols as well as some nice graphics about where in the world they are found and their uses.
Petro Matad has provided the following operational update.
May 5, 2022
[[ Thanks to Malcy's blog ]]
https://www.malcysblog.com/2022/05/oil-price-petromatad-petrofac-ceag-and-finally/
The recent increase in Covid-19 related lockdowns and travel restrictions in China continue to impact Mongolia at a time when it was hoped there would have been significant relaxation. China is maintaining tight control on movement across its borders and there are currently no signs that these controls will be relaxed in the short term. This is impacting all businesses in Mongolia that rely on cross-border trade including the oil field service providers. PetroChina’s export of Mongolian oil production across the border into China is also suspended because of the Covid-19 controls and there are no Chinese oil rigs operating in Mongolia at the moment.
Block XX Exploitation Area
Petro Matad has continued to engage with local and central Government to secure all necessary permits. Local officials remain reticent to discuss applications due to lobbying on social media by a vocal minority protesting against industrial activity. This included at a recent local meeting when allegations were made about the Company’s Environmental Impact Assessment despite the fact it was prepared as per the regulations and has been approved by the Ministry of Environment.
For issues that cannot be resolved locally, Petro Matad has sought input from central government and this strategy has resulted in progress on the long-running land issue. In late April, the Cabinet of the Mongolian Government issued a resolution directing the certification of exploration and exploitation licences by the central Land Agency such that local approvals on land use are not required. We are advised by industry regulator, the Mineral Resources and Petroleum Authority of Mongolia (MRPAM), that this will allow work on all Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) areas to progress without land access delays whilst the planned amendments to the land law that will remove the current legal ambiguities pass through parliament. We are pushing to secure the land certificates on Block XX and V as a matter of urgency. We will follow a similar strategy with the central Government if required to ensure there is no impact on our already completed environmental permitting.
With the Covid-19 situation in China causing operational delays in Mongolia, the Company continues to prioritise its efforts to get Heron 1 on stream. The contract with the chosen well completions contractor is in final form. We are seeking confirmation that equipment and crews for the completion and readying for production of Heron 1 are available as soon as we are ready to mobilise. It is our operational preference that as soon as the well is stimulated and completed it should immediately be put on production. The current suspension of all oil production and export from PetroChina’s Blocks XIX and XXI and with all on site storage full means that we need oil export to restart in order to optimise the start-up sequencing on Heron 1.
In anticipation of the situation improving, Petro Matad has placed orders for surface production equipment for the Heron 1 well and discussions with PetroChina, on the use of its production facilities are progressing well. We are also in discussion to buy or rent equipment from PetroChina Mongolia to avoid the need for, and current uncertainty of, importation.
Discussions with MRPAM on oil processing, transport and sales options were concluded with their full support and we are now in discussion with PetroChina’s Mongolian affiliate on the commercial details of sharing infrastructure and logistics.
Technical and operational cooperation, Block XX
In parallel with operational preparations for the 2022 programme, Petro Matad continues to work with DQE Drilling (DQE) on its proposal to enter into a cooperation agreement that could accelerate Heron Field development activities. Petro Matad has supplied a multi-year target work programme and this is under review in DQE’s headquarters.
Block V Exploration PSC
The Cabinet resolution on land access will assist in securing the necessary permits to allow the Company to work on the Raptor Trend. Having identified an in-country drilling contractor with equipment and experience in drilling to the target depth required on the Velociraptor prospect, we are now in discussion on potential rig availability and well cost.
Mike Buck, CEO of Petro Matad, said:
“China’s zero Covid-19 policy is having major impacts not only within China but also on Mongolia. Our preparations to operate are progressing well but, with uncertainty on when drilling operations in country will recommence, we are focusing as a priority on Heron 1 completion and production.
We are very pleased with the outcome of the Cabinet meeting held last week. The restoration of land use rights under the PSC is an important and necessary step, and we will continue to work with the local, district and provincial authorities to underline our intention to be a partner whose activities can continue to bring benefits to the communities in which we operate.
I would also like to personally thank our shareholders for their continued patience and support while we work to get Heron 1 on stream and implement our broader 2022 work programme.”
You couldn’t make it up, the bad luck that has rained on Mike Buck and his team at MATD recently but at least is is surely transitory and that the company is doing everything they possibly can to be ready to move fast to ensure that Heron 1 will be up and producing as soon as is possible.
I have written a good deal about China’s current woes in recent blogs but in the oil price section as the lockdowns in Shanghai and more recently Beijing have concerned markets with regard to Chinese economic growth. Now we have evidence of more micro problems and to add to the Covid problems they now have social media warriors getting involved.
Despite all this I remain confident that Mike and team will overcome the problems and backed by the Government will before long get Heron 1 on stream and get the longer term programme up and running, this is no time for faint hearts…
Hi MM. I agree with your analysis about why REEs were not included in the original plan. " At the time, the REE market was completely controlled by China, and the CCP heavily manipulated the market. "
Price manipulation by CCP is still happening according to the May 4 issue of the Rare Earth Observer:
"
The short term price development, since the China government its displeasure with high prices: March 01, 2022 to April 29, 2022
Neodymium $ 192 to $ 135 a 29% drop
Praseodymium $ 172 to $ 131 a 24% drop
Terbium $ 2,412 to $ 2,175 a 10% drop
Except for yttrium and dysprosium, all prices have fallen below the (sky-high) levels of the beginning of the year.
The price decline in March was the quick-fix (we reported) to comply with the government demands of lower prices. A demand, which, given the supply situation, was plainly absurd.
"
Who knows what the long term pricing will settle out to be.
Ahhh yes Suppky Chain Issues
As I mentioned in my post #79727 to chico's post # 79726 (a good read):
Greg Andrews of Search Minerals on the positive impact of their updated resource estimate on its coming PEA
May 2, 2022
In this InvestorIntel interview with host Tracy Weslosky, Search Minerals Inc.’s (TSXV: SMY | OTCQB: SHCMF) President, CEO, and Director, Greg Andrews, discusses the positive impact on its upcoming PEA of the recently increased mineral resource estimates for Search Minerals’ Deep Fox and Foxtrot Critical Rare Earth Element properties in South-East Labrador.
In the interview, which can also be viewed in full on the InvestorIntel YouTube channel (click here), Greg Andrews tells InvestorIntel that its updated resource estimates will form the basis of Search’s upcoming Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA). He goes on to explain how the PEA will take into account the significance of both the Deep Fox and Foxtrot properties. With Search Minerals positioned to become a reliable source of rare earths in North America, Greg also comments on how the 2022 Canadian Federal Budget is likely “to spur investment into all critical minerals, and the rare earths in particular.”
Watch at:
https://investorintel.com/investorintel-video/greg-andrews-of-search-minerals-on-the-positive-impact-of-their-updated-resource-estimate-on-its-coming-pea/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=greg-andrews-of-search-minerals-on-the-positive-impact-of-their-updated-resource-estimate-on-its-coming-pea
Re: Post # 79357
Question to Jim Sims:
Hi chico
I like:
American Creek Congratulates JV Partner Tudor Gold on the Appointment of Two Accomplished Mining Executives to Their Advisory Board
Cardston, Alberta--(Newsfile Corp. - April 29, 2022) - American Creek Resources Ltd. (TSXV: AMK) ("the Company" or "American Creek") congratulates JV Partner Tudor Gold on the announcement of the appointments of Mr. Joseph Ovsenek and Mr. Ken McNaughton to Tudor's Advisory Board. The announcement comes on the precipice of the largest projected drill program to date on the Treaty Creek Project.
American Creek CEO, Darren Blaney comments: "This announcement marks another example of Tudor Gold's commitment to aggressively advancing the Treaty Creek project. Lead by Mr. Ken Konkin, this top tier leadership team is poised to bring one of the largest gold discoveries in the past 30 years into the next chapter."
Read more at:
https://us5.campaign-archive.com/?e=6f11d69fd1&u=af629dcbbf88a5932a7e484e3&id=e8dfe82abb
VITAL METALS' MARCH 2022 QUARTERLY REPORT
April 29, 2022
Vital accelerates heavy rare earths strategy, aiming to be the world’s first producer of both heavy and light rare earth oxides
Vital’s three-stage development strategy includes adding heavy rare earths to its existing light rare earths operation at Nechalacho with first production ~ mid 2022
It will investigate developing a zone of xenotime mineralisation, a heavy rare earth mineral, at Nechalacho’s North T pit, targeting a 10-year operation from the zone
Vital commences drilling to define maiden Ore Reserve for the Tardiff deposit at Nechalacho
Vital plans to develop Tardiff in a modular fashion, having defined three modules with an existing resource of 16.3Mt at 1.85% TREO – or 303kt contained TREO
Tardiff is part of Vital’s larger 94Mt at 1.4% TREO Nechalacho resource (1.3Mt contained TREO)
Tardiff contains elevated heavy rare earths mineralisation which may complement North T’s xenotime deposit as part of Vital’s strategy to produce heavy and light rare earths
Construction activities continue at Saskatoon Rare Earth Extraction facility with first feed to occur in June 2022
Vital secures C$5 million interest-free funding facility from PrairiesCan
Funding is for eligible costs relating to establishing and commissioning Saskatoon facility and will assist Vital’s working capital requirements during facility commissioning and ramp
Vital’s shares commenced trading on the OTCQB Venture Market in North America
Offtake partner REEtec signs supply agreement with Schaeffler securing Vital’s revenue from the sale of its product to REEtec
Canada’s first rare earths producer Vital Metals Limited (ASX: VML l OTCQB: VTMXF) (“Vitalâ€, “Vital Metals†or “the Companyâ€) is pleased to report on its activities during the March 2022 quarter, including at its 100%-owned Nechalacho Rare Earth Project in Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.
Vital Metals Managing Director Geoff Atkins said “This quarter has crystallised Vital’s three-stage development strategy to become a leading rare earths producer and the world’s first producer of heavy and light rare earths. Our three stages are foundation, growth and heavy rare earth production and we are now taking the steps towards executing that strategy.
“With our first mining campaign complete at Nechalacho’s North T pit in 2021, our rare earth extraction facility in Saskatoon is nearly ready to start processing bastnaesite concentrate shipped from site to produce a mixed rare earth carbonate for our offtake partners. This will cement our foundation as a rare earth producer.
“From there we are drilling at Tardiff to define a maiden Ore Reserve for the Zone 1 module as part of our second stage of growth and we are focusing other work during 2022 on developing the existing xenotime resource at North T, which sits beneath the base of the current mining envelope, into our development strategy, to accelerate our plans to become a producer of both rare earths groups.
Jervois releases BFS for São Miguel Paulista refinery restart
April 29, 2022
Jervois Global Limited (“Jervois”) completes Bankable Feasibility Study (“BFS”) for Stage 1 of São Miguel Paulista Nickel and Cobalt refinery (“SMP”) restart to process mixed nickel hydroxide (“MHP”) and cobalt hydroxide through to metal.
Initial Stage 1 forecast production of 10,000mtpa1 and 2,000mtpa of refined nickel and cobalt metal cathode respectively. Stage 2 BFS regarding a return to full 25,000mtpa refined nickel production capacity expected to be finalized in 2H 2022.
Net Present Value (“NPV”) for Stage 1 restart of US$228 million and US$141 million at an 8% (real) discount rate on a pre-tax and post-tax basis respectively; nominal Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) of 47% (pre tax) and 35% (post tax).
At US$8.00/lb nickel and US$25.00/lb cobalt, post ramp up of Stage 1 to BFS production rates, average annual EBITDA in real terms projected to be over US$30 million. Refinery economics resilient to a range of market scenarios, including current spot market conditions for refined and intermediate products.
Total project capital cost of US$55 million, representing a competitive refurbishment of an existing brownfield nickel and cobalt refinery. SMP has a long operating history, most recently placed into care and maintenance managed by current owner Companhia Brasil de Alumino (“CBA”).
Restarting the only electrolytic nickel-cobalt refinery in South and Latin America will deliver significant local and regional economic and social benefits to the São Miguel Paulista area of São Paulo city, Brazil.
SMP benefits from competitive low carbon energy (predominantly hydropower), skilled workforce, existing infrastructure including main arterial roads and ~120km from Brazil’s largest container port at Santos.
Jervois is advancing discussions on commercial supply contracts of MHP and cobalt hydroxide to underpin SMP restart. Work continues on design of an autoclave to process cobalt concentrates from Jervois’s 100%-owned Idaho Cobalt Operations (“ICO”); once available, this will be incorporated into the Stage 1 BFS.
Execution planning has commenced and a final investment decision for Stage 1 is anticipated to occur in parallel to closing of the SMP acquisition. Jervois continues to advance operating permit renewal process with the São Paulo City Hall, a condition precedent to closing, before 31 August 2022.
First commercial production from SMP’s Stage 1 restart is expected during 2023.
Read more at:
https://mailchi.mp/869df9a7eb2e/engineering-contracts-for-ico-and-smp-nickel-cobalt-refinery-14972253?e=48b5acd3da
Ucore Announces Successful Independent Expert Evaluation of RapidSX Rare Earth Separation Technology
Halifax, Nova Scotia (April 27, 2022) – Ucore Rare Metals Inc. (TSXV: UCU) (OTCQX: UURAF) (“Ucore” or the “Company”) is pleased to report the positive conclusions of a multi-phase, independent, third-party technical review of RapidSX™ technology (the “Independent Evaluation” or the “Evaluation”) prepared by Dr. Ahmad Ghahreman of AG Hydrometallurgy Services Inc. (“AGHS“) as a noted subject-matter-expert1. With a focus on the technical assuredness, benefits, and scalability of the RapidSX™ technology specifically for the separation of rare earth elements (“REEs“) for the production of commercial-grade rare earth oxides (“REOs“), the Independent Evaluation concludes the following:
- RapidSX™ is capable of separating both light and heavy REEs for producing high-quality REOs and uses the same chemistry as proven conventional solvent extraction (“CSX“) processes but with faster kinetics; thus, no chemistry risk at scale-up;
- RapidSX™ process shows itself to likely be 3 times as efficient as CSX, concluding a production plant can potentially have a 2/3 smaller footprint than a CSX plant of the same capacity with an associated separation process capital cost (“CAPEX“) reduction of 50% or better;
- RapidSX™ for the separation and purification of REEs is dependent on its chemistry (same as CSX) and, given a smaller footprint for the same throughput, should have an expected operating cost (“OPEX“) of 20% less than CSX for the same purpose; and
- RapidSX™ is a modular process making it scalable with minimal risk. The process can be designed to process REEs in the range of 1,000 to 10,000+ tonnes per annum.
Read More at:
https://ucore.com/ucore-announces-successful-independent-expert-evaluation-of-rapidsx-rare-earth-separation-technology/
Should be a very valuable buyin. I suspect that AOIFF is aware of the potential.
Nice answer chico.
I suspect that even now Elk Creek, an underground mine, would be uneconomic if only mined for Total Rare Earth Oxide concentrate. I don't think adding the separation processing would help much and would probably make the project subject to China game playing like what killed Molycorp.
if
Thanks for the suggestion.
I agree, any clues about what is going on?
Hi AO
Sorry I have not run the NioCorp project through @RISK. My license expired a few years back and I don't have the capability anymore.
Being able to use it for the selling prices for the Nb-Sc-Ti-REE products would be interesting. I am sure there are other OPEX variables that are significant as well as a few CAPEX items that would be interesting to model.
Maybe it would be a way to reduce the concern about inflation and the volatility of selling prices, particularly for Sc and the REEs.
Food for thought for the project modelers at NioCorp and potential backers.
During my years of consulting I had found that obtaining financing is a bitch. Getting a client to accept the results of our analysis is often very difficult. There are always a few people on the other side of the table, the "Debbie Downers", who will throw a monkey wrench into the mix with a "Yes but what if ...?" or " .... is much more volatile than you project", etc.
For certain projects I have used an Excel add-in product called @RISK. @RISK is an add-in to Microsoft Excel that lets you analyze risk using Monte Carlo simulation. @RISK shows you virtually all possible outcomes for any situation—and tells you how likely they are to occur. This means you can judge which risks to take on and which ones to avoid—critical insight in today's market.
https://www.palisade.com/risk/
- Essentially this product allows you to express any and all variables in a model as statistical distributions. The user has complete control over which statistical distribution is used for each variable.
- When the model is built the user initiates the calculation. The user can specify the model to recalculate 100, 1,000 or more times, which is done within minutes if not seconds on today's laptops.
- Each time the model recalculates each variable is statistically sampled and a value for the variable is set. When all variables are set the model executes one recalculation.
- Each recalculation answer for all of the outputs of the model are captured in an array of answers for each output. These arrays then become statistical distributions for each output.
Using this tool my team was able to tell the client that we were were 90% (or 80% or 95%) confident that the answer will be between "X" and "Y". Eliminates lots of the "Yeah but the scrap rate may be 5.0% not 3.5%" type of "Yeah buts..." which can be the kiss of death for a project.
The selling price for each of the Nb-Sc-Ti and each of the REEs elements produced can be statistically sampled. The cost of raw materials, the percentage yield for each element, etc. can all be expressed as statistical distributions.
Sorry it is Nb-Sc-Ti not Ni-Sc-Ti
I have reached another level of my Spring archaeological dig and lo and behold I found a copy of my post #75309 (10/05/21) where I recapped the NioCorp MD&A for 9/30/13, not a typo 2013. Thanks again chico for the reference.
My post is worth a re-read (IMHO).
The MD&A is really worth a read
http://niocorp.com/wp-content/uploads/NioCorpMDA-2014Q1.pdf
Pages 2 - 12 A wealth of information about the historic drilling, and TREO. Any question concerning whether or not REEs are there should be answered.
The obvious point is that at that time, as well as the time the decision for the current FS was made, and possibly even now, the cost of an underground mine 200 - 300 meters underground for ONLY the REE probably was/is not economic. However, at this time with Ni-Sc-Ti carrying the bulk of the cost of digging the ore out of the underground ore body the REEs should be profitable despite the volatility of REE pricing.
In my post:
Hole ID From (m) To (m) Interval (m) REO (%)
Eastern anomaly
EC-93 149.40 289.60 140.20 2.19
incl. 179.80 198.10 18.30 3.12
EC-43 243.80 256.00 12.20 2.83
295.70 323.10 27.40 1.52
Western anomaly
EC-4 217.10 402.30 185.20 1.18
417.60 445.00 27.40 1.02
EC-41 304.80 335.30 30.50 1.19
365.80 396.20 30.50 1.28
EC-55 237.70 429.80 192.00 1.31
246.90 271.30 24.40 1.62
289.60 323.10 33.50 2.09
338.30 390.10 51.80 1.52
Central anomaly
EC-1 198.10 219.50 21.30 1.05
225.60 234.70 9.10 1.08
EC-17 554.70 612.60 57.90 1.27
EC-19 187.50 253.00 65.50 1.13
627.90 661.40 33.50 1.02
EC-21 207.60 228.60 21.00 1.54
A slow spring day in Chicago and I am performing an archaeological dig through the pile of papers/screen grabs/misc. printouts on my desk and overflow table. I found a copy of Walterc's post #76086 (11/18/21) which discusses MP versus NioCorp. Well worth a re-read.
Hi Walter, thank you for posting Sean's presentation video. Very interesting.
Thanks for posting these "Interesting Developments"
From memory only.
When I did some DD on Rainbow Minerals about their rich REE Open Pit mine in Africa I believe that Brian Menell and TechMet were involved in advising them. Also Thyssen Krupp Materials Trading was involved. This may be the source of ore for the Ucore project.
Again from memory only.
Thanks for the thought. I never had any exposure to data centers. As in my experience as a consultant, everything looks easy from the outside, but a real bitch when you get into the details.
Hi Nebraskan An interesting suggestion.
Post #79363 of 79364
A workaround for archiving stickies would be to create a post that has a list of links to past stickies and add this post as one of the stickies. When a new sticky is added and one removed, add the newly removed one to the list in a new post and replace the archive sticky with the new post.
An archival stickey-note might be a good suggestion to iHub
I raised the following with Jim Sims less than a hour or so ago:
Can you provide any information about about the elements, grades and pounds of REEs that may be included in the revised 2022 FS?
His very quick answer:
Hi, Doug. Not quite yet, but we expect to release that data on specific REEs, and their ore grades and tonnages, in the Elk Creek Mineral Resource (both Indicated and Inferred) shortly. REE data for the Mineral Reserve has to await results of the demo plant’s operations, as well as many other updates across the rest of the FS.
I hope this information is helpful.
Jim
My bolding in the answer, encouraging
He included some information about understanding the difference between Mineral Resource (both Indicated and Inferred) and Mineral Reserve. IMO it is a question of degree of confidence of the values quoted
Indicated Mineral Resource
The term "Indicated Mineral Resource" refers to that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.
Inferred Mineral Resource
The term "Inferred Mineral Resource" refers to that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.
Mineral Reserve
The term "Mineral Reserve" refers to the economically mineable part of a Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a preliminary feasibility study. The study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A Mineral Reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined.
Hi Nebraskan, over the years we have had a number of very good stickey-notes. It is unfortunate that for each new one one must be removed. I understand the the space for posts is precious and only a few can be listed.
Do you know if there is an archive of stickeys that a new person could go to and review the history of what we considered the most valuable posts over the years?
NCT Thank you for posting this information. I wonder if you could elicit an answer as to when there might be a PR about the grade and pounds of REEs that may be included in the revised 2022 FS.
Unfortunately AO I agree with your outline. I would think that a PR on the REE grade and pounds would be a stand alone piece of material information that could be made public without having to wait until we get the updated FS 2022.
I would think such a PR would "nudge' the SP up a bit.
I love that:
"
they can mag separate the ore to concentrate minerals prior to separation via (SX) & their proprietary methods.
"
By mag separating they reduce the mass of material that has to be dissolved in acid, lower OPEX, and maybe CAPEX.
Any chance there is a link to the webinar, that link takes me to the website and no link to the webinar.
More North American sources of REEs are starting to come out of the woodwork.
NioCorp is years ahead of them, we are "shovel" ready (assuming we got an extension on the air permit)
Thanks to "antman" on the Appia board (Post #174 of 174).
Friday, April 08, 2022 12:10:59 AM
If you go to minute 7:38 of the following video you can hear about Alces Lake the rare earth/critical rare earth property located in Saskatchewan which they are saying is one of the best rare earth discoveries in the world.
Appia Video from Mar 24, 2022
American Creek's JV Partner Tudor Gold Prepares for 2022 Drill Hole Program at Treaty Creek Gold Project in BC's Golden Triangle
Cardston, Alberta--(Newsfile Corp. - April 7, 2022) - American Creek Resources Ltd. (TSXV: AMK) ("the Corporation") is pleased to announce that Tudor crews have been mobilized to prepare for the upcoming exploration program at our JV flagship property, Treaty Creek, located in the heart of the Golden Triangle of Northwest British Columbia. Crews are currently transporting heavy equipment and drilling supplies to site along our winter access from the Brucejack Lake Road. Crews will also be preparing the camps for the upcoming drill campaign set to commence early May.
Read more at:
https://us5.campaign-archive.com/?e=6f11d69fd1&u=af629dcbbf88a5932a7e484e3&id=b1a1ddbd56
Thanks for the Molycorp and Neo history lesson and that Jim Sims is our Jim Sims.
That worked, thanks
Thanks "ge" for that info. I suspected as much.